Sweeping of membranes vs. intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening. Randomized trial.
OBJECTIVE
To compare intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel and membrane sweeping for cervical ripening.


METHODS
Fifty patients were randomized to either intracervical prostaglandin E2 or membrane sweeping. A Bishop score was assigned by a blinded examiner prior to and 24 hours following the procedure.


RESULTS
The Bishop scores assigned 24 hours after prostaglandin instillation and membrane sweeping were not significantly different (3.4, SE 0.42, vs. 3.3, SE 0.37, respectively; P > .05). The proportions of women entering active labor or delivering within 24 hours were similar in the prostaglandin and membrane groups (21% and 19%, respectively; P > .05).


CONCLUSIONS
When both intracervical prostaglandin insertion and membrane sweeping are feasible, their salutary effects are comparable.
Gemer
O
O
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barzilai Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Ashkelon, Israel. gemer@barzi.health.gov.il
Kapustian
V
V
Harari
D
D
Sassoon
E
E
Segal
S
S
D000282:Administration, Intravaginal; D000328:Adult; D020070:Cervical Ripening / Q000187:drug effects*; D015232:Dinoprostone / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007751:Labor, Induced / Q000379:methods*; D011247:Pregnancy
D015232:Dinoprostone