Advancing scientific discourse in the controversy surrounding the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: a rejoinder to Meyer (2000).
A recent commentary by Meyer (2000) in the Journal of Personality Assessment alleged that Rorschach critic Wood and his colleagues had intentionally published information that they knew to be in error. To substantiate this contention, Meyer's commentary published information that was part of the peer review process at another journal. In this rejoinder, we present factual information that shows we have consistently acted in good faith. This rejoinder suggests that the scientific debate regarding the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach is unlikely to be advanced by speculating about the intentions of Rorschach critics, or by publishing information from the peer review process that is usually kept confidential.
Wood
J M
JM
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at El Paso, 79968, USA. jawood@utep.edu
Nezworski
M T
MT
Stejskal
W J
WJ
Garven
S
S
D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D006801:Humans; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012392:Rorschach Test / Q000592:standards*