Comparison of the shock artifacts induced by tripolar and bipolar electrical stimulation techniques.
Tripolar and bipolar electrical stimulation procedures were performed on the upper limbs of eight subjects. The mid-forearm was stimulated electrically (tripolar or bipolar) by surface electrodes, and the induced stimulus shock artifacts were recorded simultaneously from the wrist and elbow. During tripolar stimulation, two types of stimulating configurations were utilized: with the center electrode designated as the cathode and the two outermost electrodes connected to a common anode, and vice versa. During bipolar stimulation, the center electrode served as one pole of the stimulator, and one of the two outermost electrodes of the tripolar stimulator was disconnected. The stimulus intensity was kept constant in all stimulating procedures. Artifacts were reduced significantly during tripolar compared to bipolar stimulation, if the outermost electrodes of the tripolar stimulator (which were facing the recording electrodes) were also oriented toward the recording sites during bipolar stimulation and had the same stimulus polarity. Artifacts were slightly reduced in amplitude from tripolar stimulation, if the center electrode were oriented toward the recording sites during bipolar stimulation and had the same stimulus polarity as previously used during tripolar stimulation.
Wee
A S
AS
Electromyography Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
Jiles
K
K
Brennan
R
R
D000328:Adult; D016477:Artifacts; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D004566:Electrodes; D004568:Electrodiagnosis; D004597:Electroshock; D005260:Female; D005542:Forearm / Q000294:innervation*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009431:Neural Conduction / Q000502:physiology*; D010525:Peripheral Nerves / Q000502:physiology; D012016:Reference Values