Medicare+Choice: doubling or disappearing?
Although the changes in the program created by the Balanced Budget Act are often viewed as the reason for the current instability in the Medicare+Choice (M+C) program, in fact, health plans are having difficulties in all of their markets, not just in Medicare. It may be time to reconsider the purpose of the program and to fundamentally redesign how payments are made to managed care organizations contracting with Medicare. Two alternative approaches are suggested: treating M+C like another provider type by severing the payment linkage to spending under traditional Medicare, and overhauling the program by creating a value-based purchasing orientation rewarding plans that provide higher-quality care to beneficiaries with chronic diseases.
Berenson
Robert A
RA
Academy for Health Services Research and Health Policy, USA.
D000368:Aged; D002017:Budgets / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D002908:Chronic Disease / Q000191:economics; D003284:Contract Services / Q000191:economics; D003361:Cost Allocation; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D018588:Fee-for-Service Plans / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D018166:Health Care Reform; D006279:Health Maintenance Organizations / Q000191:economics* / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D020398:Medicare Part C; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D011907:Rate Setting and Review / Q000379:methods*; D020379:Risk Adjustment; D014481:United States