Resin polymerization problems--are they caused by resin curing lights, resin formulations, or both?
Negative effects of rapid, high-intensity resin curing have been predicted for both argon lasers and plasma-arc curing lights. To address these questions, six different resin restorative materials were cured with 14 different resin curing lights representing differences in intensities ranging from 400 mW/cm2 to 1,900 mW/cm2; delivery modes using constant, ramped, and stepped methods; cure times ranging from 1 second to 40 seconds; and spot sizes of 6.7 mm to 10.9 mm. Two lasers, five plasma-arc lights, and seven halogen lights were used. Shrinkage, modulus, heat generation, strain, and physical changes on the teeth and resins during strain testing were documented. Results showed effects associated with lights were not statistically significant, but resin formulation was highly significant. Microfill resins had the least shrinkage and the lowest modulus. An autocure resin had shrinkage and modulus as high as or higher than the light-cured hybrid resins. Lasers and plasma-arc lights produced the highest heat increases on the surface (up to 21 degrees C) and within the resin restorations (up to 14 degrees C), and the halogen lights produced the most heat within the pulp chamber (up to 2 degrees C). Strain within the tooth was least with Heliomolar and greatest with Z100 Restorative and BISFIL II autocure resin. Clinical effects of strain relief were evident as white lines at the tooth-resin interface and cracks in enamel adjacent to the margins. This work implicates resin formulation, rather than light type or curing mode, as the important factor in polymerization problems. Lower light intensity and use of ramped and stepped curing modes did not provide significant lowering of shrinkage, modulus, or strain, and did not prevent enamel cracking adjacent to margins and formation of "white line" defects at the margins. Until materials with lower shrinkage and modulus are available, use of low-viscosity surface sealants as a final step in resin placement is suggested to seal defects.
Christensen
R P
RP
Palmer
T M
TM
Ploeger
B J
BJ
Yost
M P
MP
D000180:Acrylic Resins / Q000737:chemistry / Q000528:radiation effects; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000528:radiation effects*; D003743:Dental Enamel / Q000293:injuries; D003748:Dental Equipment; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D004548:Elasticity; D006244:Hardness; D006358:Hot Temperature; D006801:Humans; D007834:Lasers; D008027:Light; D016015:Logistic Models; D011108:Polymers / Q000737:chemistry / Q000528:radiation effects; D011140:Polyurethanes / Q000737:chemistry / Q000528:radiation effects; D019279:Resin Cements / Q000737:chemistry / Q000528:radiation effects; D012822:Silicon Dioxide / Q000737:chemistry / Q000528:radiation effects; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013674:Technology, Dental / Q000295:instrumentation; D015040:Zirconium / Q000737:chemistry / Q000528:radiation effects
D000180:Acrylic Resins; C029012:Composite Dental Resin; D003188:Composite Resins; C513708:Heliomolar; D011108:Polymers; D011140:Polyurethanes; D019279:Resin Cements; C420128:Spectrum composite resin; C083568:Z100 composite resin; C078905:Bisfil; C065770:Herculite XR; C074741:Silux Plus; D012822:Silicon Dioxide; D015040:Zirconium