Reducing the need for food allergen challenges in young children: a comparison of in vitro with in vivo tests.
BACKGROUND
Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC), the gold standard for the diagnosis of food hypersensitivity, are time-consuming and not without risk. We have recently reported skin prick test (SPT) weal diameters to cow's milk, egg and peanut above which infants and young children referred for investigation of suspected food allergy showed an adverse reaction on food challenge. We have termed these the "100% diagnostic SPT levels". In this study, we compare in vivo with in vitro measurement of IgE antibody levels to three common food allergens--cow's milk, egg and peanut--in infants and young children with suspected food allergy, in order to reduce the need for food challenges.


METHODS
SPT and Enzyme Allergo-sorbent Test (EAST) (from 1992 to 1998) and CAP values (from 1999 to 2000) were performed in 820 children < 2 years of age with suspected allergy to cow's milk and/or egg and/or peanut. SPT levels previously shown to be diagnostic of challenge-proven allergy to cow's milk, egg and peanut were used as the "100% diagnostic SPT levels" and compared with EAST and CAP values associated with IgE food allergy according to the manufacturer's definition.


RESULTS
McNemar's test showed a significant difference between the "100% diagnostic SPT levels" and positive EAST in identifying patients who did not require food challenge for cow's milk (P = 0.01), egg (P < 10-6) and peanut (P < 10-6), and a significant difference between the "100% diagnostic SPT levels" and positive CAP (P < 10-6) for egg and peanut but not cow's milk. Twenty-three per cent of food challenges which, based on the results of EAST and CAP, would have been necessary to confirm the diagnosis of food allergy were avoided by the use of the "100% diagnostic SPT levels" .


CONCLUSIONS
The use of the "100% diagnostic SPT levels" compared with in vitro measurement of IgE antibody to cow's milk, egg and peanut reduces the need for food challenge in young children with suspected food allergy.
Hill
D J
DJ
Department of Allergy, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia. allergy@cryptic.rch.unimelb.edu.au
Hosking
C S
CS
Reyes-Benito
L V
LV
D000485:Allergens / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000276:immunology; D000818:Animals; D010367:Arachis / Q000009:adverse effects; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004531:Eggs / Q000009:adverse effects; D005260:Female; D005512:Food Hypersensitivity / Q000175:diagnosis*; D006801:Humans; D006969:Hypersensitivity, Immediate / Q000175:diagnosis; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D016269:Milk Hypersensitivity / Q000175:diagnosis; D012882:Skin Tests / Q000379:methods*
D000485:Allergens