[Biomechanical study and digital modeling of traction resistance in posterior thoracic implants].
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this experimental study was to compare posterior fixation systems using hooks and screws implanted in the thoracic spine. This study was completed by a digital analysis using the finished element method.


METHODS
For the experimental study, we used 7 human thoracic spines. Forty-nine groups of 2 vertebrae were individualized. Traction was applied to maximum breaking force measured on an Instron. We used two types of instrumentations, alternating 4 pedicle screws and 2 pedicle-lamina hooks. For the digital study, we used a vertebral model composed of nearly 63 000 nodes and 14 000 elements. Elastic field calculations were carried out with a finished element abacus.


RESULTS
The base of the pedicles broke when traction was applied to a pedicle-lamina hook assembly. The medial part of the pedicle broke when traction was applied to a pedicle screw assembly. Maximul break strength for hooks was 1 108 +/- 510 N. It was 820 +/- 418 N for 4 mm diameter screws and 1 395 +/- 435 for 5 mm screws. The most fragile vertebrae were T5-T6 and T7-T8. the screw-instrumented model showed that stress concentrated on the medial aspect of the pedicle, inside the medullary canal. Using a long screw did not reduce the stress force significantly. The hook-instrumented model showed that stress was greatest on the lower part of the pedicle.


CONCLUSIONS
From a mechanical point of view, screw instrumentation is the more appropriate type of fixation. Screw fixation did not however demonstrate its superiority during the traction tests. For 4 mm screws, resistance was 23% weaker than with a hook assembly and for 5 mm screws, it was only 12% stronger. Pullout may be attributed to two principal causes, either fracture of the bony anchoring of the screw system or breakage of the pedicle. Bone thread pullout occurs when the screw threads do not penetrate sufficiently deep into the cortical bone due to the small diameter of the screw shaft. Using a larger diameter screw raises however the problem of damaging the pedicle. Pedicle breakage is seen with stronger stress forces and constitutes the upper limit of maximum break force. This leads us to formulate the hypothesis that in most cases, screw pullout occurs by breakage of the bony threading. Screws are less effective if they are not properly anchored in the pedicles, probably the reason for their relative weakness. Screw diameter should be adapted to the size of each pedicle. This would allow better transmission of stress from the screw to the pedicle. Hooks apply further stress to the vertebrae. The digital study showed that using a long screw crossing through the vertebra does not reduce the stress applied to the pedicles enough to justify its use.
Gayet
L E
LE
Service d'Orthopédie-Traumatologie, CHRU de la Milétrie, Hôpital Jean-Bernard, BP 577, 86021 Poitiers. l.e.gayet@chu-poitiers.fr
Hamcha
H
H
Charbonneau
A
A
Texereau
J
J
Bertheau
D
D
Bellicaud
D
D
Pries
P
P
D000368:Aged; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D001858:Bone Nails / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000592:standards*; D001863:Bone Screws / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000592:standards*; D002102:Cadaver; D005260:Female; D020342:Finite Element Analysis; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008422:Materials Testing; D008875:Middle Aged; D009716:Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted; D013123:Spinal Fusion / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D013718:Tensile Strength; D013904:Thoracic Vertebrae / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D014143:Traction / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*