title: Evaluation of a decision aid for patients considering autologous blood donation before open-heart surgery.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Patients undergoing open-heart surgery frequently require one or more blood transfusions. Because of the risks of receiving blood from volunteer donors, some patients choose to donate their own blood before surgery. This reduces their risk of exposure to volunteer-donated blood, but it increases their chance of receiving any transfusion, either of self-donated or volunteer-donated blood. Also, preoperative hemoglobin levels tend to be lower in patients who donate their own blood, and surgeons may be more likely to give transfusions to patients with self-donated blood. To help patients decide whether to donate their blood before surgery, we designed a decision aid comprising a booklet and audiotape and assessed its effectiveness.
  
  
  METHODS
  The 59 study subjects were a sample of consecutive patients referred to the Ottawa Heart Institute between Oct. 1, 1998, and Jan. 5, 1999, for future coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery or combined surgery. All were eligible to donate blood. Initial questionnaires were administered in the clinic by a physician or study nurse, and follow-up questionnaires were completed at home and mailed in after use of the decision aid. Outcome measures included patients' knowledge, values (importance ratings), preferences for transfusion methods, decisional conflict (the amount of uncertainty about the course of action to take), risk perception and acceptability of the decision aid.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mean knowledge scores on a 15-item test increased from 67% correct responses before the decision aid to 85% correct responses after use of the aid (p < 0.001); the effect was similar when the patients were divided into subgroups according to education level. The number of patients favouring donating their own blood increased from 41 (69%) before to 45 (76%) after use of the aid. Nine (64%) of 14 initially uncertain patients preferred autologous donation after use of the aid. The overall mean score for decisional conflict was unchanged, at 1.7, which indicated a low level of uncertainty. Risk perception improved, from 0%-14% correct responses on an 8-item test before the aid to 18%-60% correct responses after use of the aid. The decision aid was acceptable to the majority of patients, and 95% indicated that they would recommend it to others.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The decision aid improved knowledge and risk perceptions of blood donation and transfusion, and it helped uncertain patients to make choices.
authors.affiliation: Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ont. curry.grant@ices.on.ca
authors.forename: F C
authors.initials: FC
authors.lastname: Grant
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Laupacis
authors.forename: A M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: O'Connor
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Rubens
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Robblee
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000368:Aged; D001782:Blood Donors / Q000193:education* / Q000523:psychology; D001804:Blood Transfusion, Autologous / Q000523:psychology*; D006348:Cardiac Surgical Procedures; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D005260:Female; D006331:Heart Diseases / Q000601:surgery; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010349:Patient Compliance; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011300:Preoperative Care / Q000379:methods* / Q000523:psychology; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires