Attitudes of the dental team to the provision of care for people with learning disabilities.
The aim of this study was to report on the evaluation of an attitude scale for General Dental Practitioners (GDPs) and Dental Auxiliaries/Professionals Complementary to Dentistry (PCDs), to determine the reliability of the scale with these two groups and to note any inter-group differences. Seventy-four GDPs and 89 PCDs completed the self-administered questionnaires. The main outcome measures were reliability statistics, attitude scores, and factor analysis statistics. Reliability was satisfactory for both groups. PCDs scored consistently higher than GDPs on this attitude scale. Six factors were found to underlie the responses of GDPs, accounting for 62% of the variance. Seven factors were found to underlie the responses of PCDs, accounting for 65% of the variance. PCDs expressed more positive views about provision of care for patients with learning disabilities than did GDPs. Factor analysis revealed that GDPs were concerned about effectiveness of treatment and the stress related with treating patients with disabilities. PCDs appeared to be more concerned with the human rights of people with learning disabilities and how they fit into society.
Bedi
R
R
WHO Collaborating Centre for Disability, Culture and Oral Health, National Centre for Transcultural Oral Health, Eastman Dental Institute, 256 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LD, UK. R.Bedi@eastman.ucl.ac.uk
Champion
J
J
Horn
R
R
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003730:Dental Care for Persons with Disabilities / Q000523:psychology*; D003797:Dental Staff / Q000523:psychology*; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D005260:Female; D005792:General Practice, Dental; D006801:Humans; D007859:Learning Disabilities; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires