Evaluation of the usability of two types of image display systems, during laparoscopy.
BACKGROUND
This study was performed to assess the optimal display location of a flat-screen monitor for laparoscopy. It was also performed to assess the posture (objective), opinion, and preference (subjective) of subjects using a flat-screen monitor positioned in the optimal display location and a cathode-ray tube monitor on a tower next to the operating table (current situation).


METHODS
Twelve surgeons performed cholecystectomies using the two display systems alternately. The postures of the operator and the assistant were assessed by an infrared video analysis system.


RESULTS
The posture of the assistant is significantly better when using a flat-screen monitor [more neutral head flexions (p = 0.036) and neutral neck torsions (p = 0.012)]. No significant differences were found for the posture of the operator. The operators and assistants felt more comfortable when using a flat-screen monitor (p = 0.008) and they preferred this display to the use of a monitor on a tower.


CONCLUSIONS
The use of flat-screen monitors is better for the physical and psychological comfort of the users, even though the technical performance is inferior in comparison with that of regular monitors.
Veelen
M A
MA
Faculty of Design, Engineering and Production, Subfaculty Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 9, 2628 BX, Delft, The Netherlands. m.a.vanveelan@io.tudelf.nl
Jakimowicz
J J
JJ
Goossens
R H M
RH
Meijer
D W
DW
Bussmann
J B J
JB
D002763:Cholecystectomy / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D016288:Computer Terminals; D006804:Ergonomics / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D020706:Laparoscopes; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D008328:Man-Machine Systems; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires