Common errors in the use of magnetic resonance imaging for neuro-ophthalmic diagnosis.
The optimal utilization of magnetic resonance imaging in neuro-ophthalmic diagnosis is limited by errors in prescribing and interpreting scans. In a review of case material, we discovered four common prescriptive errors: 1) failure to apply a dedicated study, 2) inappropriate use of a dedicated study, 3) omission of intravenous contrast, and 4) omission of specialized sequences. The four common interpretive errors were the following: 1) failure to detect the lesion because of misleading clinical information, 2) rejection of a clinical diagnosis because an expected imaging abnormality was absent, 3) assumption that a striking imaging abnormality accounted for the clinical abnormality, and 4) failure to consider the lack of clinical specificity of imaging abnormalities. Many of these errors could be avoided by improved communication between clinicians and radiologists.
Wolintz
R J
RJ
W.K. Kellogg Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI 49105, USA.
Trobe
J D
JD
Cornblath
W T
WT
Gebarski
S S
SS
Mark
A S
AS
Kolsky
M P
MP
D016477:Artifacts; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D003951:Diagnostic Errors; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D009901:Optic Nerve Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis*