Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results.
In summary, if TKRs are to be performed in patients who are younger and more active than those who had the initial procedures in the 1970s and 1980s, better wear performance is imperative for long-term durability, especially if surgeons continue to consider the versatility associated with modular knee-replacement systems to be a necessity. At least with some designs, including the Oxford knee and the LCS knee, the results after a minimum follow-up of 10 years are comparable with the best results after arthroplasty with fixed-bearing designs in terms of wear, loosening, and osteolysis (Table 7). As with fixed-bearing designs, there are additional challenges in terms of optimizing bearing-surface conformity and improving kinematics. Improvements in future designs of mobile-bearing total knee replacements should include better control of bearing mobility patterns to reduce the prevalence of the abnormal kinematic motions that have been observed in fluoroscopic evaluations.
Callaghan
J J
JJ
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Insall
J N
JN
Greenwald
A S
AS
Dennis
D A
DA
Komistek
R D
RD
Murray
D W
DW
Bourne
R B
RB
Rorabeck
C H
CH
Dorr
L D
LD
D000328:Adult; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000379:methods*; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D006801:Humans; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D011095:Polyethylenes; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D016474:Weight-Bearing
D011095:Polyethylenes