title: Efficacy of laser Doppler flowmetry for the diagnosis of revascularization of reimplanted immature dog teeth.
abstract: This study was performed to assess if laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) is an improved method for the detection of revascularization of replanted teeth. Teeth were extracted and reimplanted under different experimental conditions. LDF readings were taken before extraction and weekly for 3 months. In control teeth, LDF baseline readings were taken and then repeated after the apical blood vessels were cut surgically. At the end of 3 months it was determined radiographically and histologically whether revascularization had occurred, i.e. vitality had returned.
  
  
  RESULTS
  LDF readings correctly predicted the pulp status (vital vs. non-vital) in 83.7% of the readings. 73.9% (17 of 23) were correct for the vital teeth and 95% (19 of 20) were correct for the non-vital teeth. Fisher's exact test (2-tail) indicated that there was no significant association between the efficacy of LDF and tooth type (P = 0.166), although P2 was the least accurate tooth tested. Wilcoxon's matched-pair signed rank test demonstrated that in the revascularized (vital) teeth, the flux value between the baseline and week 2 dropped significantly (P = 0.0001), increased significantly from week 2 to week 4 (P = 0.0001) and then decreased steadily until week 12. However, at week 12 the flux was still significantly higher than at week 2 (P = 0.010). In the teeth that failed to revascularize, the flux value dropped significantly by weeks 1 and 2 (P = 0.004 and P = 0.0001, respectively). Flux values did not increase from week 2. A Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) analysis confirmed a pulse of dominant frequency of 2 Hz in the teeth that returned to vitality and the lack thereof in those that stayed non-vital. One tooth in which the flux value evaluation indicated a non-vital tooth but the radiographic/histologic findings showed vital (false negative) possessed a pulse of dominant frequency and proved by this method to have successfully revascularized.
authors.affiliation: Department of Endodontics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Yanpiset
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Vongsavan
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Sigurdsson
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Trope
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001641:Bicuspid; D003782:Dental Pulp / Q000098:blood supply / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D004285:Dogs; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005544:Forecasting; D005583:Fourier Analysis; D007180:Incisor; D017078:Laser-Doppler Flowmetry; D018919:Neovascularization, Physiologic / Q000502:physiology*; D011673:Pulsatile Flow / Q000502:physiology; D011859:Radiography; D012039:Regional Blood Flow / Q000502:physiology; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D013997:Time Factors; D014070:Tooth / Q000098:blood supply* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D014090:Tooth Replantation; D019553:Tooth, Nonvital / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology