title: The role of method in treatment effectiveness research: evidence from meta-analysis.
abstract: A synthesis of 319 meta-analyses of psychological, behavioral, and educational treatment research was conducted to assess the influence of study method on observed effect sizes relative to that of substantive features of the interventions. An index was used to estimate the proportion of effect size variance associated with various study features. Study methods accounted for nearly as much variability in study outcomes as characteristics of the interventions. Type of research design and operationalization of the dependent variable were the method features associated with the largest proportion of variance. The variance as a result of sampling error was about as large as that associated with the features of the interventions studied. These results underscore the difficulty of detecting treatment outcomes, the importance of cautiously interpreting findings from a single study, and the importance of meta-analysis in summarizing results across studies.
authors.affiliation: Administration of Justice Program, George Mason University, Manassas, Virginia 20110-2203, USA.
authors.forename: D B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Wilson
authors.forename: M W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Lipsey
mesh_terms: D001521:Behavior Therapy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D015982:Bias; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D006801:Humans; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011588:Psychology, Educational / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011594:Psychometrics; D011613:Psychotherapy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012106:Research