Impact of hepatitis C virus infection on renal transplant outcome in India--a single centre study.
BACKGROUND
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is currently the main cause of hepatotropic viral infection in renal transplant (RT) recipient throughout the world. Contrary reports are available as regard graft and patient survival and liver disease outcome in these patients. From India, outcome of HCV positive patients following RT has not been documented. Herewith, we present results of RT in HCV positive patients at our centre.


METHODS
Study design was prospective case control with primary end point being graft and patient survival and the exposure being HCV infection. Between June 1995 till February 1998, 128 patients had RT at our hospital, of which, 37 (28.9%) were anti-HCV positive at the time of RT. All the patients were on triple immunosuppressive therapy. As a policy of unit, none of the donor had HBV and/or HCV infection. Anti-HCV positive patients formed the subjects (Gr. I), while anti-HCV negative patients severed as control (Gr. II). Anti HCV was done using 3rd generation ELISA tests kit. HCV-RNA could not be done due to non-availability. None of the positive patient was treated with anti-viral therapy. Acute rejection, serious infections, patient and graft survival and outcome of liver disease was compared in these patients.


RESULTS
Mean age of the patients, number of males, number of pre-RT haemodialysis and blood transfusion, donor age and HLA-mismatch were comparable in both the groups. Mean follow-up in Gr. I was 28 +/- 9.4 months and in Gr. II 31.4 +/- 7.6 months. At the end of this follow-up, acute rejection was seen in 43% and 33.3% patient in Gr. I and II respectively. In Gr. I, serious infections were seen in 30% while the same in Gr. II was 11.8% (p < 0.01). There was no difference in graft survival in Gr. I and II (72% and 66%) and the patient survival were also similar (72% and 66%). Of the deaths in Gr. I, 80% died of sepsis and 20% died of liver cell failure related to one each of hepatitis B and hepatitis E. Of the deaths in Gr. II, 65% died of sepsis and 17% died of hepatic cell failure. But, there was no difference in causes of deaths in these two groups. In both the groups, none of liver related death was due to isolated HCV infection. There was no effect of donor age, HLA mismatch, number of haemodialysis and pre-RT blood transfusion on the survival of graft as well as patient.


CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, HCV infection is major problem in RT with us. In a short follow-up of nearly 30 months, graft and patient survival is same in HCV positive and negative patients. However, serious infections are significantly more common in HCV positive patients.
Department of Nephrology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
S K
SK
Agarwal
S C
SC
Dash
M
M
Irshad
S
S
Gupta
D
D
Bhowmik
S C
SC
Tiwari
S
S
Guleria
S N
SN
Mehta
D000328:Adult; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D004797:Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; D006085:Graft Survival; D016174:Hepacivirus / Q000302:isolation & purification; D006526:Hepatitis C / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000401:mortality / Q000635:transmission*; D006801:Humans; D007194:India; D016030:Kidney Transplantation / Q000009:adverse effects*; D008297:Male; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors; D016019:Survival Analysis