Transfer function index of pulse volume recordings: a new method for vein graft surveillance.
OBJECTIVE
Color flow duplex scanning is currently the best method available for vein graft surveillance. However, it puts a considerable strain on the workload of a vascular unit and requires a highly trained operator. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a new, noninvasive tool for graft surveillance. The utility of transfer function index (TFI) of pulse volume recordings is tested for this purpose.


METHODS
The design of the study was a blind comparative study that involved 70 testing procedures that were performed on 58 different infrainguinal vein bypass grafts. The TFI was measured with a portable vascular laboratory multi-cuff unit. Ankle/brachial indexes were obtained with the same device. Color flow duplex scanning was used as a diagnostic standard. A graft was defined as at risk, according to duplex scanning, if a local stenosis with a V2/V1 more than 2 was found or if peak systolic velocity remained less than 45 cm/s throughout the graft. The repeatability of the method was tested on 30 grafts.


RESULTS
A total of 63 tests were available for analysis. Seven tests were excluded. Four were excluded because they had unreliable TFI measurement due to cardiac arrhythmias, and in three tests, the whole graft could not be visualized in the duplex scan. Forty normal and 22 at-risk grafts were found. One graft was occluded. The TFI was significantly lower for at-risk grafts (0.89) versus normal grafts (1.09; P =.005). A TFI of 1.02 or less correctly detected 21 of 22 at-risk grafts. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 96%, 65%, and 76%, respectively. The ability of the ankle/brachial index to detect the at-risk grafts was clearly inferior to the TFI. The repeatability of the method at proximal thigh, distal thigh, and proximal calf was +/- 0.21, +/- 0.07, and +/- 0.14, respectively.


CONCLUSIONS
The TFI is a sensitive and reliable method to detect an at-risk graft. The examination is noninvasive, simple, quick to perform, and well tolerated by the patients. We suggest that the TFI could be the first-line screening method in vein graft surveillance.
Ihlberg
L H
LH
Department of Vascular Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland. leo.ihlberg@hus.fi
Mätzke
S
S
Albäck
N A
NA
Roth
W D
WD
Sovijärvi
A R
AR
Lepäntalo
M
M
D001810:Blood Volume; D005583:Fourier Analysis; D006083:Graft Occlusion, Vascular / Q000175:diagnosis*; D006801:Humans; D007511:Ischemia / Q000601:surgery*; D007866:Leg / Q000098:blood supply*; D008838:Microcomputers; D010991:Plethysmography / Q000295:instrumentation*; D011674:Pulse; D012307:Risk Factors; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000295:instrumentation; D018615:Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color; D014680:Veins / Q000637:transplantation*