Change in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behavior of gemcitabine in human tumor xenografts upon entrapment in vesicular phospholipid gels.
OBJECTIVE
The in vivo pharmacokinetics (PK), biodistribution and antitumor activity of a new liposomal formulation of gemcitabine (GemLip) were compared to the conventional (clinical) formulation of gemcitabine (GemConv).


METHODS
Gemcitabine was entrapped in a vesicular phospholipid gel (VPG) consisting of densely packed liposomes. Redispersed VPG containing GemLip consisted of 33% liposomally entrapped and 67% free gemcitabine. The in vivo efficacies of GemLip and GemConv were compared using the subcutaneously growing human soft tissue sarcoma SXF 1301 and the orthotopically growing human bladder cancer BXF 1299T. PK and biodistribution were evaluated using radiolabeled drug and lipid in SXF 1301 tumor-bearing nude mice.


RESULTS
GemLip was highly active in SXF 1301 at a gemcitabine dose of 6-9 mg/kg (days 1, 8 and 15; dose near the MTD). In the 6-mg/kg groups, complete tumor remissions were observed in seven of eight mice. Equimolar doses of GemConv resulted in only moderate tumor growth inhibition. Even at equitoxic doses (360 mg/kg given on days 1, 8 and 15, or 120 mg/kg on days 1, 5 and 8) GemConv was less active than GemLip. Furthermore, GemLip was active in the orthotopically growing BXF 1299T bladder cancer model at 6 mg/kg and prevented distant organ metastasis. In the PK study, GemLip achieved a 35-fold higher plasma AUC (1680 mg x h/ml) than GemConv (47.6 mg x h/ml). The serum half-lives were 0.15 h for free gemcitabine and 13.3 h for liposomal gemcitabine (6 mg/kg each i.v.). Moreover, gemcitabine levels in tumors were fourfold higher following injection of GemLip than following injection of GemConv.


CONCLUSIONS
GemLip is a highly effective gemcitabine delivery system which results in superior gemcitabine pharmacodynamics and PK than GemConv. The enhanced in vivo efficacy might be explained by sustained release and passive tumor targeting.
Moog
R
R
Department of Clinical Research, Tumor Biology Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Burger
A M
AM
Brandl
M
M
Schüler
J
J
Schubert
R
R
Unger
C
C
Fiebig
H H
HH
Massing
U
U
D000818:Animals; D000964:Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000493:pharmacokinetics* / Q000494:pharmacology*; D000972:Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000493:pharmacokinetics / Q000494:pharmacology; D003841:Deoxycytidine / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000031:analogs & derivatives* / Q000493:pharmacokinetics* / Q000494:pharmacology*; D000077143:Docetaxel; D005782:Gels; D006207:Half-Life; D006801:Humans; D008081:Liposomes; D051379:Mice; D008819:Mice, Nude; D009368:Neoplasm Transplantation; D017239:Paclitaxel / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000031:analogs & derivatives* / Q000493:pharmacokinetics / Q000494:pharmacology; D010743:Phospholipids; D012509:Sarcoma / Q000188:drug therapy*; D043823:Taxoids; D014018:Tissue Distribution; D014183:Transplantation, Heterologous; D001749:Urinary Bladder Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy*; D014751:Vindesine / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000493:pharmacokinetics / Q000494:pharmacology; D000093542:Gemcitabine
D000964:Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; D000972:Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; D005782:Gels; D008081:Liposomes; D010743:Phospholipids; D043823:Taxoids; D003841:Deoxycytidine; D000077143:Docetaxel; D017239:Paclitaxel; D014751:Vindesine; D000093542:Gemcitabine