Structure and H(2)-Loss Energies of OsHX(H(2))(CO)L(2) Complexes (L = P(t-Bu)(2)Me, P(i-Pr)(3); X = Cl, I, H): Attempted Correlation of (1)J(H-D), T(1min), and DeltaG().
1J(H-D), T(1min) and k(1) for H(2) dissociation from OsHX(H(2))(CO)L(2) have been measured for X = Cl, I, H (L = P(t-Bu)(2)Me or P(i-Pr)(3)), as well as for OsCl(2)(H(2))(CO)(P(i-Pr)(3))(2). For comparison, new data (including previously unobserved coupling constants) have been reported for W(HD)(CO)(3)(P(i-Pr)(3))(2). A comprehensive consideration of T(1min) data for over 20 dihydrogen complexes containing only 1-2 phosphines cis to H(2), together with a consideration of the shortest "conceivable" H-H distance for H(2) bound to a d(4) or d(6) metal, is used to argue that the "fast spinning" model is not appropriate for determining r(H-H) in such complexes. Regarding OsHX(H(2))(CO)L(2), the stronger electron-donor (lighter) halide, when cis to H(2), facilitates loss of H(2). The complete absence of pi-donor ability when X = H renders H(2) loss most difficult. However, a pi-donor trans to H(2) also makes H(2) loss unobservable. Within the series of isoelectronic, structurally analogous Os complexes, a longer H-H bond shows a larger DeltaG() for H(2) loss. However, this correlation does not continue to W(H(2))(CO)(3)(P(i-Pr)(3))(2), which has r(H-H) comparable to that of OsH(halide)(H(2))(CO)(P(i-Pr)(3))(2), but a significantly higher DeltaG(). This may originate from lack of a pi-donor ligand to compensate as H(2) leaves W.
Gusev
Dmitry G.
DG
Department of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405-4001, and Laboratoire de Structure et Dynamique des Systèmes Moléculaires et Solides (UMR 5636), Université de Montpellier II, Bâtiment 15, Case Postale 014, 34095 Montpellier Cedex, France.
Kuhlman
Roger L.
RL
Renkema
Kenton B.
KB
Eisenstein
Odile
O
Caulton
Kenneth G.
KG