title: Judgments of grammaticality of sentences with a differing number of arguments: a comparison of English and Japanese speakers.
abstract: This study explored native speakers' linguistic intuition as revealed in judging the grammaticality of sentences. Speakers of English (n = 36) and Japanese (n = 57) judged the relative grammaticality of sentences involving a verb which occurred together with one, two or three arguments. Findings showed that English speakers were more affected by the number of arguments in sentences. They judged sentences having three arguments as grammatical most often and ones having one or two arguments as grammatical less often. However, Japanese speakers gave rather similar and more grammatical judgments regardless of the number of arguments in sentences. The findings indicate a difference in tightness of argument structure in the two languages even when the sentences judged are simple sentences and they are given without any sentential context.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Economics, Okayama University, Tsushima, Japan. hinagata@e.okayama-u.ac.jp
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Nagata
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Bain
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D019545:Intuition; D007564:Japan; D007600:Judgment; D007802:Language; D008297:Male; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D012660:Semantics; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology