Psychiatric Darwinism = survival of the fittest + extinction of the unfit.
This article is a critical analysis of the American Health Security Act of 1993. Although AHSA was soundly defeated when first proposed, parts of it have been enacted into law in 1996, with the prospect of further piece-meal enactments in the future. It includes matters of fundamental importance to American mental health practitioners, to vulnerable citizens with psychiatric disorders, to their families, and to their few champions in medicine and law. Utilitarianism is the unstated philosophical substructure of AHSA and its legislative progeny, i.e., whatever cuts medical costs and saves money is good. The author delineates AHSA's mental health entitlements and limitations of in-patient, out-patient, and other patient care. She enumerates a dozen major imperfections and dangers of this mental health law, especially its medical utilitarianism emphasizing outcomes and quality of life. Dr. Cosman argues that medical cost, outcome, quality of life, and managed competition threaten the essential liberties and the lives of older persons, persons who are chronically ill, fatally ill, and most particularly those who are mentally impaired. She concludes that if limited money, medicine and time are invested only in inevitable medical success, then America's medicine by its medical law will be Medical Darwinism encouraging survival of the fittest by requiring extinction of the unfit.
Cosman
M P
MP
Medical Equity, Inc., San Diego, Cal., USA.
D000293:Adolescent; D000368:Aged; D002648:Child; D003363:Cost Control; D004989:Ethics; D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006801:Humans; D018854:Managed Competition / Q000592:standards; D008605:Mental Health Services / Q000458:organization & administration*; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D012935:Social Justice; D014481:United States; D019472:Universal Health Insurance / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*