Induction paclitaxel in previously untreated, resectable, advanced squamous cell carcinomas of head and neck.
BACKGROUND
Previous Phase II trials evaluating paclitaxel as a single agent have produced objective response rates of 38-40%. However, in these studies patients had recurrent disease and had received previous treatment with chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, or some combination of the same. To the authors' knowledge, the study reported here is the first to examine the role of paclitaxel in affecting objective antitumor response, as a single agent, in a previously untreated patient population.


METHODS
Patients with untreated, resectable, advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were eligible for this Phase II trial. The treatment plan included paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2) administered by 24-hour intravenous infusion every 21 days for a total of 3 courses and primary prophylaxis with colony stimulating factor during each course of chemotherapy. Surgical resection was performed after recovery from the final course of chemotherapy. After adequate wound healing, patients received external beam radiotherapy (median dose to primary site, 55.8 Gray [Gy]; median dose to neck sites, 50.4 Gy).


RESULTS
Forty-five patients were registered. Thirty-eight patients completed the planned chemotherapy, 41 patients underwent surgical resection, and 37 patients completed the intended radiotherapy. The objective response rate was 50% (10% complete response; 40% partial response). Severe or life-threatening (Grade 3 or higher) granulocytopenia or thrombocytopenia occurred in 78% and 27% of patients, respectively. Two patients died of sepsis. Seventy-one percent, 67%, and 91% of patients were free of local, lymph node, and distant recurrence, respectively, with a median follow-up of 37 months. The 4-year overall survival and disease-related survival rates were 44.4% and 52.9%, respectively.


CONCLUSIONS
The authors conclude that paclitaxel is an active agent in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma. However, the overall disease control, achieved by using paclitaxel as induction therapy, did not appear to be better than that achieved with standard treatment methods. Combined modality regimens with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy have demonstrated more promise.
Grecula
J C
JC
Division of Radiation Oncology, and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University/James Cancer Hospital/Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA. grecula.2@osu.edu
Smith
R E
RE
Rhoades
C A
CA
Sharma
P
P
Agrawal
A
A
Zhang
H
H
Allen
J
J
Goldman
F P
FP
Young
D
D
Schuller
D E
DE
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000380:Agranulocytosis / Q000139:chemically induced; D000972:Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D002294:Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000532:radiotherapy / Q000601:surgery; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D006258:Head and Neck Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000532:radiotherapy / Q000601:surgery; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017239:Paclitaxel / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D016019:Survival Analysis; D013921:Thrombocytopenia / Q000139:chemically induced; D016896:Treatment Outcome
D000972:Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; D017239:Paclitaxel