title: The usefulness of restorative laparoscopic-assisted total colectomy for ulcerative colitis.
abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic-assisted total colectomy with ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis in comparison with that of conventional open total colectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis. From 1990 until 1999, 11 patients underwent open total colectomy, while 21 patients had laparoscopic-assisted total colectomy. Patients characteristics, perioperative course, and recovery were compared. Differences between the groups were tested using Student's t-test for independent groups and chi-square tests when appropriate. Nasogastric tube could be removed after POD 1.1 vs. 4.8 (p < 0.05), the mean time to passage of stool was 1.7 (range, 1 to 3) vs. 5.4 (range, 3 to 7) days (p < 0.05), and in the laparoscopic group watery stool was soon made solid after POD 24.3 vs. 87.3 (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the mean operating time and mean estimated operating blood loss between two groups. Postoperative morbidity did not differ significantly between the patients treated conventionally (45.5%) and laparoscopically (33.3%). The findings of this study indicate that laparoscopic-assisted total colectomy improved cosmetic results and to be a safe and effective treatment for the elective surgery of ulcerative colitis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Araki
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Ishibashi
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Ogata
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Shirouzu
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Isomoto
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003082:Colectomy / Q000009:adverse effects; D003093:Colitis, Ulcerative / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D008297:Male