title: [Comparative antianginal efficiency of prolonged nitrites in patients treated surgically for ischemic heart disease].
abstract: To compare clinical and cost effects of prolonged nitrates (sustac-forte), isosorbide dinitrate (nitrosorbide) and isosorbide-5-mononitrate (mono mac 40), a retrospective analysis was made of 112 cases of ischemic heart diseases (functional class II-III) treated surgically. During their rehabilitation in sanatorium 30-40 days after coronary artery bypass operation the patients received sustac forte (n = 37), nitrosorbide (n = 36), mono mac 40 (n = 39). By clinico-functional effect mono-mac appeared 1.5-2 times more effective than sustac forte or nitrosorbide. By cost-effect parameters, a course 30-day treatment was the cheapest when made with mono mac (3 times more cost effective than sustac-forte and 2 times more effective than nitrosorbide).
authors.forename: V A
authors.initials: VA
authors.lastname: Kosov
authors.forename: S E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Podshibiakin
authors.forename: A N
authors.initials: AN
authors.lastname: Nagatkin
mesh_terms: D000787:Angina Pectoris / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000191:economics*; D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass / Q000379:methods; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017202:Myocardial Ischemia / Q000601:surgery*; D011182:Postoperative Care; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013997:Time Factors; D014665:Vasodilator Agents / Q000191:economics* / Q000627:therapeutic use*
chemical_list: D014665:Vasodilator Agents