title: Wound healing and infection in nail matrix phenolization wounds. Does topical medication make a difference?
abstract: After nail matrix ablation using phenolization, a medicated wound dressing (10% povidone iodine), an amorphous hydrogel dressing (Intrasite Gel), and a control dressing (paraffin gauze) were evaluated. Forty-two participants, randomly divided into three dressing groups, were evaluated. Healing time did not differ between the 10% povidone iodine (33 days), amorphous hydrogel (33 days), and the control dressing (34 days). For all groups, the clinical infection rate was lower than in previous studies, and there was no clinical difference between groups (one infection in the povidone iodine and control groups; none in the amorphous hydrogel group). However, in the amorphous hydrogel group, other complications, such as hypergranulation, were more likely. This investigation indicated that medicated or hydrogel dressings did not enhance the rate of healing or decrease infection rates.
authors.affiliation: Bayside Podiatry Pty Ltd, Bonbeach, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Dovison
authors.forename: A M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Keenan
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000891:Anti-Infective Agents, Local / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D001315:Australia; D001458:Bandages; D006214:Hallux; D006801:Humans; D020100:Hydrogels / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use; D009263:Nails, Ingrown / Q000628:therapy*; D019800:Phenol / Q000627:therapeutic use; D011032:Podiatry / Q000379:methods*; D011182:Postoperative Care / Q000379:methods; D011206:Povidone-Iodine / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use; D013997:Time Factors; D014945:Wound Healing / Q000187:drug effects*; D014946:Wound Infection / Q000517:prevention & control*
chemical_list: D000891:Anti-Infective Agents, Local; D020100:Hydrogels; D019800:Phenol; D011206:Povidone-Iodine