title: Reply to Fudin and Lembessis's critique of Malik and Paraherakis's commentary regarding the capacity of the unconscious.
abstract: In an earlier paper, we had suggested that the research examining the capacity of the unconscious cannot be interpreted unambiguously to make the claim that the unconscious is limited in scope. Fudin and Lembessis challenged our conclusion, and we address their concerns.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Dawson College, Westmount, QC, Canada.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Malik
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Paraherakis
mesh_terms: D003243:Consciousness / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D014473:Unconscious, Psychology