title: The forced-choice paradigm and the perception of facial expressions of emotion.
abstract: The view that certain facial expressions of emotion are universally agreed on has been challenged by studies showing that the forced-choice paradigm may have artificially forced agreement. This article addressed this methodological criticism by offering participants the opportunity to select a none of these terms are correct option from a list of emotion labels in a modified forced-choice paradigm. The results show that agreement on the emotion label for particular facial expressions is still greater than chance, that artifactual agreement on incorrect emotion labels is obviated, that participants select the none option when asked to judge a novel expression, and that adding 4 more emotion labels does not change the pattern of agreement reported in universality studies. Although the original forced-choice format may have been prone to artifactual agreement, the modified forced-choice format appears to remedy that problem.
authors.affiliation: School of Communication, Information, and Library Studies, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick 08903-1071, USA. mgfrank@scils.rutgers.edu
authors.forename: M G
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Frank
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Stennett
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002755:Choice Behavior; D004644:Emotions; D005149:Facial Expression; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009515:New Jersey; D009517:New South Wales; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards; D012494:Sampling Studies; D012938:Social Perception