Judging the ethics of qualitative research: considering the "ethics as process" model.
Decision-making about the ethics of qualitative research is problematic where the research design is emergent, and the balance between risks and benefits for research subjects are difficult to ascertain prior to study implementation. The discourses of health/medical research ethics and those of social research are shown to be divergent and, furthermore, where ethics committees tie themselves to the health/medical model of ethical decision-making, qualitative research approaches can be disadvantaged. Having demonstrated the dual discourses and their relevance to qualitative research ethics, a critical review of current approaches to maximising the success of qualitative research proposals being considered for approval by ethics committees is undertaken. This leads to a call for a system of monitoring qualitative research so that the "benefit to risk" ratio is always on the side of benefit. This has implications for the ways in which ethics committees are organised and the ways in which they function.
Ramcharan
P
P
Department of Mental Health and Learning Disability Nursing, Samuel Fox House, University of Sheffield, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK. p.ramcharan@sheffield.ac.uk
Cutcliffe
J R
JR
D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D004989:Ethics; D017041:Ethics Committees; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000592:standards*; D006805:Human Experimentation; D006801:Humans; D012106:Research / Q000592:standards*; D012942:Social Sciences; D013222:State Medicine; D006113:United Kingdom