Surrogate motherhood contracts: should the British or Canadian model fill the U.S. legislative vacuum?
D026683:Advisory Committees; D000533:Altruism; D002170:Canada; D002961:Civil Rights; D032982:Contracts; D005220:Fathers; D035082:Federal Government; D005249:Fees and Charges; D005260:Female; D006076:Government; D033161:Government Regulation; D006801:Humans; D007391:International Cooperation; D038622:Internationality; D033222:Judicial Role; D007603:Jurisprudence; D007878:Legislation as Topic; D009042:Motivation; D010287:Parent-Child Relations; D011640:Public Policy; D012922:Social Change; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D013219:State Government; D013533:Gestational Carriers; D006113:United Kingdom; D014481:United States
Genetics and Reproduction; Johnson v. Calvert; Legal Approach; Ontario Law Reform Commission; Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies (Canada); Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985 (Great Britain); Warnock Committee