Assessing the construct validity of the job descriptive index: a review and meta-analysis.
The construct validity of the Job Descriptive Index (JDI) was investigated by using a meta-analysis to summarize previous empirical studies that examined antecedents, correlates, and consequences of job satisfaction. In total, 79 unique correlates with a combined total of 1,863 correlations were associated with the JDI subdimensions. The construct validity of the JDI was supported by (a) acceptable estimates of internal consistency and test-retest reliability, (b) results that conform to a nomological network of job satisfaction relationships, and (c) demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity. Contrasting results with previous meta-analytic findings offered further support for the JDI's construct validity. Limitations of the JDI and suggestions for future research are discussed.
Kinicki
Angelo J
AJ
Department of Management, Arizona State University Tempe 85287-4006, USA. angelo.kinicki@asu.edu
Mckee-Ryan
Frances M
FM
Schriesheim
Chester A
CA
Carson
Kenneth P
KP
D006801:Humans; D007587:Job Description; D007588:Job Satisfaction; D011590:Psychology, Industrial / Q000379:methods; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires / Q000592:standards