title: What is the optimal frequency of cycling in automated peritoneal dialysis?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The recent increase in the use of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) has led to concerns about the adequacy of clearances delivered by this modality. Few clinical studies looking at the effects of varying the individual components of the APD prescription on delivered clearance have been done, and most published data are derived from computer modeling. Most controversial is the optimal frequency of exchanges per APD session. Many centers prescribe 4 to 6 cycles per night but it is unclear if this is optimal. The purpose of this study was to address at what point the beneficial effect of more frequent cycles is outweighed by the concomitant increase in the proportion of the total cycling time spent draining and filling.
  
  
  METHODS
  A comparison was made between the urea and creatinine clearances (CCrs) achieved by 4 different APD prescriptions, used for 7 days each, in 18 patients. The prescriptions were for 9 hours each and were all based on 2-L dwell volumes, but differed in the frequency of exchanges. They were 5 x 2 L, 7 x 2 L, and 9 x 2 L, as well as a 50% tidal peritoneal dialysis (TPD) prescription using 14 L. Ultrafiltration, dwell time, glucose absorption, sodium and potassium removal, protein excretion, and relative cost were also compared. Clearances due to day dwells and residual renal function were not included in the calculation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mean urea clearances were 7.5, 8.6, 9.1, and 8.3 L/night for the four prescriptions respectively. Urea clearance with 9 x 2 L was significantly greater than with the other three prescriptions (p < 0 0.05). Urea clearance with 7 x 2 L and TPD were superior to 5 x 2 L (p < 0.05). Mean CCr was 5.1, 6.1, 6.4, and 5.6 L/night, respectively. Compared to 5 x 2-L, the 7 x 2-L, 9 x 2-L, and TPD prescriptions achieved greater CCr (p < 0.05). Taking both urea and CCr into account, 9 x 2 L was the optimal prescription in 12 of the 18 patients. Ultrafiltration and sodium and potassium removals were all significantly greater with the higher frequency prescriptions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The 5 x 2-L prescription significantly underutilizes the potential of APD to deliver high clearances, and 7 x 2 L is a consistently superior prescription if 2-L dwells are being used. Although more costly, 9 x 2 L should be considered if higher clearances are required.
authors: Optimal Dialysis Research Unit, London Health Sciences Centre and University of Western Ontario, Canada. peter.blake@lhsc.on.ca
authors: R A
authors: RA
authors: Perez
authors: P G
authors: PG
authors: Blake
authors: S
authors: S
authors: McMurray
authors: L
authors: L
authors: Mupas
authors: D G
authors: DG
authors: Oreopoulos
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001331:Automation; D003404:Creatinine / Q000652:urine*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007677:Kidney Function Tests; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010530:Peritoneal Dialysis / Q000379:methods*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011336:Probability; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014508:Urea / Q000652:urine*
chemical_list: D014508:Urea; D003404:Creatinine