The Rorschach: facts, fictions, and future.
A large body of empirical evidence supports the reliability, validity, and utility of the Rorschach. This same evidence reveals that the recent criticisms of the Rorschach are largely without merit. This article systematically addresses several significant Rorschach components: interrater and temporal consistency reliability, normative data and diversity, methodological issues, specific applications in the evaluation of thought disorder and suicide, meta-analyses, incremental validity, clinician judgment, patterns of use, and clinical utility. Strengths and weaknesses of the test are addressed, and research recommendations are made. This information should give the reader both an appreciation for the substantial, but often overlooked, research basis for the Rorschach and an appreciation of the challenges that lie ahead.
Viglione
D J
DJ
California School of Psychology, Alliant International University, 6160 Cornerstone Court, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Hilsenroth
M J
MJ
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D006801:Humans; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D015588:Observer Variation; D010552:Personality Assessment / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011594:Psychometrics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012392:Rorschach Test / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012559:Schizophrenia / Q000175:diagnosis; D012565:Schizophrenic Psychology; D013405:Suicide / Q000523:psychology; D013850:Thinking