title: Are better eye movements an advantage in ball games? A study of prosaccadic and antisaccadic eye movements.
abstract: The aim of this study was to compare prosaccadic and antisaccadic eye movements of experts in ball sports and controls. In the prosaccadic and antisaccadic task, subjects made saccades respectively towards and away from a suddenly appearing stimulus. By means of infrared-oculography, we compared horizontal eye movements of experts (n=18) and controls (n=20). Experts had shorter overall saccadic latencies, but significantly shorter latencies occurred only on the antisaccade task, not on the prosaccade task. Our findings seem to support the concept that prosaccades and antisaccades have different underlying mechanisms and that expertise in ball games mainly improves antisaccadic performance in terms of latency and variability.
authors.affiliation: Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium. Matthieu.Lenoir@rug.ac.be
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lenoir
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Crevits
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Goethals
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Wildenbeest
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Musch
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time; D012438:Saccades; D013177:Sports / Q000523:psychology*