title: Five commandments for APA.
abstract: The author delineates 5 rules of scientific review and publishing and argues that these norms need to be upheld even when to do so proves politically difficult. The 5 rules are: (a) Scientific articles should be judged only by their logic and the strength of their evidence; (b) the results of a competent peer review should be accepted; (c) disagreements with scientific articles should be aired in peer reviewed commentaries; (d) efforts to judge scientific articles on the basis of political concerns should be resisted; and (e) the explicit rules and normative expectations of peer review should not be arbitrarily altered.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA. newcombe@astro.temple.edu
authors.forename: Nora S
authors.initials: NS
authors.lastname: Newcombe
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D011057:Politics; D011584:Psychology