Valve Resistance in Mitral Stenosis: Its Determinants and its Role in the Evaluation of the Disease.
To evaluate the value and the determinants of valve resistance in mitral stenosis, 95 patients with pure mitral stenosis were examined by Doppler echocardiography during their clinical follow-up, measuring cavity dimensions, left ventricular function, mitral area (by planimetry and pressure half time), mean transmitral pressure gradient, aortic flow, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure. The mitral resistance was calculated as mean transmitral pressure gradient/aortic flow ratio. To graduate the severity of the morphological abnormalities in valvular structure, we used a point score system with evaluation of leaflet and subvalvular thickness, calcification, and valvular mobility. The functional class was determined according to NYHA classification. In this study, both mitral area (r = -0.79, P < 0.001 and r(p) = -0.60, P < 0.001) and mitral score (r = 0.68, P < 0.001 and r(p) = 0.25, P = 0.013) were independent determinants of mitral resistance. In multivariate analysis, mitral resistance and female gender were selected by multiple linear regression analysis as determinants of pulmonary artery systolic pressure, and mitral area and pulmonary artery systolic pressure were selected by logistic linear regression analysis as determinants of NYHA functional class. In patients with moderate or severe mitral stenosis, the estimated probability for III and IV NYHA functional class considering mitral area 1 cm(2) or below went from 51.1-86.4% when mitral resistance below or above 130 dynes.sec.cm(-5), respectively, was considered together. Thus, mitral valve resistance should be used as a complement to the mitral area method in assessment of mitral stenosis, adding the effects of the reduction in mitral area and the damage in mitral valve apparatus.
Henrique Weitzel
Luís
L
Cardiolab-Copacabana, Rua Siqueira Campos 43/632, CEP 22031/070, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lima De Marca Weitzel
Evanice
E
Neval Moll Filho
Jorge
J