Review times in statistical journals: tilting at windmills?
Using limited data, I argue that the review times in statistics are far too long for the field to keep pace with the rapidly changing environment in science. I note that statisticians do not appear to believe in statistics because data on the review process are not widely available to members of the profession. I suggest a few changes that could be made to speed up the review process, although it would appear that a change in our culture is required before the problem will be solved.
Carroll
R J
RJ
Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-3143, USA. carroll@stat.tamu.edu
D001699:Biometry; D010380:Peer Review; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D011643:Publishing; D013997:Time Factors