Ethics and integrative medicine: moving beyond the biomedical model.
For the most part, those who have written on the ethics of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and integrative medicine have attempted simply to apply traditional bioethics (in the form of principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice) to this new area of healthcare. In this article I argue that adopting the practices of CAM requires a new ethical understanding that incorporates the values implicit in those practices. The characteristics of CAM and conventional medicine can be translated into the language of healthcare values in a variety of ways. I suggest that they support 5 core values: integrated humanity, ecological integrity, naturalism, relationalism, and spiritualism. Characteristics of both CAM and conventional medicine are present in value. What is now thought of as principlism is, in this understanding, simply a subset within these values.
Guinn
D E
DE
Park Ridge Center for the Study of Health, Faith, and Ethics, Chicago, Ill., USA.
D001675:Bioethics; D000529:Complementary Therapies; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D014481:United States