Ambiguity in the perception of moving stimuli is resolved in favour of the cardinal axes.
The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a link between the statistical properties of natural scenes and our perception of moving surfaces. Accordingly, we devised an ambiguous moving stimulus that could be perceived as moving in one of three directions of motion. The stimulus was a circular patch containing three square-wave drifting gratings. One grating was always either horizontal or vertical; the other two had component directions of drift at 120 degrees to the first (and to each other), producing four possible stimulus geometries. These were presented in a pseudorandom sequence. In brief presentations, subjects always perceived two of the gratings to cohere and move as a pattern in one direction, and the third grating to move independently in the opposite direction (its component direction). Although there were three equally plausible axes (one cardinal and two oblique) along which the coherent and independent motions could occur, subjects routinely saw motion along one of the cardinal axes. Thus, the visual system preferentially combines the two oblique gratings to form a pattern that drifts in the opposite direction to the cardinal grating. It was only when the contrast of one of the oblique gratings was changed that an oblique axis of motion was perceived. This perceptual anisotropy can be related to naturally occurring bias in the visual environment, notably the predominance of horizontal and vertical contours in our visual world.
Andrews
T J
TJ
University Laboratory of Physiology, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK. tim.andrews@physiol.ox.ac.uk
Schluppeck
D
D
D016880:Anisotropy; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*