title: Memory for memory.
abstract: Participants read short passages and 1 day later they answered questions via telephone about the passages (text facts) and about the experimental session (event facts). They were telephoned again 6 weeks later and answered the same questions about text and event facts. They also answered new questions about whether they remembered the answers they had given in the initial telephone interview (recall for prior memory performance). Although participants accurately remembered the majority of past memory successes, they were poor at remembering past memory failures. After being provided with the correct answer and tested again, the participants' performance improved somewhat, especially for memory failures. This suggests that some errors in recalling past forgetting might have been due to correctly remembering the answer previously given, but failing to realize that it had been wrong. These findings have implications for a variety of situations in which people are queried about past memory performance.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA. susanj@u.washington.edu
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Joslyn
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Loftus
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: McNoughton
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Powers
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003071:Cognition; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D011939:Mental Recall; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012094:Repression, Psychology; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D012647:Self-Assessment