title: Incidence of postoperative adhesion formation after transperitoneal genitourinary laparoscopic surgery.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate adhesion formation after urologic laparoscopy, a multi-institutional review was conducted among adult patients who underwent a second procedure after an initial transperitoneal laparoscopic procedure. Adhesion formation after abdominal surgery remains a major cause of postoperative morbidity. Peritoneal adhesions result in hospitalizations and interventions that result in healthcare costs of more than 1 billion dollars annually. The risk of adhesion formation from transperitoneal genitourinary laparoscopy in adults has not been previously studied.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty-seven patients (mean age 45.5 years, range 24 to 71) were identified who underwent a second laparoscopic procedure after their initial urologic laparoscopic procedure was performed. The mean time between the procedures was 11.4 months (range 8 days to 38 months). At the time of the repeated laparoscopy or open surgery, the peritoneal cavity was examined and mapped for type (grade), extent (length), and location of any adhesions at the operative and trocar sites. The adhesions were graded as 0, no adhesions; 1, flimsy; 2, dense; and 3, cohesive. The extent was graded as 0, no adhesions; 1, less than 2 cm; 2, 2.1 to 10 cm; 3, greater than 10.1 cm.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Overall, adhesions occurred in 6 (22.2%) of 27 patients. Operative site adhesions occurred in only 3 (8.2%) of 34 possible operative sites (gastric augmentation cystoplasty, renal cyst ablation, nephropexy). Trocar site adhesions occurred in 4 (3.5%) of 114 possible sites (two nephrectomies, one cyst decortication, and one orchiectomy). All adhesions were classified as grade 1 and extent 1, except for a single grade 2, extent 2 adhesion. In most patients, retroperitonealization occurred with minimal or no scarring noted. None of the patients developed symptoms as a result of the adhesion formation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although intraperitoneal adhesions do occur with adult urologic laparoscopy, the incidence is low. Also, in the few patients who do form adhesions, they are flimsy and short. This evidence, when contrasted with the available data on adhesion formation after open surgery, suggests that transperitoneal laparoscopic approaches to genitourinary surgery may have advantages over traditional open transperitoneal approaches by lowering the incidence and severity of adhesion formation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
authors.forename: John G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Pattaras
authors.forename: Robert G
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Moore
authors.forename: Jaime
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Landman
authors.forename: Ralph V
authors.initials: RV
authors.lastname: Clayman
authors.forename: Gunter
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Janetschek
authors.forename: Elspeth M
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: McDougall
authors.forename: Steven G
authors.initials: SG
authors.lastname: Docimo
authors.forename: Raul O
authors.initials: RO
authors.lastname: Parra
authors.forename: Louis R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Kavoussi
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000009:adverse effects*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010529:Peritoneal Cavity; D012086:Reoperation; D000267:Tissue Adhesions / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology* / Q000473:pathology; D013519:Urogenital Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects*