title: Sharable computer-based clinical practice guidelines: rationale, obstacles, approaches, and prospects.
abstract: Clinical practice guideline automation at the point of care is of growing interest, yet most guidelines are authored in unstructured narrative form. Computer-based execution depends on a formal structured representation, and also faces a number of other challenges at all stages of the guideline lifecycle: modeling, authoring, dissemination, implementation, and update. This is because of the multiplicity of conceptual models, authoring tools, authoring approaches, intended applications, implementation platforms, and local interface requirements and operational constraints. Complexity and time required for development and structure are also huge obstacles. These factors argue for convergence on a common shared model for representation that can be the basis of dissemination. A common model would facilitate direct interpretation or mapping to multiple implementation environments. GLIF (GuideLine Interchange Format) is a formal representation model for guidelines, created by the InterMed Collaboratory as a proposed basis for a shared representation. GLIF currently addresses the process of authoring and dissemination; the InterMed team's major focus now is on tools to facilitate these tasks and the mapping to clinical information system environments. Because of limitations in what can be done by a single team with finite resources, however, and the variety of additional perspectives that need to be accommodated, the InterMed team has determined that further development of a shared representation would be best served as an open process in which the world community is engaged. Under the auspices of the HL7 Decision Support Technical Committee, a GLIF Special Interest Group has been established, which is intended to be a forum for collaborative refinement and extension of a standard representation that can support the needs of the guideline lifecycle. Significant areas for future work will need to include demonstrations of effective means for incorporating guide-lines at point of care, reconciliation of functional requirements of different models and identification of those most important for supporting practical implementation, im-proved means for authoring and management of complexity, and methods for automatically analyzing and validating syntax, semantics, and logical consistency of guidelines.
authors.affiliation: Decision Systems Group, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. greenes@harvard.edu
authors.forename: R A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Greenes
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Peleg
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Boxwala
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Tu
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Patel
authors.forename: E H
authors.initials: EH
authors.lastname: Shortliffe
mesh_terms: D001185:Artificial Intelligence; D003658:Decision Making, Computer-Assisted; D020000:Decision Support Systems, Clinical / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic / Q000592:standards*