Two precipices, one chasm: the economics of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.
D000028:Abortion, Induced; D035843:Biomedical Research; D032781:Codes of Ethics; D003068:Coercion; D003657:Decision Making; D032981:Dehumanization; D003695:Delivery of Health Care; D004467:Economics; D004989:Ethics; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D005065:Euthanasia; D028601:Euthanasia, Active; D033101:Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D005190:Family; D005380:Financing, Government; D033161:Government Regulation; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D015276:Health Care Rationing; D006625:Hippocratic Oath; D006801:Humans; D007348:Insurance, Health; D007603:Jurisprudence; D008329:Managed Care Programs; D009042:Motivation; D009426:Netherlands; D018529:Nutritional Support; D018458:Persistent Vegetative State; D009272:Persons; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010820:Physicians; D011057:Politics; D011640:Public Policy; D011788:Quality of Life; D012106:Research; D040841:Resource Allocation; D012297:Right to Die; D012922:Social Change; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D013219:State Government; D017236:Suicide, Assisted; D035521:Supreme Court Decisions; D035502:Trust; D014481:United States; D035862:Vulnerable Populations; D035761:Wedge Argument; D028761:Withholding Treatment
Death and Euthanasia; Health Care and Public Health; Legal Approach; Roe v. Wade; Vacco v. Quill; Washington v. Glucksberg