title: Clinical outcome of the modified pi-plasty procedure for sagittal synostosis.
abstract: The aim of the study was to evaluate the modified pi-plasty procedure for the treatment of sagittal synostosis, assessing the issues of safety, complications, morphological outcome, and degree of parental satisfaction. A retrospective evaluation of 110 patients with nonsyndromal single suture sagittal synostosis operated on with the modified pi-plasty procedure was undertaken. Cephalometric radiographs were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively at ages 3 and 5 years in three standardized projections. The Cephalic Index and the Axial Width Ratio were determined and used as objective outcome measures. An evaluation of the radiographic digital markings was carried out using a Beaten Copper Score. A parental questionnaire was used to obtain a subjective esthetical outcome assessment. The patient population consisted of 76% boys and 24% girls with a 20% incidence of a positive familial history of craniosynostosis. The mean age at surgery was 7.73 months. Morbidity from the procedure was minimal and there were no mortalities. The Cephalic Index changed from a mean preoperative value of 65% to a postoperative mean value of 72% (P = 0.00004). The mean Axial Width Ratio changed from a preoperative 80% to 72% at the 3-year evaluation (P = 0.00029). The Beaten Copper score changed from a mean preoperative value of 2.35 to 5.42 postoperatively at 3 years (P = 0.00001). The response rate to the questionnaire was 86%, and there were significant postoperative improvements in all studied aspects of the skull shape. The modified pi-plasty is a safe technique, and it induces significant objective changes in skull morphology toward normality. It also yields a high degree of parental satisfaction with regard to aesthetic outcome, as evaluated by a written questionnaire.
authors.affiliation: Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Götenberg, Sweden. ferreira@medfak.gu.se
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Guimarães-Ferreira
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Gewalli
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: David
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Olsson
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Friede
authors.forename: C G
authors.initials: CG
authors.lastname: Lauritzen
mesh_terms: D001294:Attitude to Health; D002508:Cephalometry; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003393:Cranial Sutures / Q000002:abnormalities* / Q000601:surgery; D003398:Craniosynostoses / Q000235:genetics / Q000601:surgery*; D003399:Craniotomy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000145:classification / Q000379:methods*; D004954:Esthetics; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D007223:Infant; D008297:Male; D010290:Parents; D010294:Parietal Bone / Q000002:abnormalities* / Q000601:surgery; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012449:Safety; D012886:Skull / Q000473:pathology; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016896:Treatment Outcome