title: Evidence-based medicine: the need for a new definition.
abstract: Evidence is defined by its ability to establish or support conclusions. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) equates evidence with scientific evidence and views factors such as clinical expertise as important in moving from evidence to action. In contrast, we suggest that EBM should acknowledge multiple dimensions of evidence including scientific evidence, theoretic evidence, practical evidence, expert evidence, judicial evidence and ethics-based evidence. What EBM loses by not acknowledging these dimensions as evidence is the ability, among other things, to make and defend judgements based on understandings that complement science and are no less important than those science can offer. We argue for a new definition of EBM that, without forced accommodation or unacceptable compromise, acknowledges dimensions of evidence produced within and outside science.
authors.affiliation: Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Buetow
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Kenealy
mesh_terms: D004992:Ethics, Medical; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000145:classification; D006801:Humans; D007603:Jurisprudence; D012106:Research