Smoking in correctional facilities: a survey of employees.
OBJECTIVE
To assess level of endorsement and expected consequences of worksite smoking restriction policies among correctional employees.


METHODS
Mailed survey to Vermont state correctional employees.


METHODS
Support for various policy alternatives for both staff and inmate smoking; expected consequences of restrictive smoking policies and smoking behaviour.


METHODS
321 of 640 (50%) state correctional employees responded.


RESULTS
Employees were somewhat receptive to smoking restrictions for inmates, but less supportive of staff smoking restrictions. A complete ban on inmate smoking both indoors and outdoors was supported by 56% and 49% of never and ex-smokers, respectively, but only 15% of current smokers (p < 0.01). A similar ban on employee smoking was supported by 38% of never and ex-smokers, but only 3% of current smokers (p < 0.01). Overall, employees were most supportive (52%) of a policy for themselves that banned indoor smoking and restricted it to certain areas outdoors. Current smokers were more likely to expect negative consequences as a result of further restrictions than were never or ex-smokers.


CONCLUSIONS
Although our findings are limited by a low response rate, most employees support an indoor ban, but not a total ban on smoking. Employees generally favoured a policy that was slightly more restrictive than the current policy, but were less supportive of tighter smoking restrictions for themselves. However, a more restrictive smoking policy is likely to result in some degree of resistance among current smoking employees, who may require specific attention to address their opposition.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05401, USA. matthew.carpenter@uvm.edu
M J
MJ
Carpenter
J R
JR
Hughes
L J
LJ
Solomon
T A
TA
Powell
D004651:Employment; D006801:Humans; D011330:Prisons; D012907:Smoking / Q000453:epidemiology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014707:Vermont