title: [Not all vascular birthmarks are angiomas].
abstract: Vascular anomalies are extremely common but for many years have been poorly understood, partly due to the complex and colorful terminology used, which is full of descriptive terms tinged with folklore. While many lesions look the same, they have a very different prognosis and require very different treatment. Therefore, it is essential to be precise when using the nomenclature. This article reviews the current classification of vascular anomalies and describes recent advances in their diagnosis and management. Our aim is to replace the old confusing terminology and contribute to the unification of concepts and terms. At the same time we stress the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in order to offer patients accessible and integral treatment.
authors.affiliation: Sección de Cirugía Plástica, Hospital del Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain. bberenguer@teleline.es
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Berenguer Fröhner
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Enríquez De Salamanca Celada
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: González Meli
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Rodríguez Urcelay
mesh_terms: D000798:Angiomatosis / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000628:therapy; D001165:Arteriovenous Malformations / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000628:therapy; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D006391:Hemangioma / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000628:therapy; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008202:Lymphangioma / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000628:therapy