title: Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation, and matrix deposition.
abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of two key scaffold design parameters, void fraction (VF) and pore size, on the attachment, growth, and extracellular matrix deposition by several cell types. Disc-shaped, porous, poly(-lactic acid) (L-PLA) scaffolds were manufactured by the TheriForm solid free-form fabrication process to generate scaffolds with two VF (75% and 90%) and four pore size distributions (< 38, 38-63, 63-106, and 106-150 microm). Microcomputed tomography analysis revealed that the average pore size was generally larger than the NaCl used, while VF was at or near the designated percentage. The response of three cell types-canine dermal fibroblasts (DmFb), vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC), or microvascular epithelial cells (MVEC)-to variations in architecture during a 4-week culture period were assessed using histology, metabolic activity, and extracellular matrix deposition as comparative metrics. DmFb, VSMC, and MVEC showed uniform seeding on scaffolds with 90% VF for each pore size, in contrast to the corresponding 75% VF scaffolds. DmFb showed the least selectivity for pore sizes. VSMC displayed equivalent cell proliferation and matrix deposition for the three largest pore sizes. MVEC formed disconnected webs of tissue with sparse extracellular matrix at 90% VF and >38 to 150 microm; however, when cultured on scaffolds with pores formed with salt particles of <38 microm, MVEC formed a multilayered lining on the scaffolds surface. Culture data from scaffolds with a 75% VF suggests that the structural features were unsuitable for tissue formation. Hence, there were limits of acceptable scaffold architecture (VF, pore size) that modulated in vitro cellular responses.
authors.affiliation: Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc., La Jolla, California, USA.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Zeltinger
authors.forename: J K
authors.initials: JK
authors.lastname: Sherwood
authors.forename: D A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Graham
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Müeller
authors.forename: L G
authors.initials: LG
authors.lastname: Griffith
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001672:Biocompatible Materials / Q000737:chemistry*; D002152:Calorimetry, Differential Scanning; D002196:Capillaries / Q000166:cytology / Q000378:metabolism; D002448:Cell Adhesion; D002455:Cell Division; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D004285:Dogs; D004730:Endothelium, Vascular / Q000166:cytology / Q000378:metabolism; D005109:Extracellular Matrix / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000648:ultrastructure; D005347:Fibroblasts / Q000166:cytology / Q000378:metabolism; D007150:Immunohistochemistry; D019344:Lactic Acid / Q000737:chemistry; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D009131:Muscle, Smooth, Vascular / Q000166:cytology / Q000378:metabolism; D011091:Polyesters; D011108:Polymers / Q000737:chemistry; D012965:Sodium Chloride / Q000737:chemistry; D013997:Time Factors; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed
chemical_list: D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D011091:Polyesters; D011108:Polymers; D019344:Lactic Acid; D012965:Sodium Chloride; C033616:poly(lactide)