title: Will endovascular repair replace open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate of the impact of endovascular aneurysm repair on the rate of open surgical repair and on the overall treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).
  
  
  METHODS
  All patients with AAA who were treated during two consecutive 40-month periods were reviewed. During the first period, only open surgical repair was performed; during the subsequent 40 months, endovascular repair and open surgical repair were treatment options.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 727 patients with AAA were treated during the entire period. During the initial 40 months, 268 patients were treated with open surgical repair, including 216 infrarenal (81%), 43 complex (16%), and 9 ruptured (3%) aortic aneurysms. During the subsequent 40 months, 459 patients with AAA were treated (71% increase). There was no significant change in the number of patients undergoing open surgical repair and no significant difference in the rate of infrarenal (238 [77%]) and complex (51 [16%]) repairs. A total of 353 patients were referred for endovascular repair. Of these, 190 (54%) were considered candidates for endovascular repair based on computed tomography or arteriographic morphologic criteria. Analyzing a subgroup of 123 patients, the most common primary reasons for ineligibility for endovascular repair were related to morphology of the neck in 80 patients (65%) and of the iliac arteries in 35 patients (28%). A total of 149 patients underwent endovascular repair. Of these, the procedure was successful in 147 (99%), and 2 (1%) patients underwent surgical conversion. The hospital death rate was 0%, and the 30-day death rate was 1%. During a follow-up period of 1 to 39 months (mean 12 +/- 9), 21 secondary procedures to treat endoleak (20) or to maintain graft limb patency (1) were performed in 17 patients (11%). There were no aneurysm ruptures or aneurysm-related deaths.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Endovascular repair appears to have augmented treatment options rather than replaced open surgical repair for patients with AAA. Patients who previously were not candidates for repair because of medical comorbidity may now be safely treated with endovascular repair.
authors.affiliation: Division of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University Hospital, Stanford, California 94305-5642, USA. zarins@stanford.edu
authors.forename: C K
authors.initials: CK
authors.lastname: Zarins
authors.forename: Y G
authors.initials: YG
authors.lastname: Wolf
authors.forename: W A
authors.initials: WA
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: B B
authors.initials: BB
authors.lastname: Hill
authors.forename: I V
authors.initials: IV
authors.lastname: Olcott C
authors.forename: E J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Harris
authors.forename: R L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Dalman
authors.forename: T J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Fogarty
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D017544:Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D001019:Aortic Rupture / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D001807:Blood Vessel Prosthesis; D019917:Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D017052:Hospital Mortality; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D015607:Stents; D013997:Time Factors; D014656:Vascular Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods