title: Prospective evaluation of a simplified approach for common atrial flutter radio frequency ablation with only two catheters.
abstract: Intra-atrial conduction block within the inferior vena cava-tricuspid annulus isthmus (IVCT) has been shown to predict successful common atrial flutter ablation. However, its demonstration requires the use of several electrode catheters and mapping of the line of block. The aim of this study was prospectively to test the feasibility of a simplified ablation procedure using only two catheters.
  
  
  METHODS
  Radio frequency (RF) ablation of common atrial flutter was performed in 30 patients with the sole use of a catheter for atrial pacing and a RF catheter. RF ablation lesions were created in the IVCT. Surface ECG criteria were used to monitor the conduction within the IVCT. The end point during low lateral atrial pacing was an increment in the interval between the pacing artefact and the peak of the R wave in surface lead II >50 ms and clockwise rotation of the P wave axis beyond -30 degrees and inferiorly. Then, the line of lesions was mapped during atrial pacing with the RF catheter. Additional RF lesions were applied if mapping disclosed a zone of residual conduction. Otherwise the procedure was stopped if mapping showed parallel double potentials all along the line. Finally, the block was reassessed with a 'Halo' catheter.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Surface ECG criteria were met in 26 patients. Mapping the line of lesions showed a complete corridor of parallel double potentials in these 26 cases and in 3 of the 4 patients in whom ECG criteria were not met. Conduction evaluated with the Halo catheter showed bi-directional complete block in these 29 patients. After a follow-up of 16 +/- 4 months there was no recurrence of atrial flutter.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Surface ECG criteria combined with mapping of the line of block demonstrate evidence of bi-directional IVCT block. This simplified RF ablation of common atrial flutter is feasible with a low recurrence rate.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiology, University of Lille, France. dklug@chru-lille.fr
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Klug
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Lacroix
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Marquié
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Mairesse
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Alix
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Dennetière
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: d'Hautefeuille
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Zghal
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kacet
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001281:Atrial Fibrillation / Q000150:complications / Q000601:surgery; D001282:Atrial Flutter / Q000150:complications / Q000601:surgery*; D017115:Catheter Ablation / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000592:standards; D002404:Catheterization / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004562:Electrocardiography; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012008:Recurrence; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014261:Tricuspid Valve / Q000601:surgery; D014682:Vena Cava, Inferior / Q000601:surgery