Chronic and temporary distinct expectancies as comparison standards: automatic contrast in dispositional judgments.
In 4 studies, the authors examined whether making outcome expectancies distinct resulted in their use as comparison standards and, consequently, in contrastive dispositional inferences for a target's behaviors. The expectancies examined were based on either chronic future-event expectancies (Study 1) or temporary, manipulated expectancy standards (Studies 2-4). Analyses revealed that when contextual expectancies were distinct or separable from target information, participants' dispositional judgments were contrasted from them under cognitive load and overcorrected (assimilated to them) under no load. These effects were mediated by participants' behavior categorizations. Evidence suggestive of a proceduralized form of correction for task difficulty and an effortful awareness-based correction for the effects of expectancies also were found. Results are examined in light of recent models of the dispositional inference process.
Weary
G
G
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA.
Tobin
S J
SJ
Reich
D A
DA
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003071:Cognition; D019336:Cognitive Science; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009042:Motivation; D011593:Psychology, Social; D012938:Social Perception