Employer sponsored health benefit plans under ERISA after Pegram v. Herdrich: the fiduciary duty argument and mixed eligibility versus treatment decisions.
Karns
J E
JE
East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA. karnsj@mail.ecu.edu
D015746:Abdominal Pain / Q000175:diagnosis; D001064:Appendicitis / Q000150:complications / Q000191:economics; D003363:Cost Control / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D004608:Eligibility Determination / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D019461:Employee Retirement Income Security Act / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005607:Fraud / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006264:Health Benefit Plans, Employee / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006279:Health Maintenance Organizations / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D007416:Intestinal Perforation / Q000209:etiology; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D010816:Physician Incentive Plans / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D012017:Referral and Consultation / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D012422:Rupture, Spontaneous / Q000209:etiology; D012941:Social Responsibility; D014481:United States