title: Comparison of three chronic dialysis models.
abstract: The chronic peritoneal dialysis model is important for understanding the pathophysiology of peritoneal transport and for studying biocompatibility of peritoneal dialysis solutions. In this study, we compared three different chronic peritoneal dialysis models. A peritoneal catheter was placed in 23 male Sprague-Dawley rats, 12 of which had an intact omentum (model 1) and 11 of which received an omentectomy (model 2). Seven other rats, without a catheter, received a daily intraperitoneal injection (model 3). Each rat received a daily infusion of 25 mL of 3.86% glucose dialysis solution either through the catheter (models 1 and 2) or through injection (model 3) for 4 weeks. Then, a 4-hour dwell study using 3.86% glucose solution with an intraperitoneal volume marker and frequent dialysate and blood sampling was performed in each rat. The intraperitoneal volume was significantly lower in all the dialysis groups as compared to a control group (n = 6) in which the rats had no chronic dialysate exposure. The peritoneal fluid absorption rate, as well as the direct lymphatic absorption rate, was significantly higher in the three dialysis groups as compared to the control group. In general, no significant differences were seen in any of the parameters among the three dialysis models. Owing to catheter obstruction, three rats in model 1 and four rats in model 2 were lost during dialysis. Histological examination showed no significant differences among the three dialysis groups. Our results suggest that omentectomy may not be necessary in the chronic peritoneal dialysis model when using dialysate infusion and no drainage. Based on the present study, we think that perhaps model 1 may be the method of choice to test new peritoneal dialysis solutions. However, owing to its simplicity, model 3 could also be used if great care is taken to avoid puncturing the intestine or injecting into the abdominal wall.
authors.affiliation: Department of Nephrology, 1st Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
authors.forename: W X
authors.initials: WX
authors.lastname: Peng
authors.forename: Q Y
authors.initials: QY
authors.lastname: Guo
authors.forename: S M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.forename: C Z
authors.initials: CZ
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Lindholm
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Wang
mesh_terms: D000042:Absorption; D000818:Animals; D001692:Biological Transport; D015314:Dialysis Solutions / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D005947:Glucose / Q000008:administration & dosage; D005950:Glucose Solution, Hypertonic / Q000008:administration & dosage; D007263:Infusions, Parenteral; D007274:Injections, Intraperitoneal; D008196:Lymph / Q000378:metabolism; D008297:Male; D023421:Models, Animal; D009852:Omentum / Q000601:surgery; D010530:Peritoneal Dialysis / Q000379:methods*; D010537:Peritoneum / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000473:pathology; D051381:Rats; D017207:Rats, Sprague-Dawley
chemical_list: D015314:Dialysis Solutions; D005950:Glucose Solution, Hypertonic; D005947:Glucose