"Two steps forward, one step back": an analysis of New Jersey's latest "right-to-die" decisions.
D016223:Advance Directives; D002961:Civil Rights; D003657:Decision Making; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D005610:Freedom; D006801:Humans; D033222:Judicial Role; D007603:Jurisprudence; D016743:Mental Competency; D009515:New Jersey; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D012015:Reference Standards; D012297:Right to Die; D020458:Third-Party Consent; D016312:Treatment Refusal; D028761:Withholding Treatment
Death and Euthanasia; In re Farrell; In re Jobes; In re Peter; Legal Approach; New Jersey Supreme Court