title: Antibiotics against Chlamydia pneumoniae and prognosis after acute myocardial infarction.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There is mounting pathologic and immunologic evidence that Chlamydia pneumoniae plays a role in the atherogenic pathway. However, very few clinical studies have supported these findings.
  
  
  METHODS
  Using the administrative data of all patients > or =65 years of age who had an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Quebec between 1991 and 1995 (n = 26,195), we studied the relationship between the intake of antichlamydial antibiotics and post-AMI prognosis. Three groups were compared: patients exposed to (1) antichlamydial antibiotics, (2) sulfa-derivative antibiotics, to which C pneumoniae is not sensitive, and (3) neither of the above classes of antibiotics. Two periods of antibiotic exposure were explored: (1) during the first 3 months after AMI and (2) during the 6 months before AMI.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Patients in the 3 exposure groups were similar except for a slightly lower proportion of men in the sulfa-derivative antibiotics group. Among all patients who were exposed during the 3 months after AMI and who survived at least 3 months, the 1-year mortality rate was similar across the 3 groups (10.1%, 11.1%, and 10.4% for the antichlamydial, sulfa-derivative, and nonexposed group, respectively) but favored the antichlamydial group at 2 years (15.9%, 23.0%, and 20.0%). In adjusted survival analysis, patients in the sulfa-derivative and nonexposed groups were slightly more likely to die than patients in the antichlamydial group (relative risk [RR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.82 and 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.59, respectively). Among individuals treated during the 6 months before AMI, the adjusted risk of dying was similar in the sulfa-derivative and nonexposed groups compared with the antichlamydial group (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.18 and 1.08, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.19, respectively).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Exposure to antichlamydial antibiotics during the 3 months after AMI is associated with a small survival benefit, whereas exposure during the 6 months before AMI does not affect survival.
authors.affiliation: Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4, Canada. louise.pilote@mcgill.ca
authors.forename: Louise
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Pilote
authors.forename: Laurence
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Green
authors.forename: Lawrence
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Joseph
authors.forename: Hugues
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Richard
authors.forename: Mark J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Eisenberg
mesh_terms: D042462:4-Quinolones; D000368:Aged; D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D000890:Anti-Infective Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D023521:Chlamydophila Infections / Q000150:complications / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000401:mortality; D016993:Chlamydophila pneumoniae / Q000187:drug effects*; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000382:microbiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D018942:Macrolides; D008297:Male; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000382:microbiology* / Q000401:mortality; D011379:Prognosis; D015996:Survival Rate; D013754:Tetracyclines
chemical_list: D042462:4-Quinolones; D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D000890:Anti-Infective Agents; D018942:Macrolides; D013754:Tetracyclines