The killing words? How the new quality-of-life ethic affects people with severe disabilities.
D000025:Abortion, Eugenic; D000328:Adult; D001290:Attitude; D002648:Child; D003068:Coercion; D009358:Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; D003933:Diagnosis; D006233:Persons with Disabilities; D026822:Ethicists; D004989:Ethics; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D005610:Freedom; D013502:General Surgery; D015276:Health Care Rationing; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D033222:Judicial Role; D007603:Jurisprudence; D016743:Mental Competency; D018529:Nutritional Support; D010290:Parents; D018579:Patient Selection; D018458:Persistent Vegetative State; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D028723:Personhood; D019989:Persons with Intellectual Disabilities; D010820:Physicians; D011287:Prejudice; D011379:Prognosis; D011788:Quality of Life; D012297:Right to Die; D012935:Social Justice; D012941:Social Responsibility; D013405:Suicide; D020458:Third-Party Consent; D016312:Treatment Refusal; D014481:United States; D026712:Value of Life; D012122:Ventilators, Mechanical; D028761:Withholding Treatment; D015974:Wrongful Life
Bouvia v. Superior Court; Death and Euthanasia; In re Phillip B.; Legal Approach; McKay v. Bergstedt; Superintendent v. Saikewicz