title: Flow cytometry in the diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Peritoneal carcinomatosis is the second major cause of ascites. Because of its frequency and poor prognosis, it is important to establish an accurate diagnosis. The aim of this study was to analyze the use of a DNA index, detemined by flow cytometry in the differential diagnosis of ascites, and to compare it to the cytopathological examination.
  
  
  METHODS
  A prospective analysis was carried out on 67 patients (39 female, 28 male; mean age, 53+/-14 yr [range, 5-82]) with ascites of various etiologies. Peritoneal carcinomatosis was detected in 21 patients, whereas in 46 the ascites was of noncarcinomatosis origin.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The sensitivity of the cytopathological examination for the diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis was 42.9%, and the specificity was 100%. The mean DNA index determined by flow cytometry was similar for peritoneal carcinomatosis and noncarcinomatosis patients, being 1.28 versus 1.01, respectively, in the preparations without control lymphocytes and 1.28 versus 1.04, respectively, when control lymphocytes were added. The sensitivity of DNA index cytometry was 57.1% and specificity, 93.5%. The combined use of the DNA index and cytopathological examination did not show an advantage over the use of any of the tests individually, although the DNA index was able to detect half of the cases of peritoneal carcinomatosis in which cytopathological examination was negative. Although the sensitivity was higher when the parameters were associated, the DNA index did not offer a statistically significant advantage over the use of cytopathological examination alone, which in turn had higher specificity.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The DNA index presented lower sensitivity for the diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis when used alone, showing no advantage over conventional cytopathological examination. However, the DNA index was able to detect 50.0% of peritoneal carcinomatosis cases whose conventional cytopathological examinations were negative, and could be valuable in these situations.
authors.affiliation: Postgraduate Course in Hepatology, Santa Casa Hospital, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
authors.forename: C T
authors.initials: CT
authors.lastname: Both
authors.forename: A A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: de Mattos
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Neumann
authors.forename: M D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Reis
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001201:Ascites / Q000175:diagnosis; D001202:Ascitic Fluid / Q000473:pathology; D002277:Carcinoma / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000235:genetics / Q000473:pathology; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004273:DNA, Neoplasm / Q000032:analysis; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D005260:Female; D005434:Flow Cytometry; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010534:Peritoneal Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000235:genetics / Q000473:pathology; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity
chemical_list: D004273:DNA, Neoplasm