Cross-cultural comparisons of health status in Canada using the Health Utilities Index.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in health status, as measured by the Health Utilities Index (HUI), among seven cultural groups in Canada defined by place of birth and language.


METHODS
The study analysed cross-sectional data from the National Population Health Survey conducted by Statistics Canada in 1994-95.


RESULTS
Age-standardized prevalence of dysfunction, defined as HUI < 0.83, varied from 12.7% in English-speaking immigrants to 17.8% in French-speaking Canadians. Considerable differences between the groups were found in the reporting of pain, emotional function, and cognitive function. The variation in HUI scores across the cultural groups could not be explained by differences in socioeconomic status and self-reported chronic conditions.


CONCLUSIONS
Although the healthy immigrant effect is probably responsible for some of the variation in health status among cultural groups in Canada, considerable differences exist within the immigrant and Canadian-born populations. Cultural factors may have a substantial effect on the reporting of pain and mental health problems. Further studies are needed to determine the cross-cultural validity of the HUI.
Kopec
J A
JA
Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, University of British Columbia and Arthritis Research Centre of Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada. j.kopec@utoronto.ca
Williams
J I
JI
To
T
T
Austin
P C
PC
D002170:Canada / Q000453:epidemiology; D002908:Chronic Disease / Q000453:epidemiology*; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005006:Ethnicity; D005260:Female; D006304:Health Status; D006305:Health Status Indicators; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D015995:Prevalence; D012307:Risk Factors; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires