title: Are the after-effects of low-frequency rTMS on motor cortex excitability due to changes in the efficacy of cortical synapses?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To investigate the mechanisms responsible for suppressing the amplitude of electromyogram (EMG) responses to a standard transcranial magnetic stimulus (TMS) after prior conditioning of the motor cortex with repetitive subthreshold TMS (rTMS) at a frequency of 1 Hz.
  
  
  METHODS
  EMG responses from the first dorsal interosseous, abductor pollicis brevis and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscles were recorded after suprathreshold TMS of the motor cortex. In some experiments, H-reflexes were also obtained in the FCR. The amplitude of these responses was compared before and after applying from 150 to 1500 rTMS pulses to motor cortex at an intensity of 95% resting motor threshold through the same figure-of-8 coil.
  
  
  RESULTS
  When tested with subjects relaxed, rTMS conditioning reduced the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to approximately 60% of pre-conditioning values for 2-10 min after the end of the conditioning train, depending on the number of pulses in the train. There was more suppression with 1500 rTMS pulses than with 150 pulses. There was no effect on H-reflexes. There was no effect on MEPs if the test stimuli were given during active contraction of the target muscle.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The findings confirm previous observations that low-frequency, low-intensity rTMS to motor cortex can produce transient depression of MEP excitability. Since there was no effect on spinal H-reflexes, this is consistent with the idea that some of the suppression occurs because of an effect on the motor cortex itself. The lack of any conditioning effect on MEPs evoked in actively contracting muscle is not readily consistent with the idea that rTMS depresses transmission in synaptic connections to pyramidal cells activated by the test TMS pulse. An alternative explanation is that rTMS reduces the excitability of cortical neurones in relaxed subjects, so that responses to a given input are smaller than before conditioning. Voluntary contraction normalises excitability levels so that the effect is no longer seen.
authors.affiliation: Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kagawa Medical University, Kagawa, Japan.
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Touge
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Gerschlager
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Brown
authors.forename: J C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Rothwell
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003213:Conditioning, Psychological / Q000502:physiology; D004558:Electric Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D004576:Electromyography; D019054:Evoked Potentials, Motor / Q000502:physiology; D006181:H-Reflex / Q000502:physiology; D006225:Hand / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008280:Magnetics; D009044:Motor Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000502:physiology; D009126:Muscle Relaxation / Q000502:physiology; D013569:Synapses / Q000502:physiology*