title: [Assessment of 3 radiographic methods (conventional periapical, digital periapical, and panoramic) ni the diagnosis of artificially produced periapical lesions].
abstract: This research was carried out in order to evaluate three radiographic methods--conventional periapical, digital periapical and panoramic--in the diagnosis of artificially produced periapical lesions. For this purpose, 5 mandibles, with lesions produced by means of spherical drills of different sizes, were used. The research was divided into five distinct phases, as follows: phase Z (initial)--characterized by the absence of lesion; phase R--lesion produced with a number 6 drill; phase J--lesion produced with a number 8 drill; phase D--lesion produced with a number 10 drill; and phase H--lesion reaching the vestibular cortex. The lesions were produced in quadrants. Radiographs were made after each phase and analyzed by 4 experts in radiology. For the digital system there was statistically significant difference in phase R (in the region of incisors) and in phase H (in the region of premolars). In the region of molars there was statistically significant difference in phase D for panoramic radiography. It must be pointed out that panoramic radiography produced the less effective results in phase H.
authors.affiliation: Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, UNICAMP.
authors.forename: S M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: de Almeida
authors.forename: F N
authors.initials: FN
authors.lastname: Bóscolo
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Haiter Neto
authors.forename: J C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: dos Santos
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D010483:Periapical Diseases / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D019252:Radiography, Dental, Digital; D011862:Radiography, Panoramic