Central auditory processes and test measures: ASHA 1996 revisited.
The theoretical issues surrounding central auditory processing disorders (CAPD) are reviewed here, especially with reference to the central auditory behavioral processes and the auditory test measures as prescribed in the ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54) statement on CAPD. A simplified nomenclature is recommended that directly relates process and test measure to facilitate the diagnostic process in CAPD. This new terminology closely follows the ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54) document, but provides some refinement based on recent research in CAPD. To support this recommendation, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was applied to the findings of Domitz and Schow (2000, American Journal of Audiology), who proposed use of a battery of CAPD tests, the Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment (MAPA) for testing school children. The CFA was found to reinforce the four-factor model, which clearly emerged in the exploratory factor analysis of Domitz and Schow. The model was found to be reasonably consistent even when subtests from the SCAN were included in the analysis. Refinement and revision of ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54) is recommended to facilitate diagnosis, subclassification, and intervention for CAPD.
Schow
R L
RL
Idaho State University, Pocatello, USA. schorona@isu.edu
Seikel
J A
JA
Chermak
G D
GD
Berent
M
M
D016235:American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; D001308:Auditory Perceptual Disorders / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D006320:Hearing Tests / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013063:Speech Discrimination Tests / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D014481:United States