A "virtual hearing aid" for comparing hearing aids in children: a double-blind crossover study.
In this study, a "virtual hearing aid" was used to compare different types of hearing aids. A digital hearing aid (Oticon DigiFocus Compact) and an analogue, automatic reference hearing aid were compared in a group of 17 schoolchildren (median age: 10 years) with moderate to severe, symmetrical, sensorineural hearing loss. Differences in performance were assessed using routine diagnostic methods (speech recognition performance tests, loudness scaling), subjective assessments (questionnaires) and the "virtual hearing aid". Guaranteeing double-blind testing conditions, the "virtual hearing aid" offers the possibility to directly compare individual in-situ recordings of different hearing aids. In contrast to the clear subjective preferences for the digital hearing aid, we could not obtain any significant results with routine diagnostic methods. Using the "virtual hearing aid", the subjective comparison and speech recognition performance tasks yielded significant differences. The "virtual hearing aid" proved to be suitable for directly comparing different hearing aids under double-blind testing conditions.
Prinz
I
I
Department of Audiology and Phoniatrics, University Hospital Benjamin Franklin, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany. prinz@medizin.fu-berlin.de
Nubel
K
K
Gross
M
M
D002648:Child; D012048:Correction of Hearing Impairment; D018592:Cross-Over Studies; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005260:Female; D006310:Hearing Aids; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011897:Random Allocation; D013067:Speech Perception; D014584:User-Computer Interface