Improving standards in the scientific biomedical community in Romania by using journal ranking to improve journal quality.
The paper articulates the problems of journal publication in a relatively small country such as Romania where locally (i.e. nationally) published journals include most of the national medical scientific output. The starting point was a study ordered by the Cluj University of Medicine and Pharmacy Scientific Council, for the purpose of obtaining an objectively ranked list of all current Romanian biomedical journals that could be used in the evaluation of the scientific activity of the university academic staff. Sixty-five current biomedical journals were identified--of which more than half were new titles that had appeared over the past 5 years. None of these are included in the Science Citation Index or Journal Citation Reports (JCR). A set of criteria was used for ranking the journals: peer review, inclusion in international databases, publication time lag, language of articles and abstracts, journal specific index and domestic impact factor. The period covered, along with tools and formulas used are presented. The problems of Romanian biomedical journals as well as ways of improving publishing standards are discussed. Also emphasized is the necessity for increased awareness in the medical scholarly community and the role of the library in this respect.
Robu
I
I
Central Library of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj, Romania. irobu@umfcluj.ro
Marineanu
D
D
Aciu
I
I
Wood-Lamont
S
S
D015706:Bibliometrics; D016206:Databases, Bibliographic; D006801:Humans; D010380:Peer Review; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011643:Publishing; D011786:Quality Control; D012015:Reference Standards; D012383:Romania