Rolling back third-party intrusions in the practice of medicine.
Formerly vaunted projections about the triumph of managed care over the provider-controlled health services industry now appear overly optimistic as consumer and provider opposition stiffens. Popular dislike of managed care and purchaser disenchantment over its failure to deliver on promises to control health insurance spending have created a strategic opening for rolling back third-party interference in medical practice. Employer frustration over rising premiums, compounded by workers' antagonism toward benefits restrictions and worry over the loss of government protection against managed care litigation, signals a radical overhaul in the way health insurance is offered. For many employers, substituting defined contribution for defined benefit plans and transferring ownership rights and responsibilities to employees is an attractive solution. Along with the growth of consumer-friendly health plans and a relaxation of onerous managed care practices, physicians can look forward to a restored doctor-patient relationship. This article identifies the forces pushing health care purchasers to adopt defined contribution plans and discusses the implications of such a movement on the physician-patient relationship.
Battistella
R M
RM
Sloan Graduate Program, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. RMB13@CORNELL.EDU
Burchfield
D C
DC
D003256:Community Participation; D006264:Health Benefit Plans, Employee; D006801:Humans; D020402:Medical Savings Accounts; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D014481:United States