Can the computerized physical examination differentiate normal subjects from abnormal subjects with benign mechanical low back pain?
Inconsistencies among physicians in the evaluation of benign low back conditions make standardization desirable. A computerized physical examination device was used to evaluate low back pain patients and compare their results with a normative database obtained from a selection of healthy subjects. A high-resolution motion analysis system tracked the movement of skin markers placed on the midline and pelvis. Surface electromyography electrodes placed above L(5) collected data from multifidus. From the kinematics of skin markers during flexion extension with lifts up to 32 kg, and lateral bending with lifts up to 4.6 kg, the following parameters were estimated: lumbosacral angle and elongation, contribution of each lumbar segment to the lordosis reduction, relative pelvic/spine motion and trunk velocity. First, the average normal value for each estimated parameter was determined using 40 normal subjects. For each subject, the difference between his parameter and the normal was processed by an expert system generating a normality index varying from zero (perfect abnormal) to one (perfect normal). To develop the expert system's rules, a preliminary group of 20 very abnormal subjects were used, such that the normality index separated them from the normals. For validation, a set of 29 WCB sprain patients and another set of 42 discogram positive were selected. Each subject was tested and his computerized normality index calculated without any clinicians' input. The computerized normality index was compared with the clinicians' evaluation which was taken to be the gold standard. The Receiver Operating Characteristic technique was used to quantify the discrepancies. Results show that the expert system can detect clinically abnormal subjects with accuracy (sensitivity 83-91% and specificity >/=90%) while providing quantitative information on workers' functional capacities.
Newman
N
N
University of Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Gracovetsky
S
S
Itoi
M
M
Zucherman
J
J
Richards
M
M
Durand
P
P
Xeller
C
C
Carr
D
D