Experience with an adverse drug reaction reporting program in a neurology specialty clinic.
OBJECTIVE
To describe an adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting program that was developed in a university-affiliated neurology specialty clinic.


METHODS
Reportable ADRs were identified through 3 mechanisms: by clinicians through routine visits, by patients who were encouraged to follow up with the pharmacist in the clinic, and by the pharmacist who contacted high-risk patients. Patient demographics, the suspected drug(s), elements to define probability, and outcomes were documented, collated, and analyzed for trends and opportunities for continuous quality-improvement efforts. Information was shared with clinic administrators and clinicians. Serious ADRs were reported to the Food and Drug Administration.


RESULTS
The experience during a 1-year period, during which 40 ADRs were reported, is described. Medications by frequency of report and types of reactions are reported. None of the ADRs required admission to the hospital. Pharmacy personnel reported the majority of ADRs (92.5%).


CONCLUSIONS
This program is successfully incorporated within daily practice and is an integral part of quality-improvement efforts.
Ryan
Melody
M
Division of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. maryan1@pop.uky.edu
Gora-Harper
Mary Lea
ML
Caldwell
Frank
F
D016907:Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000639:trends; D064420:Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; D006785:Hospitals, University; D009462:Neurology; D010044:Outpatient Clinics, Hospital; D010564:Personnel, Hospital / Q000193:education; D010607:Pharmacy Service, Hospital / Q000706:statistics & numerical data