title: Powder-free, non-sterile gloves assessed in a wound healing centre.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To investigate the relative importance of features of gloves for medical staff working with problem wounds.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective, consecutive, crossover, open questionnaire investigation.
  
  
  METHODS
  University hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  
  
  METHODS
  38 doctors, nurses, and podiatrists.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two types of powder-free, non-sterile gloves (No powder Ansell Medical and Skinsense Biogel coated examination glove) were evaluated in the outpatient clinic and the ward of the Copenhagen Wound Healing Center.
  
  
  METHODS
  Features of gloves regarded as important in the treatment of wounds and a comparison of the features based on the following criteria: much better = 2, better = 1, no difference = 0, worse = -1, much worse = -2.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The first questionnaire showed that 84% of the respondents needed a new type of non-sterile glove, and for 66% the price of the glove was a main feature. The study of individual features of gloves showed that "protection" was ranked highest followed by "durability" and "sensitivity". Least important was the "length of the gloves" (p <0.01). The gloves were tested in two different time periods. The Skinsense Biogel glove was evaluated better or much better for "durability" (82%-92% (period 1, 2), p <0.001), "protection" (76%-80%, p <0.001) and "ease of donning" (68%-71%, p <0.001). The Ansell Medical glove was evaluated as better or much better for "tactile sensitivity" (77%-79%, p <0.001). The Skinsense Biogel glove showed more positive changes in skin condition than the Ansell Medical glove. The quality of packing of the Ansell Medical glove in the containers also resulted in more gloves being unusable when unpacked.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The powder-free, non-sterile gloves were useful in a wound healing department. The Skinsense Biogel glove showed more advantageous features, less changes for the worse in the skin condition, and was better packed in the containers.
authors.affiliation: Copenhagen Wound Healing Center, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. fg02@bbh.hosp.dk
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Gottrup
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Müller
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Bergmark
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Nørregaard
mesh_terms: D000554:Ambulatory Care Facilities; D003428:Cross Infection / Q000517:prevention & control*; D018592:Cross-Over Studies; D005932:Gloves, Surgical; D006801:Humans; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014945:Wound Healing