title: Gerwirth's ethical rationalism and abortion: a response.
abstract: In the preface to his seminal work, Reason and Morality (1978), Alan Gerwith writes: "The most important and difficult problem of philosophical ethics is whether a substantial moral principle can be rationally justified." After summarizing his methodology, I demonstrate that (1) Gerwith's attempt to quantify personhood is unrealistic; (2) that his position on abortion rests on the unintelligible notion of "comparable conflict" between mother and unborn; and (3) that he implicitly assumes that personhood is naturally, and not functionally, defined--thereby contradicting himself. Ultimately, I outline an alternative view of personhood, one which avoids the criticism to which Gerwith's theory is particularly susceptible--namely, that personhood is a natural component of human beings from the start, rather than a gradually acquired trait.
authors.affiliation: Loyola University Chicago, IL, USA.
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Jun
mesh_terms: D000028:Abortion, Induced; D005260:Female; D005333:Fetus; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D028723:Personhood; D010684:Philosophy; D011247:Pregnancy; D037841:Pregnant People