Effects of procedure and outcome accountability on interview validity.
This study tested effects of holding interviewers accountable for either the procedure they follow to make interview judgments (procedure accountability) or the accuracy of their judgments (outcome accountability) on interview validity. Undergraduates (N = 338) simulated employment interviewers in an experiment that crossed 2 levels of procedure accountability with 2 levels of outcome accountability. They watched videotapes of 60 managers answering an interview question and rated the managers on leadership potential. The dependent variable was the correlation between their interview judgments and supervisory ratings of the managers' actual leadership performance on the job. Results showed that procedure accountability increased interview validity and outcome accountability lowered it. Participants' apparent attentiveness fully mediated effects of procedure accountability on interview validity.
Brtek
Mary D
MD
Department of Management, University of Florida, USA. mbrtek@monk.aum.edu
Motowidlo
Stephan J
SJ
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D007857:Leadership; D008297:Male; D015588:Observer Variation; D010560:Personnel Selection; D011786:Quality Control