title: [Public and private in times of the pest].
abstract: The paper explores how Hannah Arendt's oppositions public-private and intimate-social can be used as an analytical tool to better understand a very concrete, extreme situation: the state of emergency triggered when an epidemiological outbreak hits a city, totally altering its inhabitants lives. Studied observation of what specific individuals (be they imagined or real) feel and think during times of epidemic is an underutilized tool that may prove helpful in studying epidemics themselves. Focusing on Camus' "The pest" and events in the city of Oran, the article looks at how victims of the plague felt about their public or private lives and their intimate and social ties.
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Saude Publica da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Caponi
mesh_terms: D000462:Algeria; D004196:Disease Outbreaks / Q000266:history*; D005602:France; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D008091:Literature / Q000266:history*; D010684:Philosophy / Q000266:history*; D010930:Plague / Q000266:history*; D011634:Public Health / Q000266:history; D011639:Public Opinion
vernacular_title: Lo publico y lo privado en tiempos de peste.