Short-scar breast reduction: why all the fuss?
The breast can be considered conceptually as a cone. This article compares and contrasts short-scar breast reduction techniques with inverted T techniques using the cone model. Four issues are examined-the base of the breast, breast projection, the inframammary fold, and the pedicle. The short-scar techniques focus on reshaping the breast parenchyma, and skin redraping occurs secondarily. Application of this model suggests that these techniques have the advantage of better projection and greater longevity. These techniques seldom give a square shape and are better at dealing with upper pole deficiency. However, the ability of the skin to redrape is the limiting factor; hence, results are less predictable with large-volume breast reductions. The emphasis of this article is on increasing the understanding of the mechanics of breast reduction. It is this factor that will enable appropriate selection of a particular technique.
McCulley
S J
SJ
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Cape Town, and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Hudson
D A
DA
D001941:Breast Diseases / Q000601:surgery*; D002921:Cicatrix / Q000209:etiology*; D004954:Esthetics; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D006984:Hypertrophy; D016462:Mammaplasty / Q000379:methods*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology*; D016896:Treatment Outcome