Perspectives of different type biological life support systems (BLSS) usage in space missions.
In the paper an attempt is made to combine three important criteria of LSS comparison: minimum mass, maximum safety and maximum quality of life. Well-known types of BLSS were considered: with higher plant, higher plants and mushrooms, microalgae, and hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria. These BLSSs were compared in terms of "integrated" mass for the case of a vegetarian diet and a "normal"  one (with animal proteins and fats). It was shown that the BLSS with higher plants and incineration of wastes becomes the best when the exploitation period is more than 1 yr. The dependence of higher plants' LSS structure on operation time was found. Comparison of BLSSs in terms of integral reliability (this criterion includes mass and quality of life criteria) for a lunar base scenario showed that BLSSs with higher plants are advantageous in reliability and comfort. This comparison was made for achieved level of technology of closing and for perspective one.
Bartsev
S I
SI
Biophysics Institute of SB RAS, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Gitelson
J I
JI
Lisovsky
G M
GM
Mezhevikin
V V
VV
Okhonin
V A
VA
D001419:Bacteria; D000460:Chlorophyta; D018504:Ecological Systems, Closed; D004779:Environment Design; D004780:Environment, Controlled; D005160:Facility Design and Construction; D006801:Humans; D008021:Life Support Systems / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000592:standards; D008433:Mathematics; D016081:Moon; D010944:Plants; D011788:Quality of Life; D013026:Space Flight / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000592:standards; D014893:Weightlessness