The role of multimodality therapy for resectable esophageal cancer.
BACKGROUND
There is an increasing interest in the role of combined therapy to achieve long-term survival for patients with resectable esophageal neoplasms. Surgery provides excellent palliation with relatively low morbidity and mortality rates, but cure remains elusive.


METHODS
From January 1988 to January 1998, a total of 137 patients met eligibility criteria for a combined multimodal therapy, prospective, nonrandomized protocol of induction chemoradiation therapy followed by surgical resection, based on radiological and endoscopic assessment of the extension (all patients were initially considered to be at clinical stages I to III, locoregional). Consequently, patients with high grade Barrett's dysplasia or any squamous carcinoma in situ (stage 0) and those with distant metastatic disease (stage IV) were excluded. Among this group, 48 operable patients with biopsy-proven esophageal cancer finally entered and completed the protocol and are the sample of the present study. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for death or recurrence. Actuarial survival was calculated since the beginning of the induction protocol by the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons between groups were made by the log-rank test.


RESULTS
Mean age was 61.6 (range 45 to 71), and 72.9% were male. The majority of the tumors (70.8%) were located at the lower third/cardia and as many as 18.8% were adenocarcinoma. After a mean of 7.5 weeks (range 5 to 12) after the completion of the induction phase, 68.7% underwent a transthoracic esophagectomy and 31.3% a transhiatal esophagectomy. The in-hospital mortality rate was 10.4% (5 patients). A complete response (no evidence of tumor within the specimen: pT0) was achieved in 25% (12 patients). After a mean follow-up of 20.2 months, mean survival for the entire group was 18.2 months (95% confidence interval 14 to 22). At the end of the study, 25% (12) remained alive. Actuarial survival rates at 12, 23, and 37 months were 56.2%, 36.9%, and 21.9%, respectively.


CONCLUSIONS
Esophageal resection after induction therapy seems to be related to a slightly higher mortality rate compared with historical series, and for this reason, neoadjuvant therapy must be considered still experimental. However, no statistical significant difference in survival is showed in those cases with complete pathological response (pT0). Factors influencing survival are recurrence and age. Surgery alone remains the standard therapy for esophageal cancer.
Meneu-Diaz
J C
JC
Departamento de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
Blazquez
L A
LA
Vicente
E
E
Nuño
J
J
Quijano
Y
Y
Lopez-Hervás
P
P
Devesa
M
M
Fresneda
V
V
D000368:Aged; D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D002294:Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Q000401:mortality / Q000628:therapy*; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D018572:Disease-Free Survival; D004938:Esophageal Neoplasms / Q000401:mortality / Q000628:therapy*; D016629:Esophagectomy / Q000379:methods; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D011379:Prognosis; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011878:Radiotherapy / Q000379:methods; D015996:Survival Rate; D016896:Treatment Outcome