title: Routine examination of the newborn and maternal satisfaction: a randomised controlled trial.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine whether the routine examination of the newborn by a midwife compared with a junior paediatrician (SHO) affects maternal satisfaction with this examination.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomised controlled trial: 826 mother and baby pairs in a district general hospital in south east England were randomised to a paediatric SHO or a midwife for the routine newborn examination. Maternal satisfaction with the examination was analysed in relation to intervention group, process, and background variables.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Some 81% of mothers reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied with the newborn examination. Mothers assigned to a midwife were more satisfied with the newborn examination (crude odds ratio (OR) 0.54 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39 to 0.75), p < 0.001). However, after provision of health education during the examination, continuity of care provided, and history of miscarriage had been controlled for, status of examiner was no longer related to maternal satisfaction (adjusted OR 0.82 (95% CI 0.57-1.20), NS). The discussion of healthcare issues by the examiner (adjusted OR 0.49 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.70), p < 0.001) and continuity of care (adjusted OR 0.43 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.81), p < 0.01) were both related to enhanced satisfaction, and history of miscarriage (adjusted OR 1.61 (1.08 to 2.40), p < 0.05) was associated with lower maternal satisfaction with the newborn examination. Midwives (61%) were more likely than SHOs (33%) to discuss healthcare issues, such as feeding, sleeping, and skin care.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Mothers were more likely to be satisfied with the newborn examination by a midwife than an SHO because midwives were more likely to discuss healthcare issues during the examination and were able to provide continuity of care. However, midwife examinations according to exclusion criteria agreed with trial midwives excluded half of all newborns, and criteria may have to be reconsidered for practice implementation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts, UK. D.F.H.Wolke@herts.ac.uk
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Wolke
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Dave
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hayes
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Townsend
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Tomlin
mesh_terms: D002983:Clinical Competence; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital / Q000592:standards*; D009035:Mothers / Q000523:psychology*; D009721:Nurse Midwives / Q000592:standards*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010808:Physical Examination / Q000592:standards*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires