title: Functional comparison of transmyocardial revascularization by mechanical and laser means.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  As a result of the clinical benefit observed in angina patients treated by transmyocardial revascularization (TMR) with a laser, interest in mechanical TMR has been renewed. Although the injury induced by mechanical TMR is similar to laser TMR, the resultant impact on myocardial contractility is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether mechanical TMR improves ventricular function as compared with laser TMR in chronically ischemic myocardium.
  
  
  METHODS
  After establishing an area of chronic myocardial ischemia, 25 domestic pigs were randomized to treatment by: excimer laser (group I), a hot needle (50 degrees C) (group II), a normothermic needle (group III), an ultrasonic needle (40 KHz) (group IV), or no treatment (group V). All devices create a transmural channel of the same diameter; 22 +/- 1 transmural channels were created in each animal. Regional myocardial contractility was assessed by measuring ventricular wall thickening at rest and with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Six weeks after revascularization, the animals were restudied at rest and with stress. Postsacrifice and histologic analysis of angiogenesis and TMR effects was then assessed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Laser TMR provided significant recovery of ischemic myocardial function. This improvement in contractility after laser TMR was a 75% increase over the baseline function of the ischemic zone (p < 0.01). Mechanical TMR provided no significant improvement in function posttreatment. In fact, TMR achieved with an ultrasonic needle demonstrated a 40% worsening of the contractility versus the pretreatment baseline (p < 0.05). Histologic analysis demonstrated a significant increase in new blood vessels in the ischemic zone after laser TMR, which was not demonstrated for any of the other groups (p < 0.05). Additionally, evaluation of the mechanical TMR channels demonstrated significant scarring, which correlated with the functional results.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Using devices to create an injury analogous to the laser, mechanical TMR failed to improve the function of chronically ischemic myocardium. Only laser TMR significantly improved myocardial function.
authors.affiliation: Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA. khorvath@nmh.org
authors.forename: K A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Horvath
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Belkind
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Wu
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Greene
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Doukas
authors.forename: J W
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Lomasney
authors.forename: D D
authors.initials: DD
authors.lastname: McPherson
authors.forename: D A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Fullerton
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003331:Coronary Vessels / Q000473:pathology; D004598:Electrosurgery / Q000379:methods*; D006352:Heart Ventricles / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D053685:Laser Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D009200:Myocardial Contraction / Q000502:physiology; D017202:Myocardial Ischemia / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D009204:Myocardial Revascularization / Q000379:methods*; D018919:Neovascularization, Physiologic / Q000502:physiology; D013552:Swine; D014464:Ultrasonic Therapy / Q000379:methods*