title: Special status consultation for frequent attenders. Who are the candidates?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The need to optimize frequent attender (FA) care and to economize on scarce resources in primary care has given rise to calls for intervention. However, precise knowledge of the specifics of this need is scarce, as is knowledge of how best to orchestrate intervention vis-à-vis particular FA groups. The aim of the study was to analyse the need for a special FA status consultation and to analyse if such need springs from physical, mental or social factors among FAs.
  
  
  METHODS
  Half of the 270 general practices in the County of Aarhus, Denmark, were randomly allocated to the study group (in total 132 practices; 220 general practitioners (GPs)). From these practices age- and gender-stratified samples of FAs were drawn. FAs were defined as the top 10 per cent attenders in 12 months. Questionnaires were used to elicit FA and GP attitudes to the introduction of a status consultation and to obtain GPs' evaluation of their FAs' physical, mental and social status. The special FA consultation was introduced as a reimbursed half-hour consultation where the FA and the GP could discuss the patient's current and future care status.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Over three-quarters of the FAs would accept the offer to have the status consultation, and the GPs would recommend it for one-fourth of their FAs. The expressed need was highly associated with an expected positive effect on health (prevalence ratio (PR) for GPs: 11.7 (8.9-15.5), PR for FAs: 1.6 (1.5-1.8)) and a decrease in attendance (PR for FAs: 1.4 (1.3-1.5)). The GPs quoted physical, mental and social indications for the consultation. The FAs who had high levels of functional symptoms were most likely to accept the consultation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There was an expressed need for an FA status consultation, which may lead to a positive effect on health and attendance. The GPs pointed to physical, mental and social indicators for a special FA consultation.
authors.affiliation: Department of General Practice, University of Aarhus, Denmark. pv@alm.au.dk
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Vedsted
authors.forename: Morten Bondo
authors.initials: MB
authors.lastname: Christensen
authors.forename: Henrik Toft
authors.initials: HT
authors.lastname: Sørensen
authors.forename: Per
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Fink
authors.forename: Frede
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Olesen
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003718:Denmark; D005194:Family Practice / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005260:Female; D015276:Health Care Rationing; D006301:Health Services Needs and Demand; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care / Q000523:psychology* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011897:Random Allocation; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires