Aortic dissection: natural course of disease? Report of two cases representing the extremes of the condition.
OBJECTIVE
In a time when diagnostic methods and above all, surgical as well as interventional radiological treatment for aortic aneurysms and aortic dissections have reached a point nobody could think of a few years back, the present authors feel that it is worth while to remind oneself of the natural course of disease in these conditions. Taking into consideration the high morbidity and mortality rate in surgically treated patients with aortic dissection, and the high complication rate per- and postoperatively, it also seems right to ask if a more expectative and conservative approach to the condition sometimes perhaps may be justified.


METHODS
Two case reports are given. One was a 15-year-old boy with Stanford (Daily) type B dissection who statistically ought to have a good prognosis, but who died within 2 h after onset of symptoms. The other patient, a middle-aged woman with Stanford type A dissection, survived for 25 years without operation.


CONCLUSIONS
These two cases, though not unique viewed separately, we consider to represent the extremes of the condition and also a natural course of disease, while none of them was operated on.
Tollefsen
I
I
Department of Radiology, Rogaland Central Hospital, Armauer Hansensvei 20, N-4011 Stavanger, Norway. isak.tollefsen@sensewave.come
Jørgensen
I K
IK
Woie
L
L
Fossdal
J E
JE
D000293:Adolescent; D000367:Age Factors; D000784:Aortic Dissection / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery; D001013:Aorta, Thoracic; D017545:Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery; D001027:Aortography; D005260:Female; D005471:Fluoroscopy; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011379:Prognosis; D013902:Radiography, Thoracic; D013997:Time Factors