Topical treatment of digital dermatitis associated with severe heel-horn erosion in a Swedish dairy herd.
Two experiments were run in a commercial dairy herd to test the efficacy of topical treatments of digital dermatitis associated with severe heel-horn erosion. In Experiment I, topical treatments with solutions of either glutaraldehyde or oxytetracycline were compared with foot trimming and cleansing alone. After trimming of all feet, one front and one rear foot in each cow were treated with either glutaraldehyde or oxytetracycline (regardless of dermatitis status), while the other feet were used as controls and only trimmed. Two hundred foot records were obtained from 34 Swedish Red and White and 16 Swedish Holstein cows. The proportions (p) of feet cured from digital dermatitis were compared between each group of medically treated feet and the control feet, assuming the feet to be independent observations with respect to curing. Oxytetracycline was significantly more effective than hoof trimming alone (p=0.87 and 0.34, respectively; P<0.001) and than glutaraldehyde (p=0.41; P=0.004). Treatment with glutaraldehyde was no more effective than hoof trimming alone. In Experiment II, a specially designed footbath with two longitudinal compartments was used to study the effectiveness of a solution of acidic ionised copper in preventing or curing digital dermatitis. The footbath--using water in one compartment--was constructed to make within-cow comparisons of treatment efficacy possible. The hoof health of 44 dairy cows (also included in Experiment I) were studied when the animals first were turned out to pasture and at the end of the grazing season (approximately 6 months later). During the grazing season, the cows were walked through the footbath twice daily after milking for a total of 47 days, divided into five separate periods ranging in length from 3 to 16 days. As judged by a two-sample comparison of proportions, a higher proportion of the cows' hind feet that were affected by dermatitis were cured by the copper solution (20/24) than by water alone (12/23). The copper solution had no significant preventive effect on healthy feet.
Manske
Thomas
T
Department of Animal Environment and Health, Section of Field Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 234, SE-532 23, Skara, Sweden. thomas.sanke@hmh.slu.se
Hultgren
Jan
J
Bergsten
Christer
C
D000287:Administration, Topical; D000822:Animal Husbandry; D000818:Animals; D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000627:therapeutic use; D002417:Cattle; D002418:Cattle Diseases / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000473:pathology; D003300:Copper / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000627:therapeutic use; D003872:Dermatitis / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000662:veterinary*; D004202:Disinfectants / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000627:therapeutic use; D005260:Female; D005534:Foot Diseases / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000662:veterinary*; D005976:Glutaral / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000627:therapeutic use; D006724:Hoof and Claw / Q000473:pathology*; D006920:Hygiene; D010118:Oxytetracycline / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000627:therapeutic use; D012621:Seasons; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D016138:Walking
D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D004202:Disinfectants; D003300:Copper; D005976:Glutaral; D010118:Oxytetracycline