Criminal decision making: the development of adolescent judgment, criminal responsibility, and culpability.
Theories of judgment in decision making hypothesize that throughout adolescence, judgment is impaired because the development of several psychosocial factors that are presumed to influence decision making lags behind the development of the cognitive capacities that are required to make mature decisions. This study uses an innovative video technique to examine the role of several psychosocial factors--temporal perspective, peer influence, and risk perception--in adolescent criminal decision making. Results based on data collected from 56 adolescents between the ages of 13 and 18 years revealed that detained youth were more likely to think of future-oriented consequences of engaging in the depicted delinquent act and less likely to anticipate pressure from their friends than nondetained youth. Examination of the developmental functions of the psychosocial factors indicates age-based differences on standardized measures of temporal perspective and resistance to peer influence and on measures of the role of risk perception in criminal decision making. Assessments of criminal responsibility and culpability were predicted by age and ethnicity. Implications for punishment in the juvenile justice system are discussed.
Fried
C S
CS
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Reppucci
N D
ND
D000293:Adolescent; D000367:Age Factors; D003417:Criminal Psychology; D003657:Decision Making; D005006:Ethnicity / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D006803:Human Development; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009040:Motion Pictures; D010379:Peer Group; D000297:Psychology, Adolescent; D012309:Risk-Taking; D012737:Sex Factors; D012941:Social Responsibility; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires