title: Re-auditing a regional lithotripsy service.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess, in a repeat audit of a regional lithotripsy service, whether changes implemented after a regional audit in 1994 (which showed disappointing results from shock wave lithotripsy, attributable to both poor patient selection and an inadequate fixed-site lithotripter) have had any effect.
  
  
  METHODS
  A data-collection sheet was devised to gather information on the site, size and number of stones treated, together with information on the lithotripsy treatment and outcome. Patients selected for the audit were the first 50 new patients treated with lithotripsy at each centre in 1999. As only one hospital has a fixed-site lithotripsy machine, the results of mobile lithotripsy were grouped by machine for analysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There was an overall improvement in patient selection from the previous audits. Few stones of > 16 mm or < 4 mm were treated. Two units treated more ureteric stones, thought to reflect first the influence of a fixed-site lithotripter, and second a willingness to insert a ureteric stent and await the next mobile lithotripter visit. The stone free rates were all disappointingly low (16.7-26.7%) but the results improved when fragments of < 4 mm were included as "successful" giving an "overall success rate" of 45.9-66.7%. The unit with a fixed-site lithotripter appeared to perform better (two-thirds successful) than the mobile machines (Modulith SLX, 51%; Modulith SLK, 46%). One centre visited by both mobile machines had a success rate of 65% but a high rate of auxiliary procedures (35% vs 16-19% vs the fixed-site).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although these results show some improvement in patient selection for our regional lithotripsy service, stone-free and success rates are poorer than those reported elsewhere. This may reflect the modern lithotripsy machines that allow day-case treatment with minimal analgesia, and confirms reports by other authors who encourage a re-examination of success rates of shock wave lithotripsy.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital, Westbury on Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK. jkparkin@hotmail.com
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Parkin
authors.forename: F X
authors.initials: FX
authors.lastname: Keeley
authors.forename: A G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Timoney
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D007669:Kidney Calculi / Q000473:pathology / Q000628:therapy*; D008096:Lithotripsy / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000592:standards*; D008485:Medical Audit; D015607:Stents; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014514:Ureteral Calculi / Q000473:pathology / Q000628:therapy*