title: Metacognition in motor learning.
abstract: Research on judgments of verbal learning has demonstrated that participants' judgments are unreliable and often overconfident. The authors studied judgments of perceptual-motor learning. Participants learned 3 keystroke patterns on the number pad of a computer, each requiring that a different sequence of keys be struck in a different total movement time. Practice trials on each pattern were either blocked or randomly interleaved with trials on the other patterns, and each participant was asked, periodically, to predict his or her performance on a 24-hr test. Consistent with earlier findings, blocked practice enhanced acquisition but harmed retention. Participants, though, predicted better performance given blocked practice. These results augment research on judgments of verbal learning and suggest that humans, at their peril, interpret current ease of access to a perceptual-motor skill as a valid index of learning.
authors.affiliation: Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada. simond@mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca
authors.forename: D A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Simon
authors.forename: R A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Bjork
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003071:Cognition; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D012153:Retention, Psychology