Contrast-enhanced power Doppler harmonic imaging--influence on visualization of renal vasculature.
To compare contrast-enhanced power Doppler (PD) harmonic imaging (CHI) with contrast-enhanced power Doppler fundamental imaging (CPD) in the depiction of renal cortical vessels, 20 healthy volunteers were subjected to PD imaging and HI assessment of the kidney after bolus injection of Levovist(R) (SH U 508A). System settings were standardized and the pulse-repetition frequencies (PRF) systematically toggled from 750 to 500 and 250. Videotapes were independently reviewed by three readers with regard to the presence of artefacts, the degree of Doppler signal enhancement, demarcation of vessels and the extent of visualization. The assessments were graded separately for each PRF in accordance with a multistage scoring system. In comparison to contrast-enhanced PD, artefacts were significantly lower with CHI for all PRF (p = 0.0001). Vessels were better visualized (p = 0.002) and less blurred (p = 0.006) with CHI than with CPD. There was no significant difference in the extent of Doppler signal increase between CPD and the contrast-enhanced harmonic mode. Combination of the contrast-enhanced harmonic method and PD allows the PRF to be lowered and, by balancing the greater susceptibility of PD to interference from clutter, increases the likelihood of detection of flow in small vessels.
Huber
S
S
Department of Radiology, Lainz Hospital, Wolkersbergenstr.1, 1130 Vienna, Austria. s.pankl@1012surfnet.at
Steinbach
R
R
Sommer
O
O
Zuna
I
I
Czembirek
H
H
Delorme
S
S
D000328:Adult; D003287:Contrast Media / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D006801:Humans; D007668:Kidney / Q000098:blood supply* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D008875:Middle Aged; D011134:Polysaccharides / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D018608:Ultrasonography, Doppler / Q000379:methods*; D014743:Videotape Recording
D003287:Contrast Media; D011134:Polysaccharides; C059891:SHU 508