title: Substance versus style: a new look at social desirability in motivating contexts.
abstract: Although there is an emerging consensus that social desirability does not meaningfully affect criterion-related validity, several researchers have reaffirmed the argument that social desirability degrades the construct validity of personality measures. Yet, most research demonstrating the adverse consequences of faking for construct validity uses a fake-good instruction set. The consequence of such a manipulation is to exacerbate the effects of response distortion beyond what would be expected under realistic circumstances (e.g., an applicant setting). The research reported in this article was designed to assess these issues by using real-world contexts not influenced by artificial instructions. Results suggest that response distortion has little impact on the construct validity of personality measures used in selection contexts.
authors: Jess H. Jones Graduate School of Management and Department of Psychology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA. smithb@rice.edu
authors: D Brent
authors: DB
authors: Smith
authors: Jill E
authors: JE
authors: Ellingson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D015982:Bias; D008192:Deception; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007586:Job Application; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D010556:Personality Tests / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011594:Psychometrics; D012016:Reference Values; D012928:Social Desirability; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology