Preventive detention must be resisted by the medical profession.
A policy of "preventive detention" has recently been debated in the British Parliament. Alarmed by the high-profile criminal activities of people suspected of having dangerous severe personality disorder (DSPD), the government have made clear their intention to "indeterminately but reviewably detain" people with DSPD, after diagnosis by forensic psychiatrists, even if the individuals are yet to commit an offence. Such a policy may improve the safety of the public, but has obvious implications for civil liberties. This essay criticises the morality of the government's intention and rejects the notion that the medical profession could ethically collude with such a policy.
White
S M
SM
Department of Anaesthetics, Brighton Royal Sussex County Hospital, East Sussex. igasbest@hotmail.com
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003416:Criminal Law / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003617:Dangerous Behavior; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D033161:Government Regulation; D028642:Persons with Psychiatric Disorders; D010552:Personality Assessment; D010553:Personality Development; D010554:Personality Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis*; D009626:Terminology as Topic; D006113:United Kingdom