Claiming in the name of fairness: organizational justice and the decision to file for workplace injury compensation.
This article explored the relationship among injured workers' perceptions of workplace justice (i.e., distributive, interactional, and procedural), perceptions of employers' disability-related policies, and the decision to file a workers' compensation claim. Using a 2-wave sample of 1,077 workers with repetitive motion injuries, the authors tested a structural equation model. Results revealed that Time 1 interactional justice was negatively related to filing a claim, whereas Time 1 distributive justice was positively related to perceptions of employer disability-related practices measured a year after the date of injury report. At Time 2, the claim decision was unrelated to perceptions of justice, yet perceptions of disability-related practices were significantly related to all 3 types of justice.
Roberts
K
K
School of Labor and Industrial Relations, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824, USA. robert15@msu.edu
Markel
K S
KS
D000328:Adult; D017281:Cost of Illness; D012090:Cumulative Trauma Disorders / Q000191:economics / Q000523:psychology*; D003625:Data Collection; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008824:Michigan; D008875:Middle Aged; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009784:Occupational Diseases / Q000191:economics / Q000523:psychology*; D015279:Organizational Culture; D010465:Perception; D010559:Personnel Management / Q000379:methods*; D012935:Social Justice / Q000523:psychology* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012944:Social Support; D014942:Workers' Compensation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*