Superadditive effects of multiple lesions in a connectionist architecture: implications for the neuropsychology of optic aphasia.
Neuropsychological disorders have traditionally been understood in terms of a focal lesion to a single component of a cognitive architecture. Optic aphasia (OA) defies explanation in this way. In OA, naming of visual stimuli is impaired in the absence of general visual agnosia or anomia. OA has been explained by positing multiple semantic systems or multiple functional pathways to visual naming. M. J. Farah (1990) instead sketched a parsimonious account based on multiple lesions--to pathways mapping visual input to semantic and semantics to naming responses--and the assumption that the effects of the lesions are superadditive. The authors demonstrate superadditive effects of damage in a connectionist architecture and model other phenomena associated with OA. Multiple lesions with superadditivity provide a novel class of explanations for neuropsychological deficits that previously seemed to imply the existence of highly specialized processing components.
Sitton
M
M
Department of Computer Science, Engineering Center OT-741, University of Colorado, Boulder 80309-0430, USA.
Mozer
M C
MC
Farah
M J
MJ
D001037:Aphasia / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology; D001921:Brain / Q000503:physiopathology; D003072:Cognition Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis; D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D016571:Neural Networks, Computer; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012660:Semantics; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D014825:Vocabulary