title: Amalgam--Resurrection and redemption. Part 1: the clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam.
abstract: Dental amalgam has come under attack for its allegedly poor physical properties and clinical performance in addition to its poor appearance. It has been claimed that the American Dental Association has a hidden agenda to protect amalgam and that other countries have banned its use. A literature search revealed that the vast majority of amalgam restorations do not cause fractured cusps or have recurrent caries. Most amalgam restorations have been shown to last longer than resin composite restorations. In addition, the materials and techniques involved in amalgam restorations have vastly improved in recent years. Like resin composite restorations, amalgam restorations can often be repaired. The American Dental Association has no vested interest in protecting amalgam. The use of amalgam has not been banned in any country in the European Union. According to the latest scientific information available, dental amalgam is a remarkably durable and long-lasting restorative material. Although its appearance is unesthetic, its clinical performance and effectiveness are unsurpassed by those of resin composite.
authors.affiliation: WahlMichaelJ@aol.com
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Wahl
mesh_terms: D000571:American Dental Association; D003188:Composite Resins; D003723:Dental Amalgam / Q000009:adverse effects; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003731:Dental Caries / Q000209:etiology; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000379:methods*; D005062:European Union; D006801:Humans; D010330:Patents as Topic; D012008:Recurrence; D019228:Tooth Crown / Q000293:injuries; D014082:Tooth Fractures / Q000209:etiology; D014481:United States
chemical_list: D003188:Composite Resins; D003723:Dental Amalgam