Evaluation of the QALY model for analysis of cost-effectiveness of eating training after stroke.
New methods developed and insights gained in research are of increasing significance in health care and the question is which services and methods are to be implemented. If eating training after stroke is to be implemented it must be given priority in relation to other measures. Otherwise there is a risk that patients with eating difficulties after stroke will be fed by personnel or permanently receive nourishment via tube. This may lead to expensive measures or costs for the tube feeding as well as costs for the personnel needed for feeding, and patients' well-being will be reduced if they do not have the opportunity to eat as independently as possible. Economic analyses should not guide the priorities to be made, but can be one of several bases for resource allocation. The estimation of cost-effectiveness must, however, be made by means of a method which in its ethical foundation is in line with nursing and the Swedish Government Bill for guiding priorities in health care. The aim of this paper is to discuss the ethical foundation of nursing care and the ethical principles proposed by the Swedish Government Bill for guiding priorities in health care and the model of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) related to eating training after stroke. The findings showed that there was a considerable difference in the ways health and health maximization were discussed in the QALY model and in specific nursing care. There are two aspects underpinning the QALY model that are not in line with either the ethical foundations of nursing or the principles proposed by the Swedish Government Bill for guiding priorities in health care. However, a new method called Equity Adjusted Life Years (EQALYs) can be a tool for evaluation in specific nursing care. Cost per EQALY is based on a compromise between initial severity of disease and treatment effect that is very close to the distribution rule applied in specific nursing care. In conclusion it is obvious that cost per EQALY, a balance between health maximization and severity of disease and treatment effects, can be a tool for the evaluation of eating training after stroke.
Jacobsson
C
C
Doctoral Student, Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Sweden. CatrineJacobsson@nurs.umu.se
Lindholm
L
L
Engström
B
B
Norberg
A
A
D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D004993:Ethics, Nursing; D005248:Feeding Methods; D001068:Feeding and Eating Disorders / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D015399:Nursing Research; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000191:economics*; D019057:Quality-Adjusted Life Years; D020521:Stroke / Q000150:complications / Q000451:nursing*; D000071939:Stroke Rehabilitation; D013548:Sweden; D016896:Treatment Outcome