Raising the stakes in the euthanasia debate: judge rules on Washington law.
D002410:Catholicism; D002977:Clergy; D004645:Empathy; D005065:Euthanasia; D028601:Euthanasia, Active; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D005610:Freedom; D006708:Homicide; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D033222:Judicial Role; D007603:Jurisprudence; D008824:Michigan; D009014:Morals; D009042:Motivation; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010820:Physicians; D012067:Religion; D012928:Social Desirability; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D013315:Stress, Psychological; D017236:Suicide, Assisted; D019452:Terminally Ill; D028725:Theology; D020458:Third-Party Consent; D016312:Treatment Refusal; D014481:United States; D026712:Value of Life; D035862:Vulnerable Populations; D014861:Washington; D028761:Withholding Treatment
Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington; Death and Euthanasia; Fourteenth Amendment; Legal Approach; Religious Approach