When is surgery research? Towards an operational definition of human research.
The distinction between clinical practice and surgical research may seem trivial, but this distinction can become a complex issue when innovative surgeries are substituted for standard care without patient knowledge. Neither the novelty nor the risk of a new surgical procedure adequately defines surgical research. Some institutions tacitly allow the use of new surgical procedures in series of patients without informing individuals that they are participating in a scientific study, as long as no written protocol or hypothesis exists. Institutions can justify this practice by viewing human research in narrow terms as an activity outlined in a formal protocol. Application of limited definitions, however, erodes patients' rights and risks losing public confidence in how biomedical research is conducted. I propose an operational definition of human research also be recognised. Enforcing more rigid and less ambiguous guidelines of human research may curtail enrolment into some studies, but it will also protect patients from being used as subjects without their knowledge.
Margo
C E
CE
Watson Clinic, Lakeland, Florida, USA.
D001294:Attitude to Health; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006805:Human Experimentation; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D010344:Patient Advocacy; D018579:Patient Selection; D013514:Surgical Procedures, Operative / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D035703:Therapies, Investigational; D014481:United States