title: Reasoning about beliefs: a human specialization?
abstract: A recent meta-analysis performed by Wellman, Cross, and Watson clears the air surrounding young children's performance on tests of false belief by showing that it is highly likely that there is some type of conceptual development between 3 and 5 years of age that supports improved task performance. The data concerning the evolutionary origin of these abilities, however, is considerably less clear. Nonetheless, there is some reason to suspect that theory of mind is unique to our species, and that its original function was to provide a more abstract level of describing ancient behavioral patterns (such as deception, reconciliation, and gaze following)-behaviors that humans share in common with many other species. Thus, the initial selective advantage of theory of mind may have been because it increased the flexibility of already-existing behaviors, not because it generated scores of radically new ones.
authors.affiliation: Cognitive Evolution Group, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, 70504-3772, USA. djp3463@usl.edu
authors.forename: D J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Povinelli
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Giambrone
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003210:Concept Formation; D006801:Humans; D002679:Pan troglodytes; D010469:Perceptual Distortion; D010553:Personality Development; D011340:Problem Solving; D012649:Self Concept; D012938:Social Perception; D013045:Species Specificity; D014796:Visual Perception