Measuring adverse selection in managed health care.
Health plans paid by capitation have an incentive to distort the quality of services they offer to attract profitable and to deter unprofitable enrollees. We characterize plans' rationing as a "shadow price" on access to various areas of care and show how the profit maximizing shadow price depends on the dispersion in health costs, individuals' forecasts of their health costs, the correlation between use in different illness categories, and the risk adjustment system used for payment. These factors are combined in an empirically implementable index that can be used to identify the services that will be most distorted by selection incentives.
Frank
R G
RG
Harvard University, Harvard Medical School, Department of Health Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115, USA. frank@hcp.med.harvard.edu
Glazer
J
J
McGuire
T G
TG
D002204:Capitation Fee; D015276:Health Care Rationing; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D007182:Income; D015273:Insurance Selection Bias; D008329:Managed Care Programs / Q000191:economics* / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008484:Medicaid; D017059:Models, Econometric; D009937:Organizational Objectives; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D020379:Risk Adjustment; D014481:United States