[Does public access to defibrillators have a chance in Germany?--On the US model, legal considerations and justification].
OBJECTIVE
The introduction of public access to defibrillation via automated external defibrillators makes it possible to reduce the incidence of sudden cardiac arrest cases. Since they may expect civil and criminal liability after negligence causing damage, many German potential First Responders might hesitate to use an AED.


METHODS
After we demonstrate the medical reasons and compare the legal situation of Public Access Defibrillation between the USA and Germany we analyse a possible hesitation of German First Responders.


RESULTS
More than 30 states of the USA provide immunity from civil liability after a public access defibrillation followed by damage due to negligence. However, only an AED-trained US-First Responder is granted immunity from civil liability. In Germany there is no immunity from civil and criminal liability in case of public access defibrillation with damage caused by negligence.


CONCLUSIONS
German law will not decrease any possible hesitation by First Responders. For a successful system of public access defibrillation, revision of the legal situation is mandatory.
Seliger
M
M
Institut für Arterioskleroseforschung an der Universität Münster.
Knorr
M
M
D016887:Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Q000295:instrumentation*; D004554:Electric Countershock / Q000295:instrumentation*; D005392:First Aid; D005858:Germany; D006323:Heart Arrest / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006801:Humans; D016365:Liability, Legal; D011634:Public Health / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D014481:United States
Hat die Public Access Defibrillation in Deutschland eine Chance?--Uber das US-Modell, rechtliche Bedenken und deren Berechtigung.