Encoding specificity revisited: the role of semantics.
Three experiments examined the effects of semantic characteristics of word pairs on memory using the encoding specificity paradigm. The paradigm involved four phases: (a) an encoding phase to relate cues and targets, (b) a phase in which words were generated to new cues, (c) a phase for recognition of generated targets, and (d) a cued-recall phase using the original encoding cues. Encoding pairs were classified a priori as either semantically similar (e.g., alluring-PRETTY), semantically contrasting (e.g., drab-PRETTY), or semantically unrelated (e.g., sore-PRETTY). Generation pairs were classified a priori as either semantically similar (e.g., beautiful-PRETTY) or semantically contrasting (e.g., ugly-PRETTY). For recall, the results showed that both the semantic relations between the encoding cue and target and the reprovision of the encoding cue at retrieval were important factors. In the case of recognition, however, both the semantic congruence between the encoding and generation contexts and the amount of semantic elaboration provided by the encoding context were important factors.
Hannon
B
B
University of Toronto. brendah@psych.utoronto.ca
Craik
F I
FI
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001245:Association Learning; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory; D011939:Mental Recall; D009864:Ontario; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012660:Semantics