Strains in experimental social psychology: a textual anaylsis of the development of experimentation in social psychology.
A textual analysis of post-World War II social psychology methodology manuals and handbook chapters on "methods" indicates that the introduction of the experimental method was enforced and gradually strengthened through the use of scientific rhetoric and the minimization of alternative research strategies. As a consequence, by the 1960s experimentation had become such an established identifying feature of psychological social psychology that the acceptability of ideas in the field came to depend largely on the ability of authors to couch them in the language of the experiment. Text writers continually shored up the defenses of scientific legitimacy and denigrated all other types of argument. We explore three sources of tension or strains evident as contradictions in these texts: (1) between a rational experimenter's carefully following prescribed, logic-generated scientific practices and the investigator's artfully or intuitively designing research; (2) between social psychologists' missionary activities of proselytizing the experiment as the primary research method and social psychologists' apologies and insecurities expressed about using experiments; and (3) between the treatment of participants as docile and submissive versus portraying them as underhanded and damaging to the outcome of the research. In addition, we briefly reexamine the strain (4) between sober scientific experimentation and a playful "fun and games" approach to experimentation (Lubek & Stam, 1995).
Stam
H J
HJ
Department of Psychology at the University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Radtke
H L
HL
Lubek
I
I
D006663:Historiography; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D009656:North America; D011589:Psychology, Experimental / Q000193:education / Q000266:history*; D011593:Psychology, Social / Q000193:education / Q000266:history*; D012013:Reference Books; D013782:Textbooks as Topic / Q000266:history*