title: [Free choice of doctors - an international comparison].
abstract: The focus of this international comparison concerning the issue of free choice among primary care physicians and specialists is to learn from experiences in other countries. Two different types of health care systems are analysed: state-administered health systems such as in Finland and Great Britain or competition-based systems such as in Switzerland and the USA. In the countries outlined mentioned and other OECD nations (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development) not described in this study, several restrictions of free choice among physicians can be observed. Restrictions are to be found when changing the general practitioner as well as in first contact to specialists. Both limitations do not seem to have a significant effect on the level of satisfaction of the population with health care in general. From an international perspective free choice of doctors seems to be an exception in health systems.
authors: Bertelsmann Stiftung, Bereich Wirtschaft, Abteilung für Wirtschafts- und Sozialpolitik. jan.boecken@bertelsmann.de
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Böcken
authors: W
authors: W
authors: Kunstmann
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Butzlaff
mesh_terms: D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D005060:Europe; D020793:Gatekeeping; D006801:Humans; D009313:National Health Programs; D020403:Patient Freedom of Choice Laws; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D014481:United States