title: Physicians' accuracy and interrator reliability for the diagnosis of unstable meniscal tears in patients having osteoarthritis of the knee.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine clinicians' accuracy and reliability for the clinical diagnosis of unstable meniscus tears in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee.
  
  
  METHODS
  A prospective cohort study.
  
  
  METHODS
  A single tertiary care centre.
  
  
  METHODS
  One hundred and fifty-two patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee refractory to conservative medical treatment were selected for prospective evaluation of arthroscopic debridement.
  
  
  METHODS
  Arthroscopic debridement of the knee, including meniscal tear and chondral flap resection, without abrasion arthroplasty.
  
  
  METHODS
  A standardized assessment protocol was administered to each patient by 2 independent observers. Arthroscopic determination of unstable meniscal tears was recorded by 1 observer who reviewed a video recording and was blinded to preoperative data. Those variables that had the highest interobserver agreement and the strongest association with meniscal tear by univariate methods were entered into logistic regression to model the best prediction of resectable tears.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were 92 meniscal tears (77 medial, 15 lateral). Interobserver agreement between clinical fellows and treating surgeons was poor to fair (kappa < 0.4) for all clinical variables except radiographic measures, which were good. Fellows and surgeons predicted unstable meniscal tear preoperatively with equivalent accuracy of 60%. Logistic regression modelling revealed that a history of swelling and a ballottable effusion were negative predictors. A positive McMurray test was the only positive predictor of unstable meniscal tear. "Mechanical" symptoms were not reliable predictors in this prospective study. The model was 69% accurate for all patients and 76% for those with advanced medial compartment osteoarthritis defined by a joint space height of 2 mm or less.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study underscored the difficulty in using clinical variables to predict unstable medial meniscal tears in patients with pre-existing osteoarthritis of the knee. The lack of interobserver agreement must be overcome to ensure that the findings can be generalized to other physician observers.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa and the Ottawa Hospital, Ont.
authors.forename: G F
authors.initials: GF
authors.lastname: Dervin
authors.forename: I G
authors.initials: IG
authors.lastname: Stiell
authors.forename: G A
authors.initials: GA
authors.lastname: Wells
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Rody
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Grabowski
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015588:Observer Variation; D020370:Osteoarthritis, Knee / Q000150:complications*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D000070600:Tibial Meniscus Injuries