Confidential death to prevent suicidal contagion: an accepted, but never implemented, nineteenth-century idea.
Nineteenth-century medical literature often admonished the popular press to limit reports of suicide, because of a belief that knowledge of another's suicide could stimulate some persons to kill themselves. An 1837 case report (perhaps the earliest attempt at a psychological autopsy in an American medical journal) is discussed, because it presciently clarifies the concept of psychological sensitization. Its study leads to documentation of two examples of falsified death certificates. The power to prevent publicity of suicide by not reporting it may have diminished efforts for newspaper restraint, as did editorial resistance and later acceptance of Emile Durkheim's (1897/1951) strongly expressed belief that reports of suicide did not cause an overall increase in suicide. Despite lack of success over the past two centuries, efforts to keep reports of self-inflicted death confidential continue to flow from concern about suicidal contagion. Today, uncensored websites and books advocating suicide may limit the benefit of the U. S. Surgeon General's "call to action" to prevent suicide, which again supports voluntary media restraint in reporting suicide.
Leonard
E C
EC
Friends Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19124-2399, USA. ecleonard@pol.net
D001293:Attitude to Death; D003219:Confidentiality / Q000266:history; D003644:Death Certificates / Q000266:history; D049672:History, 19th Century; D006801:Humans; D009524:Newspapers as Topic / Q000266:history; D011582:Psychological Theory; D013405:Suicide / Q000266:history* / Q000523:psychology; D014481:United States; D000092864:Suicide Prevention