Quadruply Bonded Dichromium Complexes with Variously Fluorinated Formamidinate Ligands.
Complexes of chromium with various amidinate anions of N,N'-di(biphenyl)formamidine (DbiPhF), N,N'-di(pentafluorophenyl)formamidine (DPh(F)()5F), N,N'-di(p-fluorophenyl)formamidine (DPh(p)(-)(F)F), N,N'-di(o-fluorophenyl)formamidine (DPh(o)(-)(F)F), N,N'-di(3,5-fluorophenyl)formamidine (DPh(3,5)(-)(F)F), and N,N'-di(m-fluorophenyl)formamidine (DPh(m)(-)(F)F) have been synthesized and structurally characterized to study the response of the M-M multiple bond to the donor capacity of the ligand by varying the substituents of the aromatic rings. All six of these dinuclear fluorinated amidinate derivatives of the chromium(II) compounds have the paddlewheel configuration. The synthetic route involves the reaction of CrCl(2) with the corresponding lithium salt of the ligands, LiDArF (where Ar = o-C(6)H(4)F, m-C(6)H(4)F, p-C(6)H(4)F, p-C(6)H(4)C(6)H(5), C(6)F(5), or 3,5-C(6)H(3)F(2)). Compounds [Cr(2)(DPh(p)(-)(F)F)(4)] (1), [Cr(2)(DPh(m)(-)(F)F)(4)] (2), [Cr(2)(DPh(3,5)(-)(F)F)(4)].C(6)H(14) (3.C(6)H(14)), and [Cr(2)(DbiPhF)(4)].0.7CH(2)Cl(2) (4.0.7CH(2)Cl(2)) show no variation in the Cr-Cr quadruple bond length, even though the ligands have very different basicities. In the solid state, [Cr(2)(DPh(F)()5F)(4)] (5) shows close axial contacts between the o-F atoms and the chromium metal centers. The (19)F NMR show an unresolved and broad signal for all o-F atoms that cannot be resolved even at very low temperature. To assess the efficiency of the contacts, [Cr(2)(DPh(o)(-)(F)F)(4)] (6) was prepared.( )()The crystal structure shows the same kind of Cr.F interactions as in 5, and an elongation of the Cr-Cr quadruple bond, compared with the values for the complexes 1, 2, 3, and 4. These new complexes reveal that the electronic contribution of the ligand basicity to the M-M bond is smaller and less important than the axial interactions of the chromium centers. Crystal data: for 1, orthorhombic, space group Fddd with a = 25.25(7) Å, b = 26.752(12) Å, c = 28.57(4) Å, alpha = beta = gamma = 90 degrees, and Z = 16; for 2, triclinic, space group P&onemacr; with a = 9.606(12) Å, b = 9.727(10) Å, c = 13.249(11) Å, alpha = 69.24(1) degrees, beta = 73.84(2) degrees, gamma = 84.24(2) degrees, and Z = 1; for 3.C(6)H(14), triclinic, P&onemacr; with a = 10.8274(10) Å, b = 13.739(2) Å, c = 18.152(4) Å, alpha = 83.25(1) degrees, beta = 75.61(2) degrees, gamma = 70.246(10) degrees, and Z = 2; for 4.0.7CH(2)Cl(2), triclinic P1 with a = 9.689(2) Å, b = 13.7088(3) Å, c = 16.844(3) Å, alpha = 69.90(3) degrees, beta = 87.10(3) degrees, gamma = 70.13(3) degrees, and Z = 1; for 5, monoclinic, C2/c with a = 19.114(3) Å, b = 18.957(3) Å, c = 29.923(6) Å, beta = 97.27(1) degrees, and Z = 4; for 6, triclinic, P&onemacr; with a =10.225(2) Å, b = 11.312(2) Å, c = 11.797(3) Å, alpha = 117.08(1) degrees, beta = 96.432(2) degrees, gamma = 107.52(2) degrees, and Z = 1.
Cotton
F. Albert
FA
Laboratory for Molecular Structure and Bonding, Department of Chemistry, P.O. Box 30012, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77842-3012, and Escuela de Química, Universidad de Costa Rica, Ciudad Universitaria, Costa Rica.
Murillo
Carlos A.
CA
Pascual
Isabel
I