title: A prospective randomized comparison of 270 degrees fusions to 360 degrees fusions (circumferential fusions).
abstract: METHODS
  Prospective randomized comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) plus transpedicular instrumentation plus posterolateral fusion (PLF) (360 degrees fusion) to ALIF plus transpedicular instrumentation without PLF (270 degrees fusion).
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To compare the clinical outcomes, costs, and utilization of health resources of 360 degrees versus 270 degrees fusions.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  The 360 degrees fusion is effective, but its costs and utilization of health resources are high. The PLF often resorbs and may not be necessary.
  
  
  METHODS
  Before and after surgery pain was measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and function was measured by the Oswestry Low Back Disability Index (OSI). Costs were calculated by billing records. Operating times, blood loss, and hospital stays were measured at the time of hospital discharge.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were 48 patients: 21 women and 27 men. Mean age was 42 years. Follow-up averaged 35 months (range 24-45 months). In both 360 degrees and 270 degrees fusions, there were significant improvements in NRS and OSI, and the percentage of solid ALIF was high. Only 14% of PLF appeared solid bilaterally and 18% appeared solid on one side only. There were no significant differences in changes in NRS, changes in OSI, or percentage solid ALIF between the 360 degrees and 270 degrees fusions. However, the 270 degrees fusion group had significantly less blood loss, shorter operative times, shorter hospital stays, and lower professional fees, and although hospital charges were lower, this difference was not significant.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Both the 360 degrees and 270 degrees fusions significantly reduce pain and improve function, and there are no significant clinical differences between them. However, there were shorter operating times, less blood loss, lower costs, and less utilization of health care resources associated with the 270 degrees fusions.
authors: SpineCare Medical Group and the San Francisco Spine Institute, Daly City, California, USA. jschoff@spinecare.com
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Schofferman
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Slosar
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Reynolds
authors: N
authors: N
authors: Goldthwaite
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Koestler
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006295:Health Resources / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009984:Orthopedic Fixation Devices; D010166:Palliative Care; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013122:Spinal Diseases / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D013123:Spinal Fusion / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome