Hearing aids versus ventilation tubes in persistent otitis media with effusion: a survey of clinical practice.
A postal survey was carried out to determine the current clinical practice amongst consultant otolaryngologists in the UK, regarding re-insertion of ventilation tubes or recommendation of hearing aids in cases of recurrence of otitis media with effusion (OME) after ventilation tube extrusion. Amongst the 319 respondents, 15 (4.70 per cent) routinely, 146 (45.77 per cent) sometimes, and 158 (49.53 per cent) either never, or very rarely, recommend hearing aids. Hearing aids and ventilation tubes were both suggested to be equally good options by some consultants but they preferred surgery for a number of reasons. There were inconsistencies in practice and some of the reasons for re-inserting ventilation tubes are not evidence-based. A hearing aid is a non-invasive option and this survey shows a need for a randomized control trial of hearing aids and ventilation tubes in the management of persistent and recurrent OME.
Ahmmed
A U
AU
Fulwood Paediatric Audiology Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. ahmmed@man.ac.uk
Curley
J W
JW
Newton
V E
VE
Mukherjee
D
D
D002648:Child; D004868:Equipment Failure; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006310:Hearing Aids / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008876:Middle Ear Ventilation / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010034:Otitis Media with Effusion / Q000628:therapy*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D011368:Professional-Family Relations; D012008:Recurrence; D019233:Retreatment