Overconfidence effects in category learning: a comparison of connectionist and exemplar memory models.
Exemplar and connectionist models were compared on their ability to predict overconfidence effects in category learning data. In the standard task, participants learned to classify hypothetical patients with particular symptom patterns into disease categories and reported confidence judgments in the form of probabilities. The connectionist model asserts that classifications and confidence are based on the strength of learned associations between symptoms and diseases. The exemplar retrieval model (ERM) proposes that people learn by storing examples and that their judgments are often based on the first example they happen to retrieve. Experiments 1 and 2 established that overconfidence increases when the classification step of the process is bypassed. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that a direct instruction to retrieve many exemplars reduces overconfidence. Only the ERM predicted the major qualitative phenomena exhibited in these experiments.
Sieck
W R
WR
Department of Psychology, Cognition, and Perception, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1109, USA. sieck@umich.edu
Yates
J F
JF
D000328:Adult; D002755:Choice Behavior; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D011939:Mental Recall; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011337:Probability Learning; D012649:Self Concept