Use of pattern standard deviation instead of corrected pattern standard deviation in Anderson's criteria.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether the use of pattern standard deviation instead of corrected pattern standard deviation, as part of Anderson's criteria, makes a difference in categorizing a single field printout using the full threshold strategy on the Humphrey's Field Analyzer.


METHODS
Forty-eight patients with glaucomatous field defects of varying severity underwent full threshold perimetry on the Humphrey's Field Analyzer. The third field of one eye was used for the study. The agreement between CPSD and PSD alone was determined. Each field was then categorized using Anderson's criteria first using CPSD and then PSD. The kappa statistic was used to determine agreement in both situations.


RESULTS
The agreement between CPSD and PSD alone, as determined by kappa, was 0.77. The kappa statistic for categorization using Anderson's criteria was 0.82; the weighted kappa was 0.92.


CONCLUSIONS
There was almost perfect agreement using the PSD instead of CPSD as part of Anderson's criteria. This substitution seems valid for the spectrum of field defects used in this series, at least for the full threshold programs.
Thomas
R
R
Department of Ophthalmology, Chirstian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Paul
P
P
Muliyil
J
J
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000465:Algorithms; D005901:Glaucoma / Q000175:diagnosis*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D014786:Vision Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis*; D058609:Visual Field Tests / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D014794:Visual Fields