title: Illusory conjunctions die hard: a reply to Prinzmetal, Diedrichsen, and Ivry (2001).
abstract: M. Donk (1999) showed that various data patterns that have been considered as evidence for the existence of illusory conjunctions may be due to errors of target-nontarget confusion, an account that challenges the mere existence of illusory conjunction. In a reply, W. Prinzmetal, J. Diedrichsen, and R. B. Ivry (2001) argued against this conclusion, claiming that some earlier findings can be explained only when one assumes that illusory conjunctions exist. The current article shows that Prinzmetal et al.'s claims cannot refute any of Donk's earlier conclusions, suggesting indeed that one can only conclude that "illusory conjunctions are an illusion."
authors: Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. w.donk@psy.vu.nl
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Donk
mesh_terms: D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D003118:Color Perception; D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall; D009903:Optical Illusions; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011601:Psychophysics; D011932:Reading