Selected ethical issues in research and publication: perceptions of health education faculty.
A national random sample of 195 university health education faculty at graduate degree-granting programs completed a 31-item survey with regard to their perceptions of ethical issues in research and publishing. Most respondents were male (57%), tenured (75%), had graduate faculty status (92%), had presented original research at conferences (85%), and had published articles in health education journals (89%). Faculty members were requested to assess whether 21 scenarios dealing with ethical issues in research and publishing were ethical, unethical, questionable, or not an ethical issue. Of the scenarios, 3 were considered ethical and 7 unethical by the majority of respondents. The perceptions of how ethical the remaining 11 scenarios were varied considerably. Perceptions of the ethical scenarios did not differ among respondents by sex, academic rank, years taught as a faculty member, whether the department taught units/classes on research ethics, or whether the respondents were from doctoral-level versus master's-level programs.
Price
J H
JH
Department of Public Health and Rehabilitative Services, University of Toledo, OH 43606, USA. jprice@utnet.utoledo.edu
Dake
J A
JA
Islam
R
R
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002170:Canada; D004500:Education, Graduate; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D005178:Faculty / Q000592:standards*; D005260:Female; D006266:Health Education / Q000592:standards*; D006293:Health Promotion / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011643:Publishing / Q000592:standards; D011897:Random Allocation; D012106:Research / Q000592:standards; D012576:Schools, Health Occupations / Q000592:standards; D015871:Scientific Misconduct / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States; D000078329:Workforce