title: Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants using a resorbable membrane vs a PTFE membrane.
abstract: The aim of the present experimental pilot study was to assess bone regeneration underneath resorbable barrier membranes vs non-resorbable extended polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membranes in peri-implant defects. Two implants were inserted into surgically created defects on each side of the mandibles of 6 adult beagle dogs 3 months after extraction of all premolar teeth. One implant on each side was covered with a porous polylactic acid membrane or a ePTFE membrane, respectively, while the second implant served as control. Fluorochrome labelling was administered during the 1st, 5th, 12th and the 18th week. Three animals each were evaluated after 3 and 6 months. Bone regeneration was assessed by measuring the distance from the first fluorochrome label to the level of the regenerated bone immediately adjacent to the implant surface and to the top of the newly formed alveolar contour both on the lingual and buccal side. The increase in bone height was significantly higher compared to the controls under both barrier membranes after 3 months at the top of the alveolar crest but not immediately adjacent to the implant surface. After 6 months, bone height was significantly increased only at the top of the alveolar contour underneath the ePTFE membranes, while bone underneath the polylactic acid membranes showed signs of superficial resorption. It is concluded that guided bone regeneration underneath barrier membranes can restore alveolar bone contour but is not necessarily associated with a higher bone/implant contact. The use of resorbable membranes may be associated with untoward biological effects at later stages, when membrane degradation starts due to degradation products of the polymer material or decreasing membrane stability. Future efforts have to refine the relation between degradation kinetics, membrane porosity and mechanical properties of degradable barrier membranes to improve membrane performance.
authors.affiliation: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Schliephake
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Dard
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Planck
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Hierlemann
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Jakob
mesh_terms: D020341:Absorbable Implants; D000818:Animals; D001861:Bone Regeneration; D003758:Dental Implantation, Endosseous; D015921:Dental Implants; D004285:Dogs; D005260:Female; D016557:Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal / Q000379:methods*; D019344:Lactic Acid; D008334:Mandible; D008567:Membranes, Artificial; D008856:Microscopy, Fluorescence; D016348:Osseointegration; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011091:Polyesters; D011108:Polymers; D011138:Polytetrafluoroethylene; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric
chemical_list: D015921:Dental Implants; D008567:Membranes, Artificial; D011091:Polyesters; D011108:Polymers; D019344:Lactic Acid; C033616:poly(lactide); D011138:Polytetrafluoroethylene