Toxicity and efficacy of conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate versus escalating doses of amphotericin B deoxycholate---fat emulsion in HIV-infected patients with oral candidosis.
BACKGROUND: Amphotericin B deoxycholate remains the treatment of choice for most systemic fungal infections; however, its clinical use can be limited by infusion-related side effects and nephrotoxicity. New formulations of amphotericin in lipid compounds have been shown to decrease toxicity. We previously showed that a lipid emulsion preparation of amphotericin B deoxycholate was better tolerated than the conventional preparation in dextrose. Therefore, we have now studied the clinical tolerance, renal toxicity and efficacy of higher doses of amphotericin B deoxycholate prepared and infused in a fat emulsion (Intralipid 20%). Thus, this report adds information to the previous publication. METHODS: Forty-two patients infected with HIV and suffering oral candidosis entered the study. The patients received either amphotericin B deoxycholate---glucose 1 mg/kg/day or amphotericin B deoxycholate---lipid emulsion 1 mg/kg/day for 4 days (randomized phase), or amphotericin B deoxycholate---lipid emulsion 2 mg/kg/day or 3 mg/kg/day (escalating-dose phase) for 5 days. Clinical (immediate) side effects and renal (creatinine) tolerance were assessed daily; efficacy against oral candidosis was measured by using a simple clinical score. Serum levels of amphotericin B were also measured. RESULTS: None of the patients receiving amphotericin B deoxycholate---lipid emulsion had treatment interrupted, as compared to four (36%) in the amphotericin B deoxycholate---glucose group (pless-than-or-equal0.01); chills during or after the infusions were significantly less frequent in the amphotericin B deoxycholate---lipid emulsion groups than in the amphotericin B deoxycholate-glucose group (p=0.03). The increase of creatininemia during treatment was significantly higher for patients receiving amphotericin B deoxycholate---glucose than for those receiving amphotericin B deoxycholate---lipid emulsion (p=0.001). The number of patients who had a creatininemia greater-than-or-equal18 mg/L during treatment was significantly higher in both the amphotericin B deoxycholate---glucose group (36%) and in the group receiving the highest dose of amphotericin B deoxycholate---lipid emulsion than in other groups (pless-than-or-equal0.06). The serum concentrations of amphotericin B were lower for the amphotericin B deoxycholate---lipid emulsion regimen than for the amphotericin B deoxycholate---glucose regimen at the same dose of 1 mg/kg/day, but increased with the dose. The change of the oral candidosis score was similar for the same dose of 1 mg/kg/day of amphotericin B deoxycholate infused in either glucose or lipid emulsion; higher doses of amphotericin B deoxycholate---lipid emulsion were more efficacious (p=0.009) and this efficacy seemed to increase with the dose (p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and renal tolerance of amphotericin B deoxycholate are improved when the drug is directly prepared and infused in lipid emulsion (Intrapid) and this preparation allows for greater dosage, up to 3 mg/kg/day, with resultant greater efficacy. This preparation is simple and cost-effective (approximately 7 US $ per 50 mg of amphotercin B) and could be clinically compared to other formulations of amphotericin B.
Chavanet
Pascal
P
Infectious Diseases Department, Hopital du Bocage, Dijon, France.
Clement
Claudine
C
Duong
Michel
M
Buisson
Marielle
M
D'Athis
Philippe
P
Dumas
Monique
M
Bonnin
Alain
A
Portier
Henri
H