title: Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography for visualization of lower extremity arteries.
abstract: Objective vascular assessment is frequently required before microvascular reconstruction involving the lower extremities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for preoperative assessment before free flap surgery. Five patients underwent preoperative MRA: one before fibula harvest for oromandibular reconstruction, and four before muscle free flap reconstruction of the lower extremity. In all patients, the tibioperoneal trunk, anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and peroneal arteries were well visualized to the ankle, including pathological occlusions. The radiographic findings were demonstrated at surgery and were confirmed to be accurate. These findings facilitated and guided the surgical procedure. This study strongly suggests the accuracy and surgical relevance of MRA before free flap surgery. MRA is desirable over angiography because of its noninvasive nature. It may also be better than ultrasonography because the latter is highly dependent on the technician (particularly in identifying the peroneal artery). MRA may likely replace angiography as the objective procedure of choice before microvascular surgery.
authors: Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
authors: B A
authors: BA
authors: Mast
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D015901:Angiography, Digital Subtraction; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007866:Leg / Q000098:blood supply* / Q000601:surgery*; D018810:Magnetic Resonance Angiography; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011300:Preoperative Care; D013524:Surgical Flaps / Q000098:blood supply*