title: Serving up food safety: who wants a piece of the pie?
abstract: A total of 12 federal agencies, plus their state counterparts, contribute to the regulatory snarl that governs the safety of the American food supply. With so much federal oversight, one might expect U.S. foods to be virtually risk-free. But this is hardly the case; contaminated food is responsible for 75 million illnesses, 325,000 hospitalizations, and 5,000 deaths in the United States each year. Recent reports from the General Accounting Office and the National Research Council claim that creation of a single agency with centralized authority is the best solution to U.S. food safety problems. Some experts agree that regulatory gaps in food safety highlight the need for centralized leadership, and that more money is necessary to fund the number of inspectors needed to adequately inspect the food supply before it reaches consumers. The single-agency concept has garnered congressional, industry, and scientific support, but the idea isn't without its skeptics, who believe that consolidating food safety under a single agency eliminates checks and balances offered by the current system and, more importantly, runs the risk of politicizing the agency.
authors.forename: C W
authors.initials: CW
authors.lastname: Schmidt
mesh_terms: D005506:Food Contamination / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000517:prevention & control; D005513:Food Inspection / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006077:Government Agencies / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D007373:Interinstitutional Relations; D015279:Organizational Culture; D011634:Public Health; D012449:Safety / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D014481:United States