Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma with MR imaging: a reappraisal of diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls.
The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls of MR imaging in preoperative staging of cervical cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to determine the tumor staging for 41 patients with cervical carcinoma emphasizing tumor size, parametrial invasion, vaginal invasion, and lymph node metastases. According to the correlation of MR findings with surgical-pathological features, there was less than 5 mm discrepancy in the size in 29 of 34 tumors (85.3%) that were larger than 1 cm. In assessing parametrial invasion, vaginal invasion and lymph node metastases, MR imaging had an accuracy of 95, 83, and 86%, respectively. In determining stage of disease and differentiating operable (< or =stage IIA) from advanced disease (> or =stage IIB), MR imaging had an accuracy of 82.9 and 93%. Pitfalls leading to staging errors included difficulties in differentiating cancer foci from surrounding tissue edema and detecting microscopic tumor extension. Magnetic resonance imaging is accurate in the evaluation of parametrial invasion and differentiation of operable from advanced disease. The ability of MR imaging to detect microscopic extra-cervical tumor extension and differentiate cancer foci from surrounding tissue edema is not as reliable.
Sheu
M H
MH
Department of Radiology, Veterans General Hospital-Taipei and School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, 201 Shih-Pai Road, Section 2, Taipei, Taiwan. mhsheu@vghtpe.gov.tw
Chang
C Y
CY
Wang
J H
JH
Yen
M S
MS
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002584:Cervix Uteri / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008197:Lymph Node Excision; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000473:pathology; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D002583:Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery