title: Effect of weaning status and implant regimen on growth, performance, and carcass characteristics of steers.
abstract: One hundred forty-three Angus x Simmental crossbred steers (initial BW = 155.1 +/- 4.5 kg) were used in a 2-yr study (yr 1, n = 67; yr 2, n = 76) to determine the effects of weaning age, implant regimen, and the weaning age x implant regimen interaction on steer growth and performance, organ mass, carcass characteristics, and cooked beef palatability. Steers were early-weaned at an average age of 108 d (EW) or normally weaned at an average age of 202 d (NW) and allotted by weight to an aggressive or nonaggressive implant regimen. On their respective weaning dates, EW and NW steers were penned individually and fed a grain-based diet until they were slaughtered at a final BW of 546 kg. A subsample of steers (n = 2 per treatment) were slaughtered at 254 kg. At 254 kg, EW steers implanted with the aggressive implant regimen had 64% greater backfat depth than those implanted with the nonaggressive implant regimen; conversely, NW steers implanted with the aggressive implant regimen had 52% lower backfat depth than those implanted with the nonaggressive implant regimen (weaning status x implant regimen interaction; P < 0.01). A similar interaction was observed for empty visceral organ weights. Early-weaned steers were younger (354.7 vs 372.4 d; P < 0.01) at final slaughter but were in the feedlot longer (246.5 vs 169.6 d; P < 0.01) than NW steers, whereas the aggressive implant regimen decreased days fed (203.3 vs 212.7; P < 0.07) compared to the nonaggressive implant regimen. Overall ADG was greater for EW than for NW steers (1.61 vs 1.50 kg/d; P < 0.01) and for the aggressive compared with the nonaggressive implant regimen (1.59 vs 1.52 kg/d; P < 0.02). Early-weaned steers consumed less DM per day (7.4 vs 8.5 kg/d; P < 0.01) and were more efficient (0.217 vs 0.208 kg/kg; P < 0.02) but consumed more total DM (1,817 vs 1,429 kg; P < 0.01) than NW steers while in the feedlot. Implant regimen did not affect DMI (P > 0.37) or feed efficiency (P > 0.15). Weaning status did not affect carcass characteristics (P > 0.14), final empty body composition (P > 0.25), or final longissimus muscle composition (P > 0.18); however, steaks from EW steers had higher (P < 0.05) taste panel tenderness and juiciness ratings than steaks from NW steers. The aggressive implant regimen decreased yield grade (P < 0.02), but did not affect quality grade (P > 0.86) compared to the nonaggressive implant regimen. Placing early-weaned steers on an aggressive implant regimen is a viable management option.
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center/The Ohio State University, Wooster 44691, USA.
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Schoonmaker
authors.forename: F L
authors.initials: FL
authors.lastname: Fluharty
authors.forename: S C
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Loerch
authors.forename: T B
authors.initials: TB
authors.lastname: Turner
authors.forename: S J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Moeller
authors.forename: D M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Wulf
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D045930:Anabolic Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000494:pharmacology*; D000818:Animals; D001823:Body Composition; D002417:Cattle / Q000254:growth & development*; D003692:Delayed-Action Preparations; D004338:Drug Combinations; D004958:Estradiol / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000031:analogs & derivatives* / Q000494:pharmacology*; D008297:Male; D011374:Progesterone / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000494:pharmacology*; D014204:Trenbolone Acetate / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000031:analogs & derivatives* / Q000494:pharmacology*; D014886:Weaning; D015430:Weight Gain
chemical_list: D045930:Anabolic Agents; D003692:Delayed-Action Preparations; D004338:Drug Combinations; C021828:Revalor; D011374:Progesterone; D004958:Estradiol; C025370:estradiol benzoate, progesterone drug combination; D014204:Trenbolone Acetate