title: Substantive thoughts about substantive thoughts: a reply to Galin.
abstract: In his commentary, David Galin raises several important issues that deserve to be addressed. In this response, I do three things. First, I briefly discuss the relation between the present work and the metaphoric theories of thought developed by cognitive lin- guists such as Lakoff and Johnson (1998). Second, I address some of the confusions that seem to have arisen about my use of the terms "substantive thought" and "nucleus." Third, I briefly discuss some of the directions that Galin suggests for further research.
authors.affiliation: Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Rd., Cambridge, CB2 2EF, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Epstein
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition; D003243:Consciousness; D006801:Humans; D008037:Linguistics; D019365:Metaphor; D008960:Models, Psychological; D012660:Semantics