title: Brief intervention during hospital admission to help patients to give up smoking after myocardial infarction and bypass surgery: randomised controlled trial.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate a smoking cessation intervention that can be routinely delivered to smokers admitted with cardiac problems.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomised controlled trial of usual care compared with intervention delivered on hospital wards by cardiac rehabilitation nurses.
  
  
  METHODS
  Inpatient wards in 17 hospitals in England.
  
  
  METHODS
  540 smokers admitted to hospital after myocardial infarction or for cardiac bypass surgery who expressed interest in stopping smoking.
  
  
  METHODS
  Brief verbal advice and standard booklet (usual care). Intervention lasting 20-30 minutes including carbon monoxide reading, special booklet, quiz, contact with other people giving up, declaration of commitment to give up, sticker in patient's notes (intervention group).
  
  
  METHODS
  Continuous abstinence at six weeks and 12 months determined by self report and by biochemical validation at these end points. Feasibility of the intervention and delivery of its components.
  
  
  RESULTS
  After six weeks 151 (59%) and 159 (60%) patients remained abstinent in the control and intervention group, respectively (P=0.84). After 12 months the figures were 102 (41%) and 94 (37%) (P=0.40). Recruitment was slow, and delivery of the intervention was inconsistent, raising concerns about the feasibility of the intervention within routine care. Patients who received the declaration of commitment component were almost twice as likely to remain abstinent than those who did not receive it (P<0.01). Low dependence on tobacco and high motivation to give up were the main independent predictors of positive outcome. Patients who had had bypass surgery were over twice as likely to return to smoking as patients who had had a myocardial infarction.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Single session interventions delivered within routine care may have insufficient power to influence highly dependent smokers.
authors.affiliation: Department of Human Science and Medical Ethics, Queen Mary's School of Medicine, London. p.hajek@qmul.ac.uk
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Hajek
authors.forename: Tamara Z
authors.initials: TZ
authors.lastname: Taylor
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Mills
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D003376:Counseling; D004739:England; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006760:Hospitalization; D006801:Humans; D007297:Inpatients / Q000193:education / Q000523:psychology*; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009042:Motivation; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D010349:Patient Compliance; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D011182:Postoperative Care / Q000379:methods / Q000451:nursing; D016540:Smoking Cessation / Q000379:methods* / Q000523:psychology; D016896:Treatment Outcome