Vertical or holistic decentralization of the health sector? Experiences from Zambia and Uganda.
Many countries in Africa have embarked on health sector reforms. The design of the reforms differs considerably. A key feature of the reforms is decentralization, of which Uganda and Zambia are implementing two different models. This paper analyses the two models of health sector reform, and their implications for ultimate development goals. In Uganda, the whole government has been decentralized, with a wide range of powers and resources transferred to the districts. The health care system is part of the political set up of the country. In Zambia, only the health sector has been decentralized. Power and resources for health care have been divested to new parallel organizations. While useful lessons can be drawn from the managerial and administrative experience in the two countries, not least concerning donor coordination, it seems that neither form of decentralization has so far led to a clear and appreciable improvement of health services and, ultimately, to a clear focus on development goals, such as poverty alleviation. The conditions for this to happen are discussed in this paper.
Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
A
A
Jeppsson
S A
SA
Okuonzi
D005260:Female; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000458:organization & administration; D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000458:organization & administration*; D019981:Health Care Sector / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006305:Health Status Indicators; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D017146:Models, Organizational; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000458:organization & administration*; D019982:Organizational Case Studies; D009937:Organizational Objectives; D009939:Organizations, Nonprofit; D011057:Politics; D012040:Regional Health Planning / Q000458:organization & administration*; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D014454:Uganda; D015024:Zambia