Beware of q2!
Validation is a crucial aspect of any quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling. This paper examines one of the most popular validation criteria, leave-one-out cross-validated R2 (LOO q2). Often, a high value of this statistical characteristic (q2 > 0.5) is considered as a proof of the high predictive ability of the model. In this paper, we show that this assumption is generally incorrect. In the case of 3D QSAR, the lack of the correlation between the high LOO q2 and the high predictive ability of a QSAR model has been established earlier [Pharm. Acta Helv. 70 (1995) 149; J. Chemomet. 10(1996)95; J. Med. Chem. 41 (1998) 2553]. In this paper, we use two-dimensional (2D) molecular descriptors and k nearest neighbors (kNN) QSAR method for the analysis of several datasets. No correlation between the values of q2 for the training set and predictive ability for the test set was found for any of the datasets. Thus, the high value of LOO q2 appears to be the necessary but not the sufficient condition for the model to have a high predictive power. We argue that this is the general property of QSAR models developed using LOO cross-validation. We emphasize that the external validation is the only way to establish a reliable QSAR model. We formulate a set of criteria for evaluation of predictive ability of QSAR models.
Golbraikh
Alexander
A
Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, Division of Medicinal Chemistry and Natural Products, School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599, USA.
Tropsha
Alexander
A
D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D016208:Databases, Factual; D026461:Ecdysteroids / Q000032:analysis; D008024:Ligands; D008432:Mathematical Computing; D008958:Models, Molecular; D021281:Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship; D011969:Receptors, Histamine H1; D013256:Steroids / Q000032:analysis; D014156:Transcortin / Q000032:analysis
D026461:Ecdysteroids; D008024:Ligands; D011969:Receptors, Histamine H1; D013256:Steroids; D014156:Transcortin