Combining the best of two medical worlds: Canadian universality and United States' freedom.
D001290:Attitude; D020811:Biomedical Technology; D002170:Canada; D016265:Conflict of Interest; D003625:Data Collection; D003695:Delivery of Health Care; D004467:Economics; D016520:Entrepreneurship; D035082:Federal Government; D005249:Fees and Charges; D005251:Fees, Medical; D005610:Freedom; D006076:Government; D033161:Government Regulation; D015276:Health Care Rationing; D018166:Health Care Reform; D006801:Humans; D007348:Insurance, Health; D007391:International Cooperation; D038622:Internationality; D007603:Jurisprudence; D008350:Manitoba; D008910:Minnesota; D009017:Morbidity; D009313:National Health Programs; D009864:Ontario; D018579:Patient Selection; D010361:Patients; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010820:Physicians; D011050:Policy Making; D011057:Politics; D011640:Public Policy; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D040841:Resource Allocation; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D012935:Social Justice; D012940:Social Problems; D012941:Social Responsibility; D012945:Social Values; D012946:Social Welfare; D012950:Socialism; D012952:Societies; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D013317:Strikes, Employee; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical; D014481:United States; D014922:Wisconsin
Analytical Approach; Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health