title: Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To test the hypothesis that routine intraperitoneal drainage is not required after pancreatic resection.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  The use of surgically placed intraperitoneal drains has been considered routine after pancreatic resection. Recent studies have suggested that for other major upper abdominal resections, routine postoperative drainage is not required and may be associated with an increased complication rate.
  
  
  METHODS
  After informed consent, eligible patients with peripancreatic tumors were randomized during surgery either to have no drains placed or to have closed suction drainage placed in a standardized fashion after pancreatic resection. Clinical, pathologic, and surgical details were recorded.
  
  
  RESULTS
  One hundred seventy-nine patients were enrolled in the study, 90 women and 89 men. Mean age was 65.4 years (range 23-87). The pancreas was the tumor site in 142 (79%) patients, with the ampulla (n = 24), duodenum (n = 10), and distal common bile duct (n = 3) accounting for the remainder. A pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 139 patients and a distal pancreatectomy in 40 cases. Eighty-eight patients were randomized to have drains placed. Demographic, surgical, and pathologic details were similar between both groups. The overall 30-day death rate was 2% (n = 4). A postoperative complication occurred during the initial admission in 107 patients (59%). There was no significant difference in the number or type of complications between groups. In the drained group, 11 patients (12.5%) developed a pancreatic fistula. Patients with a drain were more likely to develop a significant intraabdominal abscess, collection, or fistula.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This randomized prospective clinical trial failed to show a reduction in the number of deaths or complications with the addition of surgical intraperitoneal closed suction drainage after pancreatic resection. The data suggest that the presence of drains failed to reduce either the need for interventional radiologic drainage or surgical exploration for intraabdominal sepsis. Based on these results, closed suction drainage should not be considered mandatory or standard after pancreatic resection.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10021, USA.
authors.forename: K C
authors.initials: KC
authors.lastname: Conlon
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Labow
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Leung
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Jarnagin
authors.forename: D G
authors.initials: DG
authors.lastname: Coit
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Merchant
authors.forename: M F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Brennan
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D004322:Drainage / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010180:Pancreatectomy / Q000379:methods*; D010190:Pancreatic Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D010529:Peritoneal Cavity; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology*; D011184:Postoperative Period; D015995:Prevalence; D011336:Probability; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012016:Reference Values; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D016019:Survival Analysis; D016896:Treatment Outcome