Reducing normative bias in health technology assessment: interactive evaluation and casuistry.
Health technology assessment (HTA) is often biased in the sense that it neglects relevant perspectives on the technology in question. To incorporate different perspectives in HTA, we should pursue agreement about what are relevant, plausible, and feasible research questions; interactive technology assessment (iTA) might be suitable for this goal. In this way a kind of procedural ethics is established. Currently, ethics too often is focussed on the application of general principles, which leaves a lot of confusion as to what really is the matter in specific cases; in an iTA clashes of values should not be approached by use of such ethics. Instead, casuistry, as a tool used within the framework of iTA, should help to articulate and clarify what is the matter, as to make room for explication and consensus building.
Reuzel
R P
RP
Department of Medical Technology Assessment, University of Nijmegen, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The Netherlands. r.reuzel@mie.kun.nl
van der Wilt
G J
GJ
ten Have
H A
HA
de Vries Robbé
P F
PF
D032764:Casuistry; D002648:Child; D002669:Child Welfare; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D009014:Morals; D009426:Netherlands; D012945:Social Values; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Q000379:methods*