title: Corticospinal inhibition appears normal in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.
abstract: The pathogenesis of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) remains unknown. Thresholds and latencies of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are normal but intracortical inhibition has not been investigated. Eleven patients with CFS were compared with 11 control subjects. Each patient completed a questionnaire using visual analogue indices of pain, fatigue, anxiety and depression. Subjects released a button to initiate simple (SRTs) and choice reaction time (CRTs) tasks; for each task, movement times were measured between release of the initiation button and depression of a second button 15 cm away. Subjects held a 10 % maximum voluntary contraction in the thenar muscles of their dominant hand while TMS was applied to the motor cortex; the duration and extent of inhibition of surface electromyographic (EMG) activity were assessed at stimulus strengths above and below the threshold for MEPs. Patients had significantly (P < 0.05) higher mean indices of fatigue than of pain, anxiety or depression. Mean (+/- S.E.M.) SRTs (but not CRTs) were longer in patients (309 +/- 45 ms) than in controls (218 +/- 9 ms). Movement times were longer in patients for both SRTs and CRTs. TMS thresholds, expressed as a percentage of the maximum stimulator output, were not significantly (P > 0.05) different in both groups for both MEPs (patients, 34 +/- 3%; controls, 36 +/- 3%) and inhibition of voluntary contraction (patients, 29 +/- 2%; controls, 34 +/- 4%). The duration and extent of inhibition did not differ significantly between groups at any stimulus strength. The pattern of change in duration and extent of inhibition with increasing stimulus intensity was no different in the two groups. The duration and extent of corticospinal inhibition in patients with CFS did not differ from controls, adding further evidence to the notion that the feeling of fatigue and the slowness of movement seen in CFS is not manifest in corticospinal output pathways.
authors.affiliation: Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital, London W6 8RF, UK.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Zaman
authors.forename: B K
authors.initials: BK
authors.lastname: Puri
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Main
authors.forename: A V
authors.initials: AV
authors.lastname: Nowicky
authors.forename: N J
authors.initials: NJ
authors.lastname: Davey
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004576:Electromyography; D019054:Evoked Potentials, Motor / Q000502:physiology*; D015673:Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008280:Magnetics; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009044:Motor Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D009433:Neural Inhibition; D010146:Pain / Q000503:physiopathology; D011712:Pyramidal Tracts / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires