A line less reasonable: Cruzan and the looming debate over active euthanasia.
D016223:Advance Directives; D002961:Civil Rights; D003657:Decision Making; D005065:Euthanasia; D028601:Euthanasia, Active; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D005190:Family; D005431:Florida; D006708:Homicide; D006801:Humans; D007087:Illinois; D033222:Judicial Role; D007603:Jurisprudence; D007878:Legislation as Topic; D008020:Life Support Care; D008396:Maryland; D008923:Missouri; D009518:New York; D018529:Nutritional Support; D018458:Persistent Vegetative State; D018907:Privacy; D011640:Public Policy; D016414:Resuscitation Orders; D012297:Right to Die; D013219:State Government; D017236:Suicide, Assisted; D035521:Supreme Court Decisions; D009626:Terminology as Topic; D020458:Third-Party Consent; D016312:Treatment Refusal; D014481:United States; D014861:Washington; D028761:Withholding Treatment
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health; Death and Euthanasia; In re Busalacchi; In re Quinlan; Initiative 119 (Washington); Legal Approach