title: Comparison of 2 wound volume measurement methods.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare 2 wound volume measurement techniques, the Kundin device and stereophotogrammetry, on 2 wound shapes.
  
  
  METHODS
  Using 2 wound measurement techniques, the interrater and intrarater reliability and the bias and standard error of measurement of an L-shaped and a pear-shaped plaster of paris wound model were assessed.
  
  
  METHODS
  A clinical laboratory of a school of nursing.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty-four raters, all but 2 being registered nurses, measured each of the wounds using both techniques.
  
  
  METHODS
  Each rater measured each wound twice using each method in a randomly assigned order defined on a card that was drawn from a box. Measurements were recorded on a researcher-designed data collection form, which included some demographic data related to each participant.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference in accuracy between the 2 wound volume measurement methods.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The least biased and most accurate technique was stereophotogrammetry, with the smallest standard of error of measurement. Interrater reliability of average ratings was identical for both methods at 0.98. For single ratings, stereophotogrammetry was slightly higher than the Kundin device. Intrarater reliability was higher on the pear-shaped wound for the Kundin device, which had lower interrater reliability, suggesting that nurses were consistent in the direction and size of personal error. Intrarater reliability for stereophotogrammetry was identical to that of the Kundin device for the L-shaped wound and lower for the pear-shaped wound.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although both techniques have acceptable accuracy, stereophotogrammetry is more accurate and has more clinical applications.
authors.affiliation: University of North Dakota College of Nursing, Grand Forks, USA.
authors.forename: D K
authors.initials: DK
authors.lastname: Langemo
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Melland
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Olson
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Hanson
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hunter
authors.forename: S J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Henly
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Thompson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D018450:Disease Progression; D006801:Humans; D009730:Nursing Assessment / Q000379:methods*; D015588:Observer Variation; D010780:Photogrammetry; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014945:Wound Healing; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000451:nursing* / Q000473:pathology*