title: Is all sexual harassment viewed the same? Mock juror decisions in same- and cross-gender cases.
abstract: Given recent court decisions, there is a need to investigate less common forms of sexual harassment, including women harassing men and same-gender harassment. The present study was a 2 (harasser gender) x 2 (target gender) x 2 (participant gender) factorial design in which 408 mock jurors made decisions in a hostile work environment case. Women harassing men were more likely to be found guilty than were men harassing women, and harassers in same-gender cases were more likely to be found guilty and were perceived more negatively than harassers in cross-gender cases. Participant gender differences were found in cross-gender, but not same-gender, conditions. Results suggest that the gender composition of the harasser and target may be an extralegal factor influencing managerial and juror decision making.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27109, USA. waynej@wfu.edu
authors.forename: J H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Wayne
authors.forename: C M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Riordan
authors.forename: K M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Thomas
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001290:Attitude; D005260:Female; D005783:Gender Identity; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D017406:Sexual Harassment / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology