Inhibition of bacterial and glucan adherence to various light-cured fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
OBJECTIVE
This study investigated the potential plaque adhesion properties of various light-cured fluoride-releasing restorative materials by measuring the amount of adhering radiolabeled bacteria and glucan.


METHODS
Three resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGI) and two polyacid-modified resin composites (compomer) were used in this study. As a control, one light-cured resin composite was added. Disk-shaped specimens were made following the manufacturers' recommendations and the respective surfaces were finished with a 600-grit abrasive paper. Streptococcus sobrinus B13 was selected as a cariogenic bacterial strain. The amount of bacteria and glucan adhered to these specimens were measured after 3, 8 and 24h incubations with radiolabeled cariogenic bacteria and sucrose.


RESULTS
After 3 and 8h incubations, the amount of adhered bacteria and glucan was small and there were no significant differences among the restorative materials except in the resin composite. Although after 24h incubation the amounts of adhered bacteria and glucan, significantly increased on the RMGIs and compomers, these were still significantly less than the resin composite except one compomer. Although at 3h no good correlation was found between the contact angles and the amount of bacteria and glucans, the correlation coefficients were high at 8 or 24h. In addition, the coefficients for bacteria were always higher than those for glucan irrespective of the incubation times.


CONCLUSIONS
After 24h resin-modified glass ionomer cements and compomers showed significantly smaller amounts of adhered bacteria and glucans compared to resin composite with an exception of glucan adherence on one compomer.
Kawai
K
K
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Osaka University Faculty of Dentistry, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan. kkawai@dent.osaka-u.ac.jp
Takaoka
T
T
D000180:Acrylic Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D001422:Bacterial Adhesion / Q000187:drug effects*; D015169:Colony Count, Microbial; D020770:Compomers / Q000737:chemistry*; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D003773:Dental Plaque / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000517:prevention & control; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent; D005459:Fluorides / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements / Q000737:chemistry*; D005936:Glucans / Q000737:chemistry*; D008422:Materials Testing; D008689:Methacrylates / Q000737:chemistry; D012117:Resins, Synthetic / Q000737:chemistry; D017640:Silicates / Q000737:chemistry; D016986:Streptococcus sobrinus / Q000502:physiology; D013499:Surface Properties; D000267:Tissue Adhesions; D017155:Wettability
D000180:Acrylic Resins; D020770:Compomers; D003188:Composite Resins; C088486:Dyract; C079765:Fuji II LC cement; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D005936:Glucans; D008689:Methacrylates; C081144:Photac-Fil; D012117:Resins, Synthetic; D017640:Silicates; C090969:Tetric; C081982:VariGlass VLC; C084550:Vitremer; D005459:Fluorides