The Supreme Court's assisted suicide opinions in international perspective: avoiding a bureaucracy of death.
D001315:Australia; D002170:Canada; D002961:Civil Rights; D003105:Colombia; D003866:Depressive Disorder; D006233:Persons with Disabilities; D005065:Euthanasia; D028601:Euthanasia, Active; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D005610:Freedom; D033161:Government Regulation; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006664:History; D006801:Humans; D007391:International Cooperation; D038622:Internationality; D007603:Jurisprudence; D016365:Liability, Legal; D028642:Persons with Psychiatric Disorders; D009426:Netherlands; D015876:Northern Territory; D010146:Pain; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D009272:Persons; D010820:Physicians; D018907:Privacy; D012297:Right to Die; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D013219:State Government; D013315:Stress, Psychological; D017236:Suicide, Assisted; D035521:Supreme Court Decisions; D019452:Terminally Ill; D014481:United States; D026712:Value of Life; D035862:Vulnerable Populations
Death and Euthanasia; Legal Approach; Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney-General); Vacco v. Quill; Washington v. Glucksberg