title: Influence of close-up dry period protein supplementation on productive and reproductive performance of Holstein cows in their subsequent lactation.
abstract: Holstein cows on a commercial dairy were assigned to close-up dry groups and offered an 11.7% crude protein (CP) ration based on corn silage, alfalfa cubes, oat hay, corn, and barley grain without (Control; C) or with (Supplemented; S) 0.8 kg/d per cow of a high CP supplement of SoyPass, distillers dried grains, ring dried blood meal, feather meal, and corn gluten meal. Heifers (C: 37, S: 44) and mature cows (C: 96, S: 81) were allocated to one of four groups based upon their time in the close-up groups (i.e., 1 to 4, 5 to 8, 9 to 12, and 13 to 19 d) within parity (i.e., heifers or mature) for statistical analysis. Full lactation means of all response parameters for cows confirmed to be pregnant that completed a lactation (i.e., lactating at 305 d in milk or dried off before 305 d in milk but not culled; C: 28, S: 23 for heifers and C: 48, S: 43 for mature cows) were analyzed by ANOVA. Lactation curves were evaluated by parallel curve analysis to assess differences in lactation curve shape, and curve separation, due to treatments. Protein supplementation had no impact on full-lactation milk or milk component yields of heifers, determined by ANOVA, although parallel curve analysis showed higher milk and milk protein yield with protein supplementation. As the number of days cows spent consuming their assigned close-up dry rations increased, heifers produced more milk, milk fat and milk protein, although the maximum yield for milk and milk protein occurred for those fed close-up rations for 9 to 12 d. For mature cows, neither time close up or close-up period protein supplementation influenced any mean response parameter, by ANOVA, although parallel curve analysis showed higher milk and protein yield for supplemented cows as time close up increased. Overall, results suggest the optimum close-up period length was 9 to 12 d, with a protein content intermediate between 11.7 and 14.4% of DM, for heifers. In contrast, results do not support any substantive benefit of a close up period, or protein contents above 11.7%, for mature cows.
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis 95616-8521, USA. phrobinson@ucdavis.edu
authors.forename: P H
authors.initials: PH
authors.lastname: Robinson
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Moorby
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Arana
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Hinders
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Graham
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Castelanelli
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Barney
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000821:Animal Feed; D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D004044:Dietary Proteins / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000378:metabolism; D019587:Dietary Supplements; D005223:Fats / Q000032:analysis; D005260:Female; D007774:Lactation; D008892:Milk / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D008894:Milk Proteins / Q000032:analysis*; D010940:Plant Proteins / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000378:metabolism; D011247:Pregnancy; D011897:Random Allocation; D012098:Reproduction; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D004044:Dietary Proteins; D005223:Fats; D008894:Milk Proteins; D010940:Plant Proteins