title: Status of faculty affairs and faculty development offices in U.S. medical schools.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To collect baseline data and describe how medical schools handle faculty affairs and faculty development responsibilities.
  
  
  METHODS
  In January 2000, the authors surveyed faculty affairs designees at 125 U.S. medical schools, using a questionnaire developed in consultation with a group of faculty affairs professionals.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The responding 76 medical schools (61%) support over four times as many offices of faculty affairs as faculty development offices. Core functions of faculty affairs offices include administrative support for appointments, promotions, and tenure committees; faculty information and policies; faculty governance processes; and department chairs' recruitment support and personnel management issues.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  While a consensus is emerging about the functions of a faculty affairs office, no school has a comprehensive faculty development system, in contrast to most industries, which must be more forward-looking to compete for talent.
authors: National Center of Leadership in Academic Medicine and Hedwig van Ameringen Executive Leadership in Academic Medicine Program for Women, MCP Hahnemann University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
authors: Page S
authors: PS
authors: Morahan
authors: Jennifer S
authors: JS
authors: Gold
authors: Janet
authors: J
authors: Bickel
mesh_terms: D000288:Administrative Personnel; D005180:Faculty, Medical; D006801:Humans; D012577:Schools, Medical / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D013192:Staff Development; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States