title: [Partial replantation following proximal limb injury].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Proximal replantation is a technically feasible but life-threatening procedure. Indications must be restricted to patients in good condition with a good functional prognosis. The goal of replantation must be focused not only on reimplanting the amputated limb but also on achieving a good functional outcome. For the lower limb, simple terminalization remains the best choice in many cases. When a proximal amputation is not suitable for replantation, the main aim of the surgical procedure must be to reconstruct a stump long enough to permit fitting a prosthesis preserving the function of the adjacent joint. If the proximal stump beyond the last joint is very short, it may be possible to restore some length by partial replantation of spared tissues from the amputated part. We present here the results we obtained following this policy.
  
  
  METHODS
  This series included 16 cases of partial replantations, 14 involving the lower limb and 2 the upper limb. All were osteocutaneous microsurgical transfers. For the lower limb, all transfers recovered protective sensitivity following tibial nerve repair. The functional calcaeoplantar unit was used in 13 cases. The transfer of this specialized weight bearing tissue provided a stable distal surface making higher support unnecessary. In one case, we raised a 13-cm vascularized tibial segment covered with foot skin for additional length. For the upper limb, the osteocutaneous transfer, based on the radial artery, was not reinnervated, but this lack of sensitivity did not impair prosthesis fitting.
  
  
  RESULTS
  One vascular failure was finally amputated. This was the only unsuccessful result. For all other patients, the surgical procedure facilitated prosthesis fitting and preserved the proximal joint function despite an initially very proximal amputation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The advantages of partial replantation are obvious compared with simple terminalization or secondary reconstruction. There is no secondary donor site and, because there is no major muscle mass in the distal fragment, the overall risk is very low compared with the risk of total proximal leg replantation.
authors: Clinique La Francilienne, 16, avenue Hôtel-de-Ville, 77340 Pontault-Combault. sosmain@club-internet.fr
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Dubert
authors: S A
authors: SA
authors: Malikov
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Dinh
authors: D D
authors: DD
authors: Kupatadze
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Oberlin
authors: J Y
authors: JY
authors: Alnot
authors: B B
authors: BB
authors: Nabokov
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000673:Amputation, Traumatic / Q000601:surgery*; D001132:Arm / Q000601:surgery*; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007866:Leg / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012092:Replantation / Q000379:methods*; D012189:Retrospective Studies