title: A comparative study of feature-salience ranking techniques.
abstract: We assess the relative merits of a number of techniques designed to determine the relative salience of the elements of a feature set with respect to their ability to predict a category outcome-for example, which features of a character contribute most to accurate character recognition. A number of different neural-net-based techniques have been proposed (by us and others) in addition to a standard statistical technique, and we add a technique based on inductively generated decision trees. The salience of the features that compose a proposed set is an important problem to solve efficiently and effectively, not only for neural computing technology but also in order to provide a sound basis for any attempt to design an optimal computational system. The focus of this study is the efficiency and the effectiveness with which high-salience subsets of features can be identified in the context of ill-understood and potentially noisy real-world data. Our two simple approaches, weight clamping using a neural network and feature ranking using a decision tree, generally provide a good, consistent ordering of features. In addition, linear correlation often works well.
authors: W
authors: W
authors: Wang
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Jones
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Partridge
mesh_terms: D000060:Accidents, Aviation / Q000517:prevention & control; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D003663:Decision Trees; D003936:Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D008499:Medical Records; D016571:Neural Networks, Computer; D010024:Osteoporosis / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011897:Random Allocation; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012307:Risk Factors; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires