title: The influence of cumulus-oocyte complex morphology and meiotic inhibitors on the kinetics of nuclear maturation in cattle.
abstract: This study evaluated whether pre-established morphological classes of bovine cumulus oocyte complex (COCs) differ in their kinetics of meiosis resumption after 4 h of incubation and whether the timing of COCs resumption of meiosis differed after a period of maintained meiotic arrest. Bovine COCs were aspirated from 2- to 5- mm follicles and classified according to the state of their cumulus cells and cytoplasm (Classes 1 to 3). Groups of 15 to 20 COCs were fixed at 0 h or after an incubation period of 4 h. In addition, COCs from Class 1 were first incubated for 4 h on a theca cell monolayer or in the presence of 2 microg/mL of cycloheximide, rinsed and then incubated in cycloheximide and theca cell-free medium for another 4 h. Oocytes then were fixed and evaluated for state of nuclear maturation. Results show that at 0 h, COCs from Class 3 have fewer oocytes at the GV stage than COCs from Class 1 and Class 2 (respectively 69.3+/-3.2 vs 88.8+/-3.4% and 86.9% GV+/-4.3% SEM; P < 0.05). After 4 h of incubation, all COCs classes show a significant decrease in the number of COCs at the GV stage. The COCs maintained in meiotic arrest and then incubated for 4 h resume meiosis faster than COCs incubated in cycloheximide and theca cell-free medium (19.4+/-2.5, 33.3+/-7.3 and 59.9+/-6.5% GV SEM, respectively). The COCs of Class 3 have fewer oocytes at the GV stage at the beginning of incubation than all other classes. The number of COCs at the GV stage after 4 h of incubation in cycloheximide and theca cell-free medium is not significantly different than those COCs incubated in the presence of theca cell monolayers for 24 h (58.8+/-6.5 vs. 56.4+/-6.4% SEM; respectively). Our results indicate that the ability of theca cells to maintain oocytes at the GV stage could be limited to those oocytes that were not committed or primed in vivo to resume maturation as indicated by their faster maturation kinetics.
authors: Department of Animal Sciences, Centre de Recherche en Biologie de la Reproduction (CRBR) Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
authors: M A
authors: MA
authors: Mayes
authors: M A
authors: MA
authors: Sirard
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D002467:Cell Nucleus / Q000502:physiology; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D003470:Culture Media; D003513:Cycloheximide / Q000494:pharmacology; D005260:Female; D007700:Kinetics; D008540:Meiosis / Q000187:drug effects*; D009865:Oocytes / Q000648:ultrastructure*; D006080:Ovarian Follicle / Q000166:cytology*; D013799:Theca Cells / Q000502:physiology
chemical_list: D003470:Culture Media; D003513:Cycloheximide