title: The diagnosis of PCL injury: literature review and introduction of two novel tests.
abstract: Isolated PCL injuries have become more prevalent in recent years, possibly as a result of improved awareness and clinical recognition. However, the diagnosis can be difficult, and many of these injuries continue to go undiagnosed. Several clinical tests for PCL laxity have been described over the years, with varying degrees of sensitivity and clinical applicability. These include the posterior drawer, the Muller Quadriceps Active Test, Godfrey's Test, Trillat's reverse lachman/total translation test, and the Dynamic Posterior Shift. All of these tests require significant posterior laxity associated with complete PCL disruption to be positive. Use of the KT-1000 arthrometer, and several radiographic tests have also been developed to help with diagnosis and quantification of laxity. It is the purpose of this paper to review the technique and application of the established diagnostic tests for PCL deficiency, and to introduce two new tests employed by the senior author for nearly three decades. It is the authors' experience that these new tests are sufficiently sensitive to allow the examiner to detect the presence of PCL insufficiency even in the most difficult diagnostic situations with subtle laxity.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, USA.
authors.forename: G T
authors.initials: GT
authors.lastname: Feltham
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Albright
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001265:Athletic Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007593:Joint Instability / Q000191:economics*; D007718:Knee Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis*; D008297:Male; D010808:Physical Examination; D016119:Posterior Cruciate Ligament / Q000293:injuries*; D012421:Rupture; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity