title: Effects of dietary fat and sire breed on puberty, weight, and reproductive traits of F1 beef heifers.
abstract: Prepubertal F1 heifers (n = 246; from crossbred dams bred to either Hereford [H], Limousin [L], or Piedmontese [P] sires) were fed 1.9% (LF) or 4.4% (HF) dietary fat from 254+/-4 d of age until they reached puberty or the breeding season started. Safflower seeds (37% oil with 79% linoleic acid) were the added fat source. Blood samples and backfat thickness measurements were obtained from 60 randomly selected heifers representing the sire breeds and diets studied. In addition, five H-sired heifers from both diets were serially bled at 28-d intervals. Total gain, ADG, body condition score, and backfat thickness were affected by sire breed (P < 0.001) but not diet. Backfat thickness was affected (P < 0.01) by the diet x time on feed interaction. Diet did not affect pubertal age (P > 0.10) but tended (P = 0.08) to affect the percentage of heifers pubertal by the beginning of breeding (June 4). Sire breed effects on puberty age at beginning of breeding, percentage pubertal at the beginning of breeding, and puberty age during the entire study were all highly significant. The effect of the diet x sire breed interaction on percentage of heifers pubertal at beginning of breeding (P < 0.05) was 74.4 vs 76.3% in H-sired, 69.8 vs 60.5% in L-sired, and 76.2 vs 97.6% in P-sired heifers (LF vs HF, respectively). Number of AI services per pregnancy and final pregnancy percentage were not affected by diet or the diet x sire breed interaction. Diet affected progesterone (P < 0.05) and cholesterol (P < 0.001) concentrations, and sire breed tended to affect (P = 0.06) cholesterol concentrations. The effect of the diet x time on feed interaction on cholesterol concentrations was highly significant. There were no effects of diet or sample period on insulin or growth hormone concentrations in serially collected blood samples. We conclude that effects of supplemental dietary fat may be breed-dependent and hypothesize that a feeding period of approximately 60 d duration may be more appropriate than the 162 d used in this study.
authors.affiliation: BovaGen, San Antonio, TX 78216, USA.
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Lammoglia
authors.forename: R A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Bellows
authors.forename: E E
authors.initials: EE
authors.lastname: Grings
authors.forename: J W
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Bergman
authors.forename: S E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Bellows
authors.forename: R E
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: Short
authors.forename: D M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Hallford
authors.forename: R D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Randel
mesh_terms: D000821:Animal Feed; D000818:Animals; D001835:Body Weight; D002417:Cattle / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D004041:Dietary Fats / Q000494:pharmacology*; D019587:Dietary Supplements; D015237:Dinoprost / Q000097:blood; D005260:Female; D018392:Genomic Imprinting; D013006:Growth Hormone / Q000097:blood; D007328:Insulin / Q000097:blood; D008297:Male; D011247:Pregnancy; D011374:Progesterone / Q000097:blood; D012098:Reproduction / Q000502:physiology*; D012741:Sexual Maturation
chemical_list: D004041:Dietary Fats; D007328:Insulin; D011374:Progesterone; D013006:Growth Hormone; D015237:Dinoprost