title: Assessment of adenosine, arbutamine and dobutamine as pharmacological stress agents during (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT imaging: a randomized study.
abstract: We evaluated the use of adenosine, dobutamine and arbutamine with (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging. Forty patients under investigation for suspected coronary artery disease were recruited. Each had a resting scan and two separate stress scans on different days, in a randomized cross-over study. Resultant images were blindly reported in 13 segments per scan as normal, reversible or fixed defects. A score was given (0-3) for segmental defect severity. Haemodynamic responses were as expected for each agent. Subjective side effect scores did not differ overall between agents. Adenosine caused a significantly higher incidence of abnormal taste (54%) than dobutamine and arbutamine (both 23%) and a lower incidence of palpitations (25% vs 69% and 54%, respectively), all P<0.05. Arbutamine caused significantly more chest pain than adenosine (77% vs 46%) though less flushing (35% vs 68%), both P<0.05. Comparison of the results obtained showed highly significant levels of segmental agreement for visual and semi-quantitative analysis between adenosine and arbutamine, kappa value and correlation coefficient of 0.78 and 0.86, respectively, dobutamine and adenosine 0.69 and 0.78, and arbutamine and dobutamine 0.75 and 0.78, all P<0.0001. Adenosine, arbutamine and dobutamine differ in their haemodynamic response and side effect profile but provide highly comparable results during (99m)Tc SPECT imaging.
authors.affiliation: The Cardiothoracic Centre, Thomas Drive, Liverpool, L14 3PE, UK. jaywright34@hotmail.com
authors.forename: D J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Wright
authors.forename: S G
authors.initials: SG
authors.lastname: Williams
authors.forename: H S
authors.initials: HS
authors.lastname: Lindsay
authors.forename: K L
authors.initials: KL
authors.lastname: Sheard
authors.forename: P J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Thorley
authors.forename: U M
authors.initials: UM
authors.lastname: Sivananthan
mesh_terms: D000241:Adenosine / Q000009:adverse effects; D000318:Adrenergic beta-Agonists / Q000009:adverse effects; D001794:Blood Pressure / Q000187:drug effects; D002395:Catecholamines / Q000009:adverse effects; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000503:physiopathology; D018592:Cross-Over Studies; D004280:Dobutamine / Q000009:adverse effects; D004562:Electrocardiography; D005080:Exercise Test; D005260:Female; D006321:Heart / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D006339:Heart Rate / Q000187:drug effects; D006439:Hemodynamics / Q000187:drug effects; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015588:Observer Variation; D009943:Organophosphorus Compounds; D015609:Organotechnetium Compounds; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D015899:Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
chemical_list: D000318:Adrenergic beta-Agonists; D002395:Catecholamines; D009943:Organophosphorus Compounds; D015609:Organotechnetium Compounds; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D004280:Dobutamine; C078700:technetium tc-99m tetrofosmin; C076559:arbutamine; D000241:Adenosine