title: Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context.
abstract: Three studies tested the idea that when social identity is salient, group-based appraisals elicit specific emotions and action tendencies toward out-groups. Participants' group memberships were made salient and the collective support apparently enjoyed by the in-group was measured or manipulated. The authors then measured anger and fear (Studies 1 and 2) and anger and contempt (Study 3), as well as the desire to move against or away from the out-group. Intergroup anger was distinct from intergroup fear, and the inclination to act against the out-group was distinct from the tendency to move away from it. Participants who perceived the in-group as strong were more likely to experience anger toward the out-group and to desire to take action against it. The effects of perceived in-group strength on offensive action tendencies were mediated by anger.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara 93106-9660, USA. mackie@psych.ucsb.edu
authors.forename: D M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Mackie
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Devos
authors.forename: E R
authors.initials: ER
authors.lastname: Smith
mesh_terms: D000339:Affect; D000374:Aggression / Q000523:psychology*; D000786:Anger; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male