title: Did the antioxidant trials fail to validate the oxidation hypothesis?
abstract: Most clinical trials on antioxidants using vitamin E or beta-carotene have failed to note any significant change in cardiovascular endpoints. The results of these studies have been interpreted as a setback for the oxidation hypothesis. An analysis of the hypothesis and the trials, however, points out major misconceptions about the hypothesis and unjustified outcome expectations. Wrong selection of patient population, endpoints that are incompatible with the hypothesis, poor choice of antioxidants, and lack of inclusion of biochemical markers of oxidative stress and markers of vascular response are some of the contributors to the "failure" of these trials.
authors.affiliation: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University, 1639 Pierce Drive, #4300 WMB, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. spartha@emory.edu
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Parthasarathy
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Khan-Merchant
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Penumetcha
authors.forename: B V
authors.initials: BV
authors.lastname: Khan
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Santanam
mesh_terms: D000975:Antioxidants / Q000378:metabolism / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D001161:Arteriosclerosis / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000209:etiology / Q000378:metabolism*; D015415:Biomarkers; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D023381:Endpoint Determination; D006801:Humans; D018384:Oxidative Stress / Q000187:drug effects*; D018579:Patient Selection; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
chemical_list: D000975:Antioxidants; D015415:Biomarkers