Amlodipine versus slow release metoprolol in the treatment of stable exertional angina pectoris (AMSA).
OBJECTIVE
To compare the effects of amlodipine and slow release metoprolol on subjective symptoms and signs of ischaemia during bicycle ergometric exercise tests in patients with stable angina pectoris.


METHODS
A randomized double-blind comparison of the two drugs in patients with documented coronary disease required to have at least three attacks of angina per week and to perform a symptom-limited exercise test with significant signs of ischaemia in the ECG.


RESULTS
Out of 127 patients, 117 completed the study. Both amlodipine and metoprolol significantly increased total exercise time, total workload, time to onset of angina and time to 1 mm ST-depression with no significant differences between the drugs. Amlodipine was significantly more efficient than metoprolol in reducing ST-depression at maximum workload. Diary data revealed no differences in patients' self-rating of drug effects.


CONCLUSIONS
Judged by suppression of subjective symptoms and performance on exercise tolerance tests amlodipine represents a useful alternative to metoprolol as monotherapy in stable angina pectoris.
Midtbø
K
K
Department of Cardiology, Ullevål Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Mølstad
P
P
D000319:Adrenergic beta-Antagonists / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D000368:Aged; D017311:Amlodipine / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D000787:Angina Pectoris / Q000188:drug therapy*; D002121:Calcium Channel Blockers / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D003692:Delayed-Action Preparations; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D004562:Electrocardiography; D005080:Exercise Test; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008790:Metoprolol / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D008875:Middle Aged; D005082:Physical Exertion
D000319:Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; D002121:Calcium Channel Blockers; D003692:Delayed-Action Preparations; D017311:Amlodipine; D008790:Metoprolol