title: Response of zooplankton communities to liquid creosote in freshwater microcosms.
abstract: In this study, the response of zooplankton communities to single applications of liquid creosote in model aquatic ecosystems (microcosms) was evaluated. Liquid creosote was applied to 14 microcosms at concentrations ranging from 0.06 to 109 mg/L. Two microcosms served as controls. Zooplankton samples were collected from each microcosm on days 7 and 1 before treatment and on days 2, 5, 7, 14, 21, 28, 43, 55, and 83 following treatment. Temporal changes (response-recovery) in composition of the zooplankton community were assessed using principal response curves (PRC). Creosote induced a rapid, concentration-dependent reduction in zooplankton abundance and number of taxa, with maximum response (50-100% reduction in population densities) occurring between 5 and 7 d after treatment. Taxa that dominated at the time of treatment experienced the greatest impact, as indicated by large, positive species weight values (> 1) from the PRC analysis. Many of these taxa recovered to pretreatment or control levels during the posttreatment period, with the degree and duration of recovery being strongly dependent on concentration. Creosote had little effect on species composition at less than 1.1 mg/L, because changes in the types and relative proportion of species contributed from Cladocera, Rotifera, and Copepoda were comparable to those observed in control microcosms. However, a significant shift in species composition was observed at concentrations greater than 1.1 mg/L; these microcosms were generally dominated by low numbers of rotifers, some of which had not been collected before treatment. Community-level effect concentrations (EC50s) were 44.6 and 46.6 micrograms/L at 5 and 7 d, respectively, based on nominal creosote. Corresponding no-effect concentrations were 13.9 and 5.6 micrograms/L. The results of this field study indicate that creosote may pose a significant risk to zooplankton communities at environmental concentrations potentially encountered during spills and/or leaching events.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Toxicology, University of Guelph, Bovey Building, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada. psibley@tox.uoguelph.ca
authors.forename: P K
authors.initials: PK
authors.lastname: Sibley
authors.forename: M L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Harris
authors.forename: K T
authors.initials: KT
authors.lastname: Bestari
authors.forename: T A
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Steele
authors.forename: R D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Robinson
authors.forename: R W
authors.initials: RW
authors.lastname: Gensemer
authors.forename: K E
authors.initials: KE
authors.lastname: Day
authors.forename: K R
authors.initials: KR
authors.lastname: Solomon
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003407:Creosote / Q000633:toxicity*; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D005618:Fresh Water; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000633:toxicity*; D015048:Zooplankton / Q000187:drug effects*
chemical_list: D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical; D003407:Creosote