Withholding care from patients: Boston case asks who decides.
D000368:Aged; D001927:Brain Diseases; D001930:Brain Injuries; D003068:Coercion; D003128:Coma; D003625:Data Collection; D003657:Decision Making; D030881:Disclosure; D034462:Dissent and Disputes; D004467:Economics; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D005190:Family; D006126:Group Processes; D015276:Health Care Rationing; D006761:Hospitals; D006801:Humans; D007362:Intensive Care Units; D007603:Jurisprudence; D016365:Liability, Legal; D008020:Life Support Care; D008404:Massachusetts; D018447:Medical Futility; D016134:Organizational Policy; D010820:Physicians; D011057:Politics; D040841:Resource Allocation; D016414:Resuscitation Orders; D028761:Withholding Treatment
Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Gilgunn v. Massachusetts General Hospital; Legal Approach; Popular Approach/Source