title: [Talks on evaluation of students' writing (discussion)].
abstract: We talked about the evaluation of students' writing; this is thought to be difficult for teachers. We have a class "history of medicine" for freshmen in the second semester of the medical course. Students give lecture by themselves on famous historical persons in medicine such as Hippocrates, Vesalius, Pasteur and Sackett, referring to their historical significance in present medicine. As the final work of the subject they write report on "clinical medicine or medical researches 20 years in future and myself". We talked generally about educational evaluation in various aspects, concerning the methods for writing. We discussed mainly on two themes--ability to write and originality in thinking. We give a larger point to the originality, which correlates to ability to write, though we feel difficult in evaluating students' originality only by reading their reports. We also emphasize the importance of active interaction between students and teachers, and to evaluate educational activities of teachers in Japanese universities.
authors.affiliation: Department of Forensic Medicine and Medical Informatics, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Terazawa
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Otaki
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Abe
mesh_terms: D001076:Aptitude; D004504:Education, Medical, Undergraduate; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D006666:History of Medicine; D006801:Humans; D007564:Japan; D008297:Male; D012577:Schools, Medical; D013337:Students, Medical / Q000523:psychology*; D014956:Writing