Overlooking the merits of the individual case: an unpromising approach to the right to die.
D000063:Accidents, Traffic; D000437:Alcoholism; D000533:Altruism; D026686:Beneficence; D002203:Capital Punishment; D002961:Civil Rights; D003416:Criminal Law; D003657:Decision Making; D026689:Ethical Analysis; D004989:Ethics; D005065:Euthanasia; D033101:Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D005610:Freedom; D033161:Government Regulation; D006708:Homicide; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D007114:Immunization; D007206:Individuality; D007603:Jurisprudence; D008020:Life Support Care; D010146:Pain; D018458:Persistent Vegetative State; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D028723:Personhood; D010684:Philosophy; D011050:Policy Making; D011634:Public Health; D011640:Public Policy; D011788:Quality of Life; D012297:Right to Die; D012306:Risk; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012922:Social Change; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D012935:Social Justice; D012945:Social Values; D013315:Stress, Psychological; D035521:Supreme Court Decisions; D019452:Terminally Ill; D014481:United States; D026712:Value of Life; D014947:Wounds and Injuries
Analytical Approach; Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health; Death and Euthanasia; Legal Approach; Philosophical Approach