title: Reactions to two versions of affirmative action among whites, blacks, and Hispanics.
abstract: Houston-area Whites (n = 414), Blacks (n = 392), American-born Hispanics (n = 162), and Hispanic immigrants (n = 177) evaluated a self-defined "typical" affirmative action plan (AAP) and a tiebreak AAP that applies under conditions of equal qualifications and underrepresentation. Whites preferred Tiebreak; Blacks and Hispanics preferred the typical AAP. The groups differed in beliefs about the procedures and fairness of affirmative action (AA), perceptions of workplace discrimination, and political orientations. Perceived fairness predicted support for both AAPs in all American-born groups, but the impact of other predictors varied greatly across AAPs and ethnic groups. The results clarify the bases for Whites' opposition to AA as they construe it. The results also underscore the importance of specifying the AAP procedures, of uncovering the predictors of AA attitudes among target-group members, and of conducting separate analyses in each ethnic community.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77251-1892, USA. dkravitz@som.gmu.edu
authors.forename: D A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Kravitz
authors.forename: S L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Klineberg
mesh_terms: D001741:Black or African American; D001290:Attitude; D002961:Civil Rights; D004651:Employment; D005260:Female; D006630:Hispanic or Latino; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011897:Random Allocation; D044465:White People