Managing central venous catheters: a prospective randomised trial of two methods.
A randomised, prospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact on central venous catheter (CVC) infection when fluids and lines connected to a CVC were changed using a 'sterile' compared to an 'aseptic, non-touch' technique. The study sought to determine whether there were any differences in CVC tip colonisation (CTC) or CVC-related bacteraemia (CRB) as a result of the technique used for fluid and line changes. In the sterile technique (control) group, fluids and tubing were changed using full sterile technique. In the aseptic, non-touch (experimental) group, fluids and tubing attached to the CVC were changed using only a small sterile drape and a 2-minute clinical hand wash. When the CVC was removed, the tip was sampled and cultured using the semi-quantitative method. Blood cultures were also collected. In all, 111 samples from 79 patients were included in the trial: 61 in the sterile technique group and 50 in the non-touch, aseptic technique group. Results showed a CTC rate of 31 per cent in the control group and 14 per cent in the experimental group, while the CRB rate was 8.2 per cent and 6 per cent respectively. The most common organisms cultured were Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermis respectively. This study indicates that it is safe to change fluids and lines attached to CVCs using the aseptic, non-touch technique, which has resulted in significant financial savings through less use of equipment and less nursing time required to perform fluid and line changes.
Larwood
K A
KA
Nambour General Hospital, Queensland.
Anstey
C M
CM
Dunn
S V
SV
D016470:Bacteremia / Q000451:nursing / Q000517:prevention & control*; D002405:Catheterization, Central Venous / Q000451:nursing*; D003422:Critical Care / Q000379:methods*; D003428:Cross Infection / Q000451:nursing / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006801:Humans; D017053:Infection Control / Q000379:methods*; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies