title: Teaching of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Brazilian dental schools.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study was to evaluate the teaching program of Class I and Class II resin-based composite (RBC) restorations in Brazilian dental schools and to observe if any differences were found from similar surveys conducted in North American, European, and Japanese dental schools.
  
  
  METHODS
  A questionnaire containing 15 questions was distributed to 92 Brazilian dental schools, and 64 (70%) schools returned the questionnaire. The questions inquired the amount of time the curriculum dedicated to teaching of posterior RBC restorations, future expectation regarding the teaching time, limitation in extension of the occlusal width and the proximal box in Class II, contraindications for placing posterior RBC restorations, protocol for using bases and liners, brand of bonding agents and RBC used, instruments and techniques employed for finishing, cost relative to amalgam restorations, and biologic reactions related to the use of posterior RBC. The responses were calculated as percentages based on the number of schools that responded to the questionnaire. Where appropriate, the Chi-squared test and the Fisher exact test were used for statistical analysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of the dental schools that responded, 88% dedicated 10% to 50% of the teaching time in operative dentistry to posterior RBC restorations. A significant correlation (P = 0.041) was found between the percentage of time dedicated to the teaching of posterior RBC restorations and the higher cost of posterior RBC compared to amalgam restorations. Resin-based composite restorations cost 30% to 70% more than amalgam restorations in the 40% of dental schools that charged a fee. Posterior composites for large restorations in molars were used by 14% of the dental schools. Base and liner were not placed by 10% of dental schools in deep Class I or Class II RBC restorations. One school did not recommend acid etching of the dentin.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  No major differences were found in the teaching philosophy of posterior RBC restorations by comparing the Brazilian data to the data from similar surveys done in North America, Japan, and Europe.
authors.affiliation: College of Dentistry, Department of Operative Dentistry, Health Science Center, University of Florida, PO Box 100415, Gainesville, FL 32610-0415, USA. vgordan@dental.ufl.edu
authors.forename: V V
authors.initials: VV
authors.lastname: Gordan
authors.forename: I A
authors.initials: IA
authors.lastname: Mjör
authors.forename: L C
authors.initials: LC
authors.lastname: Veiga Filho
authors.forename: A V
authors.initials: AV
authors.lastname: Ritter
mesh_terms: D000134:Acid Etching, Dental; D000269:Adhesives; D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D001938:Brazil; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000191:economics; D000075202:Contraindications; D003479:Curriculum; D003723:Dental Amalgam / Q000191:economics; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003736:Dental Cavity Lining; D003775:Dental Polishing / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000145:classification / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods; D003814:Dentistry, Operative / Q000193:education; D005060:Europe; D005250:Fees, Dental; D006801:Humans; D007564:Japan; D009656:North America; D010685:Philosophy, Dental; D015397:Program Evaluation; D012575:Schools, Dental; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013663:Teaching / Q000379:methods*; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D000269:Adhesives; D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D003188:Composite Resins; D003723:Dental Amalgam