Beyond dissociation logic: evidence for controlled and automatic influences in artificial grammar learning.
Evidence for unconscious learning has typically been based on dissociations between direct and indirect tests of learning. Because of some inherent problems with dissociation logic, we applied the logic of opposition to 2 artificial grammar learning experiments. In Experiment 1, participants were exposed to 2 different sets of letter strings, generated from 2 different grammars, and later rated test strings for grammaticality with either in-concert (rate grammatical strings consistent with either structure) or opposition (rate grammatical only strings from 1 of the structures) instructions. Manipulating response deadline affected controlled, but not automatic influences. In Experiment 2, after similar training, a source-monitoring test was administered from which the in-concert and opposition conditions were derived. The test indicated that varying the retention interval affected controlled, but not automatic, influences. The results are discussed in terms of awareness, knowledge representation, and metacognitive processing.
Higham
P A
PA
Department of Psychology, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada. higham@soton.ac.uk
Vokey
J R
JR
Pritchard
J L
JL
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003071:Cognition; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008037:Linguistics; D008128:Logic; D008297:Male; D008606:Mental Processes; D014473:Unconscious, Psychology