title: Educating men about prostate cancer screening. A randomized trial of a mailed pamphlet.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Although evidence-based guidelines recommend that physicians inform men about prostate cancer screening, the most efficient way to do this is not known.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate whether a mailed educational pamphlet affected men's knowledge about early detection of prostate cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomized, controlled trial.
  
  
  METHODS
  Primary care clinic of the Minneapolis VA Medical Center.
  
  
  METHODS
  342 men at least 50 years of age who responded to a mailed survey (overall response rate, 68%) and did not report a history of prostate cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  "Early Prostate Cancer" pamphlet mailed to patients in the intervention group 1 week before their scheduled clinic appointments.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients' responses to a survey mailed 1 week after their clinic appointments; prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing determined from electronic medical records.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Respondents were predominantly elderly white men (mean age, 71 years; 90% white) with chronic illnesses (48% described their health as "fair" or "poor"). Men who received the educational pamphlet were better informed than men in the usual care group, as measured by correct responses to the following three questions about prostate cancer screening: the natural history of prostate cancer (32% vs. 24%; P = 0.10), whether treatment lengthens lives of men with early prostate cancer (56% vs. 44%; P = 0.04), and accuracy of PSA testing (46% vs. 27%; P < 0.008). The overall proportion of correctly answered questions was greater in the intervention group (45% vs. 32%; P < 0.001). Testing for PSA in the year after the index clinic appointments did not differ significantly between the intervention group and the usual care group (31% vs. 37%; P > 0.2).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Male veterans are poorly informed about the potential benefits and risks of prostate cancer screening. Although our mailed educational pamphlet enhanced knowledge only modestly, it was an inexpensive and easily implemented intervention.
authors: Minneapolis VA Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, University of Minnesota Department of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minn., USA. Tim.wilt@med.va.gov
authors: T J
authors: TJ
authors: Wilt
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Paul
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Murdoch
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Nelson
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Nugent
authors: H B
authors: HB
authors: Rubins
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D003625:Data Collection; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006266:Health Education / Q000379:methods*; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006293:Health Promotion; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008403:Mass Screening; D008875:Middle Aged; D008910:Minnesota; D010174:Pamphlets; D011177:Postal Service; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D017430:Prostate-Specific Antigen / Q000032:analysis; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis*; D014728:Veterans / Q000193:education
chemical_list: D017430:Prostate-Specific Antigen