title: A randomized phase 3 study of intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with penile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  We determine if mapping of the cavernous nerve during radical prostatectomy using intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with tumescence monitoring results in improved erectile potency compared to conventional nerve sparing.
  
  
  METHODS
  A prospective, randomized, single blinded study was performed on 61 patients at 6 centers. Patients had elected to undergo nerve sparing prostatectomy and had normal preoperative erectile function documented by the Sexual Function Inventory Questionnaire (SFIQ) and RigiScan parallel testing. Patients were randomized between conventional nerve sparing and nerve sparing assisted by the CaverMap Surgical Aid. paragraph sign In all patients neural continuity was assessed immediately after prostate removal by proximal cavernous nerve stimulation. All patients were blinded according to their allocation cohort.
  
  
  RESULTS
  At 1 year there was substantial improvement in erectile function in the CaverMap group as measured by RigiScan. This group had a mean of 15. 9 minutes of greater than 60% nocturnal tumescence compared to 2.1 minutes in the conventional nerve sparing group (p <0.024). By SFIQ there was a nonsignificant trend to improved potency in the CaverMap group (71% versus 62%, p = 0.17). Of patients who had bilateral, unilateral and no response to stimulation after resection erectile function assessed by SFIQ recovered in 68%, 27% and 0%, respectively (p = 0.016).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  CaverMap assisted prostatectomy led to improved erectile function as assessed by RigiScan testing with no associated adverse events. A response to stimulation immediately after removal of the prostate accurately predicted return of erectile function.
authors.affiliation: Division of Urology, Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Science Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Klotz
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Heaton
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Jewett
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Chin
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Fleshner
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Goldenberg
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gleave
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D006801:Humans; D007432:Intraoperative Period; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008991:Monitoring, Physiologic; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D010410:Penile Erection; D010413:Penis / Q000294:innervation; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000517:prevention & control*; D011468:Prostatectomy; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery