Effectiveness and safety of image-directed biopsies: coaxial technique versus conventional fine-needle aspiration.
BACKGROUND
We compared the effectiveness and safety of image-guided biopsies done with coaxial guides versus fine-needle aspiration done without coaxial guides.


METHODS
With the use of hospital computer records and chart reviews, all image-guided biopsies done during a 4-year period at our institution were assessed for adequacy and complications. For each biopsy, the use of a coaxial guide, the site, and the imaging modality were recorded. Adequacy of the biopsy and complications were compiled. Success rates were calculated for conventional and coaxial biopsies and by modality and site.


RESULTS
Coaxial technique reduced the number of unsatisfactory biopsies compared with conventional technique in extrathoracic sites. The decrease was statistically significant. No major complications occurred from extrathoracic biopsies with either technique. No difference was found in success rates or complication rates between ultrasound-guided and CT-guided biopsies using coaxial technique.


CONCLUSIONS
Coaxial technique reduces the number of inadequate biopsies in extrathoracic sites, without a detectable increase in complications.
Appelbaum
Alan H
AH
Department of Radiology and Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, USA.
Kamba
Thompson T
TT
Cohen
Ari S
AS
Qaisi
Waleed G
WG
Amirkhan
Robin H
RH
D001706:Biopsy / Q000379:methods*; D001707:Biopsy, Needle; D001859:Bone Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology; D006801:Humans; D008223:Lymphoma / Q000473:pathology; D015642:Radiology, Interventional; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012449:Safety; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D018084:Ultrasonography, Interventional