Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience.
D016223:Advance Directives; D000368:Aged; D002908:Chronic Disease; D002961:Civil Rights; D003256:Community Participation; D018864:Cultural Diversity; D003657:Decision Making; D006233:Persons with Disabilities; D004989:Ethics; D017041:Ethics Committees; D028741:Ethics Committees, Clinical; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D005190:Family; D005610:Freedom; D015276:Health Care Rationing; D006761:Hospitals; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D033222:Judicial Role; D007603:Jurisprudence; D016743:Mental Competency; D009515:New Jersey; D009735:Nursing Homes; D018529:Nutritional Support; D026706:Paternalism; D018458:Persistent Vegetative State; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010820:Physicians; D018907:Privacy; D011379:Prognosis; D011640:Public Policy; D011788:Quality of Life; D012015:Reference Standards; D040841:Resource Allocation; D012297:Right to Die; D012935:Social Justice; D012941:Social Responsibility; D012945:Social Values; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D020458:Third-Party Consent; D016312:Treatment Refusal; D026712:Value of Life; D035862:Vulnerable Populations; D028761:Withholding Treatment
Death and Euthanasia; In re Conroy; In re Farrell; In re Jobes; In re Peter; In re Quinlan; Legal Approach; New Jersey Supreme Court