title: Strategies of text retrieval: a criterion shift account.
abstract: This study scrutinized people's ability to apply different strategies to randomly intermixed immediate and delayed test items. In three experiments, participants first read one set of stories. Later, they read more stories, and after each one, answered intermixed questions about that story and one of the earlier ones. The experiments cumulatively manipulated amount of delay, test probe plausibility, probe relation (explicit, paraphrase, inference), and testing procedure (mixed versus uniform delay). Using signal detection response criterion as the index of strategy, we contrasted the single criterion hypothesis, according to which one text retrieval criterion is applied to all test items, and a multiple-criterion hypothesis. The results consistently favoured the multiple-criterion hypothesis. The results also indicated that the presence of immediate and delayed probes mutually influence one another: Less extreme signal detection criteria were adopted under mixed than uniform testing. It was concluded that text retrieval strategy is continually calibrated with reference to the quality of the test probes.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2.
authors.forename: Murray
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Singer
authors.forename: Nathalie
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Gagnon
authors.forename: Eric
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Richards
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003210:Concept Formation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011939:Mental Recall; D011932:Reading; D012153:Retention, Psychology