Can electronic medical images replace hard-copy film? Defining and testing the equivalence of diagnostic tests.
Electronic medical images are an efficient and convenient format in which to display, store and transmit radiographic information. Before electronic images can be used routinely to screen and diagnose patients, however, it must be shown that readers have the same diagnostic performance with this new format as traditional hard-copy film. Currently, there exist no suitable definitions of diagnostic equivalence. In this paper we propose two criteria for diagnostic equivalence. The first criterion ('population equivalence') considers the variability between and within readers, as well as the mean reader performance. This criterion is useful for most applications. The second criterion ('individual equivalence') involves a comparison of the test results for individual patients and is necessary when patients are followed radiographically over time. We present methods for testing both individual and population equivalence. The properties of the proposed methods are assessed in a Monte Carlo simulation study. Data from a mammography screening study is used to illustrate the proposed methods and compare them with results from more conventional methods of assessing equivalence and inter-procedure agreement.
Obuchowski
N A
NA
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology Wb4 and the Division of Radiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44195-5196, USA. nobuchow@bio.rr.ccf.org
D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D003952:Diagnostic Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008327:Mammography / Q000379:methods*; D008875:Middle Aged; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D012372:ROC Curve; D011897:Random Allocation; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; D014962:X-Ray Film