Partial liquid ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome.
PLV represents an intriguing alternative paradigm in the approach to the patient with ALI. Within the past decade, substantial information has become available regarding this technique. Clearly, PLV is feasible in patients with ALI and ARDS, and it appears to be safe with respect to short-term effects on hemodynamics and lung physiology, as well as long-term toxicity (although further research in this area is warranted). Although PLV has not yet been proven to be superior to traditional mechanical ventilation for patients with ALI or ARDS, PLV possesses an intriguing combination of physical, physiologic, and biologic effects: "Liquid PEEP" effect--e.g., more effective recruitment of dependent lung zones than achieved by gas ventilation Anti-inflammatory effects Lavage of alveolar debris Mitigation of ventilator-induced lung injury Direct anti-inflammatory effects--e.g., decreased macrophage release of proinflammatory cytokines, etc. Prevention of nosocomial pneumonia Combination with other modalities--e.g., exogenous surfactant replacement, inhaled NO, prone position Enhanced delivery of drugs or gene vectors into the lung. The results of ongoing and future clinical trials will be necessary to establish whether PLV improves clinical outcomes in patients with ALI or ARDS, or specific subgroups of such patients. Significant work also remains to be done to define the optimum dose level of PLV and the most appropriate ventilatory strategies.
Wiedemann
H P
HP
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio, USA.
D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D005466:Fluorocarbons / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D006801:Humans; D021061:Liquid Ventilation / Q000379:methods*; D012128:Respiratory Distress Syndrome / Q000628:therapy*
D005466:Fluorocarbons