Debunking the rhetoric of surrogacy arrangements.
D002170:Canada; D002835:Christianity; D003068:Coercion; D032982:Contracts; D032981:Dehumanization; D004645:Empathy; D005249:Fees and Charges; D005260:Female; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro; D005610:Freedom; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D007221:Industry; D007246:Infertility; D007315:Insemination, Artificial; D007603:Jurisprudence; D008571:Men; D009014:Morals; D009042:Motivation; D010287:Parent-Child Relations; D005791:Patient Care; D012067:Religion; D012098:Reproduction; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; D012306:Risk; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012930:Social Dominance; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D013315:Stress, Psychological; D013533:Gestational Carriers; D009626:Terminology as Topic; D028725:Theology; D014481:United States; D014930:Women; D014933:Women's Rights
Genetics and Reproduction; In re Baby M; Religious Approach