title: ["Deficiencies in the mandatory health insurance system"--possibilities and limits of medical expert assessment].
abstract: In Germany, the Federal Committee of Physicians and Health Insurance Agencies is responsible for assessing which medical procedures are covered by the insurance agencies (therapeutic/economic value). The failure to evaluate certain medical procedures which promise therapeutic benefit may be considered a failure in the system of statutory health insurance as decreed by the German Federal Social Court. In cases of system failure the assessment of medical procedures is taken over by social courts. Evidence of therapeutic value will continue to be the decisive criterion of evaluation. In special cases, however, it may be replaced by the particular procedure's rate of incidence in everyday medical practice, as reflected by a widespread resonance in medical discussion and its use by a considerable number of physicians. Medical experts may face various difficulties in handling these alternative criteria. They usually lack reliable data on the frequency of the procedure, i.e. its distribution. Even if such data and data on secondary factors--such as disease incidence etc.--were available to them, they would still not be able to come up with a definite conclusion on the degree (widespread, considerable) of dissemination, as defined by the German Federal Social Court. Nevertheless, on request of statutory health insurances, social medical experts may investigate facts in order to establish basic knowledge for later decisions that are to be done by others. Factual investigation includes clarification of etiology, incidence, importance and natural history of the particular disease processes. Potential deficiencies in the medical services rendered for specific diseases as well as the characteristics of the procedure under scrutiny, and special requirements for evaluating the outcome have to be investigated as well. Additional attention needs to be paid to the quality of related publications (analysis of statistical data), possible recommendations for therapy (e.g. guidelines and their scientific basis), as well as to economic aspects. The result of such an investigation has to be stated without use of court criteria (widespread/considerable).
authors: Medizinischer Dienst der Krankenversicherung Baden-Württemberg.
authors: E D
authors: ED
authors: Mayer
authors: K
authors: K
authors: Boukamp
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Zink
authors: E
authors: E
authors: Simoes
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Schwoerer
mesh_terms: D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005858:Germany; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D019458:Insurance Coverage / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence