title: Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: a multicenter investigation.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This article describes the design of a multicenter study sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of three measures of peripheral auditory system status (transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and auditory brain stem responses) applied in the perinatal period for predicting behavioral hearing status at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. The influences of the infant's medical status, the test environment, and test and response parameters on test performance were examined.
  
  
  METHODS
  Seven institutions participated in this study. There were 7179 infants evaluated in the perinatal period. All graduates of the neonatal intensive care unit (4478) and well babies with one or more risk factor for hearing loss (353) were targeted for follow-up testing using visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. Well babies without any risk indicators (N = 2348) were not targeted for follow-up VRA testing. However, 80 of these well babies did not pass the screening protocol and thus were targeted for follow-up VRA testing as well. Perinatal test performance was evaluated using the VRA data as the "gold standard."
  
  
  RESULTS
  The results of this study are described in a series of 11 articles following this introductory article.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The evaluation of newborn hearing tests required a longitudinal study in which newborn test results were compared with a gold standard based on behavioral audiometric assessment. Such an evaluation was possible because all newborns, passes as well as refers, were followed up long enough to permit reliable behavioral measurements. In addition, prenatal, perinatal, and maternal history information, test environment, and test parameter information were collected to provide data that led to a complete description of factors affecting test outcomes. All of these data were obtained in a sample of sufficient ethnic, medical, and geographic diversity in efforts to increase the generalizability of the results. Finally, the data were combined in a relational data base to examine the factors that influence test performance. Specific information related to these issues is presented in the articles that follow.
authors.affiliation: Multicenter Consortium on Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment, Seattle, Washington, USA.
authors.forename: S J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Norton
authors.forename: M P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Gorga
authors.forename: J E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Widen
authors.forename: R C
authors.initials: RC
authors.lastname: Folsom
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Sininger
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Cone-Wesson
authors.forename: B R
authors.initials: BR
authors.lastname: Vohr
authors.forename: K A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Fletcher
mesh_terms: D016057:Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem / Q000502:physiology; D006311:Hearing Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000209:etiology; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D015997:Neonatal Screening; D017084:Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous / Q000502:physiology; D012307:Risk Factors; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D012984:Software