title: Comparison between caloric and canal impulse rotatory test.
abstract: It has been suggested that the rotatory test using videosnystagmoscopy can also be applied for identification of vestibular canal paresis. In this study, we test this hypothesis by comparing the results of a canal impulse rotatory test with those of the caloric test using the method described by Freyss. Our study indicates that only in 38% of all tested patients, the same results between the two tests have been obtained. Furthermore, which the group with abnormal findings is observed separately, in 24% patients only these two test methods lead to the same results. Consequently, the canal impulse rotatory test cannot replace the caloric test.
authors.affiliation: CHI Montfienneil, av. du Gal Leclerc, Montfermeil, France.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Cohen
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Dobler
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Sauron
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hazan
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Peytral
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Fombeur
mesh_terms: D002150:Caloric Tests; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009760:Nystagmus, Physiologic; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D015837:Vestibular Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis*; D014724:Vestibular Function Tests / Q000379:methods*; D014741:Video Recording