Prospective randomised concurrent comparison of the COBE spectra version 4.7, COBE spectra version 6 (Auto PBSCtrade mark), and haemonetics MCS+ cell separators for leucapheresis in patients with haematological and non haematological malignancies.
A prospective study of three cell separators was undertaken to compare the mononuclear cell, CD34+ cell and CFU-GM yield. Twenty patients were entered in the study; all had received chemotherapy and daily G-CSF (5 microg/kg subcutaneously) up to and including the first day of leucapheresis. The first leucapheresis was performed on the first day the peripheral blood absolute CD34+ cell count was > or =20 cells/microl. All patients underwent two leucaphereses on consecutive days. The patients were randomised to undergo either the first or second leucapheresis using the COBE Spectra Version 4.7 and then randomised to either the COBE Spectra Version 6 or Haemonetics MCS+ for the other leucapheresis. The target durations of the procedure on the COBE Spectra Version 4.7 and Version 6 were 180 minutes or 2 total blood volumes (TBV), and for the Haemonetics MCS+ was 20 cycles with four recirculations. All machines were operated on the 1997 software supplied by the respective manufacturers. The time taken for the procedure was significantly longer with both the Haemonetics MCS+ and the COBE Spectra Version 6 than the COBE Spectra Version 4.7. Both COBE Spectra versions processed significantly larger volumes of blood than the Haemonetics MCS+. The absolute yield of mononuclear cells, CFU-GM and CD34+ cells were all significantly lower with the Haemonetics MCS+ compared with both COBE Spectra versions, as were the yields per unit volume of blood processed. The product volume was significantly higher with the COBE Spectra Version 4.7 compared to the other two machines. There was no significant difference in the reduction in the platelet count following leucapheresis with any of the machines. The COBE Spectra Version 6 is particularly useful for patients with potentially poor peripheral venous access because of its increased interface stability.
Morrison
A E
AE
Clinical Apheresis Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland.
Watson
D
D
Buchanan
S
S
Green
R H
RH
D000328:Adult; D018952:Antigens, CD34 / Q000032:analysis; D005260:Female; D006412:Hematopoietic Stem Cells; D006801:Humans; D007937:Leukapheresis / Q000295:instrumentation*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000097:blood*; D011446:Prospective Studies
D018952:Antigens, CD34