Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection.
A new methodology for measuring illusory conscious experience of the "presentation" of unstudied material (phantom recollection) is evaluated that extracts measurements directly from recognition responses, rather than indirectly from introspective reports. Application of this methodology in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm (Experiments 1 and 2) and in a more conventional paradigm (Experiment 3) showed that 2 processes (phantom recollection and familiarity) contribute to false recognition of semantically related distractors. Phantom recollection was the larger contributor to false recognition of critical distractors in the DRM paradigm, but surprisingly, it was also the larger contributor to false recognition of other types of distractors. Variability in false recognition was tied to variability in phantom recollection. Experimental control of phantom recollection was achieved with manipulations that were motivated by fuzzy-trace theory's hypothesis that the phenomenon is gist-based.
Brainerd
C J
CJ
Department of Special Education, Rehabilitation, and School Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721, USA. brainerd@u.arizona.edu
Wright
R
R
Reyna
V F
VF
Mojardin
A H
AH
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007088:Illusions; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D012094:Repression, Psychology; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology