Oversight mechanisms in public managed care programs: from little oversight to negotiations to shared decision-making.
An expanded range of oversight mechanisms is being adopted to hold public human service programs more accountable to funding sources as well as consumers, family members, and providers. Most of these approaches are hierarchical in nature. Some involve negotiated agreements and each is designed to meet certain goals and functions. Each utilizes different forms of decision-making. Stakeholders prefer to be part of a shared decision-making process. Understanding these underlying premises can help to assess the strengths and weaknesses of each method and can suggest how to most effectively utilize combinations of approaches to improve program performance. Whether we will move toward a new paradigm emphasizing participation and collaboration rather than more formal structural approaches is yet undetermined but will greatly affect how programs are monitored and evaluated in the future.
Beinecke
R H
RH
Suffolk University, Department of Public Management, Boston, MA 02108, USA.
D003254:Consumer Advocacy; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D005161:Facility Regulation and Control / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000639:trends; D008329:Managed Care Programs / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000458:organization & administration; D008605:Mental Health Services / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D017008:Negotiating; D017150:Public Sector