title: Revisiting the constraint attunement hypothesis: reply to Ericsson, Patel, and Kintsch (2000) and Simon and Gobet (2000).
abstract: This article is part of an exchange concerning the contributions of the constraint attunement hypothesis (CAH) to the understanding of expertise effects in memory recall. K. A. Ericsson, V. Patel, and W. Kintsch (2000) and H. A. Simon and F. Gobet (2000) claim that the CAH is not novel and that existing theories of this phenomenon do not have the limitations that were attributed to them. In this reply, the CAH is argued to be the only theory of expertise effects in memory recall to adopt the abstraction hierarchy as a theory of the environment, a feature that has important theoretical implications. Also, other theories focus on psychological mechanisms but have not satisfied the burden of scientific proof required of process theories. Progress can be made by integrating the complementary advantages of existing theories into a unified theory that acknowledges the equally important roles of the organism and the environment.
authors.affiliation: Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. benfica@mie.utoronto.ca
authors.forename: K J
authors.initials: KJ
authors.lastname: Vicente
mesh_terms: D004777:Environment; D019359:Knowledge; D011939:Mental Recall; D008960:Models, Psychological; D015203:Reproducibility of Results