title: [Significance of prospective multicenter observational studies for gaining knowledge in surgery].
abstract: The meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies (RCS) achieves the highest degree of reliability. Although the status of prospective multicenter clinical trials (PMS) is the subject of controversial discussion, recent publications suggest that these two forms of analysis reveal comparable results. On the other hand, particularly in the operative part of medicine, the problem of recruitment and performing of controlled studies for the more rapid evaluation of new surgical procedures becomes more evident. We followed these two aspects by using a separate analysis of data and biostatistical models. In the evaluation of single aspects, under no circumstances can non-controlled clinical trials replace randomised clinical studies in surgery. Only the use of a variety of forms of analysis in clinical research will lead to the desired scientific findings.
authors.affiliation: AN-Institut für Qualitätssicherung in der operativen Medizin, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120 Magdeburg. IGastinger@aol.com
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Gastinger
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Koch
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Marusch
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Schmidt
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Köckerling
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Lippert
mesh_terms: D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D015337:Multicenter Studies as Topic; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013514:Surgical Procedures, Operative / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*