Should all implantable cardioverter defibrillators for ventricular arrhythmias be dual-chamber devices?
The advantages of a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) over a single-chamber ICD include physiologic pacing capability, atrial electrogram storage, enhanced arrhythmia discrimination algorithms, and a potential to treat atrial arrhythmia by pacing or defibrillation. Current evidence supports the supposition that dual-chamber ICDs are definitely indicated in patients who have a concomitant indication for physiologic pacing, such as bradycardia or bradycardia-dependent ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Refined dual-chamber arrhythmia discrimination algorithms and enhanced atrial therapies are probably required for patients with frequent supraventricular arrhythmias. Furthermore, in patients with systolic heart failure, low ejection fraction, and intraventricular conduction delay, triple-chamber ICDs with biventricular pacing may improve their functional status and prevent sudden arrhythmic death. Careful patient selection is required to optimize the cost-effectiveness of these sophisticated technologies.
Lee
K L
KL
University Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, PR China.
Lau
C P
CP
D001145:Arrhythmias, Cardiac / Q000209:etiology / Q000628:therapy*; D002304:Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; D017147:Defibrillators, Implantable / Q000592:standards; D004867:Equipment Design / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic