Filter extrusion of liposomes using different devices: comparison of liposome size, encapsulation efficiency, and process characteristics.
Liposomes were prepared by stepwise extrusion through 5, 1, 0.4, 0.2, 0.1 and 0.05 microm pore sizes using two different filter-extruders, the continuous high pressure device Dispex Maximator (CE) or alternatively the discontinuous Avestin LiposoFast (DE). The liposome dispersions obtained were compared in terms of particle size, lamellarity and encapsulation efficiency of calcein. The liposomes were smaller with CE than DE at all stages due to higher flow rates and pressure drops, except for final filter pore size (0.05 microm) where both preparations had similar sizes. The particle size analysis technique itself had a strong influence on the liposome sizes measured. For bigger liposomes (extruded through 0.4 microm filters) the Nicomp 370 revealed bigger volume-based mean particle sizes along with more stringent differences between volume-based and number-based diameters than the Malvern Zetasizer. In contrast, for small liposomes extruded through 0.05 microm filters, similar liposome sizes were found no matter which of the two PCS techniques or cryo-transmission electron microscopy was used. In congruence to the liposome sizes measured, encapsulation efficiencies were smaller for CE than DE at all filter stages except the final (0.05 microm). No lipid loss occurred and lyso-phosphatidylcholine formation was negligible irrespective of which extrusion technique was used.
Berger
N
N
Schering AG, Pharmazeutische Entwicklung Parenterale AF, 13342, Berlin, Germany.
Sachse
A
A
Bender
J
J
Schubert
R
R
Brandl
M
M
D005374:Filtration; D008081:Liposomes / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D010316:Particle Size
D008081:Liposomes