title: [Vaginal hysterectomy in non-prolapsed uterus].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There is an increasing number of methods available for removing the uterus, but no multicentre, randomised, clinical trials are available to show which type of operation ensures the best outcome for the patient. The charts of 207 vaginal hysterectomies were reviewed in this descriptive study. The aim was to examine whether vaginal hysterectomy might be an alternative for a group of patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  Only patients with a previous, vaginal birth were entered in the study (four patients had not given birth). A uterus weight of 500-600 g was the upper limit set by our group for the use of the vaginal route. Patient characteristics, data from the operations, complications, and histological examinations of the uterus were analysed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean operation time was 61 min (95% CI 58-64 min), range 25-115 min. The difference between preoperative and postoperative haemoglobin was 1.1 mmol/l (95% CI 1.0-1.2 mmol/l). The mean length of hospital stay was 2.9 days (95% CI 2.7-3.1 days). The complications were 1) febrile morbidity; 17 (8%) (95% CI 4-12%); 2) urinary tract injury, 3 (2%) (95% CI 0-3%); 3) unforeseen need for major surgery (including conversion to abdominal hysterectomy), 3 (2%) (95% CI 0-3%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In some patients, vaginal hysterectomy is a good alternative.
authors: Gynaekologisk-obstetrisk afdeling, Frederikshavn-Skagen Sygehus.
authors: N
authors: N
authors: Kjaergaard
authors: B
authors: B
authors: Johansen
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Haumann
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Fisker
authors: E
authors: E
authors: Seiersen
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007045:Hysterectomy, Vaginal / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D008875:Middle Aged; D018579:Patient Selection; D016896:Treatment Outcome