One for you and two for me: revenue sharing arrangements in charitable healthcare organizations.
Charitable healthcare organizations have often borrowed from the methods of their for-profit counterparts in compensating physicians and other business partners. This is done in order to provide needed services to their communities, and to protect their charitable assets by sharing risk and preserving limited capital. One of the most controversial compensation methods in use by such organizations is the revenue sharing arrangement. In use for over thirty years, these arrangements have received close scrutiny and inconsistent treatment by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and have been the subject of critics' ire as an impermissible transgression of the fundamental line between charities and commercial enterprises. The author, however, concludes that revenue sharing arrangements serve an important purpose in enabling charitable healthcare organizations to fulfill their missions, that the IRS and the Treasury have now made clear that there is not a higher standard governing their use, and that these arrangements are consistent with charitable operation when an appropriate process and safeguards are in place to prevent payment of unreasonable compensation.
Hyatt
T K
TK
Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, Washington, D.C., USA.
D002608:Charities / Q000191:economics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003132:Commerce / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005377:Financial Management, Hospital / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006788:Hospitals, Voluntary / Q000191:economics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D010816:Physician Incentive Plans / Q000191:economics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D019464:Tax Exemption / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D014481:United States