The influence of a central vacuum system on quality life in patients with house dust-associated allergic rhinitis.
Indoor pollution is one of the most common problems addressed by allergists and troublesome for their patients. Although a large variety of products are available for removing such pollutants, including house dust, there is a relative paucity of data on the effectiveness of such devices. In many cases, central vacuum systems are recommended, particularly in new homes. To specifically address the question of whether a central vacuum system produces an improvement in the well characterized domains of Juniper Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire, we selected 25 individuals with a history of documented type I hypersensitivity to house dust. Each of these individuals used either a Beam Central Vacuum System or their own conventional vacuum for a period of 3 months. At the end of this period, the individual switched over to the opposite limb of the study for 3 additional months. Interestingly, in all seven domains of the evaluation, including activity, sleep, nonnasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms and emotions, use of the central vacuum proved to be superior.
Naguwa
S M
SM
Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of California at Davis School of Medicine, 95616, USA.
Gershwin
M E
ME
D000328:Adult; D000389:Air Conditioning; D016902:Air Pollution, Indoor / Q000517:prevention & control*; D004391:Dust / Q000009:adverse effects*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011788:Quality of Life; D012221:Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000523:psychology; D014618:Vacuum
D004391:Dust