A pluralistic evaluation of nursing/practice development units.
Nursing/practice development units (N/PDU) are perceived as centres for pioneering, evaluating and disseminating innovative practice development and facilitating the professional development of practitioners. This paper reports on a pluralistic evaluation research study of the nursing/ practice development unit accreditation programme provided by the University of Leeds, UK. Individual and focus group interviews were undertaken with key stakeholders involved in six nursing/practice development units. These included: clinical leaders, team members, executive nurses, trust board members, general medical practitioners, nursing/practice development unit steering group members, and accreditation panel members. Stakeholder perceptions of what constituted a successful nursing/practice development unit were elicited and then used to judge the success of the programme. Seven criteria for judging the success of nursing/practice development units were identified. These were: achieving optimum practice; providing a patient-orientated service; disseminating innovative practice; team working; enabling practitioners to develop their full potential; adopting a strategic approach to change and autonomous functioning. The findings highlighted differences between the rhetoric of a successful nursing/practice development unit and the reality in which they function. Whereas all the units were actively involved in innovative practice development, evaluation, dissemination and networking activities, several factors influenced the success of the units, in particular, the role of the clinical leader, the motivation and commitment of nursing/practice development unit members, financial resources, and the nature of support from managers, medical staff and education institutions. Although the nursing/practice development units had made significant progress in developing both healthcare practice and practitioners, there is still a need to consider how the claim that nursing/practice development units benefit patients can be substantiated.
Gerrish
K
K
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Northern General Hospital, UK. k.a.gerrish@sheffield.ac.uk
D000068:Accreditation; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001294:Attitude to Health; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D004739:England; D017144:Focus Groups; D006757:Hospital Units / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D020380:Needs Assessment; D015399:Nursing Research / Q000458:organization & administration*; D009741:Nursing Staff, Hospital / Q000193:education / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000523:psychology*; D009936:Organizational Innovation; D009937:Organizational Objectives; D018802:Patient-Centered Care / Q000458:organization & administration; D015397:Program Evaluation; D013192:Staff Development