Concave versus posterior-stabilized tibial joint surface in total knee arthroplasty: randomized evaluation of 47 knees.
Forty-seven knees in 43 patients with severe deformities randomly received AMK total knee arthroplasty with concave (C, n = 25) or posterior-stabilized (PS, n = 22) polyethylene insert and with resection of the posterior cruciate ligament. Radiostereometric examinations were done postoperatively and after 3, 12, and 24 months. Two patients (1 C, 1 PS) underwent revision surgery. At the 2-year follow-up, the median absolute rotations of the tibial inserts ranged from 0.13 degrees to 0.26 degrees (C vs PS; P =.1-.7). The maximum total point motion was almost identical in the 2 groups (C, 0.38; PS, 0.39; P =.9). Maximum subsidence, lift-off, and Hospital for Special Surgery scores did not differ (P =.1-.6). Recipients of 20 of 24 knees with concave design and 14 of 19 knees with posterior-stabilized design reported that their knee could be regarded as normal or almost normal. Variations of the configuration of the polyethylene insert did not alter the outcome in the short term.
Uvehammer
J
J
Department of Orthopaedics, Göteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden.
Kärrholm
J
J
Regnér
L
L
Carlsson
L
L
Herberts
P
P
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D016916:Joint Deformities, Acquired / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery*; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020370:Osteoarthritis, Knee / Q000150:complications / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010780:Photogrammetry; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D011859:Radiography; D012086:Reoperation; D013977:Tibia