Chondral lesions of the knee: A new localization method and correlation with associated pathology.
OBJECTIVE
We report a new method of describing and recording chondral lesions of the knee at arthroscopy in order to permit a more accurate and meaningful analysis of patterns of articular cartilage damage.


METHODS
Case series study.


METHODS
Data were collected prospectively at 1,000 consecutive arthroscopies by the senior author and chondral lesions were recorded on anatomic articular maps divided into different functional zones. Ten zones on the femur were determined by tibiofemoral weight-bearing and flexion horizons (namely the 0 degrees, 45 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees horizons as they pass the anterior meniscosynovial junction). Ten zones were determined on the tibia, principally by meniscal relations, and 6 zones on the patella. This allowed the size, Outerbridge grade, and location to be analyzed in relation to mechanism, chronicity, and associated intra-articular pathologies. The recording methods were tested for interobserver reproducibility in 50 subsequent cases at the same arthroscopy by 2 independent observers. The results were analyzed by a third person, and showed a relatively small interobserver error of 7.2% for size for a set of grade 3 and 4 lesions and only a 3% error for site. The Fisher exact test was used. The data sheets were entered onto a computer spreadsheet database using standard software (Excel; Microsoft, Redmond, WA) to permit analysis of the data.


RESULTS
There were 1,553 chondral lesions in 853 patients correlated with associated lesions, including 356 meniscal lesions, 230 ligamentous injuries, 440 synovial lesions, and other pathologies. High degrees of correlation have been found between specific lesions and their opposing surfaces and the progression of these with time.


CONCLUSIONS
The problem of precision of localization of articular lesions in the knee has been recently acknowledged by the International Cartilage Research Society (ICRS). However, such recording ought to take into account both function and contact with other structures. This would appear essential in the assessment of prognosis and comparisons between different treatment regimes.
Hunt
N
N
Imperial College School of Medicine, Division of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Charing Cross Hospital, London, England.
Sanchez-Ballester
J
J
Pandit
R
R
Thomas
R
R
Strachan
R
R
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001182:Arthroscopy / Q000379:methods*; D002358:Cartilage, Articular / Q000293:injuries* / Q000473:pathology*; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007718:Knee Injuries / Q000145:classification / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D008023:Ligaments, Articular / Q000293:injuries / Q000473:pathology; D008297:Male; D008592:Menisci, Tibial / Q000473:pathology; D008875:Middle Aged; D015588:Observer Variation; D010329:Patella / Q000473:pathology; D011446:Prospective Studies; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012421:Rupture; D013499:Surface Properties; D013583:Synovial Membrane / Q000293:injuries / Q000473:pathology; D000070600:Tibial Meniscus Injuries