Kinematic accuracy of three surface registration methods in a three-dimensional wrist bone study.
The use of registration techniques to determine motion transformations noninvasively has become more widespread with the increased availability of the necessary software. In this study, three surface registration techniques were used to generate carpal bone kinematic results from a single cadaveric wrist specimen. Surface contours were extracted from specimen computed tomography volume images of the forearm, carpal, and metacarpal bones in four arbitrary positions. Kinematic results from each of three registration techniques were compared with results derived from multiple spherical markers fixed to the specimen. Kinematic accuracy was found to depend on the registration method and bone size and shape. In general, rotation errors of the capitate and scaphoid were less than 0.5 deg for all three techniques. Rotation errors for the other bones were generally less than 2 deg, although error for the trapezoid was greater than 2 deg in one technique. Translation errors of the bones were generally less than 1 mm, although errors of the trapezoid and trapezium were greater than 1 mm for two techniques. Tradeoffs existed in each registration method between image processing time and overall kinematic accuracy. Markerless bone registration (MBR) can provide accurate measurements of carpal kinematics and can be used to study the noninvasive, three-dimensional in vivo kinematics of the wrist and other skeletal joints.
Neu
C P
CP
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
McGovern
R D
RD
Crisco
J J
JJ
D000368:Aged; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002348:Carpal Bones / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology*; D005542:Forearm; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008663:Metacarpus / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology*; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014955:Wrist Joint / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology