title: Hindsight bias in medicolegal expert reports.
abstract: Malpractice litigation is now a substantial cost in the provision of healthcare. Despite new attitudes of Australian courts towards medical evidence, expert reports remain the cornerstone of most medical negligence cases. There is evidence that hindsight bias, which may cause the expert to simplify, trivialise and criticise retrospectively the decisions of the treating doctor, is inevitable when the expert knows there has been an adverse outcome. If possible, outcome information should be withheld from experts providing reports. If outcome information is not withheld, courts should be made aware of the probability of hindsight bias.
authors: St Vincent's Clinic, Sydney, NSW. tbh35@hotmail.com
authors: Thomas B
authors: TB
authors: Hugh
authors: G Douglas
authors: GD
authors: Tracy
mesh_terms: D001315:Australia; D015982:Bias; D005104:Expert Testimony; D006801:Humans; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D018024:Peer Review, Health Care; D011287:Prejudice