Protecting research integrity.
It is not controversial to state that acts of fraud do not belong in the academic world. What is debated is the best way to minimise the risk of fraudulent behaviour. Broadly speaking there are two different approaches to this problem. They differ with regard to whether the main focus is on internal or external control. In this article I argue that the main emphasis should be on internal structures in order to achieve the desired end. Only when the internal structures are in place is it meaningful to adopt external, supportive means to the same end. Invitation to the academic project as such, education and training in research ethics and good research practice, the implementation of good documentation procedures and the implementation of a procedure for investigation of suspicions of fraud which is characterised by efficiency, impartiality and competence are the four primary ingredients in the cure. The first three are suggested to build up the necessary foundation before a structure of investigation procedures are established.
Hansson
M G
MG
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Academic Hospital, Uppsala Science Park, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. mats.hansson@bioethics.uu.se
D035843:Biomedical Research; D030881:Disclosure; D004989:Ethics; D032984:Ethics, Research; D033161:Government Regulation; D028681:Moral Obligations; D012106:Research; D015871:Scientific Misconduct; D035642:Whistleblowing