Cost-effectiveness studies on cervical cancer.
Cost-effectiveness analyses are an important source of information for the design and evaluation of policies to reduce cervical cancer. This paper describes the recommendations of a panel on cost-effectiveness studies convened as part of the International Consensus Conference on the Fight Against Cervical Cancer. Recommendations for cost-effectiveness studies include: (1) the use of reference case methods to support comparisons across studies, (2) the use of a consistent standard of evidence on the clinical effectiveness of different screening strategies, (3)further research into the costs and effectiveness of different screening and treatment strategies for cervical cancer, (4) further research into screening and treatment strategies in a wide range of countries, (5) easily accessible and detailed descriptions of the methods and supplementary analyses underlying published studies, (6) greater use of newly developed models of cervical cancer, and (7) greater revelation of potential conflict of interest by researchers.
Brown
A D
AD
Department of Health Administration, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. adalsteinn.brown@utoronto.ca
Raab
S S
SS
Suba
E J
EJ
Wright
R G
RG
D016265:Conflict of Interest; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000191:economics*; D012106:Research; D002583:Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000191:economics*; D014626:Vaginal Smears / Q000191:economics*