Pretrial publicity and civil cases: a two-way street?
Published pretrial publicity (PTP) research has been conducted almost exclusively with criminal cases and has focused on PTP that is detrimental to the defense. The current research examined the effects of PTP in a civil case to determine if PTP can have a biasing effect against either the defendant or the plaintiff in civil litigation. In Experiment 1, participants exposed to PTP biased against the defendant were more likely to reach a liable verdict than participants who read a control article or PTP biased against the plaintiff Experiment 2 demonstrated that a judicial admonition did not reduce the biasing effect of PTP about a civil defendant. However, participants given the admonition both before and after the trial evidence viewed the defendant as less culpable than participants given the admonition after the trial only or not at all. The implications for the legal system are discussed.
Bornstein
Brian H
BH
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, USA. bbornstein2@unl.edu
Whisenhunt
Brooke L
BL
Nemeth
Robert J
RJ
Dunaway
Deborah L
DL
D000328:Adult; D002617:Chemical Industry / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D002961:Civil Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005260:Female; D006256:Hazardous Waste / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D007649:Ketamine / Q000633:toxicity; D016365:Liability, Legal; D008297:Male; D009524:Newspapers as Topic / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D010051:Ovarian Neoplasms / Q000139:chemically induced; D011287:Prejudice; D011639:Public Opinion
D006256:Hazardous Waste; D007649:Ketamine