Are different kinds of acoustic features processed differently for speech and non-speech sounds?
This study examined how changes in different types of acoustic features are processed in the brain for both speech and non-speech sounds. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in native Finnish speakers presented with sequences of repetitive vowels (/e/) or complex harmonical tones interspersed with infrequent changes in duration, frequency and either a vowel change (/o/ for vowel sequences) or a double deviant (frequency+duration change for tone sequences). The stimuli were presented monaurally in separate blocks to either the left or right ear. The results showed that speech stimuli were more efficiently processed than harmonical tones as reflected by an enhanced mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a ERP components. In addition, the duration change in vowels elicited a larger MMN component than the equivalent change in tones. This result might reflect enhanced processing of duration features in the Finnish language in which phoneme duration plays a critical role.
Jaramillo
M
M
Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, PO Box 13, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Ilvonen
T
T
Kujala
T
T
Alku
P
P
Tervaniemi
M
M
Alho
K
K
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology; D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology; D004569:Electroencephalography; D004585:Electrooculography; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D005072:Evoked Potentials, Auditory / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D013067:Speech Perception / Q000502:physiology*