Comparison of methods for determination of volatile organic compounds in drinking water.
Comparison of four methods including liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), direct aqueous injection (DAI), purge and trap (PAT) and head space (HS) were carried out in this work for determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including trihalomethanes (THMs) in drinking water. This comparison is made especially to show the advantages and disadvantages and specifically the different detection limits (DL) that can be obtained for a given type of analysis. LLE is applicable only for determination of the THMs concentrations, while DAI, PAT, HS methods with different DL each of them are applicable for all VOCs, with PAT to be the most sensitive. Sampling apparatus and procedure for all these methods except of PAT are very simple and easy, but possible disadvantages for LLE and DAI are the low sensitivity and especially the detection only of THMs with LLE.
Golfinopoulos
S K
SK
Department of Environmental Studies, University of the Aegean, Mytilene, Greece. sgolf@env.aegean.gr
Lekkas
T D
TD
Nikolaou
A D
AD
D002623:Chemistry Techniques, Analytical / Q000379:methods; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods; D009930:Organic Chemicals / Q000032:analysis; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013048:Specimen Handling; D022882:Trihalomethanes / Q000032:analysis*; D014835:Volatilization; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000032:analysis*; D014881:Water Supply
D009930:Organic Chemicals; D022882:Trihalomethanes; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical