Accounting for covariate measurement error in a Cox model analysis of recurrence of depression.
When a covariate measured with error is used as a predictor in a survival analysis using the Cox model, the parameter estimate is usually biased. In clinical research, covariates measured without error such as treatment procedure or sex are often used in conjunction with a covariate measured with error. In a randomized clinical trial of two types of treatments, we account for the measurement error in the covariate, log-transformed total rapid eye movement (REM) activity counts, in a Cox model analysis of the time to recurrence of major depression in an elderly population. Regression calibration and two variants of a likelihood-based approach are used to account for measurement error. The likelihood-based approach is extended to account for the correlation between replicate measures of the covariate. Using the replicate data decreases the standard error of the parameter estimate for log(total REM) counts while maintaining the bias reduction of the estimate. We conclude that covariate measurement error and the correlation between replicates can affect results in a Cox model analysis and should be accounted for. In the depression data, these methods render comparable results that have less bias than the results when measurement error is ignored.
Liu
K
K
Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Mazumdar
S
S
Stone
R A
RA
Dew
M A
MA
Houck
P R
PR
Reynolds
C F
CF
D000368:Aged; D015982:Bias; D003866:Depressive Disorder / Q000473:pathology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D015233:Models, Statistical; D011379:Prognosis; D012008:Recurrence; D012044:Regression Analysis; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design; D012895:Sleep, REM