title: The effects of defendant conduct on jury damage awards.
abstract: Laws of negligence dictate that jurors' decisions about damages be influenced by the severity of plaintiffs' injuries and not by the reprehensibility of defendants' conduct. The authors simulated an automobile negligence trial to assess whether jurors' decisions are in accord with those expectations. Conduct of the defendant and severity of the plaintiff's injuries were manipulated. Jurors listened to the evidence, completed predeliberation questionnaires, deliberated as a jury, and completed postdeliberation questionnaires. Severity of the plaintiff's injury had a strong impact on damage awards, but evidence related to the defendant's conduct was also influential, particularly when the plaintiffs injuries were mild. Here, jurors with any conduct-related evidence gave larger damage awards than jurors with no conduct-related evidence. Findings suggest an effect of defendant conduct on damage awards that may be mediated by judgments that the defendant was negligent.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, 80933, USA. egreene@mail.uccs.edu
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Greene
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Johns
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Smith
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019548:Crime Victims / Q000523:psychology*; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007346:Insurance, Accident / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D007351:Insurance, Liability / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012803:Sick Role; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000523:psychology*