Quality evaluation of clinical records of a group of general dental practitioners entering a quality assurance programme.
This paper discusses the importance of maintaining high quality clinical records. Evidence from studies carried out in the USA, Australia and Scandinavia shows that record keeping often falls well below accepted standards. Evidence of current standards in the UK, however, has tended to be anecdotal or circumstantial. An assessment was carried out on 47 general practitioners entering the quality assurance programme of a private capitation scheme. A sample of clinical records from each practitioner was analysed, and the presence or absence of key diagnostic and treatment planning entries were recorded. Overall, the quality of record keeping was poor, and in line with the findings of the other worldwide studies. Fundamental clinical entries that could impact on basic dental care provision were missing from many records. The frequency of recording for patients whose treatment was funded under NHS regulations was significantly worse than for patients whose treatment was privately funded.
Morgan
R G
RG
University of Birmingham School of Dentistry. r.g.morgan@bham.ac.uk
D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D003792:Dental Records / Q000592:standards*; D003817:Dentition; D003945:Diagnosis, Oral; D005260:Female; D005792:General Practice, Dental / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008487:Medical History Taking; D010347:Patient Care Planning; D010510:Periodontal Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis; D017149:Private Sector; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D013218:State Dentistry; D006113:United Kingdom