title: Comparison of threshold vs linear and animal vs sire models for predicting direct and maternal genetic effects on calving difficulty in beef cattle.
abstract: This study compared the accuracy of several models for obtaining genetic evaluations of calving difficulty. The models were univariate threshold animal (TAM), threshold sire-maternal grandsire (TSM), linear animal (LAM), and linear sire-maternal grandsire (LSM) models and bivariate threshold-linear animal (TLAM), threshold-linear sire-maternal grandsire (TLSM), linear-linear animal (LLAM), and linear-linear sire-maternal grandsire (LLSM) models for calving difficulty and birth weight. Data were obtained from the American Gelbvieh Association and included 84,420 first-parity records of both calving difficulty and birth weight. Calving difficulty scores were distributed as 73.4% in the first category (no assistance), 18.7% in the second, 6.3% in the third, and 1.6% in the fourth. Included in the animal models were fixed sex of calf by age of dam subclasses, random herd-year-season effects, and random animal direct and maternal breeding values. Sire-maternal grandsire models were similar to the animal models, with animal and maternal effects replaced by sire and maternal grandsire effects. Models were compared using a data splitting technique based on the correlation of estimated breeding values from two samples, with one-half of the calving difficulty records discarded randomly in the first sample and the remaining calving difficulty records discarded in the second sample. Reported correlations are averages of 10 replicates. The results obtained using animal models confirmed the slight advantage of TAM over LAM (0.69 vs 0.63) and TLAM over LLAM (0.90 vs 0.86). Bivariate analyses greatly improved the accuracy of genetic prediction of direct effects on calving difficulty relative to univariate analyses. Similar ranking of the models was found for maternal effects, but smaller correlations were obtained for bivariate models. For sire-maternal grandsire models, no differences between sire or maternal grandsire correlations were observed for TLSM compared to LLSM, and small differences were observed between TSM and LSM. The threshold model offered advantages over the linear model in animal models but not in sire-maternal grandsire models. For genetic evaluation of calving difficulty in beef cattle, the threshold-linear animal model seems to be the best choice for predicting both direct and maternal effects.
authors.affiliation: Animal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens 30602, USA.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ramirez-Valverde
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Misztal
authors.forename: J K
authors.initials: JK
authors.lastname: Bertrand
mesh_terms: D000822:Animal Husbandry; D000818:Animals; D001724:Birth Weight; D002417:Cattle / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D004420:Dystocia / Q000235:genetics / Q000662:veterinary*; D005260:Female; D020022:Genetic Predisposition to Disease; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D008954:Models, Biological; D010298:Parity; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011247:Pregnancy