title: Commentary: what "community review" can and cannot do.
abstract: The author praises Sharp and Foster's differentiation of the forms of "community review," and agrees that the discussion is far from settled. He argues that rather than attempting to define "community" by various criteria, it might be more helpful to both researchers and research subjects to enable persons to create their own communities: a process of community construction, rather than reaction.
authors.affiliation: Center for Biomedical Ethics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, USA.
authors.forename: E T
authors.initials: ET
authors.lastname: Juengst
mesh_terms: D026724:Ethical Review; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D036281:Genetic Research; D005820:Genetic Testing; D005823:Genetics; D005828:Genetics, Population; D006801:Humans; D035842:Research Subjects; D013240:Stereotyping; D020458:Third-Party Consent