title: Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with brain tumors: a preliminary report.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the relationship between functional outcome and quality of life (QOL) in patients with brain tumors receiving inpatient rehabilitation, and to assess the sensitivity of 4 assessment tools in measuring changes in that population.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective study using longitudinal data collected from consecutively admitted patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  Acute inpatient rehabilitation unit.
  
  
  METHODS
  Ten patients with primary brain tumors admitted to an acute inpatient rehabilitation unit.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients participated in an inpatient interdisciplinary rehabilitation program that used the following disciplines: occupational therapy, rehabilitation therapy, recreational therapy, speech therapy, physical therapy, rehabilitation nursing and case management.
  
  
  METHODS
  The FIM instrument, Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPS), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-BR).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Improvement in total functional outcome was indicated by all 3 functional measures (FIM: F = 46.84, p < .05; DRS: F = 19.25, p < .05; KPS: F = 10.11, p < .05). Significant improvements were found between admission and discharge scores for the FIM and DRS. The KPS revealed significant improvement between admission and 3-month follow-up scores. All admission and discharge functional scales (FIM, DRS, KPS) correlated significantly with each other. No significant change was noted in the FACT-BR between admission and discharge scores, but FACT-BR scores did improve at 1- and 3-months postdischarge relative to admission. The FIM, KPS, and DRS did not show significant correlation with the FACT-BR. Ninety percent of patients were initially discharged to a home environment.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although patients make functional gains during and after inpatient rehabilitation, gains in QOL are not significant until 1 month postdischarge. QOL does not appear to correlate well with functional outcomes. Further, the KPS is less sensitive than the FIM and DRS in detecting change in functional status.
authors.affiliation: Rehabilitation and Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia Hospitals, Richmond, USA.
authors.forename: M E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Huang
authors.forename: J E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Wartella
authors.forename: J S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Kreutzer
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D000208:Acute Disease; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001932:Brain Neoplasms / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011788:Quality of Life; D020127:Recovery of Function; D012047:Rehabilitation Centers; D016896:Treatment Outcome