Routine prophylactic antibiotic use in the management of snakebite.
BACKGROUND
Routine antibiotic prophylaxis following snakebite is not recommended but evidence suggests that it may be common practice in Zimbabwe. This study set out to determine and describe the extent of this practice at Parirenyatwa Hospital, a large teaching hospital in Zimbabwe


METHODS
A retrospective case review (1996 to 1999 inclusive) of all cases of snakebite was undertaken at Parirenyatwa Hospital. Cases with a diagnosis of snakebite, presenting within 24 hours of the bite and with no complications or concurrent illness were defined as "routine prophylactic antibiotic use".


RESULTS
From 78 cases which satisfied the inclusion criteria, 69 (88.5%) received antibiotics. Ten different antibiotics from 6 different classes were used with penicillins the most commonly prescribed (benzylpenicillin in 29% of cases, alone or in combination). Over 40% of antibiotics were given parenterally although all patients were conscious on admission. The total cost of antibiotics used was estimated at US$522.98.


CONCLUSIONS
Routine prophylactic use of antibiotics in snakebite at Parirenyatwa Hospital is common practice. This may highlight the lack of a clearly defined policy leading to wasteful inappropriate antibiotic use which is costly and may promote bacterial antibiotic resistance. Further work is required to investigate the reasons for this practice and to design appropriate interventions to counter it.
Tagwireyi
D D
DD
Department of Pharmacy, University of Zimbabwe, Avondale, Harare. dtagwireyi@healthnet.zw
Ball
D E
DE
Nhachi
C F
CF
D019072:Antibiotic Prophylaxis / Q000191:economics; D004363:Drug Utilization / Q000191:economics; D006784:Hospitals, Teaching; D006801:Humans; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012909:Snake Bites / Q000628:therapy*; D015030:Zimbabwe