What causes specificity of practice in a manual aiming movement: vision dominance or transformation errors?
The withdrawal of vision of the arm during a manual aiming task has been found to result in a large increase in aiming error, regardless of the amount of practice in normal vision before its withdrawal. In the present study, the authors investigated whether the increase in error reflects the domination of visual afferent information over the movement representation developed during practice to the detriment of other sources of afferent information or whether it reflects only transformation errors of the location of the target from an allocentric to an egocentric frame of reference. Participants (N = 40) performed aiming movements with their dominant or nondominant arm in a full-vision or target- only condition. The results of the present experiment supported both of those hypotheses. The data indicated that practice does not eliminate the need for visual information for optimizing movement accuracy and that learning is specific to the source or sources of afferent information more likely to ensure optimal accuracy during practice. In addition, the results indicated that movement planning in an allocentric frame of reference might require simultaneous vision of the arm and the target. Finally, practice in a target-only condition, with knowledge of results, was found to improve recoding of the target in an egocentric frame of reference.
Proteau
L
L
Département de kinésiologie, Université de Montréal, P.O. Box 6128, Station Centreville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada. luc.proteau@umontreal.ca
Carnahan
H
H
D000328:Adult; D005246:Feedback; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D008954:Models, Biological; D009048:Motor Skills; D009068:Movement; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D014796:Visual Perception