title: Role of the efferent medial olivocochlear system in contralateral masking and binaural interactions: an electrophysiological study in guinea pigs.
abstract: Contralateral broadband noise (BBN) elevates ipsilateral auditory thresholds (central masking) and reduces the amplitude of ipsilateral brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs). Binaural interactions are complex psychophysical phenomena, but binaural interaction components are easily extracted from BAEPs to monaural versus binaural click stimulation. However, contralateral, or binaural, acoustical stimulation is known to activate simultaneously the crossed and uncrossed medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent systems and decrease activity in both cochleas. Particularly, contralateral BBN stimulation suppresses in part ipsilateral peripheral activity. What is the role of such contralaterally induced peripheral suppression in the overall changes in central BAEPs observed during contralateral masking or binaural stimulation? Compound action potentials (CAPs) of the auditory nerve and BAEPs were recorded simultaneously in awake guinea pigs from electrodes chronically implanted on the round window of the cochlea and the surface of the brain. Peripheral and central measures of contralateral masking and binaural interactions were obtained from responses to monaural or binaural clicks, with or without contralateral BBN, recorded before, during, and after the reversible blockade of the MOC function following a single intramuscular injection of gentamicin. Contralateral BBN effectively reduced the amplitudes of CAP and of all BAEP peaks. CAP to ipsilateral click did not, however, change significantly from monaural to binaural click stimulation; still, normal binaural interaction components developed in the BAEPs. When the medial efferent function was blocked by gentamicin, the normal contralateral BBN suppression of CAP and of the earliest BAEP peak was lost; however, the later BAEP peaks were suppressed by contralateral BBN as before gentamicin, and the central binaural interaction components were unchanged. In these experimental conditions, the MOC efferent system seems to play little role in centrally recorded contralateral masking and binaural interactions.
authors.affiliation: Audiologie Expérimentale et Clinique, EMI 99-27: Biologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire de l'Audition, Inserm and Université Victor Ségalen Bordeaux 2, Hĵpital Pellegrin, France.
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Aran
authors.forename: A M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Pajor
authors.forename: R C
authors.initials: RC
authors.lastname: de Sauvage
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Erre
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001306:Auditory Pathways / Q000502:physiology*; D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D003051:Cochlea / Q000502:physiology*; D003056:Cochlear Nerve / Q000502:physiology; D004567:Electrodes, Implanted; D016057:Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology*; D006168:Guinea Pigs; D010470:Perceptual Masking / Q000502:physiology*; D012405:Round Window, Ear / Q000502:physiology