Cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
The major disadvantage of cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs) is difficulty in retrievability. The retentive strengths of the provisional luting agents usually employed in these cases are therefore an important consideration. This study evaluated the cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of FPDs supported by 2 implants or 4 implants. Nogenol luting agent exhibited the lowest retentive values in both types of FPD. ImProv proved to be the most retentive cement of all tested. Temp Bond NE and Temp Bond presented significantly different values (P < .05) for the 2-implant FPD, but not for the 4-implant model. On the basis of the study results, it may be concluded that Nogenol appears to be more appropriate for cementation of both 2- and 4-implant-supported FPDs when removal of the provisionally cemented superstructure is anticipated.
Michalakis
K X
KX
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotles University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Pissiotis
A L
AL
Hirayama
H
H
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D002484:Cementation; D000044:Dental Abutments; D003738:Dental Cements; D017268:Dental Prosthesis Retention / Q000379:methods; D019094:Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D003830:Denture, Partial, Fixed; D003833:Denture, Partial, Temporary; D020878:Device Removal; D004338:Drug Combinations; D005054:Eugenol; D005227:Fatty Acids; D006801:Humans; D008422:Materials Testing; D012116:Resins, Plant; D012459:Salicylates; D013718:Tensile Strength; D013943:Thymol; D015034:Zinc Oxide
D003738:Dental Cements; D004338:Drug Combinations; D005227:Fatty Acids; C413303:ImProv; D012116:Resins, Plant; D012459:Salicylates; D013943:Thymol; D005054:Eugenol; C076899:Temp-Bond; C029586:Nogenol; D015034:Zinc Oxide