Caring or starving?  The case of Claire Conroy.
D000368:Aged; D001290:Attitude; D002140:California; D002961:Civil Rights; D003657:Decision Making; D003704:Dementia; D026822:Ethicists; D004989:Ethics; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D006708:Homicide; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D007603:Jurisprudence; D007872:Legal Guardians; D008020:Life Support Care; D016743:Mental Competency; D009042:Motivation; D009515:New Jersey; D009735:Nursing Homes; D018529:Nutritional Support; D018458:Persistent Vegetative State; D010820:Physicians; D011788:Quality of Life; D012015:Reference Standards; D012297:Right to Die; D012306:Risk; D018570:Risk Assessment; D019452:Terminally Ill; D020458:Third-Party Consent; D016312:Treatment Refusal; D028761:Withholding Treatment
Analytical Approach; Barber v. Superior Court; Death and Euthanasia; In re Conroy; Legal Approach; Nejdl v. Superior Court