Evolution and inequality.
Some scientists remain wary of evolutionary theory because of its supposed genetic determinism and insensitivity to the inequalities often associated with gender, race and class. Our aim is to show that such fears are outdated and to foster a role for evolutionary theory in public health. We use complex adaptive systems theory and the concept of a tradeoff between current and future reproduction to argue that when the future is objectively risky and uncertain the optimal reproductive strategy will often be to reproduce at a young age and/or high rate. Because reproducing early and/or often can lead to ill health and shortened lives, and because inequality is a major source of environmental risk and uncertainty, we argue that any attempt to use evolutionary theory to understand human reproduction, health or wellbeing must include considerations of inequality and social capital.
Chisholm
J S
JS
Department of Anatomy and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6907, Australia. jchisholm@anhb.uwa.edu.au.
Burbank
V K
VK
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D004463:Ecology; D005191:Family Characteristics; D005260:Female; D005828:Genetics, Population; D015186:Hominidae; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011247:Pregnancy; D011253:Pregnancy in Adolescence; D012098:Reproduction; D012306:Risk; D012919:Social Behavior; D012931:Social Environment; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000503:physiopathology