Property and women's alienation from their own reproductive labour.
There is an urgent need for reconstructing models of property to make them more women-friendly. However, we need not start from scratch: both 'canonical' and feminist authors can sometimes provide concepts which we can refine and apply towards women's propertylessness. This paper looks in particular at women's alienation from their reproductive labour, building on Marx and Delphy. Developing an economic and political rather than a psychological reading of alienation, it then considers how the refined and revised concept can be applied to concrete examples in global justice for women: in particular, the commercialisation of embryonic and fetal tissue in the new stem cell technologies.
Dickenson
D L
DL
Centre for the Study of Global Ethics, Selly Oak Campus, University of Birmingham, Bristol Road, Birmingham, UK. D.L.Dickenson@bham.ac.uk
D030861:Capitalism; D032821:Commodification; D003148:Communism; D004622:Embryo, Mammalian; D005260:Female; D019513:Feminism; D016332:Fetal Tissue Transplantation; D005333:Fetus; D033161:Government Regulation; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D038622:Internationality; D010067:Ownership / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; D012918:Social Alienation; D012945:Social Values; D013234:Stem Cells; D014019:Tissue Donors; D006113:United Kingdom; D014481:United States; D014930:Women; D014933:Women's Rights / Q000191:economics*