title: [A structured pain interview for geriatric patients].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In old age, assessment of pain often is hampered by sensory and cognitive deficits that do not allow the patients to fill in standardized questionnaires without help from significant others. Therefore, as an alternative, we developed a structured pain interview, and examined its properties and acceptance in a sample of geriatric patients with pain.
  
  
  METHODS
  The interview covers site of pain, intensity of pain, its duration and persistency, pain related disability and, finally, emotional and cognitive variables. In addition, the interviewer addresses significant others to get information about medication, previous treatment, and residence, and administers the Mini-Mental-State-Examination (MMSE). The analysis includes 128 patients of pain centers older than 74 years, of whom 80% are female.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Forty percent of the subjects score below the critical MMSE value < or =23 indicative of cognitive impairment. These patients are responsible for 36 out of a total of 39 missing values. A significant increase of missing values is observed in patients with a MMSE score below 10. Cognitive impairment goes along with greater functional and social disability. On the other hand, cognitive impairment is unrelated to localization, intensity, and duration of pain. The memory item of the MMSE can be used as a screening tool for cognitive impairment. Patients, who are unable to recall any of the three objects, comprise 80% of the total of missing values and demonstrate a low MMSE score.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  As long as geriatric patients are able to communicate verbally, they are most likely to profit from the structured pain interview in spite of existing cognitive impairment. A MMSE score <10 indicates that the interpretation of the data obtained may be difficult, especially due to a high frequency of missing values.
authors.affiliation: Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Universität Marburg. basler@mailer.uni-marburg.de
authors.forename: H D
authors.initials: HD
authors.lastname: Basler
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Bloem
authors.forename: H R
authors.initials: HR
authors.lastname: Casser
authors.forename: H U
authors.initials: HU
authors.lastname: Gerbershagen
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Griessinger
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Hankemeier
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hesselbarth
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Lautenbacher
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Nikolaus
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Richter
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Schröter
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Weiss
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged / Q000502:physiology* / Q000523:psychology; D003071:Cognition; D003072:Cognition Disorders; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008609:Mental Status Schedule; D010147:Pain Measurement; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires