Health care systems: the emperor has no clothes.
Stand-alone hospitals are becoming something of a rarity on the American landscape. While hospital boards have repeatedly voted to form systems in the last 10 to 20 years, they have been just as likely to neglect to identify specific, measurable benefits that a merger would bring to their institution. An even if they did, they frequently discontinued evaluating whether system formation brought the hoped-for benefits, thereby justifying ongoing system participation. It is an incumbent fiduciary obligation to continually ask the question: Does continued participation make sense; that is, are we appropriately exercising stewardship over the hospitals' or system's assets by participating in this system? In a sense, boards are in danger of becoming like the emperor in the children's fairy tale, believing they have done the right thing without taking a hard look at today's reality.
Fine
A
A
CHPS Consulting, Chicago, U.S.A.
Marren
J P
JP
D003284:Contract Services; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D019033:Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / Q000458:organization & administration*; D004465:Economic Competition; D006075:Governing Board; D006754:Hospital Restructuring; D006801:Humans; D014481:United States