Can simultaneous inhibition of seedling growth and stimulation of rhizosphere bacterial populations provide evidence for phytotoxin transfer from plant residues in the bulk soil to the rhizosphere of sensitive species?
In order to demonstrate that allelopathic interactions are occurring, one must, among other things, demonstrate that putative phytotoxins move from plant residues on or in the soil, the source, through the bulk soil to the root surface, a sink, by way of the rhizosphere. We hypothesized that the incorporation of phytotoxic plant residues into the soil would result in a simultaneous inhibition of seedling growth and a stimulation of the rhizosphere bacterial community that could utilize the putative phytotoxins as a sole carbon source. If true and consistently expressed, such as relationship would provide a means of establishing the transfer of phytotoxins from residue in the soil to the rhizosphere of a sensitive species under field conditions. Presently, direct evidence for such transfer is lacking. To test this hypothesis, cucumber seedlings were grown in soil containing various concentrations of wheat or sunflower tissue. Both tissue types contain phenolic acids, which have been implicated as allelopathic phytotoxins. The level of phytotoxicity of the plant tissues was determined by the inhibition of pigweed seedling emergence and cucumber seedling leaf area expansion. The stimulation of cucumber seedling rhizosphere bacterial communities was determined by the plate dilution frequency technique using a medium containing phenolic acids as the sole carbon source. When sunflower tissue was incorporated into autoclaved (to reduce the initial microbial populations) soil, a simultaneous inhibition of cucumber seedling growth and stimulation of the community of phenolic acid utilizing rhizosphere bacteria occurred. Thus, it was possible to observe simultaneous inhibition of cucumber seedlings and stimulation of phenolic acid utilizing rhizosphere bacteria, and therefore provide indirect evidence of phenolic acid transfer from plant residues in the soil to the root surface. However, the simultaneous responses were not sufficiently consistent to be used as a field screening tool but were dependent upon the levels of phenolic acids and the bulk soil and rhizosphere microbial populations present in the soil. It is possible that this screening procedure may be useful for phytotoxins that are more unique than phenolic acids.
Staman
K
K
Department of Botany, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA.
Blum
U
U
Louws
F
F
Robertson
D
D
D027721:Amaranthus / Q000737:chemistry / Q000502:physiology; D001419:Bacteria; D018553:Cucumis sativus / Q000737:chemistry; D006368:Helianthus / Q000737:chemistry; D010636:Phenols / Q000494:pharmacology*; D063245:Plant Development; D010936:Plant Extracts / Q000494:pharmacology*; D018517:Plant Roots / Q000382:microbiology*; D011157:Population Dynamics; D012988:Soil Microbiology; D014908:Triticum / Q000737:chemistry / Q000502:physiology
D010636:Phenols; D010936:Plant Extracts