Rib graft reconstruction versus osseointegrated prosthesis for microtia: a significant change in patient preference.
Until recently the options for reconstruction of the microtic ear were unsatisfactory and the ear was often left alone. With recent advances, both autologous rib reconstruction and osseointegration produce good quality results. It is our practice to offer all patients a choice of no surgery, autologous rib cartilage reconstruction or an osseointegrated prosthetic ear. This study reports on parental choice between the reconstructive options as assessed by questionnaire. Earlier patients who have had their surgery were compared with more recent patients who have chosen an option but are awaiting surgery. In the patients who have had surgery, seven (30%) chose a prosthetic ear and 16 (69.5%) chose rib cartilage reconstruction, compared to those patients that are awaiting surgery, four (11%) chose a prosthetic ear and 31 (88.6%) chose rib cartilage reconstruction. The results show a significant increase in the choice for rib cartilage reconstruction in those patients awaiting surgery. Although high quality autologous reconstruction is not widely available we feel it is important that parents are at least informed that it is an alternative to osseointegration and no surgery.
Botma
M
M
Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK. mbotma@doctorsworld.com
Aymat
A
A
Gault
D
D
Albert
D M
DM
D002648:Child; D003657:Decision Making; D004431:Ear, External / Q000002:abnormalities* / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D016348:Osseointegration; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D019736:Prostheses and Implants; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures; D012272:Ribs / Q000637:transplantation*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014182:Transplantation, Autologous / Q000639:trends; D016896:Treatment Outcome