title: Are emotionally charged lures immune to false memory?
abstract: Using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott task and E. Tulving's (1985) remember-know judgments for recognition memory, the authors explored whether emotional words can show the false memory effect. Participants studied lists containing nonemotional, orthographic associates (e.g., cape, tape, ripe; part, perk, dark) of either emotional (e.g., rape) or nonemotional (e.g., park) critical lures. This setup produced significant false "remembering" of emotional lures, even though initially no emotional words appeared at study. When 3 emotional nonlure words appeared at study, emotional-lure false recognition more than doubled. However, when these 3 study words also appeared on the recognition test, false memory for the emotional lures was reduced. Across experiments, participants misremembered nonemotional lures more often than they did emotional lures, but they were more likely to rate emotional lures as "remembered," once they had been recognized as "old." The authors discuss findings in light of J. J. Freyd and D. H. Gleave's (1996) criticisms of this task.
authors: Department of Psychology, Cleveland State University, USA. bpesta22@cs.com
authors: B J
authors: BJ
authors: Pesta
authors: M D
authors: MD
authors: Murphy
authors: R E
authors: RE
authors: Sanders
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D004644:Emotions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D012094:Repression, Psychology; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D012660:Semantics