Intraoral wound closure with tissue-engineered mucosa: new perspectives for urethra reconstruction with buccal mucosa grafts.
In urethra reconstruction, the creation of a new urethra from a free oral mucosa graft is an established surgical technique. The oral mucosa is removed at the same time that the urethra reconstruction procedure is performed. Depending on the size of graft required, the intraoral wound is closed primarily or left to heal secondarily. The latter method limits this technique by leading to scars or strictures, which have a negative impact on the condition of the intraoral soft tissue. Therefore, in this study, a pilot study involving 12 patients, tissue-engineered mucosa was tested for covering intraoral defects to avoid the drawbacks mentioned above. For mucosa tissue-graft engineering, a biopsy sample 2 to 4 mm in diameter was removed from the hard palate approximately 4 weeks before the urethra reconstruction procedure was to be performed. In addition, 30 ml of autogenous serum was extracted from a venous whole-blood sample. The primary cultures were incubated in Dulbecco modified Eagle's medium and nutrient factor F 12 (Gibco Co., Eggenstein, Germany), containing the usual additives and autogenous serum. After a period of 3 weeks, subcultivation was performed to engineer mucosa transplants consisting of several layers of keratinocytes on a support foil. After thorough intraoperative blood coagulation had occurred, the cultured mucosa graft on the carrier foil was applied on the wound surface and fixed by single sutures. Additionally, the cultured mucosa graft was covered for 8 to 10 days by an intraoral dressing, which was also fixed onto the wound surface by single suture loops. It is possible to perform primary intraoral wound closure with tissue-engineered mucosa to cover defect sizes as large as 11.0 x 4.0 cm. This new method provides a better prospect for both urethra reconstruction and the reconstruction of intraoral tissue defects. The number and size of intraoral scars and strictures are diminished. This is of special interest for the reconstruction of the functional unit oral cavity, including soft tissue and cosmetic conditions (e.g., in case of prosthetic rehabilitation). In comparison to primary wound closure with local tissue, the technique presented in this study reduces the severity of postoperative pain and allows faster rehabilitation in patients because of a better wound-healing process. Furthermore, better mobility of intraoral soft tissue structures is achieved.
Lauer
G
G
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Clinic of Freiburg, Germany. guenter.lauer@mailbox.tu-dresden.de
Schimming
R
R
Frankenschmidt
A
A
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D021522:Bioartificial Organs; D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D046508:Culture Techniques; D006801:Humans; D007021:Hypospadias / Q000601:surgery; D008297:Male; D009055:Mouth / Q000601:surgery*; D009061:Mouth Mucosa / Q000601:surgery / Q000637:transplantation*; D010865:Pilot Projects; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000379:methods; D012086:Reoperation; D014521:Urethra / Q000601:surgery*; D014945:Wound Healing
D001672:Biocompatible Materials