Gene transfer to Clostridium cellulolyticum ATCC 35319.
Although much is known about the bacterial cellulosome and its various protein components, their contributions to bacterial growth on cellulose and the process of cellulolysis in vivo cannot currently be assessed. To remedy this, the authors have developed gene transfer techniques for Clostridium cellulolyticum ATCC 35319. Firstly, transfer of Tn1545 has been obtained using an Enterococcus faecalis donor. Secondly, IncP-mediated conjugative mobilization of plasmids from Escherichia coli donors has also been achieved. The yield of transconjugants in both cases was low and was probably limited by the suboptimal growth conditions that must of necessity be employed for the co-culture of oligotrophic C. cellulolyticum with copiotrophic donors. A restriction endonuclease was detected in crude extracts of C. cellulolyticum. This enzyme, named CCE:I, is an isoschizomer of MSP:I (HPA:II). Electro-transformation was employed to establish plasmids containing the replication functions of pAMss1 (En. faecalis), pIM13 (Bacillus subtilis), pCB102 (Clostridium butyricum), pIP404 (Clostridium perfringens) and pWV01 (Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris) in C. cellulolyticum. Transformants were only obtained if the DNA was appropriately methylated on the external C of the sequence 5'-CCGG-3' using either BSU:FI methylase in vivo or MSP:I methylase in vitro. Plasmids based on the pAMss1 and pIM13 replicons were more stably maintained than one based on the pCB102 replicon. Selection of transformants on solid medium led to low apparent transformation efficiencies (approx. 10(2) transformants per microg DNA) which might, in part, reflect the low plating efficiency of the organism. Selection of transformants in liquid medium led to a higher apparent yield of transformants (between 10(5) and 10(7) transformants per microg DNA). The methods developed here will pave the way for functional analysis of the various cellulosome components in vivo.
Jennert
Katrin C B
KCB
Institute of Biological Sciences, Cledwyn Building, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Penglais SY23 3DD, UK1.
Tardif
Chantal
C
Université de Provence, Marseille, France3.|Laboratoire de Bioénergétique et Ingénierie des Protéines, CNRS, 31 Chemin Joseph Aiguier, 13402 Marseille Cedex 20, France2.
Young
Danielle I
DI
Institute of Biological Sciences, Cledwyn Building, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Penglais SY23 3DD, UK1.
Young
Michael
M
Institute of Biological Sciences, Cledwyn Building, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Penglais SY23 3DD, UK1.
D002482:Cellulose / Q000378:metabolism; D003013:Clostridium / Q000235:genetics* / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism; D003227:Conjugation, Genetic; D019175:DNA Methylation; D004251:DNA Transposable Elements; D004269:DNA, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics; D019003:Deoxyribonuclease HpaII / Q000378:metabolism; D018274:Electroporation / Q000379:methods; D015388:Organelles / Q000201:enzymology / Q000235:genetics; D010957:Plasmids / Q000235:genetics; D014169:Transformation, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics
D004251:DNA Transposable Elements; D004269:DNA, Bacterial; D002482:Cellulose; D019003:Deoxyribonuclease HpaII