title: Pain and systematic reviews.
abstract: There is a huge medical literature, with very large amounts of information. Some of that information is useful, some not. The task is to distil the information, apply quality filters, and place it into context so that we can use the knowledge we have with wisdom. The process of systematically reviewing the literature helps us generate solid, unbiased knowledge. Using appropriate tools, like numbers needed to treat (NNT), we can provide a solid basis to allow practitioners and their patients to make the best, and best informed, choices about their care.
authors.affiliation: Pain Research & Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, The Churchill, Oxford, UK. andrew.moore@pru.ox.ac.uk
authors.forename: R A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Moore
mesh_terms: D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D010146:Pain / Q000503:physiopathology; D059408:Pain Management; D012196:Review Literature as Topic