title: Primary vs. secondary anastomosis after sigmoid colon resection for perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey Stage III and IV): a prospective outcome and cost analysis.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Our hypothesis was that in patients with perforated sigmoid colon diverticulitis and peritonitis (Hinchey Stage III and IV) a one-stage sigmoid colon resection is safe and cost effective when performed by an experienced colorectal surgeon. We evaluated outcome and cost of one-stage vs. two-stage sigmoid colon resection after diverticulitis perforation and peritonitis.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients undergoing emergency resection for perforated sigmoid colon diverticulitis and peritonitis (Hinchey Stage III and IV). Outcome, costs, and insurers reimbursement were compared between 13 patients undergoing sigmoid colon resection and primary anastomosis (Group A) and 42 patients undergoing sigmoid colon resection with Hartmann's procedure and secondary descendorectostomy (Group B).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Group A patients were comparable to Group B patients in age, gender, preoperative risk and severity of peritonitis (Mannheim Peritonitis Index and C-reactive protein). Operating room time for sigmoid colon resection with primary anastomosis (3.3 +/- 1.2 hours) was identical to the time for sigmoid colon resection with colostomy (3.3 +/- 1 hour), and morbidity and mortality, intensive care unit, and in-hospital stay were not significantly different between the two groups. In Group B patients' intestinal continuity was restored 169 +/- 74 days after the primary resection in 32 of 42 patients only (78 percent). The second procedure took on average 1.4 hours longer than the first procedure. Patients in Group B received more antibiotics (2.2 vs. 2) albeit for a shorter period of time (4.5 vs. 5.7 days, P = not significant). Overall expenses for restoration of intestinal continuity were between 74 and 229 percent higher for Group B patients than for Group A patients. Reimbursement was 18,191 +/- 16,761 SFr (Group A) and 41,321 +/- 26,983 SFr (Group B) respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  With meticulous surgical technique and extensive intraoperative lavage, perforated sigmoid colon diverticulitis with peritonitis can be treated by a one-stage sigmoid colon resection and anastomosis with a low mortality and morbidity. A one-stage procedure is considerably cheaper and patients are rehabilitated faster and to a higher percentage.
authors.affiliation: Department of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Bern, Switzerland.
authors.forename: M K
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Schilling
authors.forename: C A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Maurer
authors.forename: O
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Kollmar
authors.forename: M W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Büchler
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000714:Anastomosis, Surgical / Q000379:methods; D012809:Colon, Sigmoid / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D003125:Colostomy / Q000379:methods*; D004239:Diverticulitis, Colonic / Q000191:economics / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006760:Hospitalization; D006801:Humans; D007349:Insurance, Health, Reimbursement; D007362:Intensive Care Units; D007416:Intestinal Perforation / Q000191:economics / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010533:Peritoneal Lavage; D010538:Peritonitis / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D012737:Sex Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome