title: Comparing increment and decrement probes in the probed-sinewave paradigm.
abstract: Using the probed-sinewave paradigm, we explore the differences between increment and decrement probes across a range of frequencies (approx. 1-19 Hz). In this paradigm, detection threshold is measured for a small test probe presented on a large sinusoidally flickering background (at eight different phases). Probe thresholds are very similar for increment and decrement probes, but there is a very small (and systematic) difference: increment thresholds are usually slightly higher relative to decrement thresholds during the part of the cycle when the background's intensity is increasing. Although Wilson's (1997, Vis. Neuro., 14, 403-423) model substantially underestimates the size of this difference, it predicts some phase dependency. However, the existence of On- and Off-pathways in Wilson's model is not important for these predictions. A recent model by Snippe, Poot, and van Hateren (2000, Vis. Neuro., 17, 449-462) may be able to predict this result by using explicit contrast-gain control rather than separate On- and Off-pathways. Auxiliary experiments measuring the perceived polarity of the probe provide a further argument suggesting that separate On- and Off-pathways are not useful in explaining increment and decrement probe thresholds.
authors: Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA. sabina@psych.columbia.edu
authors: S S
authors: SS
authors: Wolfson
authors: N
authors: N
authors: Graham
mesh_terms: D000221:Adaptation, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D005425:Flicker Fusion / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D014795:Visual Pathways / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology