A comparative study of the law relating to the physician's duty to obtain the patient's "informed consent" to medical treatment in England and California.
D002140:California; D032982:Contracts; D030881:Disclosure; D004632:Emergency Medical Services; D005610:Freedom; D006664:History; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D007391:International Cooperation; D038622:Internationality; D007603:Jurisprudence; D016365:Liability, Legal; D008318:Malpractice; D026706:Paternalism; D005791:Patient Care; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010820:Physicians; D011361:Professional Competence; D012015:Reference Standards; D012306:Risk; D018570:Risk Assessment; D006113:United Kingdom; D014481:United States
Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee; Canterbury v. Spence; Cobbs v. Grant; Legal Approach; Professional Patient Relationship; Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees; Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital