Standardization of prostate brachytherapy treatment plans.
OBJECTIVE
Whereas custom-designed plans are the norm for prostate brachytherapy, the relationship between linear prostate dimensions and volume calls into question the routine need for customized treatment planning. With the goal of streamlining the treatment-planning process, we have compared the treatment margins (TMs) achieved with one standard plan applied to patients with a wide range of prostate volumes.


METHODS
Preimplant transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images of 50 unselected University of Washington patients with T1-T2 cancer and a prostate volume between 20 cc and 50 cc were studied. Patients were arbitrarily grouped into categories of 20-30 cc, 30-40 cc, and 40-50 cc. A standard 19-needle plan was devised for patients in the 30- to 40-cc range, using an arbitrary minimum margin of 5 mm around the gross tumor volume (GTV), making use of inverse planning technology to achieve 100% coverage of the target volume with accentuation of dose at the periphery and sparing of the central region. The idealized plan was applied to each patient's TRUS study. The distances (TMs) between the prostatic edge (GTV) and treated volume (TV) were determined perpendicular to the prostatic margin.


RESULTS
Averaged over the entire patient group, the ratio of thickness to width was 1.4, whereas the ratio of length to width was 1.3. These values were fairly constant over the range of volumes, emphasizing that the prostate retains its general shape as volume increases. The idealized standard plan was overlaid on the ultrasound images of the 17 patients in the 30- to 40-cc group and the V100, the percentage of target volume receiving 100% or more of the prescription dose, was 98% or greater for 15 of the 17 patients. The lateral and posterior TMs fell within a narrow range, most being within 2 mm of the idealized 5-mm TM. To estimate whether a 10-cc volume-interval stratification was reasonable, the standard plan generated from the 30- to 40-cc prostate model was applied to 5 patients each from the 20- to 30-cc group and the 40- to 50-cc group. Using the standard plan designed for the 30- to 40-cc group, the TMs were closer to 10 mm than to 5 mm for the smaller volume glands and too small for the larger volume ones, assuming an ideal margin of 5 mm.


CONCLUSIONS
The application of standardized plans to prostate brachytherapy is feasible. Stratifying the volume in 10-cc intervals appears to be adequate, suggesting that the majority of cases appropriate for treatment with brachytherapy might be treated with three standard plans. While the authors believe that the use of a limited number of standard treatment plans is feasible, practical, and medically acceptable, it should be emphasized that the use of a standard plan should always be previewed by computer-aided application to the particular patient's planning images.
Ove
R
R
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Wallner
K
K
Badiozamani
K
K
Korjsseon
T
T
Sutlief
S
S
D001918:Brachytherapy / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011467:Prostate / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D011880:Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D014463:Ultrasonography