Identifying patients with ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross sectional study of paper and computerised medical records.
OBJECTIVE
To identify patients with ischaemic heart disease by using a practice computer and to estimate the work required to do so.


METHODS
Cross sectional study. Data from the notes and from the computer records of 1680 patients were used to build a database. This was used to compare different methods of identifying patients with ischaemic heart disease.


METHODS
11 general practices in the Battersea primary care group in south London.


METHODS
1 in 40 random sample of patients aged 45 or older.


METHODS
Numbers of patients identified with ischaemic heart disease.


RESULTS
The combination of the Read code for ischaemic heart disease (G3) and a prescription for a nitrate had a 73% sensitivity and a yield (100/positive predictive value) of one case of ischaemic heart disease for every 1.2 sets of notes reviewed. By searching the records of patients also receiving aspirin, atenolol, digoxin, or a statin, the sensitivity was increased to 96% but the yield fell to one in three.


CONCLUSIONS
Although commonly used to identify cases, a computer search for G3 code or nitrate missed almost 30% of patients with ischaemic heart disease. A substantially higher percentage of patients can be identified by adding other drugs to the search strategy.
Gray
J
J
Battersea Research Group, Lavender Hill Group Practice, London SW11 5TU. jgray@drs.desk.sthames.nhs.uk
Majeed
A
A
Kerry
S
S
Rowlands
G
G
D000368:Aged; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D016208:Databases, Factual; D005194:Family Practice; D006801:Humans; D016247:Information Storage and Retrieval / Q000379:methods*; D008499:Medical Records; D016347:Medical Records Systems, Computerized; D008875:Middle Aged; D017202:Myocardial Ischemia / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000188:drug therapy; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity