title: Who contracts for primary care?
abstract: The implications of the 1997 NHS (Primary Care) Act have been largely overlooked in the rush to establish Primary Care Groups. Allowing health authorities to develop local contracts for primary care has far-reaching implications and is an important departure from the national system of negotiation that has characterized general practice to date. This paper describes a content analysis of a sample of Personal Medical Services (PMS) pilot contracts. In the first year little attention has been given to achieving cost savings or greater efficiency and few contracts promote clinical guidelines. The difficulties of specifying services sensitive to local health needs are highlighted and the national Statement of Fees and Allowances (the 'Red Book') may not be swiftly supplanted. However, the pilots have introduced innovations such as salaried general practitioners, nurse-led services and NHS trust-managed care. The development of local contracts provides a valuable learning experience for general practitioners and health authorities in advance of the establishment of Primary Care Trusts.
authors.affiliation: The King's Fund, London.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Lewis
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Gillam
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Gosden
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Sheaff
mesh_terms: D003284:Contract Services / Q000458:organization & administration*; D017598:Efficiency, Organizational; D006291:Health Policy; D006302:Health Services Research; D017008:Negotiating; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration*; D012935:Social Justice; D013222:State Medicine / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006113:United Kingdom