title: The relationship between tail biting in pigs, docking procedure and other management practices.
abstract: The tail length (docked, tipped or undocked) and tail status (bitten or unbitten) of 27,870 pigs from 450 units was recorded at six UK abattoirs. A farm survey of the final finishing stage was used to investigate the relationship between management practice and tail biting. This showed that docking was the most important factor influencing the probability of being not bitten, with 2.4% of docked and 8.5% of long-tailed pigs being tail-bitten. The following factors reduced the probability of long-tailed pigs being tail-bitten; light straw provision, use of natural ventilation or artificially controlled natural ventilation (ACNV), mixed sex grouping, meal or liquid feeding, and use of double or multi-space feeders. Docked and long-tailed pigs provided with light straw and natural ventilation/ACNV had levels of tail biting of 1.2% and 4.3% respectively; 3.9% of docked pigs with artificial ventilation and no straw were tail-bitten. Long-tailed pigs fed via double or multi-space feeders also had 3.9% of tails bitten.
authors.affiliation: Cambac JMA Research, Manor Farm, Draycot Cerne, Wiltshire, UK. lemanoir@aol.com
authors.forename: E J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Hunter
authors.forename: T A
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.forename: H J
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Guise
authors.forename: R H
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Penny
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hoste
mesh_terms: D000822:Animal Husbandry / Q000379:methods; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D001733:Bites and Stings / Q000662:veterinary*; D004739:England / Q000453:epidemiology; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013552:Swine / Q000293:injuries*; D013623:Tail / Q000293:injuries* / Q000601:surgery*