title: What are the relative merits of the sources used to identify potential research priorities for the NHS HTA programme?
abstract: The NHS Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme runs an annual process of identifying suggestions for health technology assessment. The objective of this paper is to describe and evaluate the relative importance of the different sources used by the program in 1998 to identify potential priorities. There were four different sources: a) a widespread consultation of healthcare commissioners, providers and consumers; b) research recommendations from systematic reviews; c) reconsidering previous research priorities which had not been taken forward for funding; and d) horizon scanning. Collectively, the four sources generated just over 1,100 HTA suggestions. By far the largest source of suggestions and priorities was the widespread consultation. However, the success rate of this source, in terms of being commissioned, was low. Research recommendations from systematic reviews provided the second largest source of priorities and the best success rate of all sources. Value was found from different sources for different healthcare areas.
authors.affiliation: University of Southampton.
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Chase
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Milne
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Stein
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Stevens
mesh_terms: D006292:Health Priorities; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D013222:State Medicine / Q000458:organization & administration*; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical; D006113:United Kingdom