Effect of left ventricular global systolic function, mitral regurgitation, and left ventricular inflow pattern on exercise echocardiography results.
Diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) by exercise echocardiography is usually based on rest or exercise-induced regional wall-motion abnormalities. Mitral regurgitation (MR), left ventricular (LV) global systolic function, and LV inflow measurements can be assessed during exercise echocardiography; however, their diagnostic value has not been analyzed consistently. Treadmill exercise echocardiography and coronary angiography were performed in 120 patients (94 male, 26 female; mean age 61 +/- 10 years [+/- 1 SD]) to evaluate known or suspected CAD. Positive exercise echocardiography was defined either as a rest- or exercise-induced regional wall-motion abnormalities. An abnormal response of LV ejection fraction (EF), LV volumes, MR (as assessed by color Doppler), and LV inflow pattern was defined as a fall in LVEF, a LV end-diastolic volume increase, a LV end-systolic volume increase, a new or increased MR, or a change from an impaired relaxation pattern (E < A) to a "pseudonormalized" pattern (E > A) from rest to exercise, respectively. CAD (> or = 50% luminal narrowing in at least one vessel) was found in 89 (74%) patients. EE-based regional wall-motion abnormality analysis was positive in 95 (79%) patients and negative in 25 (21%) patients. Feasible images for regional wall-motion abnormalities, LVEF and volumes, LV inflow, and MR measurements were acquired in 90% of patients. Regional wall-motion abnormality analysis and LVEF decrease provided the greatest sensitivities for CAD (94% and 75%, respectively), while the highest specificity was given by a new or increased MR (90%), the development of a pseudonormalized pattern (88%), and the appearance of angina (87%). A positive electrocardiogram (ECG) finding in patients with interpretable ECGs provided good sensitivity and specificity (67% and 85%, respectively). In conclusion, a complete rest and exercise Doppler echocardiography approach is feasible in most patients. Regional wall-motion abnormalities are the most accurate exercise echocardiography variable for diagnosing CAD, whereas exercise ECG remains a good test in patients with interpretable ECGs. Exercise echocardiography, exercise ECG, newly developed or increased MR, and change to a pseudonormalized LV inflow pattern are highly specific.
Peteiro
Jesús
J
Service of Cardiology, Juan Canalejo Hospital, A Coruña, Spain. jpeteiro@mundo-r.com
Monserrat
Lorenzo
L
Bouzas
Beatriz
B
Castro-Beiras
Alfonso
A
D000368:Aged; D001794:Blood Pressure / Q000502:physiology; D017023:Coronary Angiography; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology; D003331:Coronary Vessels / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology; D004452:Echocardiography; D004562:Electrocardiography; D005080:Exercise Test; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006339:Heart Rate / Q000502:physiology; D006352:Heart Ventricles / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D006801:Humans; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008944:Mitral Valve Insufficiency / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology*; D015588:Observer Variation; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D013318:Stroke Volume / Q000502:physiology; D016277:Ventricular Function, Left / Q000502:physiology*