Controlling conflicts of interest in the doctor-patient relationship: lessons from Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
D000533:Altruism; D026686:Beneficence; D035843:Biomedical Research; D002140:California; D002961:Civil Rights; D032781:Codes of Ethics; D016265:Conflict of Interest; D030881:Disclosure; D004467:Economics; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D006269:Health Facilities, Proprietary; D018594:Human Body; D006805:Human Experimentation; D006801:Humans; D007221:Industry; D007258:Informed Consent; D007603:Jurisprudence; D010067:Ownership; D010330:Patents as Topic; D010344:Patient Advocacy; D028701:Patient Rights; D010361:Patients; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010820:Physicians; D012106:Research; D012108:Research Personnel; D035842:Research Subjects; D014019:Tissue Donors; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement
Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Health Care and Public Health; Legal Approach; Moore v. Regents of the University of California; Professional Patient Relationship; University of California, Los Angeles