Consent, autonomy and the infantilised patient.
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001803:Blood Transfusion; D002170:Canada; D002835:Christianity; D003071:Cognition; D032882:Comprehension; D003657:Decision Making; D030881:Disclosure; D004345:Drug Industry; D004651:Employment; D005195:Family Relations; D005610:Freedom; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D007391:International Cooperation; D038622:Internationality; D033221:Jehovah's Witnesses; D007603:Jurisprudence; D007668:Kidney; D008511:Medicine; D016743:Mental Competency; D033242:Minors; D026706:Paternalism; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010820:Physicians; D011361:Professional Competence; D028743:Professional Misconduct; D012015:Reference Standards; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D012927:Social Control, Informal; D012930:Social Dominance; D012962:Sociology, Medical; D014019:Tissue Donors; D016312:Treatment Refusal; D006113:United Kingdom; D014481:United States; D026712:Value of Life
Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee; Canterbury v. Spence; General Medical Council (Great Britain); Gillick v. West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA; Legal Approach; Professional Patient Relationship; Reibl v. Hughes; Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital