title: Children's, adolescents', and young adults' thinking about different types of disagreements.
abstract: Individuals' thinking about different types of disagreements was examined. Ninety-six participants in third grade (mean age = 8 years 9 months), seventh grade (mean age = 13 years 2 months), and college (mean age = 21 years 10 months) judged the acceptability of believing and acting on different types of beliefs with which they disagree, the attributes of the persons with whom they disagree, and the relative importance of cultural uniformity or diversity of belief. Findings indicated that participants' thinking did not simply become more tolerant with age; their thinking at all ages was constrained by both the realm over which there was disagreement and the form of the disagreement. At all ages, participants judged that some disagreements were acceptable and some unacceptable, described disagreeing others in terms of different (more or less positive) attributes, and judged that diversity of belief was important in some realms but uniformity was preferable in others.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112, USA. cecilia.wainryb@m.cc.utah.edu
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Wainryb
authors.forename: L A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Shaw
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Laupa
authors.forename: K R
authors.initials: KR
authors.lastname: Smith
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D012938:Social Perception; D013850:Thinking