The role of participation and control in the effects of computer monitoring on fairness perceptions, task satisfaction, and performance.
Procedural justice and social facilitation theories were used to investigate effects of 2 kinds of process control on fairness perceptions, task satisfaction and performance of complex, computer-monitored tasks. A laboratory study manipulated participation (high or low voice) and monitoring approach (monitoring, control over monitoring, or no monitoring). High-voice participants perceived higher justice. Monitored participants reported higher satisfaction with high voice and lower satisfaction with low voice. Task performance was poorer for monitored participants unless they had control over monitoring. Among those with control, performance was not impaired for higher baseline performers. The 2 kinds of process control had different effects on the outcome variables. Results suggest the value of considering variations in the kinds of control provided and the justice principles that may apply in predicting effects of monitoring procedures.
Douthitt
E A
EA
Department of Human Resource Management, School of Management and Labor Relations, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, USA. elizabeth_douthitt@baruch.cuny.edu
Aiello
J R
JR
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D007588:Job Satisfaction; D008297:Male; D008838:Microcomputers; D010465:Perception; D018907:Privacy; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis