Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings.
BACKGROUND
Several authors reported incorrect high intraocular pressure (IOP) values in eyes with a thick cornea using applanation tonometry. This hypothesis was checked by comparing applanation tonometry with direct intracameral manometry.


METHODS
73 patients, scheduled for intraocular surgery, were enrolled. Immediately before surgery, the following were registered: (i) central corneal thickness (CCT), (ii) applanatory IOP (Perkins/Tonopen), and (iii) intracameral IOP.


RESULTS
The difference between applanatory and intraocular measurements was completely independent of CCT (y= -3.43 + 3.8x; where y is the difference between applanatory and intracamerally measured IOP (mm Hg) and x is CCT (mm); r(2) = 0.002; p = 0.72).


CONCLUSIONS
There is no systematic error of applanation tonometry with increasing CCT. Therefore it is inadequate to recalculate IOP based on regression formula of applanatory IOP versus CCT.
Feltgen
N
N
Department of Ophthalmology, Albert-Ludwigs- University Freiburg, Germany. feltgen@aug.ukl.uni-freiburg.de
Leifert
D
D
Funk
J
J
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003315:Cornea / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D003951:Diagnostic Errors; D006801:Humans; D007429:Intraocular Pressure; D008875:Middle Aged; D009798:Ocular Hypertension / Q000175:diagnosis; D013508:Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures; D011446:Prospective Studies; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014065:Tonometry, Ocular / Q000379:methods*; D014160:Transducers, Pressure