Motion detectors in the locust visual system: From biology to robot sensors.
Motion detectors in the locust optic lobe and brain fall into two categories: neurones that respond selectively to approaching vs. receding objects and neurones that respond selectively to a particular pattern of image motion over a substantial part of the eye, generated by the locust's own movements through its environment. Neurones from the two categories can be differentiated on the basis of their response to motion at a constant velocity at a fixed distance from the locust: neurones of the first category respond equally well to motion in any direction whereas neurones in the second category respond selectively to one preferred direction of motion. Several of the motion detectors of the first category, responding to approaching objects, share the same input organisation, suggesting that it is important in generating a tuning for approaching objects. Anatomical, physiological, and modelling studies have revealed how the selectivity of the response is generated. The selectivity arises as a result of a critical race between excitation, generated when image edges move out over the eye and delayed inhibition, generated by the same edge movements. For excitation to build up, the velocity and extent of edge motion over the eye must increase rapidly. The ultrastructure of the afferent inputs onto the dendrites of collision sensitive neurones reveals a possible substrate for the interaction between excitation and inhibition. This interpretation is supported by both physiological and immunocytochemical evidence. The input organisation of these neurones has been incorporated into the control structure of a small mobile robot, which successfully avoids collisions with looming objects. The ecological role of motion detectors of the second category that respond to image motion over a substantial part of the visual field, is discussed as is the input organisation that generates this selective response. The broad tuning of these neurones, particularly at low velocities (<0.02 degree/s), suggests they may have a role in navigation during migratory flights at altitude. By contrast, their optimum tuning to high-image velocities suggests these motion detectors are adapted for use in a fast flying insect, which does not spend significant time hovering.
Rind
F Claire
FC
Neurobiology Department, School of Neurosciences and Psychiatry, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom. Claire.rind@ncl.ac.uk
D000818:Animals; D005123:Eye / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000648:ultrastructure; D006110:Grasshoppers / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D009039:Motion Perception; D009415:Nerve Net / Q000502:physiology; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology / Q000648:ultrastructure; D009899:Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian / Q000502:physiology* / Q000648:ultrastructure; D012371:Robotics