title: Reproductive performance of postpartum dairy cows under a highly intervenient breeding program involving timed insemination and combinations of GnRH, prostaglandin F2alpha and human chorionic gonadotropin.
abstract: Lactating Holstein cows (n=288) were grouped as pairs at parturition and randomly assigned to two treatments (control, C vs intervenient treatment, T). The reproductive management of the Group C cows (n=130) consisted of the intramuscular administration of 500 microg PGF2alpha analogue (PG) on Days 28 and 63 postpartum and breeding on the basis of estrus signs with the a.m.-p.m. rule after Day 63. Cows that were not bred by 77 d postpartum received another injection of PG and were bred at estrus or 84 h after PG treatment. Pregnancy diagnoses were perfomed by palpation of the uterus per rectum 42 to 48 d after AI. Cows in the T group (n=139) received intramuscular injections of 100 microg GnRH 14 d and PG 28 d after calving. On Day 56 postpartum, cows were given a second dose of GnRH followed by PG on Day 63 postpartum and a third GnRH injection 48 h after PG (OvSynch). Cows were inseminated at a fixed time (22+/-1 h) after GnRH. Five days after the fixed-time insemination cows were given 1500 IU hCG i.m.. Group C and T cows that returned to service or were diagnosed as non-pregnant continued to receive PG at intervals of 14 d with breeding at estrus or 84 h after the second PGF2alpha dose. A sustained increase in milk progesterone concentration was observed in 59.0% of T cows after GnRH administration on Day 14. A similar rise in milk progesterone concentrations was observed in 53.8% of C cows. The PG on Day 28 induced luteolysis more in Group T cows (53.2%) than in Group C cows (36.9%). The PG on Day 63 reduced milk progesterone concentrations to basal levels in 50.7% of T and 49.2% of Group C animals. The first service pregnancy rates (T, 40.3% vs C, 36.2%) and the overall pregnancy rates (all services, T, 83.5% vs C, 86.9%) were not different between the two groups. The two treatments did not differ in the interval from first service to pregnancy, calving to pregnancy or in calving interval, number of services per pregnancy or culling rates.
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: S K
authors.initials: SK
authors.lastname: Tallam
authors.forename: T L
authors.initials: TL
authors.lastname: Kerbler
authors.forename: K E
authors.initials: KE
authors.lastname: Leslie
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Bateman
authors.forename: W H
authors.initials: WH
authors.lastname: Johnson
authors.forename: J S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Walton
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle / Q000502:physiology*; D006063:Chorionic Gonadotropin / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000502:physiology; D015237:Dinoprost / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D007987:Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000502:physiology; D007315:Insemination, Artificial / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D007774:Lactation; D008297:Male; D008892:Milk / Q000737:chemistry; D011247:Pregnancy; D011374:Progesterone / Q000032:analysis; D011897:Random Allocation; D012098:Reproduction / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*
chemical_list: D006063:Chorionic Gonadotropin; D007987:Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; D011374:Progesterone; D015237:Dinoprost