Emergency medicine and "acute" general practice: comparing apples with oranges.
Emergency Departments (EDs) operate at the interface between the inpatient and ambulatory sectors of health care. Because of shared funding between the Commonwealth and States for ambulatory care, there has been intense focus on the ED patient population, and the potential to shift the locus of care for non-inpatients. One of the frequently cited models for the provision of after-hours GP services is the Balmain General Practice Casualty (GPC). This paper analyses the GPC model, looking in detail at casemix, clinical quality, waiting times and cost-effectiveness. It is argued that the services provided and the casemix of the patient population of GPC and EDs are distinctly different. Cost-effectiveness for GPC has not been objectively established. Health service planning should recognise the distinct but complementary roles of general practice and emergency medicine. Evaluation of alternative models of service provision should critically examine the available evidence, and comparisons should be based on a precise analysis of equivalent services.
Ieraci
S
S
Liverpool Hospital, Australasian College for Emergency Medicine.
Cunningham
P
P
Talbot-Stern
J
J
Walker
S
S
D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003953:Diagnosis-Related Groups / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D004635:Emergency Medicine; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005194:Family Practice; D006779:Hospitals, Public / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D017146:Models, Organizational; D009517:New South Wales; D010343:Patient Admission / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010819:Physician's Role; D015397:Program Evaluation; D014850:Waiting Lists; D000078329:Workforce