title: How events are reviewed matters: effects of varied focus on eyewitness suggestibility.
abstract: Witnesses to a crime or an accident perceive that event only once, but they are likely to think or talk about it multiple times. The way in which they review the event may affect their later memory. In particular, some types of review may increase suggestibility if the witness has been exposed to postevent misleading information. In Experiment 1, participants viewed a videotaped crime and then received false suggestions about the event. We found that participants who were then asked to focus on specific details when reviewing the event were more suggestible on a later source memory test than participants asked to review the main points. The findings of Experiment 2 suggest that this effect was not due to a criterion shift at test. These findings indicate that the type of rehearsal engaged in after witnessing an event can have important consequences for memory and, in particular, suggestibility.
authors.affiliation: University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA. sean_m_lane@yahoo.com
authors.forename: S M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Lane
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mather
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Villa
authors.forename: S K
authors.initials: SK
authors.lastname: Morita
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003415:Crime; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D011939:Mental Recall; D013404:Suggestion; D014796:Visual Perception