title: Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses.
abstract: This article reports four subliminal perception experiments using the relationship between confidence and accuracy to assess awareness. Subjects discriminated among stimuli and indicated their confidence in each discrimination response. Subjects were classified as being aware of the stimuli if their confidence judgments predicted accuracy and as being unaware if they did not. In the first experiment, confidence predicted accuracy even at stimulus durations so brief that subjects claimed to be performing at chance. This finding indicates that subjects's claims that they are "just guessing" should not be accepted as sufficient evidence that they are completely unaware of the stimuli. Experiments 2-4 tested directly for subliminal perception by comparing the minimum exposure duration needed for better than chance discrimination performance against the minimum needed for confidence to predict accuracy. The latter durations were slightly but significantly longer, suggesting that under certain circumstances people can make perceptual discriminations even though the information that was used to make those discriminations is not consciously available.
authors.affiliation: University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. ckunimoto@ucsd.edu
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Kunimoto
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Miller
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Pashler
mesh_terms: D001290:Attitude; D001364:Awareness / Q000502:physiology*; D004056:Differential Threshold; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D010470:Perceptual Masking / Q000502:physiology; D011594:Psychometrics; D012684:Sensory Thresholds / Q000502:physiology*; D013360:Subliminal Stimulation