Length illusions in conventional and single-wing Müller-Lyer stimuli.
Warren and Bashford (1977) reported that eliminating one of the wing components from the conventional (i.e., two-wing) Müller-Lyer figures had no appreciable effect on the magnitude of the acute-angle (contraction) illusion but substantially reduced the magnitude of the obtuse-angle (expansion) illusion. In addition, they found that whereas the contractionary effects of the acute-angle components tended to be confined to the region of the shaft adjacent to the angles, the expansionary effects of the obtuse-angle components were more uniformly distributed across the shaft. Since these findings challenge many theories of the Müller-Lyer illusion, the purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate further Warren and Bashford's work with four experiments. Experiments 1 and 2 assessed length illusion magnitudes by requiring subjects to adjust either the length of a plain comparison line to match the length of the Müller-Lyer test figures (Experiment 1) or the length of comparison Müller-Lyer figures to match the length of plain test lines (Experiment 2). Experiments 3 and 4 used a bisection task to assess whether the illusory effects of the angle components are confined mainly to regions of the shaft adjacent to the angles. Consistent with most theories of the Müller-Lyer illusion, eliminating one of the wing components reduced both forms of the Müller-Lyer length illusion to a similar extent. In addition, the acute- and obtuse-angle forms yielded similar patterns of bisection errors, with substantial errors for regions of the shaft adjacent to the angles and negligible errors for regions of the shaft distant from the angles.
Predebon
J
J
Department of Psychology, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. johnp@psych.usyd.edu.au
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009903:Optical Illusions; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D012858:Size Perception