Weaving "birth" technology into the "value and policy web" of medicine, ethics and law: should policies on "conception" be consistent?
D000028:Abortion, Induced; D026683:Advisory Committees; D001290:Attitude; D001315:Australia; D001459:Bangladesh; D002170:Canada; D002648:Child; D002681:China; D003068:Coercion; D003219:Confidentiality; D003267:Contraception; D003657:Decision Making; D003906:Developing Countries; D004467:Economics; D004622:Embryo, Mammalian; D005314:Embryonic and Fetal Development; D004989:Ethics; D005260:Female; D033161:Government Regulation; D015276:Health Care Rationing; D006805:Human Experimentation; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D007246:Infertility; D007258:Informed Consent; D007391:International Cooperation; D038622:Internationality; D007603:Jurisprudence; D008571:Men; D010287:Parent-Child Relations; D018579:Patient Selection; D011155:Population Control; D011287:Prejudice; D018907:Privacy; D011639:Public Opinion; D011640:Public Policy; D011788:Quality of Life; D012098:Reproduction; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; D040841:Resource Allocation; D012306:Risk; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012847:Single Person; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D012945:Social Values; D013245:Sterilization, Reproductive; D014481:United States; D026712:Value of Life; D014930:Women; D015974:Wrongful Life
Genetics and Reproduction; Legal Approach