title: Interrupting recognition memory: tests of a criterion-change account of the revelation effect.
abstract: The revelation effect is evidenced by an increase in positive recognition responses when the test probe is immediately preceded by an unrelated problem-solving task. As an alternative to familiarity-based explanations of this effect (Hicks & Marsh, 1998; Westerman & Greene, 1998), Niewiadomski and Hockley (2001) proposed a decision-based account in which it is assumed that the problem-solving task displaces the study list context in working memory, leading subjects to adopt a more liberal recognition criterion. In the present study, we show that the revelation effect is seen when the stimulus materials are pure lists of very rare words or nonwords. In contrast, for mixed lists of common words and very rare words or nonwords, the revelation effect is found for common words but disappears for very rare words and nonwords. We argue that, in mixed lists, the liberal decision bias following the revelation task and the criterion changes between common words and very rare words and nonwords serve to offset each other.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. whockley@wlu.ca
authors.forename: W E
authors.initials: WE
authors.lastname: Hockley
authors.forename: M W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Niewiadomski
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory; D011581:Psychological Tests; D011930:Reaction Time; D021641:Recognition, Psychology