Polymerization shrinkage of dental composite resins.
Aesthetic materials have always been a priority for the restoration of anterior teeth; increasingly, they have also gained prominence in the restoration of posterior teeth. This has been due to their advantages as an alternative to amalgam. Their drawbacks however, can include poor marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity and cuspal movement. These are particularly associated with the polymerization shrinkage accompanying the placement of composite resins. Consequently, a variety of methods have been used for determining the polymerization shrinkage. These range from dilatometer methods, specific gravity methods and deflecting disc systems to optical methods. In this work a unique method for the qualitative analysis of polymerization shrinkage was undertaken. This method utilized a miniature transducer and provided details of the shrinkage from within the material. The results indicated movement of material towards the initiating light, followed by a return movement away from it. The study was expanded to incorporate clinical aspects, whereby the composite resin was in direct contact with dental tissue, as in a restoration. Tests were performed with surface-treated cavity moulds, as in restoration placement, and without surface treatment. Results indicated that the shrinkage was highly dependent upon the region under investigation, as well as on the state of the surface.
Ensaff
H
H
Department of Mechanical and Medical Engineering, University of Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK.
O'Doherty
D M
DM
Jacobsen
P H
PH
D000180:Acrylic Resins / Q000737:chemistry*; D016880:Anisotropy; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry*; D008422:Materials Testing; D011140:Polyurethanes / Q000737:chemistry*; D013499:Surface Properties; D014159:Transducers
D000180:Acrylic Resins; C029012:Composite Dental Resin; D003188:Composite Resins; D011140:Polyurethanes