title: The impact on outcomes in a community hospital setting of using the AANS traumatic brain injury guidelines. Americans Associations for Neurologic Surgeons.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Traumatic brain injury poses a serious public health challenge. Treatment paradigms have dramatically shifted with the introduction of the American Association of Neurologic Surgeons (AANS) Guidelines for the Management of Severe Head Injury. Implementation of the AANS guidelines positively affects patient outcomes and can be successfully introduced in a community hospital setting.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data were collected both retrospectively and prospectively from the records of all trauma patients between 1994 and 1999. A cohort of 93 patients was selected. Thirty-seven patients were treated before the implementation of the AANS guidelines, and these were statistically compared with 56 patients treated after the implementation of the guidelines.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Implementation of the recommendations in the AANS guidelines in a standardized protocol resulted in a 9.13 times higher odds ratio of a good outcome relative to the odds of a poor outcome or death compared with a group managed before the practice change. A Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) admission score > 8 was associated with a 6.58 times higher odds ratio of a good outcome compared with a GCS admission score < or = 8. Odds ratio of a good outcome decreased by a factor of 0.92 for each year increase in age of patients starting at age 9. A dedicated neurotrauma team and comprehensive treatment algorithms are critical elements to this success. Hospital charges increased by more than $97,000 per patient, but are justifiable in the face of significantly improved outcomes.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Implementation of a traumatic brain injury protocol in a community hospital setting is practical and efficacious. Appropriate invasive monitoring of systemic and cerebral parameters guides care decisions. The protocol results in an increase in resource usage, but it also results in statistically improved outcomes justifying the increase in expenditures.
authors: Mission Hospital Regional Medical Center, Mission Viejo, California, USA.
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Palmer
authors: M K
authors: MK
authors: Bader
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Qureshi
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Palmer
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Shaver
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Borzatta
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Stalcup
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D017677:Age Distribution; D000465:Algorithms; D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000191:economics / Q000401:mortality / Q000628:therapy*; D002140:California / Q000453:epidemiology; D002648:Child; D002985:Clinical Protocols / Q000592:standards; D003663:Decision Trees; D005260:Female; D015600:Glasgow Coma Scale; D019983:Guideline Adherence / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards*; D006295:Health Resources / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017722:Hospital Charges / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006764:Hospitals, Community / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D015601:Injury Severity Score; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D008991:Monitoring, Physiologic; D016017:Odds Ratio; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D010343:Patient Admission; D010348:Patient Care Team / Q000458:organization & administration; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016019:Survival Analysis