title: Two configurations of static magnetic fields for treating rheumatoid arthritis of the knee: a double-blind clinical trial.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess the efficacy of a nonpharmacologic, noninvasive static magnetic device as adjunctive therapy for knee pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomized, double-blind, controlled, multisite clinical trial.
  
  
  METHODS
  An American and a Japanese academic medical center as well as 4 community rheumatology and orthopedics practices.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cohort of 64 patients over age 18 years with rheumatoid arthritis and persistent knee pain, rated greater than 40/100mm, despite appropriate use of medications.
  
  
  METHODS
  Four blinded MagnaBloc (with 4 steep field gradients) or control devices (with 1 steep field gradient) were taped to a knee of each subject for 1 week.
  
  
  METHODS
  The American College of Rheumatology recommended core set of disease activity measures for RA clinical trials and subjects' assessment of treatment outcome.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Subjects randomly assigned to the MagnaBloc (n = 38) and control treatment groups (n = 26) reported baseline pain levels of 63/100mm and 61/100mm, respectively. A greater reduction in reported pain in the MagnaBloc group was sustained through the 1-week follow-up (40.4% vs 25.9%) and corroborated by twice daily pain diary results (p < .0001 for each vs baseline). However, comparison between the 2 groups demonstrated a statistically insignificant difference (p < .23). Subjects in the MagnaBloc group reported an average decrease in their global assessment of disease activity of 33% over 1 week, as compared with a 2% decline in the control group (p < .01). After 1 week, 68% of the MagnaBloc treatment group reported feeling better or much better, compared with 27% of the control group, and 29% and 65%, respectively, reported feeling the same as before treatment (p < .01).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Both devices demonstrated statistically significant pain reduction in comparison to baseline, with concordance across multiple indices. However, a significant difference was not observed between the 2 treatment groups (p < .23). In future studies, the MagnaBloc treatment should be compared with a nonmagnetic placebo treatment to characterize further its therapeutic potential for treating RA. This study did elucidate methods for conducting clinical trials with magnetic devices.
authors.affiliation: Vanderbilt University Medical School, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
authors.forename: N A
authors.initials: NA
authors.lastname: Segal
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Toda
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Huston
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Saeki
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Shimizu
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Fuchs
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Shimaoka
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Holcomb
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: McLean
mesh_terms: D018771:Arthralgia / Q000209:etiology* / Q000628:therapy*; D001172:Arthritis, Rheumatoid / Q000150:complications*; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D004574:Electromagnetic Fields; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint; D008280:Magnetics / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged