title: Labeling partner violence: when do victims differentiate among acts?
abstract: Domestic violence professionals have debated whether all physical assaults by partners should be labeled abuse. This study examined the use of labels such as "abuse," "victim," and "battered woman" in a sample of women (n = 78) who had sustained at least one physical assault in their current or most recent relationship. Self-labeling followed a differentiating strategy, that is, women experiencing more frequent and more severe assaults were more likely to apply labels. Lower partner income, being Black, lower relationship commitment, and having ended the relationship also were associated with increased self-labeling. Labeling of hypothetical acts followed an inclusive strategy, that is, all assaults were considered abusive. These results suggest that contextual factors influence labeling. Prevention and intervention programs may be able to increase their effectiveness by including more situational context in their messages.
authors: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
authors: S L
authors: SL
authors: Hamby
authors: B
authors: B
authors: Gray-Little
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001741:Black or African American; D018585:Battered Women; D019548:Crime Victims; D004493:Education; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007182:Income; D017533:Marital Status; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D013179:Spouse Abuse / Q000517:prevention & control; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D044465:White People