Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: do Swiss midwives implement evidence into practice?
OBJECTIVE
Evidence Based Medicine has shown that the results of continuous electronic fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring are equivalent to those of intermittent auscultation. We were interested in the method midwives preferred to use to monitor FHR during labour and the factors which influenced their choice of method.


METHODS
A questionnaire with Likert scaled questions was sent to 500 German speaking Swiss midwives. Data analysis was performed by using SPSS for Windows.


RESULTS
The majority of the midwives were confident monitoring FHR using intermittent auscultation as their main method during low risk delivery. The essential factors influencing the choice of method of FHR monitoring were their own personal experience and hospital guidelines. Less important were factors such as risk category, litigation, the mother's preferences, research results, time and staffing levels.


CONCLUSIONS
Although the skills necessary to implement evidence into obstetrical practice are still available, evidence based research results do not seem to be of great importance, when midwives decide which method to use for intrapartum FHR monitoring. Hospital policies and the professional training received were more important factors. Programs designed to implement evidence in care should reflect the identification and use of these factors in order to facilitate the process of realisation.
Luyben
A G
AG
Midwifery School, Berufsschule für Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege, Chur, Switzerland. luyben@swissonline.ch
Gross
M M
MM
D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D005260:Female; D005323:Fetal Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D006340:Heart Rate, Fetal; D006761:Hospitals; D006801:Humans; D007743:Labor, Obstetric; D008880:Midwifery / Q000193:education; D011247:Pregnancy; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013557:Switzerland