title: Wire-bottom versus solid-bottom rodent caging issues important to scientists and laboratory animal science specialists.
abstract: Recent emphasis in the National Research Council's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care, International, related to the availability of bedding in rodent cages raises regulatory and accreditation issues in the toxicology-laboratory setting. This article reviews the results of a recent survey of 12 United States-based pharmaceutical and contract toxicology laboratories. The perceived benefits and issues related to the use of wire-bottom and bedded caging for rodent studies are presented. The 1999 survey showed that more than 80% of the rodents in surveyed toxicology facilities were housed in wire-bottom cages. Long-term budget expenses related to supplies and waste disposal are assessed. Considerable short-term and long-term costs to programs would be associated with a change from wire-bottom to solid-bottom caging. A review of the past and recent literature related to animal preferences and cage-associated animal lesions is included. The importance of IACUC review of caging chosen by the investigative staff is emphasized.
authors.affiliation: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Veterinary Sciences, P.O. Box 4000, D24-01, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-4000, USA.
authors.forename: D M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Stark
mesh_terms: D000827:Animal Welfare / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D000818:Animals; D000830:Animals, Laboratory; D001512:Bedding and Linens / Q000662:veterinary*; D003625:Data Collection; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D006799:Housing, Animal / Q000592:standards*; D007753:Laboratories / Q000592:standards; D012377:Rodentia