A rule-based categorization deficit in Alzheimer's disease?
This study examined the categorization processes that Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients use during assessments of semantic memory. Rule-based categorization involves the careful, analytic processing of strict criteria to determine category membership, particularly for items from graded categories with ambiguous category membership; similarity-based categorization requires an overall comparison of a test stimulus with a prototype or remembered exemplar of the category and is relatively effective for the rapid categorization of items with unambiguous category membership. To assess these processes in AD, patients were asked to decide the category membership of test stimuli for categories with poorly defined or fuzzy boundaries (e.g., VEGETABLE) and for categories with well-defined boundaries (e.g., FEMALE) and then to judge the representativeness of the test stimulus for its chosen category. A subgroup of AD patients demonstrated a typical pattern of impaired semantic memory compared to healthy control subjects; that is, difficulty deciding the category membership of test items from fuzzy categories. Among these patients, we found no deficit in category membership decisions about items taken from well-defined categories. We also found that AD patients and healthy controls do not differ in their representativeness judgments of items within a correctly judged category. These findings are most consistent with the hypothesis that rule-based categorization difficulty limits semantic memory in AD.
Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia 19104-4283, USA. mgrossman@mail.med.upenn.edu
M
M
Grossman
K
K
Robinson
N
N
Bernhardt
P
P
Koenig
D000368:Aged; D000544:Alzheimer Disease; D003072:Cognition Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis*; D016002:Discriminant Analysis; D006801:Humans; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D012720:Severity of Illness Index