Peer review of classroom teaching: an interim report.
This paper provides interim findings from the implementation of peer review of classroom teaching in a large UK University School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting. A total of 258 classroom teaching sessions, involving 129 teaching staff (n=129) were included over a period of 7 months. Teachers had two teaching sessions reviewed by a colleague. One reviewer was self-nominated and the Dean of School allocated the other. The paper is in two parts. Part one includes a short literature review followed by a descriptive account of how peer review was implemented. Part two focuses upon individual experiences from a small scale study with data obtained from 14 teachers (n=14) who took part in qualitative interviews based on their experiences of being both reviewer and reviewee. The larger study gathered data from several sources. This paper presents the initial findings from interview data with nurse teachers. Their perceptions form the basis of a discussion, which raises issues related to the experience of both implementing and being involved in, peer review of classroom teaching. Four themes emerged from the interview transcriptions; peer review was initially perceived as a threat; the experience of peer review was a positive one; teachers felt that being a reviewer was an interesting and worthwhile experience and perceived peer review positively when good relations existed between them and their reviewer.
Costello
J
J
University of Manchester School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting, Gateway House, Piccadilly South, Manchester, M60 7LP, UK. John.costello@man.ac.uk
Pateman
B
B
Pusey
H
H
Longshaw
K
K
D001290:Attitude; D004650:Employee Performance Appraisal / Q000379:methods*; D005181:Faculty, Nursing; D006801:Humans; D010380:Peer Review / Q000379:methods; D015397:Program Evaluation; D006113:United Kingdom