Who shall decide when doctors disagree?  A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation.
D002648:Child; D032781:Codes of Ethics; D003216:Conditioning, Operant; D026724:Ethical Review; D004989:Ethics; D017041:Ethics Committees; D028744:Ethics Committees, Research; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D035082:Federal Government; D005333:Fetus; D005378:Financial Support; D006076:Government; D033161:Government Regulation; D006664:History; D006805:Human Experimentation; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D007603:Jurisprudence; D007878:Legislation as Topic; D008318:Malpractice; D008511:Medicine; D028642:Persons with Psychiatric Disorders; D033281:Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation; D010380:Peer Review; D004364:Pharmaceutical Preparations; D011329:Prisoners; D011612:Psychosurgery; D011640:Public Policy; D012306:Risk; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012922:Social Change; D012926:Social Control, Formal
DHEW Guidelines; National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects; Tuskegee Syphilis Study