A decision support process to compare riparian revegetation options in Scheu Creek catchment in north Queensland.
While riparin vegetation can play a major role in protecting land, water and natural habitat in catchments, there are high costs associated with tree planting and establishment and in diverting land from cropping. The distribution of costs and benefits of riparian revegetation creates conflicts in the objectives of various stakeholder groups. Multicriteria analysis provides an appropriate tool to evaluate alternative riparian revegetation options, and to accommodate the conflicting views of various stakeholder groups. This paper discusses an application of multicriteria analysis in an evaluation of riparian revegetation policy options for Scheu Creek, a small sub-catchment in the Johnstone River catchment in north Queensland, Australia. Clear differences are found in the rankings of revegetation options for different stakeholder groups with respect to environmental, social and economic impacts. Implementation of a revegetation option will involve considerable cost for landholders for the benefits of society. Queensland legislation does not provide a means to require farmers to implement riparian revegetation, hence the need for subsidies, tax incentives and moral suasion.
Qureshi
M E
ME
CRC Sustainable Sugar Production, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld. 4811, Australia. ejaz.quseshi@jcu.edu.au
Harrison
S R
SR
D001290:Attitude; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000191:economics*; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D005618:Fresh Water; D006801:Humans; D010944:Plants; D011793:Queensland