Alternative study designs for research on women's gynaecological morbidity in developing countries.
Although community-based studies are considered to be the 'gold standard' for research on gynaecological morbidity among women, there is growing appreciation of the significant challenges to successfully undertaking such studies in developing countries. In this review, the constraints to undertaking community-based studies are discussed and alternative study designs are evaluated. Our review suggests that these alternative designs have both limitations as well as strengths compared to community-based designs. An important limitation concerns possible selection bias in the populations studied and the extent to which findings can be generalized to the broader population. Important advantages include higher feasibility, lower respondent refusal rates especially for medical procedures, lower costs, and potentially a more direct link between research and utilization. We conclude that the alternative study designs considered provide researchers with an expanded array of tools for investigating the issue of women's gynaecological morbidity in developing countries.
Koenig
M
M
Department of Population and Family Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. mkoenig@jhsph.edu
Shepherd
M
M
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003906:Developing Countries; D016021:Epidemiologic Studies; D005260:Female; D005831:Genital Diseases, Female / Q000453:epidemiology*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D011159:Population Surveillance; D012107:Research Design; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires