title: Fluency of retrieval at study affects judgments of learning (JOLs): an analytic or nonanalytic basis for JOLs?
abstract: The fluency of retrieval during a test of memory has been implicated as a cue for judgments of learning (JOLs), but little is known about how fluency affects JOLs. In three experiments, we investigated (1) whether the fluency of generation during study may be a cue for JOLs and (2) whether such fluency effects are mediated by an analytic or nonanalytic inference. To accomplish our goals, we used a learner-observer-judge method. While studying paired associates, learners generated some targets at study. For these items, their JOLs were negatively correlated with the time taken to generate targets. Observers watched learners generate targets and then predicted learners' memory performance. Judges also made JOLs but did not watch the learners generate targets. JOLs from all groups were negatively related to learners' latencies to generate targets, with the magnitude of the relationship equivalent for learners and observers and lower for judges. These and other findings are consistent with the conclusions that the fluency of generation at study is a cue for JOLs and that such fluency effects are partly mediated by an analytic inference about how fluency is related to memory.
authors.affiliation: University of North Carolina, Greensboro, USA.
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Matvey
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Dunlosky
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Guttentag
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D007858:Learning; D008568:Memory; D008960:Models, Psychological