[A differentiated approach to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis using multi-slice CT].
OBJECTIVE
To establish a differentiated protocol for multi-slice CT (MSCT) examinations in cases of clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) using pulmonary CT-angiography (CTA) and indirect CT-phlebography (CTP).


METHODS
161 patients with suspected PE were examined using an MSCT (SOMATOM Volume Zoom; Siemens, Forchheim, Germany). After intravenous administration of 120 ml of contrast material, a thin collimation chest-CT scan was performed (120 kV, 100 mAs, collimation: 4 x 1 mm). If PE was present, or previous examinations and clinical signs suggested deep venous thrombosis (DVT), a CTP was subsequently completed. CTPs were performed using a 4 x 5 mm protocol (120 kV, 170 mAs). Venous phase scanning, starting from the pelvic crest, was completed in the popliteal fossa three minutes after contrast material injection. In 73 extremities, CTP were compared to the results of ultrasound, phlebography and autopsy. Scan ranges were documented in all patients. Cumulative doses were calculated for male and female subgroups.


RESULTS
62 patients in our series suffered from PE and in 47 of these patients deep venous thrombosis was seen additionally. Of the 99 patients without PE, 47 also received indirect CTP. CTP confirmed the suspicion and extent of DVT in 8 patients. Only in 2 of 39 patients (5.1 %) was previously unknown DVT found, despite the exclusion of PE. Regarding DVT, sensitivity was 94.3 % and specificity was 92.1 % for indirect CTP. Cumulative chest CT doses averaged 3.3 mSv for males and 4.2 mSv for females, the calculated CTP dosage was 9.3 mSv (according to ICRP 60).


CONCLUSIONS
The examination protocol presented is suitable for clinical usage in patients with suspected PE. If PE is confirmed, indirect CTP is justified, so that detailed information of the venous system can be obtained. However, the relatively high radiation dosage of an additional CTP requires a strict indication regiment in patients with a negative CTA.
Wildberger
J E
JE
Klinik für Radiologische Diagnostik, Germany. wildberg@rad.rwth-aachen.de
Mahnken
A H
AH
Sinha
A M
AM
Stargardt
A
A
Haage
P
P
Schaller
S
S
Günther
R W
RW
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000792:Angiography; D003287:Contrast Media / Q000008:administration & dosage; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D007472:Iohexol / Q000031:analogs & derivatives*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011655:Pulmonary Embolism / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D020246:Venous Thrombosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*
D003287:Contrast Media; D007472:Iohexol; C038192:iopromide