title: Influences of visual pitch and visual yaw on visually perceived eye level (VPEL) and straight ahead (VPSA) for erect and rolled-to-horizontal observers.
abstract: Localization within the space in front of an observer can be specified along two orthogonal physical dimensions: elevation ('up', 'down') and horizontal ('left','right'). For the erect observer, these correspond to egocentric dimensions along the long and short axes of the body, respectively. However, when subjects are rolled-to-horizontal (lying on their sides), the correspondence between the physical and egocentric dimensions is reversed. Employing egocentric coordinates, localization can be referred to a central perceptual point-visually perceived eye level (VPEL) along the long axis of the body, and visually perceived straight ahead (VPSA) along the short axis of the body. In the present experiment, measurements of VPEL and of VPSA were made on each of eight subjects who were either erect or rolled-to-horizontal while monocularly viewing a long 2-line stimulus (two parallel, 64 degrees -long lines separated by 50 degrees ) in otherwise complete darkness that was centered on the eye of the observer and was tilted out of the frontoparallel plane by a variable amount and direction (from -30 degrees to +30 degrees in 10 degrees steps). The stimulus tilt was either around an axis through the center of the two eyes (pitch; VPEL was measured) or around the long axis of the body that passed through the center of the viewing eye (yaw; VPSA was measured). Large variations in the localization settings were measured that were systematic with stimulus tilt. The slopes of the functions plouing the deviations from veridicality against the orientation of the 2-line stimulus ('induction functions') were larger for the rolled-to-horizontal observer than for the erect observer for both VPEL and VPSA, and for a given body orientation were larger for the VPEL discrimination than for the VPSA discrimination; the influences of body orientation in physical space and the direction of the discrimination relative to the body were lineraly additive. Both the y-intercepts of the induction functions and the central perceptual point measured in complete darkness were lower when the norm setting by the subject was along the vertical than when it was along the horizontal; this held for both the VPEL and VPSA discriminations. The systematic effects of body orientation on the slopes and of line orientation on the y-intercepts and dark values result from an effect of gravity on the settings and fit well to a general principle: any departure from erect posture increases the induction effects of the visual stimulus. The effect of gravity is consistent with the effect of gravity in previous work in high-g environments with the VPEL discrimination.
authors.affiliation: Clarence H. Graham Memorial Laboratory of Visual Science, Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA. wl18@columbia.edu
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Dallal
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Matin
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007699:Kinesthesis / Q000502:physiology*; D016018:Least-Squares Analysis; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D015349:Vision, Monocular / Q000502:physiology