title: Dissociation between syntactic and semantic processing during idiom comprehension.
abstract: Syntactic and semantic processing of literal and idiomatic phrases were investigated with a priming procedure. In 3 experiments, participants named targets that were syntactically appropriate or inappropriate completions for semantically unrelated sentence contexts. Sentences ended with incomplete idioms (kick the...) and were biased for either a literal (ball) or an idiomatic (bucket) completion. Syntactically appropriate targets were named more quickly than inappropriate ones for both contextual biases, suggesting that syntactic analysis occurs for idioms. In a final experiment, targets were either concrete (expected) or abstract (unexpected) nouns. For literal sentences, the abstract targets were named more slowly than the concrete targets. In contrast, there was no concreteness effect for idiomatic sentences, suggesting that the literal meaning of the idiom is not processed. Overall, the results provide evidence for dissociation between syntactic and semantic processing.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Illinois State University, USA.
authors.forename: R R
authors.initials: RR
authors.lastname: Peterson
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Burgess
authors.forename: G S
authors.initials: GS
authors.lastname: Dell
authors.forename: K M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Eberhard
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D011340:Problem Solving; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D011930:Reaction Time; D011932:Reading; D012660:Semantics