title: A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting.
abstract: Retrieving some members of a memory set impairs later recall of semantically related but not unrelated members (M. C. Anderson, R. A. Bjork, & E. L. Bjork, 1994; M. C. Anderson & B. A. Spellman, 1995). The authors investigated whether this retrieval-induced forgetting effect would generalize to testing procedures other than category-cued recall. Although the authors demonstrated a retrieval-induced forgetting effect using a category-cued recall task, they failed to show retrieval-induced forgetting on several different memory tests that used item-specific cues, including a category-plus-stem-cued recall test, a category-plus-fragment-cued recall test, a fragment-cued recall test, and a fragment completion task.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824, USA. butlerk5@msu.edu
authors.forename: K M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Butler
authors.forename: C C
authors.initials: CC
authors.lastname: Williams
authors.forename: R T
authors.initials: RT
authors.lastname: Zacks
authors.forename: R H
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Maki
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D012660:Semantics; D014706:Verbal Learning