title: Within-session changes in responding during concurrent variable interval variable ratio schedules.
abstract: Rats (Experiment 1) and pigeons (Experiment 2) responded on several concurrent variable interval (VI) variable ratio (VR) schedules. The rate of, but not the time spent, responding in each component usually changed within-sessions. The bias and sensitivity parameters of the generalized matching law (GML) did not change systematically within-sessions. The fit of the GML to the data did not change within-sessions for pigeons, but it was better in the middle than at the beginning or end of the session for some for rats. Both over- and under-matching occurred. These results imply that within-session changes in responding do not usually cause problems for assessing the validity of the GML when subjects respond on concurrent VI VR schedules. The results also suggest that under- and over-matching are not produced by different factors, but rather lie on a continuum.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Washington State University, 99164-4820, Pullman, WA, USA
authors.forename: F K.
authors.initials: FK
authors.lastname: McSweeney
authors.forename: E S.
authors.initials: ES
authors.lastname: Murphy
authors.forename: B P.
authors.initials: BP
authors.lastname: Kowal