Appreciating the difference between design-based and model-based sampling strategies in quantitative morphology of the nervous system.
Quantitative morphology of the nervous system has undergone great developments over recent years, and several new technical procedures have been devised and applied successfully to neuromorphological research. However, a lively debate has arisen on some issues, and a great deal of confusion appears to exist that is definitely responsible for the slow spread of the new techniques among scientists. One such element of confusion is related to uncertainty about the meaning, implications, and advantages of the design-based sampling strategy that characterize the new techniques. In this article, to help remove this uncertainty, morphoquantitative methods are described and contrasted on the basis of the inferential paradigm of the sampling strategy: design-based vs model-based. Moreover, some recommendations are made to help scientists judge the appropriateness of a method used for a given study in relation to its specific goals. Finally, the use of the term stereology to label, more or less expressly, only some methods is critically discussed.
Geuna
S
S
Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Università di Torino, Ospedale San Luigi, Orbassano, I-10043, Italy. stefano.geuna@unito.it
D000818:Animals; D002452:Cell Count / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D019295:Computational Biology / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D015233:Models, Statistical; D009420:Nervous System / Q000166:cytology*