title: Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Involving patients in healthcare decisions makes a potentially significant and enduring difference to healthcare outcomes. One difficulty (among many) is that the 'involvement' of patients in decisions has been left undefined. It is usually conceptualised as 'patient centredness', which is a broad and variably interpreted concept that is difficult to assess using current tools. This paper attempts to gauge general practitioners' (GPs') attitudes to patient involvement in decision making and their views about the contextual factors, competences, and stages required to achieve shared decisions within consultations.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To explore and understand what constitutes the appropriate involvement of patients in decision making within consultations, to consider previous theory in this field, and to propose a set of competences (skills) and steps that would enable clinical practitioners (generalists) to undertake 'shared decision making' in their clinical environment.
  
  
  METHODS
  Qualitative study using focus group interviews of key informants.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Experienced GPs with educational roles have positive attitudes to the involvement of patients in decisions, provided the process matches the role individuals wish to play. They perceive some clinical problems as being more suited to a cooperative approach to decision making and conceptualised the existence of professional equipoise towards the existence of legitimate treatment options as an important facilitative factor. A sequence of skills was proposed as follows: 1) implicit or explicit involvement of patients in the decision-making process; 2) explore ideas, fears, and expectations of the problem and possible treatments; 3) portrayal of equipoise and options; 4) identify preferred data format and provide tailor-made information; 5) checking process: understanding of information and reactions (e.g. ideas, fears, and expectations of possible options); 6) acceptance of process and decision making role preference; 7) make, discuss or defer decisions; 8) arrange follow-up.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These clinicians viewed involvement as an implicit ethos that should permeate medical practice, provided that clinicians respect and remain alert to patients' individual preferred roles in decision making. The interpersonal skills and the information requirements needed to successfully share decisions are major challenges to the clinical consultation process in medical practice. The benefits of patient involvement and the skills required to achieve this approach need to be given much higher priority at all levels: at policy, education, and within further professional development strategies.
authors.affiliation: Department of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, USA. elwyng@cf.ac.uk
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Elwyn
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Edwards
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Kinnersley
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Grol
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003657:Decision Making; D004501:Education, Medical / Q000379:methods; D005194:Family Practice; D006801:Humans; D010358:Patient Participation / Q000523:psychology*; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic