Community-based HIV/AIDS education in rural Uganda: which channel is most effective?
A process evaluation was conducted to evaluate four channels (drama, video, community educators and leaflets) used in a community-based IEC (Information, Education and Communication) HIV/AIDS intervention in rural Uganda. Semi-structured interviews (n = 37) and focus groups (n = 3) were held with community members working as field staff. In addition, two questionnaire surveys (n = 105 and n = 69) and eight focus groups were conducted with the target community. Over 85% of the community had seen at least one drama or video show. They rated them as relevant and realistic. However, the messages 'taken home' were not always those intended by the plays. Access to community educators (CEs) was not equal. The CEs had a tendency to avoid the educated, rich and their older relatives. Those who had met with a CE rated them as knowledgeable and trustworthy, but felt they would rather be taught by a trained health worker. Around 80% of the community said they had seen the leaflets, but had not necessarily read them. Although appreciated by some as reference material, low literacy levels and a lack of reading culture meant that some leaflets may have gone astray. These findings suggest that a multi-channel approach may be required to overcome weaknesses inherent in individual channels.
Mitchell
K
K
MRC Programme on AIDS in Uganda/UVRI, Entebbe.
Nakamanya
S
S
Kamali
A
A
Whitworth
J A
JA
D003153:Community Health Services / Q000379:methods / Q000458:organization & administration*; D003466:Cultural Characteristics; D017144:Focus Groups; D015658:HIV Infections / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006266:Health Education / Q000379:methods*; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D015397:Program Evaluation; D012424:Rural Population; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014454:Uganda