Why practice reduces dual-task interference.
M. A. Van Selst, E. Ruthruff, and J. C. Johnston (1999) found that practice dramatically reduced dual-task interference in a Psychological Refractory Period (PRP) paradigm with 1 vocal response and 1 manual response. Results from 3 further experiments using the highly trained participants of M. A. Van Selst et al. (1999) support 4 main conclusions: (a) A processing bottleneck exists even after extensive practice; (b) the principal cause of the reduction in PRP interference with practice is shortening of Task 1 bottleneck stages; (c) a secondary cause is that 1 or more, but not all, of the Task 2 substages that are postponed before practice are not postponed after practice (i.e., become automatized); and (d) the extent of PRP reduction with practice depends on the modalities of the 2 responses. A control experiment with 2 manual response tasks showed less PRP reduction with practice than that found by Van Selst et al.
Ruthruff
E
E
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center, California 94035, USA. eruthruff@mail.arc.nasa.gov
Johnston
J C
JC
Van Selst
M
M
D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D011930:Reaction Time