title: Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 2: survey of 690 patients.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To document patient satisfaction and self-perceived quality of vision after bilateral photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
  
  
  METHODS
  Noncomparative, interventional case series.
  
  
  METHODS
  Consecutive patients who underwent bilateral PRK from May 1994 through May 1997 by the 12 surgeons of four collaborating centers with a minimum of 4 months since the last surgery and up to 30 months since the first surgery.
  
  
  METHODS
  A questionnaire with known psychometric properties was self-administered by the patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  Responses to individual questions and scale scores.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 929 questionnaires were sent, of which 690 were answered and returned (74.3% response rate). The preoperative spherical equivalent ranged from -0.38 diopters [D] to -27.75 D (mean, -5.32 D; standard deviation, 2.85 D). Although 91.8% of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their surgery, 96.3% considered that their main goal had been reached, and 95.7% would still choose to have surgery if they had it to do over. The degree of satisfaction was proportional to the postoperative uncorrected visual acuity in the best eye expressed in LogMAR (r = -0.18, P: = 0. 0001) and was negatively correlated with the importance of the corneal haze (r = -0.23, P = 0.0001). Daytime glare was reported to be greater than before surgery by 55.1% of patients. A decrease in night vision was reported by 31.7% of patients, and 31.1% of patients reported increased difficulty driving at night because of their vision.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Overall satisfaction after PRK for low to severe myopia appears to be very good. Glare and night vision disturbance, particularly bothersome for night driving, seem to constitute significant secondary effects that deserve further investigation and should be kept in mind for future improvements in the technique.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Brunette
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Gresset
authors.forename: J F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Boivin
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Pop
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Thompson
authors.forename: G P
authors.initials: GP
authors.lastname: Lafond
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Makni
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001251:Astigmatism / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000601:surgery; D003315:Cornea / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D019466:Glare; D006305:Health Status Indicators; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D054018:Lasers, Excimer; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009216:Myopia / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000601:surgery; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D018903:Photorefractive Keratectomy; D011594:Psychometrics; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014792:Visual Acuity / Q000502:physiology*