Conditioning tastant and the acquisition of conditioned taste avoidance to drugs of abuse in DBA/2J mice.
BACKGROUND
Conditioned taste aversion (CTA) produced by drugs of abuse such as morphine and cocaine has been interpreted as representing the rewarding actions of these drugs. Evidence for this interpretation is based, in part, on findings in rats indicating saccharin is a more effective conditioning flavor compared to salt (NaCl). However, our studies with ethanol have found salt to be a highly effective conditioning flavor in mice.


OBJECTIVE
The present series of studies examined the acquisition of CTA to morphine, ethanol, lithium chloride, and cocaine. Further, saccharin and salt were utilized in each experiment in order to determine effectiveness of each flavor to serve as a conditioning stimulus.


METHODS
In four separate experiments, adult male DBA/2J mice were acclimated to a 2 h/day water restriction regimen. Subsequently they received four conditioning trials consisting of 1 h access to either 0.15% w/v saccharin or 0.1 M salt followed by 0, 10 or 20 mg/kg morphine (experiment 1), 0, 2, or 4 g/kg ethanol (experiment 2), 0, 1.5 or 3.0 milliequivalents/kg lithium chloride (experiment 3) or 0, 10 or 20 mg/kg cocaine (experiment 4). A fifth flavor access period (trial 5) was not followed by drug exposure. Following trial 5, each subject received 24-h access to the conditioning flavor and water (two-bottle test 1). Control subjects (0 dose groups from each experiment) received a second two-bottle test with 24-h access to both saccharin and salt flavors.


RESULTS
Reduced flavor intake and reduced flavor preference was noted in all drug-paired groups in each experiment. However, more rapid development of CTA was seen with the saccharin flavor in morphine- or cocaine-paired groups. In contrast, ethanol-induced CTA appeared more rapidly with the salt flavor. Lithium-induced CTA was modest, and emerged equally with either flavor.


CONCLUSIONS
CTA induced by morphine or cocaine in mice occurs in a similar pattern to that seen in rats, and these findings agree with an interpretation based on drug reward. In contrast, ethanol-induced CTA is more likely attributable to aversive effects.
Risinger
Fred O
FO
Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR 97201-3098, USA. risinger@ohsu.edu
Boyce
Janel M
JM
D000818:Animals; D001362:Avoidance Learning / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000502:physiology; D003042:Cocaine / Q000008:administration & dosage; D003213:Conditioning, Psychological / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000502:physiology; D000431:Ethanol / Q000008:administration & dosage; D013287:Illicit Drugs / Q000494:pharmacology*; D008094:Lithium / Q000008:administration & dosage; D008297:Male; D051379:Mice; D008811:Mice, Inbred DBA; D009020:Morphine / Q000008:administration & dosage; D012439:Saccharin / Q000008:administration & dosage; D012965:Sodium Chloride / Q000008:administration & dosage; D013649:Taste / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000502:physiology
D013287:Illicit Drugs; D000431:Ethanol; D012965:Sodium Chloride; D009020:Morphine; D008094:Lithium; D012439:Saccharin; D003042:Cocaine