title: Global descriptive evaluations are more responsive than global numeric ratings in detecting students' progress during the inpatient portion of an internal medicine clerkship.
authors.affiliation: University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84132, USA.
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Battistone
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Pendleton
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Milne
authors.forename: M L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Battistone
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Sande
authors.forename: P A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Hemmer
authors.forename: T S
authors.initials: TS
authors.lastname: Shomaker
mesh_terms: D002982:Clinical Clerkship / Q000592:standards*; D002983:Clinical Competence; D004521:Educational Measurement / Q000379:methods; D007297:Inpatients; D007388:Internal Medicine / Q000193:education*; D014481:United States