How long should a long-term esophageal motility study be?
It was the aim of this study to analyze whether a shorter measuring period would render the same diagnostic information on esophageal motility as a circadian measuring period in ambulatory esophageal manometry. In an investigation on normal volunteers (n = 10), patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophageal motility disorders (n = 13), and patients with esophageal motility disorders (n = 14), a comparison was performed between a 5-hr and a 24-hr motility study. An analysis was performed on inter- and intraindividual reproducibility of time periods, prandial phases, and motility sequences (Wilcoxon and Spearman test). There was no significant difference between the two analyzed measuring periods in all three groups with regard to the diagnostic information on esophageal motility in 44 of 45 comparisons for intraindividual variability. A measuring period restricted to 5 hr offers the same diagnostic information on esophageal peristaltic activity as a 24-hr motility study.
Freys
S M
SM
Department of Surgery, University of Würzburg, Germany.
Fuchs
K H
KH
Fein
M
M
Maroske
J
J
Thiede
A
A
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002940:Circadian Rhythm; D015154:Esophageal Motility Disorders / Q000503:physiopathology*; D004947:Esophagus / Q000503:physiopathology*; D005260:Female; D005764:Gastroesophageal Reflux / Q000503:physiopathology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008365:Manometry; D008875:Middle Aged; D010528:Peristalsis; D013997:Time Factors