title: [The campaign against malaria in central western Madagascar: comparison of the efficacy of lambda-cyhalothrin and DDT house spraying. I--Entomological study].
abstract: For malaria vector control in Madagascar, the efficacy of lambda-cyhalothrin 10% wettable powder (ICON 10 WP) was compared with DDT 75% WP for house-spraying. This evaluation was conducted from November 1997 to September 1998 in highland villages of Vakinankaratra Region, at the fringe of the malaria epidemic zone, outside the zone covered by routine DDT house-spraying (Opération de pulvérisation intro-domiciliaire de DDT: OPID zone). Treatments were compared by house-spraying in four areas: 1) application of DDT 2g ai/m2 and 2) lambda-cyhalothrin 30 mg ai/m2 in previously unsprayed villages; 3) no intervention (control); 4) OPID 5th cycle of DDT 2g ai/m2. The prevalent vector Anopheles funestus almost disappeared from both the DDT and ICON sprayed areas, whereas in the unsprayed (control) area An. funeslus density went up to 60 females per room in April and there were two seasonal peaks of malaria transmission in January and March (see following paper). In the area sprayed with ICON, the parous rate of An. funestus decreased from 47% pre-spray to 39% six months post-spraying, while the parous rate increased in DDT-sprayed area (from 57% pre-spray to 64% six months post-spray). Bioassays of An. funestus on treated walls, six months post-spray, gave mortality rates of 100% on DDT and 90% on ICON. Conversely, ICON appeared to be more effective than DDT on thatched roofs (66% versus 100%, respectively, six months post-spray). In areas sprayed with DDT or ICON the density of An. arabiensis were little affected. This study demonstrated that, under equivalent conditions, both DDT and lambda-cyhalothrin were effective in reducing malaria transmission on the western fringes of the malaria epidemic zone of the malagasy highlands, with a residual effect lasting at least for six months. Lambda-cyhalothrin appeared to be more effective than DDT in reducing the longevity of malaria vectors. In addition to efficacy, the choice of insecticide for malaria vector control should take into account their acceptability by human populations and their toxicity and persistence in the environment.
authors.affiliation: Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Programme Paludisme, BP 434, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Brutus
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Le Goff
authors.forename: L G
authors.initials: LG
authors.lastname: Rasoloniaina
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Rajaonarivelo
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Raveloson
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Cot
mesh_terms: D000336:Aerosols; D000818:Animals; D000852:Anopheles / Q000254:growth & development; D003634:DDT; D005260:Female; D006798:Housing; D006801:Humans; D007303:Insect Vectors / Q000254:growth & development; D007306:Insecticides; D008136:Longevity; D008270:Madagascar; D008288:Malaria / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000635:transmission; D008297:Male; D009032:Mosquito Control / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D009570:Nitriles; D011722:Pyrethrins; D012621:Seasons; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D000336:Aerosols; D007306:Insecticides; D009570:Nitriles; D011722:Pyrethrins; D003634:DDT; C037304:cyhalothrin