Comparison of the TEMPO+ ear-level speech processor and the cis pro+ body-worn processor in adult MED-EL cochlear implant users.
A study was conducted to compare the new MED-EL TEMPO+ ear-level speech processor with the CIS PRO+ body-worn processor in the COMBI 40/COMBI 40+ implant system. Speech tests were performed in 46 experienced subjects in two test sessions approximately 4 weeks apart. Subjects were switched over from the CIS PRO+ to the TEMPO+ in the first session and used only the TEMPO+ in the time between the two sessions. Speech tests included monosyllabic word tests and sentence tests via the telephone. An adaptive noise method was used to adjust each subject's scores to approximately 50%. Additionally, subjects had to complete a questionnaire based on their 4 weeks of experience with the TEMPO+. The speech test results showed a statistically significant improvement in the monosyllabic word scores with the TEMPO+. In addition, in the second session, subjects showed a significant improvement when using the telephone with the TEMPO+, indicating some learning in this task. In the questionnaire, the vast majority of subjects found that the TEMPO+ allows equal or better speech understanding and rated the sound quality of the TEMPO+ higher. All these objective and subjective results indicate the superiority of the TEMPO+ and are mainly attributed to a new coding strategy called CIS+ and its implementation in the TEMPO+. In other words, based on the results of this study, it appears that after switching over from the CIS PRO+ to the TEMPO+, subjects are able to maintain or even improve their own speech understanding capability.
Helms
J
J
Department of Otorhinolaryngology of the Universities of Würzburg, Germany.
Müller
J
J
Schön
F
F
Winkler
F
F
Moser
L
L
Shehata-Dieler
W
W
Kastenbauer
E
E
Baumann
U
U
Rasp
G
G
Schorn
K
K
Ebetaer
B
B
Baumgartner
W
W
Hamzavi
S
S
Gstöttner
W
W
Westhofen
M
M
Döring
W
W
Dujardin
H
H
Albegger
K
K
Mair
A
A
Zenner
H
H
Haferkamp
C
C
Schmitz-Salue
C
C
Arold
R
R
Sesterhenn
G
G
Jahnke
V
V
Wagner
H
H
Gräbel
S
S
Bockmühl
U
U
Häusler
R
R
Vischer
M
M
Kompis
M
M
Hildmann
H
H
Radü
H
H
Stark
T
T
Engel
A
A
Hildmann
A
A
Streitberger
C
C
Hüttenbrink
K
K
Müller-Aschoff
E
E
Hofmann
G
G
Seeling
K
K
Hloucal
U
U
von Ilberg
C
C
Kiefer
J
J
Pfennigdorff
T
T
Gall
V
V
Breitfuss
A
A
Stelzig
Y
Y
Begall
K
K
Hey
M
M
Vorwerk
W
W
Thumfart
W
W
Gunkel
A
A
Zorowka
P
P
Stephan
K
K
Gammert
C
C
Mathis
A
A
DeMin
N
N
Freigang
B
B
Ziese
M
M
Stützel
A
A
von Specht
H
H
Arnold
W
W
Brockmeier
S
S
Ebenhoch
H
H
Steinhoff
A
A
Zierhofer
C
C
Zwicknagl
M
M
Stöbich
B
B
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003054:Cochlear Implants / Q000592:standards; D003638:Deafness / Q000209:etiology / Q000628:therapy*; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011594:Psychometrics; D013063:Speech Discrimination Tests; D013067:Speech Perception; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires