title: Benefits and drawbacks of including consumer reviewers in the scientific merit review of breast cancer research.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  This study assessed participant opinions about inclusion of breast cancer survivors as lay representatives in a scientific and technical merit review of proposals for the 1995 Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program (DOD BCRP).
  
  
  METHODS
  The evaluation employed a prepanel and postpanel survey design, which was intended to elicit feedback about attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs toward collaborative consumer and scientist participation in scientific merit review. Qualitative methods were used to describe the consumers' and scientists' responses, to explore the significance of this interaction, and to gain an understanding of the benefits and disadvantages of bringing these participants together.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Both groups were initially troubled about the consumers' lack of scientific background and questioned their qualifications and preparation for participation in a scientific panel. In particular, consumers were concerned that their judgments would not be taken seriously by scientists, a concern somewhat lessened by participation. After the meeting, scientists viewed the consumers as hard-working, dedicated survivors and advocates and endorsed the presence of carefully chosen lay panel members. Scientists were troubled that consumers potentially would have an impact on voting and on the subsequent scoring of proposals, a concern that was not validated by quantitative findings.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  As a result of these data, the DOD BCRP continues to embrace clarify the nature of collaborative participation in scientific merit review.
authors.affiliation: Office of Communication, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
authors.forename: Yvonne
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Andejeski
authors.forename: Erica S
authors.initials: ES
authors.lastname: Breslau
authors.forename: Elizabeth
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Hart
authors.forename: Ngina
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Lythcott
authors.forename: Linda
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Alexander
authors.forename: Irene
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Rich
authors.forename: Isabelle
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Bisceglio
authors.forename: Helene S
authors.initials: HS
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: Fran M
authors.initials: FM
authors.lastname: Visco
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001294:Attitude to Health; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000517:prevention & control*; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003256:Community Participation; D005260:Female; D006077:Government Agencies; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000458:organization & administration*; D008875:Middle Aged; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D017741:Survivors; D014481:United States