title: The economics of kidney transplantation versus hemodialysis.
abstract: Using 1998 data for 8 transplantation centers located in New York City, this study found that kidney transplantation was a more cost-effective treatment than hemodialysis for the Medicare program. The initially higher costs of transplantation were fully recouped by Medicare 2 years and 10 months after surgery. For persons who are eligible for Medicare solely due to their end-stage renal disease status, transplantation would generate average monthly savings of $3800 over dialysis for the 2 years following the break-even point. For those eligible for reasons other than end-stage renal disease, for example, the aged, the average savings would be $2400. The savings difference arises because Medicare coverage for immunosuppressants for the former group ends 36 months after transplantation.
authors.affiliation: Iona College, New Rochelle, NY, USA.
authors.forename: P R
authors.initials: PR
authors.lastname: Loubeau
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Loubeau
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Jantzen
mesh_terms: D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D007676:Kidney Failure, Chronic / Q000191:economics / Q000628:therapy*; D016030:Kidney Transplantation / Q000191:economics*; D006278:Medicare / Q000191:economics; D009519:New York City; D006435:Renal Dialysis / Q000191:economics*; D014481:United States