The rationality of resistance: alternatives for engagement in complex emergencies.
The different conceptualisations of conflict in the complex emergency literature have profound implications on the perception of the agency of different groups and the prospects for conflict management. While much recent analysis has focused on the rational political and economic functions of violence, relatively little analysis has focused on why the majority of people chose not to resort to violence. Using Foucault's analysis of power relations, a new framework for conflict analysis is proposed which includes non-violent resistance as well as violence as a means of domination. Non-violent resistance is explored as a rational, highly adaptable response to acts of domination. A comprehensive understanding of conflict must recognise local forms of resistance and identify the barriers and opportunities for the engagement of the international humanitarian community with these groups. This engagement can be used to foster capacities for the creation of legitimate, inclusive, non-violent political and economic processes in the attempt to provide alternatives for everyone in the conflict. If the purpose of the study of complex emergencies is to understand the nature of various conflicts and, based on that understanding, make recommendations for possible routes to conflict management, the analysis of local resistance and efforts to foster it must become a major aspect of the research agenda.
megan_gilgan@yahoo.com
M
M
Gilgan
D000533:Altruism; D002960:Civil Disorders; D004189:Disaster Planning; D004630:Emergencies; D006801:Humans; D008399:Mass Behavior; D011057:Politics; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D014754:Violence / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000523:psychology*