Paradoxical effects of presentation modality on false memory.
Two experiments are reported in which the effects of presentation modality on false memory in recall and recognition are studied. False recall and recognition of critical targets are lower for non-presented items related to a study list when that study list is presented visually than when presented auditorily. This pattern of low levels of false memory for critical targets holds even when participants read the visually presented study items aloud. These results suggest that recollection of visual detail plays a role in the prevention of false memory. However, both the hit rates (true memory) and the false-alarm rates to weakly related distractors (non-critical targets) were higher for visual presentation than for auditory presentation, suggesting that more than one mechanism may underlie false recognition.
Cleary
Anne M
AM
Department of Psychology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7123, USA. amc16@po.cwru.edu
Greene
Robert L
RL
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D000328:Adult; D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012094:Repression, Psychology