"First do no harm...": can restrictions on HIV-infected health care workers be justified?
D015492:AIDS Serodiagnosis; D002487:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.; D003141:Communicable Diseases; D003219:Confidentiality; D006233:Persons with Disabilities; D030881:Disclosure; D004651:Employment; D035082:Federal Government; D006076:Government; D033161:Government Regulation; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006679:HIV Seropositivity; D006282:Health Personnel; D006716:Homosexuality; D006761:Hospitals; D006801:Humans; D007049:Iatrogenic Disease; D007258:Informed Consent; D007603:Jurisprudence; D007878:Legislation as Topic; D009726:Nurses; D016134:Organizational Policy; D005791:Patient Care; D010361:Patients; D010820:Physicians; D011287:Prejudice; D011640:Public Policy; D012306:Risk; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D012952:Societies; D013219:State Government; D013240:Stereotyping; D014481:United States
Acer, David; Americans with Disabilities Act 1990; Centers for Disease Control; Doe v. County of Cook; Estate of Behringer v. Medical Center at Princeton; Health Care and Public Health; In re Application of Milton S. Hershey Medical Center; Leckelt v. Board of Commissioners of Hospital District No. 1; Legal Approach; Rehabilitation Act 1973; School Board of Nassau County v. Arline; U.S. Congress