title: Holter monitoring: are two days better than one?
abstract: The optimal duration of Holter monitoring (HM) to minimize costs and maximize yield is unknown. In a retrospective review of 164 patients referred to a tertiary care center for evaluation with 2 days of HM, we found that 48 hours was not cost effective when compared with the traditional 24-hour period.
authors.affiliation: Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: McClennen
authors.forename: P J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Zimetbaum
authors.forename: K K
authors.initials: KK
authors.lastname: Ho
authors.forename: A L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Goldberger
mesh_terms: D001145:Arrhythmias, Cardiac / Q000175:diagnosis*; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D015716:Electrocardiography, Ambulatory / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013997:Time Factors