The biomedical disciplines and the structure of biomedical and clinical knowledge.
The relation between biomedical knowledge and clinical knowledge is discussed by comparing their respective structures. The knowledge of a disease as a biological phenomenon is constructed by the interaction of facts and theories from the main biomedical disciplines: epidemiology, diagnostics, clinical trial, therapy development and pathogenesis. Although these facts and theories are based on probabilities and extrapolations, the interaction provides a reliable and coherent structure, comparable to a Kuhnian paradigma. In the structure of clinical knowledge, i.e. knowledge of the patient with the disease, not only biomedical knowledge contributes to the structure but also economic and social relations, ethics and personal experience. However, the interaction between each of the participating "knowledges" in clinical knowledge is not based on mutual dependency and accumulation of different arguments from each, as in biomedical knowledge, but on competition and partial exclusion. Therefore, the structure of biomedical knowledge is different from that of clinical knowledge. This difference is used as the basis for a discussion in which the place of technology, evidence-based medicine and the gap between scientific and clinical knowledge are evaluated.
Nederbragt
H
H
Department of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
D001699:Biometry; D002983:Clinical Competence; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D003933:Diagnosis; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D004812:Epidemiologic Methods; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D019359:Knowledge; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D010348:Patient Care Team / Q000458:organization & administration*