title: Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength measurement in elderly incontinent women.
abstract: Pelvic floor muscles (PFM) play an important role in maintaining urinary continence with increasing age. Therefore, their contractile properties need to be evaluated. The aim of the study was to examine the reliability and correlation of simple techniques to measure PFM strength in elderly women with urinary incontinence. An interview was used to evaluate the ability to stop the urinary stream during micturition and to calculate the incontinence index. A pad test was applied to objectively evaluate the severity of the disease. Functional testing included a digital examination to measure the force and duration of one contraction, a perineometer measurement (Peritron) to assess maximal contraction force and contraction force of 5 s, and a cone-retention test (Femcon) while walking for 1 min and during Valsalva's manoeuvre. This procedure was performed on three separate occasions within one week. The 37 participating women with a mean age of 62+/-8 (mean+/-SD) years had a severity index of 4.4+/-2.6 and a urine loss of 9.5+/-13.6 mg during the pad test. Sixteen women were able to completely stop the urinary stream during micturition. The digital examination showed no intratester variability. The perineometer measurement showed that the absolute difference in maximal contraction force and mean contraction force within 5 s was less than 5.3 mm Hg and 4.5 mm Hg, respectively, with a probability of 0.95. While walking and during Valsalva's manoeuvre, 19 and 20 women, respectively, held the same cone in place on all three occasions. The maximal contraction force and mean force during the 5-s contraction correlated well with the ability to stop the urinary stream and the digital examination but only weakly with the cone-retention tests. The reliability of PFM strength measurement is highest in the digital examination, followed by perineometer measurements, and then by vaginal cone tests. As PFM function is easy to assess, it should be routinely done in the assessment of urinary incontinence in elderly women.
authors.affiliation: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Kartharina.Kerschan@akh-wien.ac.at
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kerschan-Schindl
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Uher
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Wiesinger
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kaider
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Ebenbichler
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Nicolakis
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kollmitzer
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Preisinger
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Fialka-Moser
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D009119:Muscle Contraction; D017773:Pelvic Floor / Q000503:physiopathology*; D010502:Perineum / Q000503:physiopathology; D010808:Physical Examination; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014549:Urinary Incontinence / Q000503:physiopathology*