title: Coloplasty in low colorectal anastomosis: manometric and functional comparison with straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  After resection of the distal rectum with a straight reanastomosis, poor bowel function can occur. This is felt to be because of the loss of the rectal reservoir. To overcome this, a neoreservoir using a colonic J-pouch has been advocated in low colorectal and coloanal anastomosis. However, difficulties in reach, inability to fit the pouch into a narrow pelvis, and postoperative evacuation problems can make the colonic J-pouch problematic. Coloplasty is a new technique that may overcome the poor bowel function seen in the straight anastomosis and the problems of the colonic J-pouch. The purpose of this study was to compare the functional results after a low colorectal anastomosis among patients receiving a coloplasty, colonic J-pouch, or straight anastomosis.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty patients underwent construction of a coloplasty with a low colorectal anastomosis. Postoperative manometry and functional outcome of these patients was compared with a matched group of 16 patients who had a colonic J-pouch and low colorectal anastomosis and 17 patients who had a straight low colorectal anastomosis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Maximum tolerated volume was significantly favorable in the coloplasty (mean, 116.9 ml) and colonic J-pouch group (mean, 150 ml) vs. the straight anastomosis group (mean, 83.3; P < 0.05) The compliance was also significantly favorable for the coloplasty (mean, 4.9 ml/mmHg) and the colonic J-pouch group (mean, 6.1 ml/mmHg) vs. the straight anastomosis group (mean, 3.2 ml/mmHg; P < 0.05) The coloplasty (mean, 2.6; range, 1-5) and colonic J-pouch (mean, 3.1; range, 2-6) had significantly fewer bowel movements per day than the straight anastomosis group (mean, 4.5; range, 1-8; P < 0.05). Similar complication rates were noted in the three groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Patients with a coloplasty and low colorectal anastomosis seem to have similar functional outcome along with similar pouch compliance compared with patients with colonic J-pouch and low colorectal anastomosis. However, the coloplasty may provide an alternative method to the colonic J-pouch for a neorectal reservoir construction when reach or a narrow pelvis prohibits its formation. Technically it also may be easier to construct.
authors.affiliation: Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
authors.forename: C R
authors.initials: CR
authors.lastname: Mantyh
authors.forename: T L
authors.initials: TL
authors.lastname: Hull
authors.forename: V W
authors.initials: VW
authors.lastname: Fazio
mesh_terms: D000714:Anastomosis, Surgical / Q000379:methods*; D003106:Colon / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D003108:Colonic Diseases / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008365:Manometry; D008875:Middle Aged; D016737:Proctocolectomy, Restorative / Q000379:methods*; D020127:Recovery of Function; D012002:Rectal Diseases / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D012007:Rectum / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D017792:Surgical Stapling / Q000379:methods; D016896:Treatment Outcome