A checklist for critiquing treatment fidelity studies.
My assignment was to critique and integrate the previous papers. I have organized this paper as follows: (1) a description and rationale for a checklist which can be used in judging the quality of a fidelity measure; (2) a critique of the Schaedle and Epstein paper; (4) a critique of the Lucca paper; and (4) a review of the paper by Bond, Evans, Salyers, Williams, and Kim.
Calsyn
R J
RJ
University of Missouri-St Louis, 63121-4499, USA.
D006801:Humans; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D008605:Mental Health Services / Q000592:standards*; D015397:Program Evaluation; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014481:United States