Can three-dimensional helical CT cholangiography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy be a substitute study for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography?
The study investigated the usefulness of three-dimensional helical computed tomography (3D-CT) before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LSC) when compared with that of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). Forty-five patients referred for LSC, who had undergone 3D-CT cholangiography and ERC simultaneously, participated in the study. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and 3D-CT cholangiography were compared in each patient with regard to opacification of the biliary tree, stones, and anatomic variations. Three-dimensional helical CT cholangiography and ERC imaging for predicting operative difficulties in LSC also were compared. The common bile duct and cystic duct were shown in the patients by the images, but the gallbladder was shown in 43 patients (96%) with use of 3D-CT cholangiography and in 36 patients (80%) with use of ERC. A third or more peripheral branches were shown completely with use of 3D-CT cholangiography in 33 patients (73%) and in 32 patients (71%) with use of ERC. Cystic duct stones were found in two of three patients with use of 3D-CT cholangiography and ERC. Common bile duct stones in five of seven patients were detected with use of 3D-CT cholangiography, but all of the common bile duct stones were detected with use of ERC. Anatomic variations of the bile duct were shown in three of four patients by 3D-CT cholangiography and in all patients with use of ERC. No significant differences in findings of the angle of bifurcation and presence of Heister valves between operative easy and complex cases were shown by 3D-CT cholangiography and ERC, despite the more accurate assessment of the cystic duct anatomy with use of 3D-CT cholangiography than with use of ERC. Three-dimensional helical CT cholangiography is useful clinically in preoperative assessment of biliary anatomy, but it is not reliable in the detection of common bile duct stones, and it is not helpful in predicting technical difficulty during LSC.
Ishikawa
M
M
Department of Surgery, National Kochi Hospital, Japan. masashi@kochi.hosp.go.jp
Tagami
Y
Y
Toyota
T
T
Nishioka
M
M
Hanaki
N
N
Sasaki
K
K
Yagi
Y
Y
Kashiwagi
Y
Y
Miki
H
H
Uemura
N
N
Inoue
S
S
Komatsu
Y
Y
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000465:Algorithms; D002758:Cholangiography / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D002760:Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde / Q000592:standards*; D017081:Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; D002769:Cholelithiasis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000601:surgery; D002985:Clinical Protocols; D003663:Decision Trees; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011300:Preoperative Care / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*