title: [Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer resected for cure in the Herault area. A medico-economical study].
abstract: Optimal modalities of surveillance of colorectal cancers (CRC) resected for cure have not been determined so far and the overall improvement of 5-year survival related to surveillance has not been demonstrated.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To retrospectively evaluate modalities, results and costs of follow-up of patients during the 5 years following the resection for cure of CRC.
  
  
  METHODS
  We studied medical and economical data from records of 256 patients registered in the cancer registry of the Herault area who underwent a potentially curative resection of CRC in 1992. We analyzed comparatively modalities of follow-up in patients who were followed according to recommendations from the 1998 French consensus conference (standard follow-up) and in those who had a simplified follow-up. We evaluated cumulative costs of follow-up.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Nine patients died in the postoperative period. Recurrence rate was 27% (69 patients). Sixty-nine patients had a standard follow-up (30% of the 231 classified patients) and 162 patients (70%) had a simplified follow-up. The specific survival rate (taking into account only death related to CRC) 5 years after resection for cure was 75%. The 5-year specific survival rate after diagnosis of recurrence was 12% in the patients with recurrent disease within the 5 years after initial therapy. The 5-year survival rate after standard and simplified follow-up were 85% and 79%, respectively (P=0.25). Total cost of follow-up of the 256 patients was 1 085 507 French francs (FF). Mean follow-up cost per patient was 5 527 FF. Cost of the examinations not recommended by the consensus conference represented 30% of the expenses. Individual total cost of the follow-up of patients alive 5 years after the diagnosis of the recurrence was 120 356 FF.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In Herault area, clinicians carried out in 70% of the patients a simplified follow-up and in 30% of the cases a reinforced follow-up in comparison with French recommendations. Survival rates were not significantly different between the 2 groups.
authors.affiliation: Service de Chirurgie Digestive A, Hôpital Saint-Eloi, Montpellier, France. fborie@yahoo.com
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Borie
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Daurès
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Millat
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Folschveiller-Bruggeman
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Trétarre
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000191:economics / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D007558:Italy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009364:Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000191:economics; D012042:Registries; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D015996:Survival Rate