Measuring performance: a strategy to improve programs.
This article stresses the importance of evaluation as a tool for improving the design and implementation of effective programs to reduce iron deficiency anemia and to advocate for their continued and increased support. Current concepts in program evaluation are applied to the specific issues relevant to iron programs. Evaluations should be designed to meet the needs of specific audiences (e.g., community members, program implementers, policymakers, donors and researchers) and to answer specific questions. Evaluations might answer questions about provision, coverage or impact. The choice of indicators for evaluating impact of iron programs is discussed and illustrated with recent examples. Evaluation design can be broadly categorized as monitoring, plausibility evaluations and probability evaluations. These designs differ in cost and also in the strength of evidence that they provide; however, each has appropriate uses. It is important to document program costs in the evaluation process as policymakers and donors weight impact against costs. To be useful, evaluation findings must be disseminated, usually to multiple audiences. This requires allocation of time and resources and attention to the needs of various stakeholders.
Stoltzfus
Rebecca J
RJ
Center for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. rstoltzf@jhsph.edu
Pillai
Gita
G
D000328:Adult; D018798:Anemia, Iron-Deficiency / Q000517:prevention & control*; D005260:Female; D005492:Folic Acid / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use; D006397:Hematinics / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use; D006801:Humans; D007501:Iron / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D011247:Pregnancy; D015397:Program Evaluation / Q000379:methods*; D011634:Public Health
D006397:Hematinics; D005492:Folic Acid; D007501:Iron