title: Use of exponential diffusion imaging to determine the age of ischemic infarcts.
abstract: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) detects acute ischemic infarcts with high lesion conspicuity. Determination of infarct age is difficult on DWI alone because infarct signal intensity (SIinfarct) on DWI is influenced by T2 properties ("T2 shine-through"). Maps of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) reflect pure diffusion characteristics without T2 effects but have low lesion conspicuity. Thus, in clinical practice, combined use of DWI and ADC maps is required. Exponential DWI (eDWI) is an innovative means of MRI-diffusion data analysis that merges the advantages of DWI and ADC maps. The authors hypothesized that SIinfarct on eDWI would correlate with infarct age. The authors studied 114 consecutive patients who had 120 ischemic strokes with clearly determined onset times and who underwent echo-planar DWI. The eDWI were generated by dividing the signal intensity on DWI by that on the corresponding T2 image on a pixel-by-pixel basis. SIinfarct on eDWI was measured in the lesion core and expressed as a percentage of contralateral control tissue. On eDWI, relative SIinfarct changed significantly with infarct age (P < .0001). When patients were sorted in infarct-age groups, no significant differences were found within the first 120 hours. However, for patients studied within 5 days, the mean relative SIinfarct was significantly higher compared with patients studied > or = 8 days after stroke (P < .05). For all infarcts up to 5 days old, the eDWI signal intensity was higher than control tissue (hyperintense appearance). All infarcts > 10 days old had an eDWI signal intensity lower than control tissue (hypointense appearance). The authors concluded that the use of eDWI, as a single set of images, reliably differentiates acute infarcts (< or = 5 days old) from infarcts > 10 days old. This feature would be expected to be helpful when the distinction between acute and nonacute infarction cannot be determined on clinical grounds.
authors: Division of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. sengelter@uhbs.ch
authors: S T
authors: ST
authors: Engelter
authors: J M
authors: JM
authors: Provenzale
authors: J R
authors: JR
authors: Petrella
authors: M J
authors: MJ
authors: Alberts
authors: D M
authors: DM
authors: DeLong
authors: J R
authors: JR
authors: MacFall
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002544:Cerebral Infarction / Q000175:diagnosis*; D004058:Diffusion; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity