Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
OBJECTIVE
This study examined potential differences in detorque values of abutment screws after fatigue testing when the dimensions between external implant hexagon and internal abutment hexagon were altered or the implant external hexagonal shape was eliminated.


METHODS
Three subsets (N = 10) of NobelBiocare implants were assessed: (1) standard external hexagon (R), (2) modified hexagon (M), and (3) circular (C) platform geometry. Thirty Procera machined abutments with 25-degree angulated loading platforms were manufactured. Abutments were retained with gold Unigrip abutment screws tightened to 32 N/cm with an electronic torque controller. Vertical scribes across the implant-abutment interface allowed longitudinal displacement evaluation. A carousel-type fatigue testing device delivered dynamic loading forces between 20 and 200 N for 5,000,000 cycles, or the approximate equivalent of 5 years in vivo mastication, through a piston to the abutment platform. Macroscopic and radiographic examination of the implant/abutment specimens was performed. The abutment screws were removed and the detorque values recorded. Bearing surfaces were examined microscopically.


RESULTS
No abutment looseness or longitudinal displacements at the implant-abutment interface were noted. Radiographic examination demonstrated no indication of screw bending or displacement. The mean detorque values for R, M, and C were 14.40 +/- 1.84 N/cm, 14.70 +/- 1.89 N/cm, and 16.40 +/- 2.17 N/cm, respectively. The analysis of variance demonstrated significant differences between only designs R and C (P=.031).


CONCLUSIONS
Increasing the vertical height, or degree of fit tolerance, between the implant external hexagon and the abutment internal hexagon or completely eliminating the implant external hexagon did not produce a significant effect on the detorque values of the abutment screws after 5,000,000 cycles in fatigue testing, or the equivalent of 5 years' of mastication for the implant/abutment specimens evaluated.
Cibirka
R M
RM
School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga 30912, USA. Rcibirka@mail.mcg.edu
Nelson
S K
SK
Lang
B R
BR
Rueggeberg
F A
FA
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001732:Bite Force; D000044:Dental Abutments; D015921:Dental Implants; D003776:Dental Porcelain / Q000737:chemistry; D017267:Dental Prosthesis Design; D017268:Dental Prosthesis Retention; D006047:Gold Alloys / Q000737:chemistry; D006801:Humans; D008422:Materials Testing; D016876:Metal Ceramic Alloys / Q000737:chemistry; D011859:Radiography; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013499:Surface Properties; D014025:Titanium / Q000737:chemistry; D019415:Torque
D015921:Dental Implants; D006047:Gold Alloys; D016876:Metal Ceramic Alloys; C077451:Procera; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D014025:Titanium