title: Cardioprotection from ischemia and reperfusion injury by an endothelin A-receptor antagonist in relation to nitric oxide production.
abstract: It has previously been shown that endothelin (ET)-receptor antagonists protect the myocardium from ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury. The mechanism behind this effect is unclear. The aim of this study was to elucidate the possible interaction between ET(A)-receptor antagonism and nitric oxide (NO) during I/R. Anesthetized pigs were subjected to 45-min ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) followed by 4 h of reperfusion. Vehicle (n = 7), the ET(A)-receptor antagonist LU 135252 (LU; 0.1 mg/kg, n = 7), the combination of LU and the NO precursor L-arginine (15 mg/kg, n = 7; LU + L-arg), the NO synthase inhibitor N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA; 0.2 mg/kg, n = 6), or the combination of LU and L-NMMA (LU + L-NMMA; n = 6) were injected into the LAD during the last 10 min of ischemia and the first 5 min of reperfusion. There were no significant differences in coronary flow, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, mean arterial pressure, or heart rate between the groups before ischemia or at the end of reperfusion. The area at risk was similar in all five groups. The infarct size of the vehicle group was 79 +/- 6% of the area at risk. LU and LU + L-arginine (L-arg) reduced the infarct size to 39 +/- 6% and 35 +/- 8%, respectively (p < 0.001 vs. vehicle). L-NMMA completely prevented the infarct-limiting effect of LU. Thus the infarct size in the LU + L-NMMA group was 83 +/- 4% (p < 0.001 vs. LU alone); L-NMMA did not affect infarct size per se (79 +/- 4%). ET immunoreactivity increased threefold in the I/R myocardium of the vehicle group. The increase in ET immunoreactivity was significantly attenuated in the LU and LU + L-arg groups (p < 0.001), but not in the groups given L-NMMA or LU + L-NMMA. In conclusion, ET(A)-receptor blockade results in cardioprotection and attenuation of the increase in myocardial ET levels after I/R. Both effects were inhibited by NO synthase blockade, suggesting that they are dependent on maintained production of NO.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. adrian.gonon@medks.ki.se
authors.forename: A T
authors.initials: AT
authors.lastname: Gonon
authors.forename: A V
authors.initials: AV
authors.lastname: Gourine
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Pernow
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D065128:Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; D016232:Endothelins / Q000032:analysis; D005260:Female; D006439:Hemodynamics / Q000187:drug effects; D008297:Male; D017202:Myocardial Ischemia / Q000517:prevention & control*; D015428:Myocardial Reperfusion Injury / Q000517:prevention & control*; D009569:Nitric Oxide / Q000096:biosynthesis*; D010666:Phenylpropionates / Q000494:pharmacology*; D011743:Pyrimidines / Q000494:pharmacology*; D044022:Receptor, Endothelin A; D013552:Swine; D019323:omega-N-Methylarginine / Q000494:pharmacology
chemical_list: D065128:Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; D016232:Endothelins; D010666:Phenylpropionates; D011743:Pyrimidines; D044022:Receptor, Endothelin A; D019323:omega-N-Methylarginine; D009569:Nitric Oxide; C107831:darusentan