[Which objectively assessed limitations in health status, activities of daily living, or in psychological and social spheres are decisive for referral to a nursing home or to a home for the aged].
Which type of limitation is most decisive for a positive indication for a residential home or a somatic or psycho-geriatric nursing home, and to what extent do data on living situation (independent, adapted or intramural) and the social situation (alone or living together) influence this qualification? To obtain an answer to this question three experiments with an integrated, objective and independent assessment-for-care system were set up in the Netherlands. We studied one of them, in the town of Meppel, started in 1996. The study population consisted of all older people living in and around Meppel who had a positive indication for either a residential home, or a somatic or psycho-geriatric nursing home (N = 206 in 1998). Differences in limitations were computed by means of analysis of variance and the types of limitation and their impact on the type of allocated institutions were computed by logistic regression. The limitations only partially explain the types of indication. Indication for a residential home is based on physical limitations. When these increase they become a contra-indication for a residential home and a somatic nursing home indication is given. Mental limitations primarily yield indications for psycho-geriatric nursing homes. Social limitations have a higher incidence among persons with an indication for a somatic nursing home but cannot fully explain this indication. Persons with a residential home indication were significantly more often from an adapted living situation background. The living situation -alone or together-does not have an impact on the indication. We may not conclude that the assessment took place objectively, for, based on the registration it is impossible to conclude for what criteria a person was indicated for a specific type of institution. The objective of assessment, the allocation and distribution of collectively financed care in residential homes and nursing homes based on verifiable assessment methodology could not be realised.
Dijkstra
G J
GJ
Gezondheidswetenschappen RuG, Postbus 196, 9700 AD Groningen. g.j.dijkstra@med.rug.nl
Groothoff
J W
JW
Post
D
D
D000203:Activities of Daily Living / Q000145:classification; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D016330:Frail Elderly / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D015577:Geriatric Assessment; D006304:Health Status; D006707:Homes for the Aged / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D007326:Institutionalization / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008297:Male; D008603:Mental Health; D009426:Netherlands / Q000453:epidemiology; D009735:Nursing Homes / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011159:Population Surveillance; D012307:Risk Factors; D012919:Social Behavior