Search for problem areas in endometrial biopsies to achieve quality assurance.
The aim of this study was to underline the frequently seen problems in diagnosing the lesions seen in the hyperplasia-carcinoma sequence by evaluating the variances between the observers. Four pathologists re-evaluated 137 endometrial biopsies and grouped them into diagnostic categories. The results were analyzed by Kappa statistics. Full agreement was reached in 89 cases (64.96%), with Kappa values ranging between 0.63-0.74. Three observers rendered the same diagnosis in 34 (24.81%) cases, and only one pathologist disagreed. Two or more observers held different views in 16 cases (10.95%). The problem areas were as follows: criteria distinguishing simple hyperplasia from other benign lesions, discrimination between atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma, and decision-making regarding the presence of atypia. There was a tendency towards overdiagnosis of hyperplasia in our department. Since the progression to carcinoma is a sequential event, borderline cases will exist if categories based on simple and clear cut off points are not defined.
Usubütün
A
A
Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Ankara, Turkey. usubutun@ato.org.tr
Ertoy
D
D
Ozkaya
O
O
Altinok
G
G
Kücukali
T
T
D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000473:pathology*; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001706:Biopsy; D003951:Diagnostic Errors / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004714:Endometrial Hyperplasia / Q000473:pathology*; D016889:Endometrial Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D015588:Observer Variation; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D015203:Reproducibility of Results