Normative data for normative comparisons.
Normative comparisons are a procedure for evaluating the clinical significance of therapeutic interventions. Although a step-by-step statistical methodology for conducting normative comparisons has been reported elsewhere (P. C. Kendall, A. Marrs-Garcia, S. R. Nath, & R. C. Sheldrick, 1999), questions regarding the collecting of normative data remain. For this study, all treatment outcome studies published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology from 1988 to 1997 were examined and reviewed, and the 5 most commonly used outcome measures were identified. For these outcome measures, multiple sources of normative data were located. Although we identified a dearth of normative data on measures used for treatment outcome, results discussed here nevertheless provide information that may be of use to therapy outcome evaluators when conducting normative comparisons. In addition, equations to determine the minimum sample size needed in a normative sample for a given treatment outcome study are provided.
Kendall
P C
PC
Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA.
Sheldrick
R C
RC
D015986:Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic; D018849:Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000592:standards; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D006801:Humans; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000628:therapy*; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / Q000592:standards*; D012015:Reference Standards; D012016:Reference Values; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards; D016896:Treatment Outcome