Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: rethinking the mere exposure effect.
In studies of the mere exposure effect, rapid presentation of items can increase liking without accurate recognition. The effect on liking has been explained as a misattribution of fluency caused by prior presentation. However, fluency is also a source of feelings of familiarity. It is, therefore, surprising that prior experience can enhance liking without also causing familiarity-based recognition. We suggest that when study opportunities are minimal and test items are perceptually similar, people adopt an analytic approach, attempting to recognize distinctive features. That strategy fails because rapid presentation prevents effective encoding of such features; it also prevents people from experiencing fluency and a consequent feeling of familiarity. We suggest that the liking-without-recognition effect results from using an effective (nonanalytic) strategy in judging pleasantness, but an ineffective (analytic) strategy in recognition. Explanations of the mere exposure effect based on a distinction between implicit and explicit memory are unnecessary.
Whittlesea
B W
BW
Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada. bruce_whittlesea@sfu.ca
Price
J R
JR
D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008568:Memory; D013850:Thinking