title: [Is application of electrocardiographic exercise test always usefull in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease? Advantages and limitations of this method].
abstract: To determine the diagnostic value of the electrocardiographic exercise testing (EET) in 551 patients with chest pain regarded as definite or probable stable angina pectoris (CAD), results of performed EET were compared with coronary angiography. All patients underwent exercise testing according to the Bruce protocol. The criterion for a positive exercise ST-segment response was > or = 1 mm of horizontal or down sloping depression 80 msec after J-point. The indications for cardiac catheterization in each patient were determined at the discretion of the attending physician. Clinically important coronary artery disease was defined as > 50 per cent narrowing of the diameter of at least one major vessel or > or = 50 per cent of the left main coronary artery.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The sensitivity and specificity of EET for detection of CAD were for the entire group, in women and men respectively: 93%, 91%, 94% and 21%, 16%, 27%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  1. Indications for EET should be based on prior probability of coronary artery disease. 2. Application of higher than conventional ST depression criteria (> or = 2 mm) lowers sensitivity but increases specificity of EET. 3. Variables determining false positive results are as follows: age, sex (female), low probability of CAD, ST-segment depression in leads: II, III, aVF and mitral valve prolapse. 4. Variables determining false negative results are as follows: high probability of CAD, sex (male) and one vessel disease.
authors.affiliation: Klinika Choroby Wieńcowej Instytutu Kardiologii w Warszawie.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lewandowski
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Szwed
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Kowalik
authors.forename: Z
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Gasior
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Gackowski
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kasprzak
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Spring
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Płońska
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Swiatkiewicz
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Szyszka
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Michalski
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kośmicki
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Krzymińska-Stasiuk
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Górski
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Jaworska
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Janion
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000787:Angina Pectoris / Q000209:etiology*; D006328:Cardiac Catheterization; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D017023:Coronary Angiography; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology; D004562:Electrocardiography; D005080:Exercise Test; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012737:Sex Factors