title: Testing parameters in structural equation modeling: every "one" matters.
abstract: A problem with standard errors estimated by many structural equation modeling programs is described. In such programs, a parameter's standard error is sensitive to how the model is identified (i.e., how scale is set). Alternative but equivalent ways to identify a model may yield different standard errors, and hence different Z tests for a parameter, even though the identifications produce the same overall model fit. This lack of invariance due to model identification creates the possibility that different analysts may reach different conclusions about a parameter's significance level even though they test equivalent models on the same data. The authors suggest that parameters be tested for statistical significance through the likelihood ratio test, which is invariant to the identification choice.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA. gonzo@umich.edu
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Gonzalez
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Griffin
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological