title: Comparison of two computer-automated procedures for tinnitus pitch matching.
abstract: Clinical assessment of the perceptual characteristics of tinnitus usually includes an attempt to match the pitch of tinnitus to a pure tone. A standardized clinical protocol for tinnitus pitch matching does not yet exist, and there is a history of unsuccessful attempts to obtain such measures reliably. The present study was designed to evaluate new protocols for identifying the perceived pitch of tinnitus, with the objectives of reducing testing time and improving test-retest reliability. Two protocols ("Octave" and "Binary") were developed, each of which was patterned after the testing procedure previously developed at the Oregon Tinnitus Clinic and used to assess thousands of tinnitus patients. Both protocols use computer-automation to conduct testing; the protocols differ according to their specific testing algorithms. Twenty subjects with nonfluctuating tinnitus were each tested over two sessions. Results of testing revealed that both protocols could obtain pitch matches within 20 to 25 min. Reliability of responses was good for some subjects but not others, and the Binary protocol generally provided more reliable results.
authors.affiliation: VA Rehabilitation Research and Development, National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland VA Medical Center, OR 97207, USA. henryj@ohsu.edu
authors.forename: J A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Henry
authors.forename: C L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Flick
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Gilbert
authors.forename: R M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Ellingson
authors.forename: S A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Fausti
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000465:Algorithms; D003201:Computers; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010897:Pitch Discrimination; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014012:Tinnitus