The role of courts in the debate on assisted suicide: a communitarian approach.
D002170:Canada; D002961:Civil Rights; D003416:Criminal Law; D003657:Decision Making; D006233:Persons with Disabilities; D028663:Ethical Theory; D004989:Ethics; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D005610:Freedom; D033161:Government Regulation; D006801:Humans; D033222:Judicial Role; D007603:Jurisprudence; D007878:Legislation as Topic; D026706:Paternalism; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010820:Physicians; D018907:Privacy; D011640:Public Policy; D012297:Right to Die; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D012935:Social Justice; D012941:Social Responsibility; D012946:Social Welfare; D013315:Stress, Psychological; D013405:Suicide; D017236:Suicide, Assisted; D035521:Supreme Court Decisions; D019452:Terminally Ill; D016312:Treatment Refusal; D014481:United States; D035761:Wedge Argument
Bouvia v. Superior Court (Glenchur); Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms; Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington; Death and Euthanasia; Legal Approach; McKay v. Bergstedt; People v. Kevorkian; Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney-General)