Managing medical technology: lessons for the United States from Quebec and France.
Important modifications to technology assessment, diffusion, adoption, and utilization must take place if the United States is to better employ medical technology and save resources so as to assure access for the uninsured and underinsured. The United States can learn from other health systems that are more successful in achieving these goals. The author selects for comparison the health systems of France and Quebec. The discussion focuses on the differences between the three systems in the management of medical technology on a range of policy-relevant dimensions, including health system structure, attitudes about planning versus market competition, government regulation, the balance between decentralization and centralization, the needs of the individual and those of the society, linkages between technology assessment and policy-making, and the importance of medical technology assessment for medical practice. Seven specific recommendations are made for better managing medical technology in the United States, drawing on what can be observed from the experiences of Quebec and France.
Rosenau
P V
PV
School of Public Health RAS E-917, University of Texas-Houston 77225, USA.
D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D005602:France; D006077:Government Agencies; D015276:Health Care Rationing; D006285:Health Planning / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D018854:Managed Competition; D011792:Quebec; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Q000458:organization & administration*; D014481:United States