Marginal characteristics of different filling materials and filling methods with standardized cavity preparation.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of different filling materials and methods on marginal integrity in Black Class I fillings.


METHODS
Standardized occlusal cavities were prepared in 80 extracted human molars. The preparations were filled with composite resin (1), with composite resin using the incremental technique (2), an experimental glass-fiber-reinforced (3) and polyester-reinforced (4) composite resin, a direct composite inlay (5), a ceramic insert (6), a Cerafil inlay (7), and with an experimental direct filling using Dyract AP compomer (8). Allocation of the teeth to the test groups was randomized; further processing was done on a blind basis. After the preparation of replicas, the teeth were subjected to a thermomechanical cycling process of 2,000 temperature cycles (5 degrees C/55 degrees C) and 50,000 stress cycles (50 N). This was followed by production of a second set of replicas and quantitative margin analysis by SEM (200X). A dye penetration test was then performed on the mesiodistal section.


RESULTS
Groups 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7 displayed a good primary marginal quality, with the proportion of continuous margins reaching more than 85%. Significantly poorer results were recorded for the experimental glass-fiber-reinforced composite resins and Dyract compomer, where the proportion of perfect margins was only between 36% and 73%. In groups 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7, marginal integrity remained stable after the thermomechanical stress cycles, with the Cerafil inlays recording the best values: 89% perfect margins and 3% marginal gaps. In contrast, the experimental composite resins and the compomer underwent a significant (p < 0.05) increase in the proportion of marginal gaps and a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in the proportion of continuous margin.


CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study show that neither Dyract compomer nor the glass-fiber-reinforced composite resins tested can be recommended for use in the occlusally stressed posterior region, whereas the other filling materials and methods were sufficiently stress resistant.
Stoll
R
R
University of Marburg, MZ/ZMK, Department of Operative Dentistry, Georg-Voigt-Str. 3, D-35033 Marburg, Germany. stoll@mailer.uni-marburg.de
Remes
H
H
Kunzelmann
K H
KH
Stachniss
V
V
D000134:Acid Etching, Dental; D002516:Ceramics / Q000737:chemistry; D004396:Coloring Agents; D020770:Compomers / Q000737:chemistry; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D003736:Dental Cavity Lining; D003737:Dental Cavity Preparation / Q000145:classification / Q000379:methods*; D003763:Dental Leakage / Q000145:classification; D018772:Dental Marginal Adaptation; D003764:Dental Materials / Q000737:chemistry*; D003775:Dental Polishing; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000145:classification / Q000379:methods*; D005898:Glass / Q000737:chemistry; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements / Q000737:chemistry; D006801:Humans; D007284:Inlays; D008689:Methacrylates / Q000737:chemistry; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D011091:Polyesters / Q000737:chemistry; D017640:Silicates / Q000737:chemistry; D016037:Single-Blind Method; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013499:Surface Properties; D013816:Thermodynamics
D004396:Coloring Agents; D020770:Compomers; D003188:Composite Resins; D003764:Dental Materials; C088486:Dyract; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D008689:Methacrylates; C084019:Pekafill; D011091:Polyesters; D017640:Silicates; C009753:fiberglass; C061499:Ketac-Bond