[Medicine in the Cuvier Report on Natural Sciences (1810)].
Through that many sided Report to Napoleon, Cuvier delivers a plain view upon European medicine in 1800. That document remained somewhat ignored as biochemical and physiological information are scattered throughout the text, with no clear link with the "Medicine, an applied science" chapter. Chemistry and physiology of animal beings include most of the recent true data about digestion, metabolism, respiration and nervous system added to the classic irritability. Proved data, still very few, are completed by logical and well organized but theoretical concepts forshadowing future physiology, "milieu interieur" and thermal regulation among everything. But the anatomist Cuvier did not link chemistry to physiology. Clinical practice fascinate Cuvier. Nosology, thoroughly studied, disappointed the naturalist for its incapability of establishing a classification of diseases. Morbid anatomy and physical investigation, the just appearing percussion, are welcome with hope as well as experimental pharmacology and hygiene. But normal and pathological chemistry and biology are not integrated to clinical medicine leading to neglect Bichat's works and those on experimental asphyxiation ...etc. Cuvier, who was not a physician, deliberately adopted this attitude : didn't he change the effect of an expert memoir he had asked J.N. Halle, a famous physician and scientist ? But nevertheless he stated that progress in medicine is experimental! This statement report, written by a critic scientist, is an important reference mark of time, when medicine shifted, ceasing to be only empirical.
Richet
G
G
D005060:Europe; D005602:France; D049671:History, 18th Century; D049672:History, 19th Century; D008511:Medicine; D012586:Science / Q000266:history*
La medecine dans le Rapport Historique sur les Progres des Sciences Naturelles de Georges Cuvier (1810).