Comparison of dentine hypersensitivity in selected occidental and oriental populations.
Epidemiological data on dentine hypersensitivity (DH) prevalence are limited. Few studies have compared prevalence between populations. The aim of this investigation, therefore, was to compare the perception and prevalence of DH in two distinct non-periodontal practice populations, one U.K. and one Korean. Completed questionnaires from 557 patients (230 males and 327 females, comprising 115 males and 162 females, mean age 41.7 years (s.d.=14.36), U.K. and 115 males and 165 females, mean age 29.7 years (s.d.=11.86), Korean) were collected. Analysis was by frequency distribution and cross-tabulation (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)). DH prevalence was similar and at levels comparable with those reported previously. Prevalence was higher in the third and fourth decades in both populations. Although there were no differences between U.K. or Korean males and U.K. or Korean females, there was a significant difference between gender reporting of DH, with more females complaining of DH than males (standard normal deviation (SND)=4.3, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.1134-0.2736). DH appeared to be regarded by patients as not severe in most cases, so treatment was not generally sought. Of those who claimed to have sought treatment, a significant number had received restorative treatment. Of those patients, only 23.3% of U.K. and <or=2% of Korean patients claimed to have used a desensitizing dentifrice. Pain from DH was reported as low grade (slight, occasional) occurring over 5 years in both populations. Cold appeared to be the most reported stimulus in the two populations. Less periodontal surgery had been undertaken in these two populations (12.6% U.K. and 7.1% Korean) compared with those referred to a teaching hospital periodontal department (34.5%). This compared favourably with previous findings in the general dental population (15.5%). Discomfort following hygiene therapy did not appear to last >or=7 days in either population. The results indicated that there were no significant differences between U.K.- and Korean-based populations in their perception of DH, with the exception that more females complained of sensitivity than males in both groups. Overall, DH was not considered a major dental problem by most patients in either of the populations.
Gillam
D G
DG
Department of Periodontology, Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Care Sciences, University of London, London, UK. David_Gillam@BlockDrug.com
Seo
H S
HS
Newman
H N
HN
Bulman
J S
JS
D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D044466:Asian People; D003080:Cold Temperature / Q000009:adverse effects; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D003777:Dental Prophylaxis / Q000009:adverse effects; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003796:Dental Service, Hospital / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003802:Dentifrices / Q000627:therapeutic use; D003807:Dentin Sensitivity / Q000453:epidemiology*; D005260:Female; D006784:Hospitals, Teaching / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D007723:Korea / Q000453:epidemiology; D008297:Male; D010510:Periodontal Diseases / Q000453:epidemiology; D010517:Periodontics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D015995:Prevalence; D012017:Referral and Consultation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012737:Sex Factors; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D006113:United Kingdom / Q000453:epidemiology; D044465:White People
D003802:Dentifrices