The comparative constitution of twinship: strategies and paradoxes.
In both traditional and modern societies, twinship, as an unusual mode of reproduction, involves difficulties for social systems in maintaining consistent classification systems. It is proposed that the most prevalent response to twinship involves various 'strategies of normalisation' to defuse and contain the potential disruption. This proposition is illustrated and analysed in relation to ethnographic maternal drawn mainly (but not exclusively) from African communities in the twentieth century. Following a discussion of twin infanticide as the most extreme of the normalising strategies, the article concludes by identifying a number of paradoxes in the social construction of twinship.
Stewart
E A
EA
Department of Sociology, London School of Economics, UK. weinberg@lse.ac.uk
D000349:Africa; D000884:Anthropology, Cultural; D001290:Attitude; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D003469:Culture; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D007237:Infanticide; D009679:Nuclear Family; D012917:Social Adjustment; D012919:Social Behavior; D012931:Social Environment; D012961:Sociology; D014427:Twins / Q000145:classification