Able to name, unable to compare: the visual abilities of a posterior split-brain patient.
A patient with a lesion of the posterior half of the corpus callosum correctly named simple (e.g. colors) and complex (e.g. faces) stimuli whether presented to one or both hemifields. Although proficient at these tasks, and also able to make same/different judgements for stimuli within an hemifield, he failed dramatically when required to compare stimuli between the two hemifields. These results indicate that, while the posterior portion of the corpus callosum may not be essential for naming visual stimuli, it is essential for comparing stimuli between the two visual fields.
Intriligator
J
J
Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Hénaff
M A
MA
Michel
F
F
D000328:Adult; D001927:Brain Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery; D003337:Corpus Callosum / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000601:surgery; D003560:Cysts / Q000601:surgery; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008606:Mental Processes / Q000502:physiology*; D009275:Names; D011184:Postoperative Period; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*