Bioethics and the law: the case of Helga Wanglie: a clash at the bedside -- medically futile treatment v. patient autonomy.
D016223:Advance Directives; D001926:Brain Death; D032764:Casuistry; D032921:Consensus; D003643:Death; D003657:Decision Making; D006233:Persons with Disabilities; D004467:Economics; D026689:Ethical Analysis; D028663:Ethical Theory; D004989:Ethics; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D005190:Family; D005610:Freedom; D006040:Goals; D015276:Health Care Rationing; D006801:Humans; D007603:Jurisprudence; D016365:Liability, Legal; D008020:Life Support Care; D018447:Medical Futility; D010361:Patients; D018458:Persistent Vegetative State; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010820:Physicians; D011287:Prejudice; D011336:Probability; D011379:Prognosis; D011788:Quality of Life; D040841:Resource Allocation; D012297:Right to Die; D012945:Social Values; D020458:Third-Party Consent; D016312:Treatment Refusal; D035501:Uncertainty; D014481:United States; D012122:Ventilators, Mechanical; D028761:Withholding Treatment
Barber v. Superior Court; Death and Euthanasia; In re Wanglie; Legal Approach