The Supreme Court and terminal sedation: rejecting assisted suicide, embracing euthanasia.
D034723:Double Effect Principle; D004989:Ethics; D005065:Euthanasia; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D033161:Government Regulation; D006801:Humans; D006993:Hypnotics and Sedatives; D033182:Intention; D007603:Jurisprudence; D016743:Mental Competency; D009042:Motivation; D018529:Nutritional Support; D010146:Pain; D010166:Palliative Care; D009272:Persons; D004364:Pharmaceutical Preparations; D010820:Physicians; D012297:Right to Die; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D013315:Stress, Psychological; D017236:Suicide, Assisted; D035521:Supreme Court Decisions; D019452:Terminally Ill; D014481:United States; D035862:Vulnerable Populations; D035761:Wedge Argument; D028761:Withholding Treatment
Death and Euthanasia; Legal Approach; Vacco v. Quill; Washington v. Glucksberg