title: Predictive performance study of two digoxin assays in subjects with various degrees of renal function.
abstract: This prospective study was conducted to compare the predictive performance of fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA, Abbott TDx Digoxin II) and radioimmunoassay (RIA, Kallestad Labs) with combined low-pressure liquid chromatography/RIA (LPLC/RIA) digoxin assay in measuring 15-17 serum digoxin concentrations (SDC) obtained after a single 10 microg/kg intravenous digoxin dose in patients with various degrees of renal function and at different SDC ranges. Eighteen men and women were stratified into 3 age- and gender-matched groups based upon renal function [N = 6 in each, group I (Cl(cr) < 10 mL/min), group II (Cl(cr) = 10-50 mL/min), and group III (Cl(cr) > 50 mL/min)]. Serum digoxin concentrations were measured at time zero; at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours; and at 2, 3, 4, and 5-7 days after the digoxin dose, using the three different digoxin assays. TDx Digoxin II was unbiased [mean error -0.09 (95% CI -0.19, 0.01)] and RIA biased [mean error -0.29 (95% CI -0.36, -0.21)] to over-predict SDC by 14.2%. In group I patients, the analysis revealed a bias to over-predict SDC by 6.0% for TDx Digoxin II [mean error -0.16 (95% CI -0.29, -0.07)] and an unbiased performance by RIA. In groups II and III, both TDx Digoxin II and RIA showed biased performance, the mean magnitude of bias was low (< 20%). For intermediate SDC range (> 0.5 ng/mL and < or = 3.0 ng/mL), TDx Digoxin II was unbiased in predicting SDC, whereas RIA was biased to under-predict SDC [mean error 0.13 (95% CI 0.10, 0.16)] by 9.9%. The magnitude of bias observed in all cases was less than 20%. Both assays, TDx Digoxin II and RIA, imprecisely measured SDC for all samples combined, different groups and SDC ranges. In all time-paired samples, TDx Digoxin II (FPIA) performed better than the RIA. In conclusion, the magnitude of bias observed with either assay at different groups and SDC ranges was not likely to be clinically relevant. Therefore, either assay may be used to measure SDC in clinical practice.
authors: Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacy Administration, Philadelphia College of Pharmacy, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, PA, USA.
authors: S A
authors: SA
authors: Spinler
authors: A S
authors: AS
authors: Al-Jazairi
authors: J W
authors: JW
authors: Cheng
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Kapoor
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Kobrin
authors: L
authors: L
authors: Shaw
mesh_terms: D000889:Anti-Arrhythmia Agents / Q000097:blood*; D002853:Chromatography, Liquid / Q000379:methods; D004077:Digoxin / Q000097:blood*; D016903:Drug Monitoring / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D016231:Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay; D006801:Humans; D007668:Kidney / Q000502:physiology* / Q000503:physiopathology; D007676:Kidney Failure, Chronic / Q000097:blood* / Q000503:physiopathology; D008297:Male; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011863:Radioimmunoassay; D011933:Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
chemical_list: D000889:Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; D011933:Reagent Kits, Diagnostic; D004077:Digoxin