Ethical androcentrism and maternal substance addiction.
In this paper, I argue that bioethics suffers from a masculinist approach--what I call "ethical androcentrism." Despite the genesis of other legitimate approaches to ethics (such as feminist, narrative, and communicative ethics), this masculinist tradition persists. The first part of my paper concerns the problem of ethical androcentrism, and how it is manifest in our typical ways of "doing" bioethics (as teachers, ethicists, policymakers, and medical practitioners). After arguing that bioethics suffers from a masculinist ethic, I consider the case of maternal substance addiction to show how this ethic negatively affects the treatment of pregnant addicts. I argue that by treatment maternal substance addiction from an androcentric approach, we fail to serve both pregnant addicts and their fetuses; furthermore, we misrepresent the intentional state of pregnant substance addicts and label them "prenatal abusers." If maternal substance addiction is to be ethically addressed--and if pregnant substance addicts are to be effectively treated--we cannot tacitly accept an androcentric ethic.
Parks
J A
JA
Loyola University, USA.
D001675:Bioethics; D035843:Biomedical Research; D026689:Ethical Analysis; D005260:Female; D019513:Feminism; D005333:Fetus; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D008297:Male; D011247:Pregnancy; D037841:Pregnant People; D011287:Prejudice; D011297:Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000517:prevention & control; D014930:Women