The strategic response by pharmaceutical firms to the Medicaid most-favored-customer rules.
In 1991 a most-favored customer (MFC) rule was adopted to govern pharmaceutical prices paid by Medicaid. Theoretical models show that an MFC rule commits a firm to compete less aggressively in prices. I find that the price of branded products facing generic competition rose (4% on average). Brands protected by patents did not significantly increase in price. Generics in concentrated markets should display a strategic response to the brand's adoption of the MFC; I find that generic firms raise price more as their markets become concentrated. Hospital prices show little change. The results suggest that the MFC rule caused higher prices for some pharmaceutical customers.
Scott Morton
F
F
Stanford University, USA. fionasm@crown.stanford.edu
D002017:Budgets / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003625:Data Collection; D004345:Drug Industry / Q000191:economics; D016568:Drugs, Generic / Q000191:economics; D004465:Economic Competition / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005252:Fees, Pharmaceutical / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D007356:Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services; D007880:Legislation, Drug; D008484:Medicaid / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000458:organization & administration; D014481:United States
D016568:Drugs, Generic