A retrospective analysis of radical hysterectomies done for cervical cancer: is there a role for the Pfannenstiel incision?
OBJECTIVE
The goal of this work was to review patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy, comparing Pfannenstiel and vertical midline incisions for surgical feasibility, complications, and length of stay.


METHODS
Patients were identified by searching our institutional database. Data were collected from review of each patient's medical record, including demographics, cancer stage, histology, procedural information, length of stay, and complications. Associations between variables were studied using chi(2) and two-tailed t tests. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression.


RESULTS
Between March 1996 and June 2000, 113 patients from the University and Presbyterian Hospitals, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic and paraortic lymph node dissection with records available for review. Group 1 consisted of 40 patients who had vertical incisions and group 2 consisted of 73 patients who had Pfannenstiel incisions. There was no difference in race, number of previous abdominal surgeries, distribution of stage, histology, percentage of type III hysterectomies, estimated blood loss, nodal counts, pathologic margin positivity, and postoperative complications among the two groups. Group 2 were younger (41.6 vs 46.5, P = 0.02) and had a lower average QI than group 1 (24.9 vs 28.9, P = 0.001). Group 2 also had a shorter average hospital stay (4.6 days vs 5.8 days, P = 0.04) and shorter operative time (215 min vs 273 min, P = 0.09). Multivariate analysis resulted in Pfannenstiel incisions (P = 0.002), younger age (P = 0.004), and smaller body mass index (P = 0.01) being significant predictors of length of stay.


CONCLUSIONS
Pfannenstiel incisions are feasible without increased morbidity and equal nodal retrieval as compared with vertical midline incisions in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Pfannenstiel incisions may offer an advantage besides cosmesis in the form of shorter operating room time and earlier discharge from the hospital.
Scribner
D R
DR
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73190, USA. dennis-scribner@ouhsc.edu
Kamelle
S A
SA
Gould
N
N
Tillmanns
T
T
Wilson
M A
MA
McMeekin
S
S
Gold
M A
MA
Mannel
R S
RS
D000328:Adult; D015331:Cohort Studies; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D007902:Length of Stay; D008197:Lymph Node Excision; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D002583:Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*