Rehabilitation: strategic, proactive, flexible, risky?
Rehabilitation after armed conflict is a direct intellectual descendant of thinking about rehabilitation after natural calamity. It is related, generally, to poverty reduction and, operationally, to associated action at the micro level. This history has limited its strategic conceptualisation and, in particular, its links with reconciliation and state re-legitimation and also with macro-economic stabilisation and renewed growth. In post-war--or more generally, a lull in conflict with the potential to become permanent--a country's rapid, focused, prioritised action within a strategic framework is urgent. It is not risk-free for political and natural disasters as well as for those with economic and social bases. Flexibility, learning from initial experience and asking intended household beneficiaries about their needs in advance can reduce risk as can pre-positioning of contingency or standby resources to avert post-war calamities (for example, drought, flood) and catastrophes (renewed violence) from delaying and discrediting rehabilitation efforts.
Green
R H
RH
Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex. l.a.bateman@ids.ac.uk
D000351:Africa, Eastern; D004467:Economics; D006801:Humans; D007391:International Cooperation; D009073:Mozambique; D011050:Policy Making; D012066:Relief Work / Q000458:organization & administration*; D012922:Social Change; D014857:Warfare