title: Independence of scientific publishing. Reaffirming the principle.
abstract: Historically, the American Psychological Association (APA), as part of its contract with the editors of APA journals, has granted to the editors sole responsibility to accept or reject manuscripts for publication, without such actions being open for review by APA. Such a policy fosters the freedom of inquiry and expression so necessary for a healthy science. It also serves to protect the Association because publication of an article in an APA journal does not represent endorsement by APA itself. The lessons of history are clear: When political or other pressures interfere with the autonomy of science, the societal and scientific consequences are grim. APA should reaffirm the principle that a healthy science of psychology requires an open exchange of ideas and findings.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles 90095-1563, USA. rabjork@psych.ucla.edu
authors.forename: R A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Bjork
mesh_terms: D005610:Freedom; D006801:Humans; D011643:Publishing; D012958:Societies, Scientific; D014481:United States