title: Effects of the testing situation on item responding: cause for concern.
abstract: The effects of faking on personality test scores have been studied previously by comparing (a) experimental groups instructed to fake or answer honestly, (b) subgroups created from a single sample of applicants or nonapplicants by using impression management scores, and (c) job applicants and nonapplicants. In this investigation, the latter 2 methods were used to study the effects of faking on the functioning of the items and scales of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. A variety of item response theory methods were used to detect differential item/test functioning, interpreted as evidence of faking. The presence of differential item/test functioning across testing situations suggests that faking adversely affects the construct validity of personality scales and that it is problematic to study faking by comparing groups defined by impression management scores.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign 61820, USA. sstark@s.psych.uiuc.edu
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Stark
authors.forename: O S
authors.initials: OS
authors.lastname: Chernyshenko
authors.forename: K Y
authors.initials: KY
authors.lastname: Chan
authors.forename: W C
authors.initials: WC
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Drasgow
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007586:Job Application; D008014:Lie Detection; D008297:Male; D010552:Personality Assessment; D010560:Personnel Selection; D011594:Psychometrics; D014342:Truth Disclosure