title: Relation between confidence in yes-no and forced-choice tasks.
abstract: Yes-no and forced-choice tasks are common in psychology, but the empirical relation between reported confidence in the 2 tasks has been unclear. The authors examined this relation with 2 experiments. The general experimental method had participants first report confidence in the truth of each of many general knowledge statements (a yes-no task) then report confidence in them again when the statements were put into pairs where it was known that one statement was true and one was false (a forced-choice task). At issue was how confidence in the statements changed between the yes-no task and the forced-choice task. Two models, including the normative one, were ruled out as descriptive models. A linear model and a multiplicative model remain viable contenders.
authors: Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego 92093-0109, USA. cmckenzie@ucsd.edu
authors: C R
authors: CR
authors: McKenzie
authors: J T
authors: JT
authors: Wixted
authors: D C
authors: DC
authors: Noelle
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Gyurjyan
mesh_terms: D002755:Choice Behavior; D003198:Computer Simulation; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D015233:Models, Statistical; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011594:Psychometrics; D012044:Regression Analysis; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological