Investigating a memory-based account of negative priming: support for selection-feature mismatch.
Using typical and modified negative priming tasks, the selection-feature mismatch account of negative priming was tested. In the modified task, participants performed selections on the basis of a semantic feature (e.g., referent size). This procedure has been shown to enhance negative priming (P. A. MacDonald, S. Joordens, & K. N. Seergobin, 1999). Across 3 experiments, negative priming occurred only when the repeated item mismatched in terms of the feature used as the basis for selections. When the repeated item was congruent on the selection feature across the prime and probe displays, positive priming arose. This pattern of results appeared in both the ignored- and the attended-repetition conditions. Negative priming does not result from previously ignoring an item. These findings strongly support the selection-feature mismatch account of negative priming and refute both the distractor inhibition and the episodic-retrieval explanations.
MacDonald
P A
PA
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto at Scarborough, Ontario, Canada. penny@psych.utoronto.ca
Joordens
S
S
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003073:Cognitive Dissonance; D003118:Color Perception; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D014936:Word Association Tests