Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approaches for mitral reconstruction: comparison of intermediate-term results.
BACKGROUND
This study compares intermediate-term outcomes of mitral valve reconstruction after either the standard sternotomy approach or the new minimally invasive approach. Although minimally invasive mitral valve operations appear to offer certain advantages, such as reduced postoperative discomfort and decreased postoperative recovery time, the intermediate-term functional and echocardiographic efficacy has not yet been documented.


METHODS
From May 1996 to February 1999, 100 consecutive patients underwent primary mitral reconstruction through a minimally invasive right anterior thoracotomy and peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass and Port-Access technology (Heartport, Inc, Redwood City, Calif). Outcomes were compared with those for our previous 100 patients undergoing primary mitral repair who were operated on with the standard sternotomy approach.


RESULTS
Although patients were similar in age, the patients undergoing the minimally invasive approach had a lower preoperative New York Heart Association classification (2.1 +/- 0.5 vs 2.6 +/- 0.6, P <.001). There was one (1.0%) hospital mortality with the sternotomy approach and no such case with the minimally invasive approach. Follow-up revealed that residual mitral insufficiency was similar between the minimally invasive and sternotomy approaches (0.79 +/- 0.06 vs 0.77 +/- 0.06, P =.89, 0- to 3-point scale); likewise, the cumulative freedom from reoperation was not significantly different (94.4% vs 96.8%, P =.38). Follow-up New York Heart Association functional class was significantly better in the patients undergoing the minimally invasive approach (1.5 +/- 0.05 vs 1.2 +/- 0.05, P <.01).


CONCLUSIONS
These findings demonstrate comparable 1-year follow-up results after minimally invasive mitral valve reconstruction. Both echocardiographic results and New York Heart Association functional improvements were compatible with results achieved with the standard sternotomy approach. The minimally invasive approach for mitral valve reconstruction provides equally durable results with marked advantages for the patient and should be more widely adopted.
Grossi
E A
EA
Divisions of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10028, USA. grossi@cv.med.nyu.edu
LaPietra
A
A
Ribakove
G H
GH
Delianides
J
J
Esposito
R
R
Culliford
A T
AT
Derivaux
C C
CC
Applebaum
R M
RM
Kronzon
I
I
Steinberg
B M
BM
Baumann
F G
FG
Galloway
A C
AC
Colvin
S B
SB
D002315:Cardiopulmonary Bypass; D004452:Echocardiography; D005260:Female; D017052:Hospital Mortality; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / Q000401:mortality; D008943:Mitral Valve / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D008944:Mitral Valve Insufficiency / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000379:methods* / Q000401:mortality; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D015996:Survival Rate; D013908:Thoracotomy / Q000379:methods* / Q000401:mortality