title: Maclean's rankings of health care indices in Canadian communities, 2000: comparisons and statistical contrivance.
abstract: A critical perspective is presented in regard to the 2000 regional rankings of Canadian health care indices by Maclean's magazine, June 5, 2000. This perspective is related in format to previous analyses of the Maclean's rankings of Canadian universities. Several pitfalls in the health care ranking procedures are summarized. The Maclean's data and general criteria appear conceptually reasonable, but their inconsistencies and limited range, together with problems in interpretation of rank data, do not allow them to be logically or empirically useful in the matter of health care evaluation, that is, in the manner portrayed for readers of Maclean's. Using a particular set of parameters defined as health "indicators," the rank data show gratuitously that communities better endowed with certain health services, such as those with medical schools, tend to provide higher levels of care.
authors.affiliation: University of Windsor, 401 Sunset, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Page
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Cramer
mesh_terms: D019985:Benchmarking / Q000592:standards*; D002170:Canada / Q000453:epidemiology; D002391:Catchment Area, Health; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000145:classification* / Q000592:standards; D006305:Health Status Indicators; D006801:Humans; D008402:Mass Media; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D015203:Reproducibility of Results