Beyond theological conflict in the courts: the issue of assisted suicide.
D002170:Canada; D002961:Civil Rights; D006233:Persons with Disabilities; D005065:Euthanasia; D028601:Euthanasia, Active; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D005610:Freedom; D006708:Homicide; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D033222:Judicial Role; D007603:Jurisprudence; D028681:Moral Obligations; D018529:Nutritional Support; D018458:Persistent Vegetative State; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010684:Philosophy; D010820:Physicians; D018907:Privacy; D011640:Public Policy; D011788:Quality of Life; D012067:Religion; D012297:Right to Die; D012935:Social Justice; D012941:Social Responsibility; D012946:Social Welfare; D013315:Stress, Psychological; D013405:Suicide; D017236:Suicide, Assisted; D028725:Theology; D016312:Treatment Refusal; D014481:United States; D026712:Value of Life; D028761:Withholding Treatment
Bouvia v. Superior Court (Glenchur); Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital; Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health; Death and Euthanasia; Legal Approach; Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney-General)