title: Comparative strength of three methods of fixation of transverse acetabular fractures.
abstract: With the advent of percutaneously placed lag screws for fixation of acetabular fractures, this study evaluated the strength of lag screw fixation compared with traditional fixation techniques of transverse acetabular fractures. Ten formalin-treated human, cadaveric pelvic specimens with bilateral, transtectal transverse acetabular fractures were used for this study. The right acetabular fractures were fixed with a five-hole plate and four screws with the central hole spanning the posterior fracture site. The left acetabular fractures were fixed with two lag screws, one each in the anterior and posterior columns, or with a screw and wire construct stabilizing both columns. The specimens were loaded to implant failure. Stiffness, yield strength, maximum load at failure, and site of failure was recorded. The plate and screw construct showed significantly greater yield and maximum strength when compared with the two lag screws. The stiffness of the lag screw method was 39% higher than that of the plating method, but this result was not statistically significant. In addition, the plate and screw method provided significantly greater maximum strength than the screw and wire technique. The quadrilateral plate seemed to be the weakest area of fixation because 83% of the implant failures occurred in this region. In patients in whom the risks of formal open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures outweigh the possible benefits, such as in patients with burns or degloved skin, the advent of computer-assisted and fluoroscopically guided percutaneous surgical techniques have been instrumental. This study showed there is greater strength of fixation with a plate and screw construct, possibly secondary to supplementary fixation distal to the quadrilateral plate. However, lag screw fixation provided relatively greater stiffness, which may account for its clinical success. Percutaneous lag screw fixation of appropriate transverse acetabular fractures is a viable option.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical School, Taiwan, Republic of China.
authors.forename: J K
authors.initials: JK
authors.lastname: Chang
authors.forename: S S
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Gill
authors.forename: R D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Zura
authors.forename: W R
authors.initials: WR
authors.lastname: Krause
authors.forename: G J
authors.initials: GJ
authors.lastname: Wang
mesh_terms: D000077:Acetabulum / Q000293:injuries*; D001860:Bone Plates; D001863:Bone Screws; D005260:Female; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal / Q000379:methods*; D050723:Fractures, Bone / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008422:Materials Testing; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D013314:Stress, Mechanical