Penile prosthesis in the organ transplant recipient.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether pelvic organ transplant recipients are at a higher risk of developing complications after placement of a penile prosthesis relative to those receiving a penile prosthesis who did not undergo pelvic organ transplantation.


METHODS
Two hundred eleven men underwent placement of a penile prosthesis by a single urologist at our institution between July 1994 and March 2000. Of these, 46 patients had undergone pelvic organ transplantation before placement of the penile prosthesis. The average time from transplantation was 43 months. The average follow-up after prosthesis placement was 23 months. These patients were monitored for various complications, including infection, malfunction, autoinflation, and injury to the prosthesis. They were compared with a cohort of men who had had a prosthesis placed but had not received pelvic organ transplantation.


RESULTS
The overall complication rate was significantly higher in the transplant patients (22%) than in the nontransplant patients (7.9%) receiving prostheses (P <0.01). Infection was seen in 2 transplant patients (4.3%) and in 7 nontransplant patients (4.2%) (P <1). Malfunction occurred in 4 of the transplant patients (8.7%) and 6 of the nontransplant patients (3.6%) (P <0.2). In those patients with a prosthesis malfunction, 9 of 10 involved a three-piece prosthesis. All four malfunctions in the transplant group occurred in three-piece prostheses. The difference in the rate of malfunction was statistically significant (P <0.001) when comparing the three-piece prosthesis in the transplant and nontransplant patients (P <0.001). Surgical injury to the retroperitoneal reservoir occurred in 4 transplant patients (8.7%) (all with three-piece prostheses) and in none of the nontransplant patients (P <0.001).


CONCLUSIONS
The risk of infection after insertion of penile prostheses in patients with pelvic organ transplantation was similar to that in nontransplant patients. The risk of malfunction and injury to the prosthesis (three-piece) was higher in transplant patients. The overall complication rate was significantly higher in patients after transplantation and can be attributed to the reservoir complications related to three-piece prostheses. In patients with a prosthesis that did not have a retroperitoneal reservoir, no significant difference in the overall complication rate was observed. Pelvic organ transplant recipients in whom traditional conservative therapy for erectile dysfunction fails should be considered candidates for penile prosthesis placement. However, three-piece prostheses should be avoided, as these patients are best served with prostheses that do not require a retroperitoneal reservoir.
Cuellar
D C
DC
Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Sklar
G N
GN
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D007172:Erectile Dysfunction / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D016030:Kidney Transplantation / Q000379:methods; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016035:Pancreas Transplantation / Q000379:methods; D019935:Penile Implantation / Q000009:adverse effects*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology*; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D016459:Prosthesis-Related Infections / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013530:Surgical Wound Infection / Q000209:etiology