title: Functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements of sound-level encoding in the absence of background scanner noise.
abstract: Effects of sound level on auditory cortical activation are seen in neuroimaging data. However, factors such as the cortical response to the intense ambient scanner noise and to the bandwidth of the acoustic stimuli will both confound precise quantification and interpretation of such sound-level effects. The present study used temporally "sparse" imaging to reduce effects of scanner noise. To achieve control for stimulus bandwidth, three schemes were compared for sound-level matching across bandwidth: component level, root-mean-square power and loudness. The calculation of the loudness match was based on the model reported by Moore and Glasberg [Acta Acust. 82, 335-345 (1996)]. Ten normally hearing volunteers were scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging (tMRI) while listening to a 300-Hz tone presented at six different sound levels between 66 and 91 dB SPL and a harmonic-complex tone (F0= 186 Hz) presented at 65 and 85 dB SPL. This range of sound levels encompassed all three bases of sound-level matching. Activation in the superior temporal gyrus, induced by each of the eight tone conditions relative to a quiet baseline condition, was quantified as to extent and magnitude. Sound level had a small, but significant, effect on the extent of activation for the pure tone, but not for the harmonic-complex tone, while it had a significant effect on the response magnitude for both types of stimulus. Response magnitude increased linearly as a function of sound level for the full range of levels for the pure tone. The harmonic-complex tone produced greater activation than the pure tone, irrespective of the matching scheme for sound level, indicating that bandwidth had a greater effect on the pattern of auditory activation than sound level. Nevertheless, when the data were collapsed across stimulus class, extent and magnitude were significantly correlated with the loudness scale (measured in phons), but not with the intensity scale (measured in SPL). We therefore recommend the loudness formula as the most appropriate basis of matching sound level to control for loudness effects when cortical responses to other stimulus attributes, such as stimulus class, are the principal concern.
authors.affiliation: MRC Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom. debbie@ihr.mrc.ac.uk
authors.forename: D A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Hall
authors.forename: M P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Haggard
authors.forename: A Q
authors.initials: AQ
authors.lastname: Summerfield
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Akeroyd
authors.forename: A R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Palmer
authors.forename: R W
authors.initials: RW
authors.lastname: Bowtell
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001301:Audiometry, Pure-Tone; D001303:Auditory Cortex / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology*; D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008875:Middle Aged; D009622:Noise