[Optimal age of sexual maturity and limitations of juvenile survival in mammals].
Although the life history evolution of small- and large-bodied mammals seems to be governed by different factors, the both shows relative neonate size and juvenile survival to be slightly dependent on body mass. I propose a hypothesis that natural selection simultaneously maximizes a time to maturity (minimizes somatic growth rate) and a number of newborn survived to reproduction. In this case optimal juvenile survival of large-bodied mammals must be close to e-beta and that of small-bodied approximately e-(1 + beta), where beta is the slope of the regression of log annual fecundity on log annual juvenile mortality. Analysis of vital characters for 71 mammal species revealed the slope to be close to unity. As a result frequency distribution of log juvenile survival shows bimodality which coincides well with predicted optimal survival for large- and small-bodies species. It is shown that the relative neonate size can be directly proportional to the juvenile survival and inversely proportional to the lifetime offspring production irrespective of mortality factors.
Romanovskiĭ
Iu E
IuE
Department of General Ecology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119899, Russia.
D000818:Animals; D001835:Body Weight; D008136:Longevity; D008322:Mammals / Q000254:growth & development*; D008954:Models, Biological; D011156:Population Density; D012098:Reproduction; D012741:Sexual Maturation; D015996:Survival Rate