title: Immediate versus delayed midface distraction in a primate model using a new intraoral internal device.
abstract: The theoretic advantage of distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton, especially in cases of severe midface retrusion and in the presence of maxillary scarring, is prevention of relapse following significant advancements. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the utility of a new low-profile, intraoral, internal device for midface distraction at the conventional or high Le Fort I level. In addition, the present study compares the efficacy of immediate versus delayed distraction on subsequent maxillary relapse. Four adult rhesus Macaca mulatta monkeys were divided into two groups. Group 1 underwent immediate midface distraction; group 2 underwent delayed distraction. All four monkeys underwent a modified Le Fort I osteotomy through an upper buccal sulcus incision and bilateral application of the intraoral midface distraction devices. No other osteotomies or incisions were necessary. Immediate distraction, performed in group 1, entailed intraoperative activation of the devices and distraction of 10 mm followed by a 5-day lag period before postoperative activation and distraction of an additional 10 mm at the rate of 1 mm/day. Delayed distraction, performed in group 2, entailed a 5-day postoperative lag period before device activation and distraction of 20 mm at the rate of 1 mm/day. Both groups thus underwent 20 mm of midface distraction. All devices were removed 6 weeks after completion of distraction. All monkeys tolerated the devices and daily distraction uneventfully. On the basis of serial cephalograms and dental models obtained throughout the experimental period, there was no evidence of relapse in either the immediate or delayed groups 6 months after distraction. In addition, on the basis of histologic, ultrastructural, and dry skull analysis, no significant differences were observed in the quality of regenerate bone obtained when comparing the immediate and delayed distraction groups. Significant midface advancement is thus feasible using this new internal, intraoral distraction device, which presents several advantages over other internal devices that require coronal incisions and additional osteotomies to achieve midface advancement. In addition, immediate distraction may abbreviate the distraction period without adverse sequelae.
authors.affiliation: Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
authors.forename: Jeffrey
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Weinzweig
authors.forename: Stephen B
authors.initials: SB
authors.lastname: Baker
authors.forename: Gregory J
authors.initials: GJ
authors.lastname: Mackay
authors.forename: Linton A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Whitaker
authors.forename: Scott P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Bartlett
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D004867:Equipment Design; D016268:Internal Fixators; D008253:Macaca mulatta; D008437:Maxilla / Q000601:surgery*; D019857:Osteogenesis, Distraction / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D019340:Osteotomy, Le Fort / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D013997:Time Factors