title: Why don't patients do their exercises? Understanding non-compliance with physiotherapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To understand reasons for compliance and non-compliance with a home based exercise regimen by patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
  
  
  METHODS
  A qualitative study, nested within a randomised controlled trial, examining the effectiveness of physiotherapy in reducing pain and increasing mobility in knee osteoarthritis. In the intervention arm, participants undertook a series of simple exercises and repositioning of the kneecap using tape. In depth interviews were conducted with a subset of participants in the intervention arm using open ended questions, guided by a topic schedule, to encourage patients to describe their experiences and reflect on why they did or did not comply with the physiotherapy. Interviews were audiotaped, fully transcribed and analysed thematically according to the method of constant comparison. A model explaining factors influencing compliance was developed.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients were interviewed at home. The study was nested within a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty participants in the intervention arm of the randomised trial were interviewed three months after they had completed the physiotherapy programme. Eight were interviewed again one year later.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Initial compliance was high because of loyalty to the physiotherapist. Reasoning underpinning continued compliance was more complex, involving willingness and ability to accommodate exercises within everyday life, the perceived severity of symptoms, attitudes towards arthritis and comorbidity and previous experiences of osteoarthritis. A necessary precondition for continued compliance was the perception that the physiotherapy was effective in ameliorating unpleasant symptoms.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Non-compliance with physiotherapy, as with drug therapies, is common. From the patient's perspective, decisions about whether or not to comply are rational but often cannot be predicted by therapists or researchers. Ultimately, this study suggests that health professionals need to understand reasons for non-compliance if they are to provide supportive care and trialists should include qualitative research within trials whenever levels of compliance may have an impact on the effectiveness of the intervention.
authors.affiliation: Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 4SH, UK. rona.campbell@bris.ac.uk
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Campbell
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Evans
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Tucker
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Quilty
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Dieppe
authors.forename: J L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Donovan
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001294:Attitude to Health; D005081:Exercise Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020370:Osteoarthritis, Knee / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D010465:Perception; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D016312:Treatment Refusal / Q000523:psychology*