Developmental and content effects in reasoning with causal conditionals.
Two predictions derived from Markovits and Barrouillet's (2001) developmental model of conditional reasoning were tested in a study in which 72 twelve-year-olds, 80 fifteen-year-olds, and 104 adults received a paper-and-pencil test of conditional reasoning with causal premises ("if cause P then effect Q"). First, we predicted that conditional premises would induce more correct uncertainty responses to the Affirmation of the consequent and Denial of the antecedent forms when the antecedent term is weakly associated to the consequent than when the two are strongly associated and that this effect would decrease with age. Second, uncertainty responding to the Denial of the antecedent form ("P is not true") should be easier when the formulation of the minor premise invites retrieval of alternate antecedents ("if something other than P is true"). The results were consistent with the hypotheses and indicate the importance of retrieval processes in understanding developmental patterns in conditional reasoning with familiar premises.
Barrouillet
Pierre
P
Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France. barouil@satie.u-bourgogne.fr
Markovits
Henry
H
Quinn
Stéphane
S
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D015984:Causality; D002648:Child; D002657:Child Development; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D003210:Concept Formation; D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011340:Problem Solving