An outsider's view of Dutch euthanasia policy and practice.
This article provides a critical analysis of Dutch euthanasia policy and practice. The research benefited from twenty-eight interviews conducted in the Netherlands during the summer of 1999 with some of the leading figures who dictate the decision-making process and take an active part in the debates. The discussion begins with a review of the two major Dutch reports on euthanasia and the conflicting views and interpretations offered by the literature. Next, I provide some data about the interviews, and then analysis indicating that the Dutch Guidelines on the policy and practice of euthanasia do not provide ample mechanisms against abuse. I argue that the Dutch Guidelines are insufficient, do not provide adequate control over the practice of euthanasia, and that the entire policy should be revised and made more coherent and more comprehensive.
Cohen-Almagor
R
R
University of Haifa.
D001294:Attitude to Health; D005065:Euthanasia / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005568:Forms and Records Control; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D009426:Netherlands; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D012017:Referral and Consultation