Ear deformity in children following high ear-piercing: current practice, consent issues and legislation.
In this presentation we examine the practice of high ear-piercing in children, the issue of informed consent and current legislation. We sampled current practice and consent policy by visiting nine establishments in Sheffield providing this service. There were two high street department stores, two fashion accessory outlets and five body-piercing studios. Enquiries were made as to the technique used, knowledge of complications, customer counselling and consent policy. A photograph of an ear with a cosmetic deformity following high ear-piercing was shown and awareness of this possible outcome was noted. Two ear-piercing techniques were identified, either a spring-loaded gun firing a blunt stud or the use of a body-piercing needle. The fashion accessory outlets were prepared to pierce any part of the ear using a spring-loaded gun in children under 16 years of age. There was a general lack of knowledge about possible serious complications. Two of the body piercers would not perform high ear-piercing on clients under the age of 16 years. The body piercers use a disposable needle and were of the opinion that using a spring-loaded gun shatters the cartilage and increases the risk of infection. The best technique is open to debate and it may be that the perceived unsavoury environment of the body-piercing studio represents a safer option than the more respectable or cheaper alternatives. The practice of body piercing in the UK remains uncontrolled.
Jervis
P N
PN
Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Clifton
N J
NJ
Woolford
T J
TJ
D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D004426:Ear Deformities, Acquired / Q000209:etiology*; D004431:Ear, External / Q000002:abnormalities* / Q000601:surgery; D004739:England; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D011677:Punctures / Q000009:adverse effects*