Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered?
D000028:Abortion, Induced; D000300:Adoption; D002140:California; D002648:Child; D002961:Civil Rights; D032982:Contracts; D003376:Counseling; D004624:Embryo Transfer; D005249:Fees and Charges; D005260:Female; D019513:Feminism; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro; D033161:Government Regulation; D006801:Humans; D007246:Infertility; D007258:Informed Consent; D007315:Insemination, Artificial; D033222:Judicial Role; D007603:Jurisprudence; D007878:Legislation as Topic; D008571:Men; D009042:Motivation; D009513:New Hampshire; D009515:New Jersey; D018587:Oocyte Donation; D010287:Parent-Child Relations; D012922:Social Change; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D012930:Social Dominance; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D018454:Spouses; D013219:State Government; D013533:Gestational Carriers; D020458:Third-Party Consent; D014019:Tissue Donors; D014481:United States; D014768:Virginia; D014930:Women; D014933:Women's Rights
Genetics and Reproduction; In re Baby M; Johnson v. Calvert; Legal Approach