title: Patella resurfacing in total knee replacement: functional evaluation and complications.
abstract: Three different knee replacements, with three trochlear designs, were prospectively evaluated clinically and radiographically for patellar function and presence of patellar complications. They included the Insall-Burstein (IB) I and the IB-II (posterior cruciate ligament substituting) and the Meniscal Bearing Knee (MBK; posterior cruciate ligament recession). The trochlea of the IB-I was short and shallow with an anterior sharp edge of the intercondylar box (later modified to a smoother edge) and the femoral component had a prominent "shoulder." In the IB-II the trochlea was deeper to allow for soft tissue clearance. In the MBK the trochlea was more prolonged, with R and L components and the "shoulder" was less prominent. In all the cases the patella was resurfaced with an all polyethylene dome prosthesis. Knees with tibiofemoral problems were excluded. From the data of the present study the following conclusions can be drawn: (a) The most frequent problem was impingement (clunks) with the early version of the IB-I. Smoothening of the anterior edge significantly reduced the incidence of clunks to 5% in the modified IB I. (b) With the IB-II deepening the trochlea for soft tissue clearance improved the degree, not the incidence of clunks (4.5%), compared to the modified IB I. (c) With the MBK clunks were very rare and patellar function improved. (d) Throughout the three series patellar stress fractures and instability were rare and loosening or wear not evident. (e) Normal function (including stairs ascending and descending) can be expected in over 80% of category A patients. (f) Of the various radiological parameters only patella baja was correlated with symptoms in the IB prostheses. (g) We still prefer the dome design because is more tolerant and with cold flow may better conform to the trochlea increasing contact area.
authors.affiliation: First Orthopedic Clinic of the University of Florence, Largo P. Palagi 1, 50139, Florence, Italy. ortosec@unifi.it
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Aglietti
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Baldini
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Buzzi
authors.forename: P F
authors.initials: PF
authors.lastname: Indelli
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001172:Arthritis, Rheumatoid / Q000601:surgery; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D015775:Fractures, Stress / Q000209:etiology; D006801:Humans; D007720:Knee Prosthesis / Q000009:adverse effects; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020370:Osteoarthritis, Knee / Q000601:surgery; D010020:Osteonecrosis / Q000601:surgery; D010329:Patella / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011859:Radiography; D012086:Reoperation