The assessment of cognitive procedural learning in amnesia: why the tower of Hanoi has fallen down.
The Tower of Hanoi has been widely accepted as an evaluation of cognitive procedural learning in amnesia but inconsistent findings have raised questions about the nature of the learning process involved in this task. This article presents the performance of a hippocampal amnesic, MS, who, showing poor learning across daily sessions of a formal evaluation, subsequently solved the puzzle through spontaneous use of a declarative-level strategy (the odd-even rule), suggesting that his primary approach to the task was the deployment of declarative solution-searching strategies. The presented data suggest normal learning within daily sessions, but subnormal learning across daily sessions due to the forgetting of acquired declarative information. It is suggested that tasks that are potentially solvable by an algorithm or rule, as is the Tower of Hanoi, be regarded as inappropriate for use in cognitive procedural assessments.
Winter
W E
WE
Department of Behavioral Science, Kingsborough Community College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn 11235, USA. wwinter@kbcc.cuny.edu
Broman
M
M
Rose
A L
AL
Reber
A S
AS
D000328:Adult; D000425:Alcohol Amnestic Disorder / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology; D000647:Amnesia / Q000150:complications* / Q000503:physiopathology; D003072:Cognition Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology* / Q000503:physiopathology; D005625:Frontal Lobe / Q000503:physiopathology; D006801:Humans; D007859:Learning Disabilities / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology* / Q000503:physiopathology; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests