[A comparative analysis of the efficacy of different types of filling materials in the surgical elimination of tooth perforations (experimental morphological research)].
Based on the experimental morphological findings, the authors compare the efficiency of tooth perforation repair in experimental animals by surgical method using Dyract compomer, Base Line glass ionomeric cement, and Ostim-100 osteoplastic material. The data indicate a high efficiency of this method. Base Line material is preferable for filling the perforation in dental wall, as it reliably performed the isolating function under experimental conditions.
Grigor'ian
A S
AS
Grigor'iants
L A
LA
Podoĭnikova
M N
MN
D000818:Animals; D001672:Biocompatible Materials / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D002908:Chronic Disease; D020770:Compomers / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000379:methods*; D004285:Dogs; D004353:Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; D017886:Durapatite / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D006882:Hydroxyapatites / Q000627:therapeutic use; D008689:Methacrylates / Q000627:therapeutic use; D010518:Periodontitis / Q000209:etiology / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D017640:Silicates / Q000627:therapeutic use; D013997:Time Factors; D018677:Tooth Injuries / Q000150:complications / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*
D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D020770:Compomers; C088486:Dyract; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D006882:Hydroxyapatites; D008689:Methacrylates; D017640:Silicates; C074807:BaseLine dental cement; D017886:Durapatite