title: From the Johns Hopkins Baby to Baby Miller: what have we learned from four decades of reflection on neonatal cases?
authors.affiliation: Theology Department, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA. John Paris@bc.edu
authors.forename: J J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Paris
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ferranti
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Reardon
mesh_terms: D002170:Canada; D002651:Child Advocacy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D000013:Congenital Abnormalities / Q000628:therapy*; D017281:Cost of Illness; D003657:Decision Making; D026690:Ethics, Clinical; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D015931:Intensive Care, Neonatal / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000592:standards*; D008020:Life Support Care / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D008297:Male; D018447:Medical Futility; D009014:Morals; D033282:Parental Consent; D010290:Parents; D017009:Professional Autonomy; D011788:Quality of Life; D020458:Third-Party Consent / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D016312:Treatment Refusal; D014481:United States; D028761:Withholding Treatment