Conversion disorder and multiple chemical sensitivity: a comparative study of psychological defense strategies.
This study compared psychological defensive strategies in two groups of patients with multiple chemical sensitivity (n = 10) and conversion disorder (n = 10) by means of the projective perceptual Defense Mechanism Test. We attempted to create a model for personality assessment based on the test data of prior patients, in which new patients could successively be tested. The overall results indicated that it was possible to separate the clinical groups significantly from a control group and from each other. In comparison to the controls, the clinical groups were characterized by patterns that were more nonemotionally adapted as well by a lateness of perception, but the ways in which the clinical groups maintained this difference were not the same. The multiple chemical sensitivity group was characterized above all by blocking maneuvers, while the main defensive strategy of the conversion disorder group was distortion of content.
Henningsson
M
M
Department of Applied Psychology, Umeå University, Sweden. mikael.henningsson@apsy.umu.se
Sundbom
E
E
D000328:Adult; D003291:Conversion Disorder / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology*; D003674:Defense Mechanisms; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D018777:Multiple Chemical Sensitivity / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology*; D010552:Personality Assessment / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011386:Projective Techniques / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011594:Psychometrics; D012016:Reference Values; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity