title: [Is local anesthesia necessary for venipuncture?].
abstract: We evaluated the necessity of local anesthesia for the venipuncture pain in 27 healthy adult volunteers by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10. The pain scales were measured three times: at the time of percutaneous intravenous cannulation (20 G polyurethane catheter) without local anesthesia as well as the skin infiltration with local anesthetics (0.5% lidocaine 0.5 ml; 25 G needle), and after intravenous cannulation. The measurements were done twice, once by an expert staff and once by a novice staff with an interval of three days. VAS values were significantly higher (2.4 +/- 1.1) for the percutaneous intravenous cannulation without local anesthesia than both for the skin infiltration with local anesthetics (1.4 +/- 0.6) and for the evaluation after intravenous cannulation (0.7 +/- 0.8), independent of who inserted the catheter. VAS values were significantly lower (2.1 +/- 1.0) when the percutaneous intravenous cannulation without local anesthesia was performed by expert staff than when it was performed by novice staff (2.7 +/- 1.1; P < 0.05). We conclude that local anesthesia is necessary when novice staff performs the percutaneous intravenous catheterization.
authors: Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Ehime University School of Medicine, Ehime 791-0295.
authors: Etsuo
authors: E
authors: Tabo
authors: Ryoko
authors: R
authors: Honda
authors: Sonoko
authors: S
authors: Fujii
authors: Tatsuru
authors: T
authors: Arai
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000772:Anesthesia, Local; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010146:Pain / Q000517:prevention & control*; D018962:Phlebotomy / Q000009:adverse effects