Publicly disclosed information about the quality of health care: response of the US public.
Public disclosure of information about the quality of health plans, hospitals, and doctors continues to be controversial. The US experience of the past decade suggests that sophisticated quality measures and reporting systems that disclose information on quality have improved the process and outcomes of care in limited ways in some settings, but these efforts have not led to the "consumer choice" market envisaged. Important reasons for this failure include limited salience of objective measures to consumers, the complexity of the task of interpretation, and insufficient use of quality results by organised purchasers and insurers to inform contracting and pricing decisions. Nevertheless, public disclosure may motivate quality managers and providers to undertake changes that improve the delivery of care. Efforts to measure and report information about quality should remain public, but may be most effective if they are targeted to the needs of institutional and individual providers of care.
Schneider
E C
EC
Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. schneider@hsph.harvard.edu
Lieberman
T
T
D001294:Attitude to Health; D006801:Humans; D007255:Information Services / Q000600:supply & distribution*; D008402:Mass Media; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D011639:Public Opinion; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D017749:Total Quality Management; D014342:Truth Disclosure; D014481:United States