Cultural differences in end-of-life care.
The exact time of death for many intensive care unit patients is increasingly preceded by an end-of-life decision. Such decisions are fraught with ethical, religious, moral, cultural, and legal difficulties. Key questions surrounding this issue include the difference between withholding and withdrawing, when to withhold/withdraw, who should be involved in the decision-making process, what are the relevant legal precedents, etc. Cultural variations in attitude to such issues are perhaps expected between continents, but key differences also exist on a more local basis, for example, among the countries of Europe. Physicians need to be aware of the potential cultural differences in the attitudes not only of their colleagues, but also of their patients and families. Open discussion of these issues and some change in our attitude toward life and death are needed to enable such patients to have a pain-free, dignified death.
Vincent
J L
JL
Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium. jlvincen@ulb.ac.be
D001293:Attitude to Death / Q000208:ethnology*; D001294:Attitude to Health / Q000208:ethnology*; D003422:Critical Care / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000379:methods / Q000523:psychology*; D003466:Cultural Characteristics; D003657:Decision Making; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology*; D005190:Family / Q000208:ethnology; D006801:Humans; D010348:Patient Care Team; D018458:Persistent Vegetative State / Q000628:therapy; D010819:Physician's Role; D012068:Religion and Medicine; D012069:Religion and Psychology; D012297:Right to Die / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D013727:Terminal Care / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000379:methods / Q000523:psychology*; D016312:Treatment Refusal / Q000208:ethnology* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence