Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law.
D016223:Advance Directives; D000368:Aged; D020811:Biomedical Technology; D002961:Civil Rights; D003657:Decision Making; D005065:Euthanasia; D028601:Euthanasia, Active; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D005610:Freedom; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D033222:Judicial Role; D007603:Jurisprudence; D008020:Life Support Care; D009014:Morals; D009042:Motivation; D009515:New Jersey; D009735:Nursing Homes; D018529:Nutritional Support; D018458:Persistent Vegetative State; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D011379:Prognosis; D011640:Public Policy; D011788:Quality of Life; D012015:Reference Standards; D012297:Right to Die; D013405:Suicide; D019452:Terminally Ill; D020458:Third-Party Consent; D016312:Treatment Refusal; D014481:United States; D026712:Value of Life; D028761:Withholding Treatment
Death and Euthanasia; In re Conroy; In re Farrell; In re Jobes; In re Peter; In re Quinlan; Legal Approach; New Jersey Supreme Court