On the role of eye movements and saccade preparation in generating auditory inhibition of return.
In three experiments, listeners were required to either localize or identify the second of two successive sounds. The first sound (the cue) and the second sound (the target) could originate from either the same or different locations, and the interval between the onsets of the two sounds (Stimulus Onset Asynchrony, SOA) was varied. Sounds were presented out of visual range at 135 azimuth left or right. In Experiment 1, localization responses were made more quickly at 100 ms SOA when the target sounded from the same location as the cue (i.e., a facilitative effect), and at 700 ms SOA when the target and cue sounded from different locations (i.e., an inhibitory effect). In Experiments 2 and 3, listeners were required to monitor visual information presented directly in front of them at the same time as the auditory cue and target were presented behind them. These two experiments differed in that in order to perform the visual task accurately in Experiment 3, eye movements to visual stimuli were required. In both experiments, a transition from facilitation at a brief SOA to inhibition at a longer SOA was observed for the auditory task. Taken together these results suggest that location-based auditory IOR is not dependent on either eye movements or saccade programming to sound locations.
Mondor
T A
TA
University of Manitoba. todd_mondor@umanitoba.ca
Terrio
N A
NA
Hurlburt
J
J
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003463:Cues; D005133:Eye Movements; D006801:Humans; D011930:Reaction Time; D011931:Reactive Inhibition; D012438:Saccades; D013017:Sound Localization / Q000502:physiology*