Circulation of core collection monographs in an academic medical library.
Academic medical librarians responsible for monograph acquisition face a challenging task. From the plethora of medical monographs published each year, academic medical librarians must select those most useful to their patrons. Unfortunately, none of the selection tools available to medical librarians are specifically intended to assist academic librarians with medical monograph selection. The few short core collection lists that are available are intended for use in the small hospital or internal medicine department library. As these are the only selection tools available, however, many academic medical librarians spend considerable time reviewing these collection lists and place heavy emphasis on the acquisition of listed books. The study reported here was initiated to determine whether the circulation of listed books in an academic library justified the emphasis placed on the acquisition of these books. Circulation statistics for "listed" and "nonlisted" books in the hematology (WH) section of Indiana University School of Medicine's Ruth Lilly Medical Library were studied. The average circulation figures for listed books were nearly two times as high as the corresponding figures for the WH books in general. These data support the policies of those academic medical libraries that place a high priority on collection of listed books.
Schmidt
C M
CM
Muncie Center for Medical Education, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana 47306, USA.
Eckerman
N L
NL
D001874:Book Selection; D006405:Hematology; D007196:Indiana; D007993:Libraries, Medical / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D016243:Library Collection Development / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012014:Reference Books, Medical