title: Medicaid TEFRA option in Minnesota: implications for patient rights.
abstract: This research studied a special-needs population under age 18 who had both private insurance and Medicaid coverage through the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) option. We found that children with managed care plans, particularly health maintenance organizations (HMOs), tended to incur higher total expenses to TEFRA than children with indemnity plans. Our findings also show that managed care in Minnesota tends to provide the same or marginally better coverage as indemnity plans do for core medical items but much less coverage for ancillary items such as home care, therapies, and durable medical equipment.
authors.affiliation: Health Research and Educational Trust, American Hospital Association, One North Franklin, Chicago, IL 60606, USA. bchan1@aha.org
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Chan
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Vanderburg
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D002908:Chronic Disease / Q000191:economics; D019988:Children with Disabilities; D005102:Health Expenditures / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006279:Health Maintenance Organizations / Q000191:economics*; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D019458:Insurance Coverage; D007348:Insurance, Health / Q000191:economics*; D008297:Male; D008484:Medicaid / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008910:Minnesota; D017059:Models, Econometric; D010344:Patient Advocacy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D017149:Private Sector; D013659:Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act; D014481:United States