Cost-effectiveness of two types of dysphagia care in head and neck cancer: a preliminary report.
We conducted a prospective, preliminary study to compare the cost-effectiveness of two different instrument-based techniques for diagnosing and managing dysphagia in 30 consecutive hospitalized patients with head and neck cancer. The two techniques are videofluoroscopy via modified barium swallow (MBS) and videoendoscopy via flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST). Medicare was the primary insurer of all patients. Fifteen of these patients had their dysphagia diagnosed and managed by MBS and the other 15 by FEESST. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by determining the average Medicare reimbursement for each procedure. We found that the mean reimbursements were $451.01 (+/- $50.55) for MBS and $321.23 (+/- $3.01) for FEESST. The mean reimbursement for FEESST was significantly lower than that for MBS (p < 0.0001; Mann-Whitney U test). We conclude that FEESST appears to be more cost-effective than MBS for the inpatient management of dysphagia in patients with head and neck cancer.
Aviv
J E
JE
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital and College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York City, USA. jea10@columbia.edu
Sataloff
R T
RT
Cohen
M
M
Spitzer
J
J
Ma
G
G
Bhayani
R
R
Close
L G
LG
D000368:Aged; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003680:Deglutition Disorders / Q000191:economics* / Q000209:etiology*; D005260:Female; D006258:Head and Neck Neoplasms / Q000150:complications*; D006296:Health Services / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged