Confidentiality and the "dangerous" patient: implications of Tarasoff for psychiatrists and lawyers.
D001290:Attitude; D002140:California; D003219:Confidentiality; D016265:Conflict of Interest; D003617:Dangerous Behavior; D003625:Data Collection; D017007:Duty to Warn; D005104:Expert Testimony; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D007603:Jurisprudence; D035846:Law Enforcement; D016365:Liability, Legal; D001523:Mental Disorders; D028681:Moral Obligations; D009515:New Jersey; D010819:Physician's Role; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011570:Psychiatry; D011613:Psychotherapy; D011615:Psychotherapy, Group; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D012941:Social Responsibility; D035502:Trust
Empirical Approach; Legal Approach; McIntosh v. Milano; Mental Health Therapies; Professional Patient Relationship; Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California