title: Cord-care practice in Scotland.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To identify the range of policies, practices and rationale for umbilical-cord stump care in the NHS in Scotland.
  
  
  METHODS
  A postal questionnaire survey completed in two stages. The first stage elicited the views of Heads of Midwifery/Senior Midwives, and the second stage the views of midwives, enrolled nurses and nursery nurses.
  
  
  METHODS
  NHS units in Scotland providing intrapartum care. They were separated into large and small units with small units having < or = 1000 deliveries per year (n = 178), and large units > 1000 deliveries per year (n = 300).
  
  
  METHODS
  The Heads of Midwifery/Senior Midwives from the 51 units were invited to participate in the study and 49 (96.1%) replied. In stage two 512 maternity unit employees were sent questionnaires and 390 (76.2%) replied. These were six enrolled nurses, 20 nursery nurses and 360 midwives and four respondents of unspecified occupation.
  
  
  METHODS
  The existence of cord-care policies and their rationale.
  
  
  RESULTS
  About half of the units that responded had a written policy. Large units were four times more likely than small units to have a written policy. Both managers and staff reported that the most common policy/agreed practice was no specific care (cord observed and only cleaned if soiled). Where a written policy existed, less than one-half of the Heads of Midwifery/Senior Midwives and less than one third of the staff reported that the basis for this policy was research.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Units with a written policy are in the minority and small units are far less likely to have such a policy. Wide variation exists in policy, practice and rationale. Diversity within and between units creates anxiety and disillusionment for practitioners. It may also cause confusion for patients who are exposed to different cord-care practices either as these change over time or because they use different units.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The midwifery profession must examine this area of practice and determine how to address this lack of evidence. Further research is required to determine the most effective method of cord care and how best to put the findings into practice. Outstanding questions which beg further investigation are: How do cords heal and separate and what bacteria are naturally involved in this process? What constitutes an infected cord as opposed to a colonised cord?
authors.affiliation: Dugald Baird Centre for Research on Women's Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Cornhill Road, Aberdeen AB25 2ZL, UK.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ireland
authors.forename: A M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Rennie
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Hundley
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Fitzmaurice
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Graham
mesh_terms: D002983:Clinical Competence; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008880:Midwifery / Q000592:standards*; D009313:National Health Programs; D024802:Nurse's Role; D018743:Perinatal Care / Q000592:standards*; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D011247:Pregnancy; D012606:Scotland; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014470:Umbilical Cord; D014944:World Health Organization