title: Tension-free vaginal tape operation: results of the Austrian registry.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess the use of and perioperative complications associated with the tension-free vaginal tape operation with a central registry.
  
  
  METHODS
  Fifty-five gynecology units completed questionnaires on patients undergoing the tension-free vaginal tape operation. Information was collected on patient, surgical, and postoperative data.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 2795 patients were entered. Overall, 773 patients (28%) had undergone previous surgery for incontinence or prolapse; 1640 (59%) tension-free vaginal tapes were performed as isolated operations, and 1155 (41%) were done in combination with other procedures. The median operating time for tension-free vaginal tapes alone was 30 minutes (range 10-120). Of the isolated tension-free vaginal tapes, 727 (44%) were performed with local, 711 (43%) with regional, and 193 (12%) with general anesthesia. In patients undergoing tension-free vaginal tape only, postoperative bladder drainage was obtained with intermittent catheterization in 389 (24%) patients, an indwelling urethral catheter in 1032 (63%), and a suprapubic catheter in 143 (9%). The bladder perforation rate was 2.7% overall (n = 75) and higher in patients with than in those without previous surgery (4.4% compared with 2.0%, P =.01). There were four bladder perforations (3.3%) among the 120 patients with previous colposuspension. Most patients undergoing tension-free vaginal tape only were able to void the next day (range 0 to over 64). A total of 68 patients (2.4%) required reoperation for reasons related to the tape (39 to loosen, remove, or cut the tape, or to place a suprapubic catheter, 19 for hematoma, one for bowel injury).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The tension-free vaginal tape has become a frequently performed operation in Austria. There are considerable variations in clinical practice. The risk of bladder perforation was increased in patients with previous surgery. Severe complications were rare.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Graz, Austria. karl.tamussino@kfunigraz.ac.at
authors.forename: K F
authors.initials: KF
authors.lastname: Tamussino
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Hanzal
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Kölle
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Ralph
authors.forename: P A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Riss
mesh_terms: D001317:Austria / Q000453:epidemiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D012042:Registries / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012086:Reoperation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D013526:Surgical Mesh; D013997:Time Factors; D001743:Urinary Bladder / Q000293:injuries; D014550:Urinary Incontinence, Stress / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000601:surgery*; D014596:Uterine Prolapse / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000601:surgery