Learning from history: morphology's challenges in Germany ca. 1900.
A century ago, Carl Gegenbaur's program of vertebrate evolutionary morphology faced its greatest challenges. The controversy over the evolutionary origin of the vertebrate paired limbs between 1875 and 1906 illustrates the failure of the traditional methods of comparative anatomy and embryology (supported by Haeckel's biogenetic law) to choose between different phylogenetic hypotheses. The controversy over morphology's status as science intensified at the turn of the twentieth century, when the legitimacy of historical explanation itself as a mode of scientific understanding came under fire. Gegenbaur's intellectual grandson, Hermann Braus, sought to defend the legitimacy of phylogenetic reconstruction while updating it to include experimental and causal-analytical approaches, but was unable to sustain a viable synthetic research program. The article concludes with reflections on approaches to the past used by historians and evolutionary morphologists.
Nyhart
Lynn K
LK
Department of the History of Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1393, USA. lknyhart@facstaff.wisc.edu
D000717:Anatomy, Comparative / Q000266:history*; D005075:Biological Evolution; D005121:Extremities / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D005858:Germany; D049672:History, 19th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D010802:Phylogeny