An in vitro biomechanical comparison of two interlocking-nail systems for fixation of ostectomized equine third metacarpal bones.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the mechanical properties of 2 interlocking-nail systems for fixation of ostectomized equine third metacarpi (MC3): (1) a standard interlocking nail with 2 parallel screws proximal and distal to a 1-cm ostectomy; and (2) a modified interlocking nail with 2 screws proximal and distal to a 1-cm ostectomy with the screws offset by 30 degrees.


METHODS
Twelve pairs of adult equine forelimbs intact from the midradius distally.


METHODS
Twelve pairs of equine MC3 were divided into 2 test groups (6 pairs each): torsion and caudocranial 4-point bending. Standard interlocking nails (6-hole, 13-mm diameter, 230-mm length) were placed in 1 randomly selected bone from each pair. Modified interlocking nails (6-hole, 13-mm, 230-mm length, screw holes offset by 30 degrees) were placed in the contralateral bone from each pair. All bones had 1-cm mid-diaphyseal ostectomies. Six construct pairs were tested in caudocranial 4-point bending to determine stiffness and failure properties. The remaining 6 construct pairs were tested in torsion to determine torsional stiffness and yield load. Mean values for each fixation method were compared using a paired t test within each group. Significance was set at P <.05.


RESULTS
Mean (+/-SEM) values for the MC3-standard interlocking-nail composite and the MC3-modified interlocking-nail composite, respectively, in 4-point bending were: composite rigidity, 3,119 +/- 334.5 Nm/rad (newton. meter/radian) and 3,185 +/- 401.2 Nm/rad; yield bending moment, 205.0 +/- 18.46 Nm and 186.7 +/- 6.17 Nm; and failure bending moment, 366.4 +/- 21.82 Nm and 378.1 +/- 20.41 Nm. There were no significant differences in the biomechanical values for bending between the 2 fixation methods. In torsion, mean (+/-SEM) values for the MC3-standard interlocking-nail composite and the MC3-modified interlocking-nail composite were: composite rigidity, 135.5 +/- 7.128 Nm/rad and 112.5 +/- 7.432 Nm/rad; gap stiffness, 207.6 +/- 10.57 Nm/rad and 181.7 +/- 12.89 Nm/rad; and yield load, 123.3 +/- 2.563 Nm and 107.5 +/- 8.353 Nm, respectively. Composite rigidity and gap stiffness for standard interlocking-nail fixations were significantly higher than the modified interlocking-nail fixation technique in torsion. Yield load had a tendency to be higher for the standard interlocking-nail fixation (P =.15).


CONCLUSIONS
No significant differences in biomechanical properties were identified between a standard interlocking nail and one with the screw holes offset by 30 degrees in caudocranial 4-point bending. The standard interlocking nail was superior to the modified interlocking nail in torsional gap stiffness and composite rigidity. The torsional yield load also tended to be higher for the standard interlocking nail.


CONCLUSIONS
The standard interlocking nail with parallel screw holes is superior to a modified interlocking nail with the screw holes offset by 30 degrees in ostectomized equine MC3 bones in vitro when tested in torsion.
Lopez
M J
MJ
Comparative Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Wilson
D G
DG
Trostle
S S
SS
Markel
M D
MD
D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D001858:Bone Nails / Q000592:standards / Q000662:veterinary*; D001860:Bone Plates / Q000662:veterinary; D005552:Forelimb; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D050723:Fractures, Bone / Q000601:surgery / Q000662:veterinary*; D006736:Horses / Q000293:injuries* / Q000601:surgery; D050279:Metacarpal Bones / Q000293:injuries* / Q000601:surgery*; D014102:Torsion Abnormality / Q000662:veterinary