The legalization of physician-assisted suicide: creating a regulatory Potemkin village.
D002140:California; D002961:Civil Rights; D003068:Coercion; D003120:Colorado; D003142:Communication; D003219:Confidentiality; D003657:Decision Making; D004989:Ethics; D005065:Euthanasia; D028601:Euthanasia, Active; D033101:Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; D005190:Family; D033161:Government Regulation; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D007603:Jurisprudence; D007878:Legislation as Topic; D008281:Maine; D019221:Mandatory Reporting; D008404:Massachusetts; D016743:Mental Competency; D008824:Michigan; D009426:Netherlands; D009513:New Hampshire; D009518:New York; D009922:Oregon; D009272:Persons; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010820:Physicians; D018907:Privacy; D011379:Prognosis; D011640:Public Policy; D012015:Reference Standards; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D012930:Social Dominance; D013219:State Government; D013315:Stress, Psychological; D017236:Suicide, Assisted; D013727:Terminal Care; D019452:Terminally Ill; D009626:Terminology as Topic; D016312:Treatment Refusal; D014481:United States; D035862:Vulnerable Populations; D014861:Washington; D035761:Wedge Argument; D014922:Wisconsin
Death and Euthanasia; Death with Dignity Act (Oregon); Legal Approach