Amplification of screening sensitivity through selective destruction: theory and screening of a library of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.
A new method for identifying enzyme inhibitors is to conduct their synthesis in the presence of the targeted enzyme. Good inhibitors form in larger amounts than poorer ones because the binding either speeds up synthesis (target-accelerated synthesis) or shifts the synthesis equilibrium (dynamic combinatorial libraries). Several groups have successfully demonstrated this approach with simple systems, but application to larger libraries is challenging because of the need to accurately measure the amount of each inhibitor. In this report, we dramatically simplify this analysis by adding a reaction that destroys the unbound inhibitors. This works similar to a kinetic resolution, with the best inhibitor being the last one remaining. We demonstrate this method for a static library of several sulfonamide inhibitors of carbonic anhydrase. Four sulfonamide-containing dipeptides, EtOC-Phe(sa)-Phe (4a), EtOC-Phe(sa)-Gly (4b), EtOC-Phe(sa)-Leu (4c) and EtOC-Phe(sa)-Pro (4d), were prepared and their inhibition constants measured. These inhibitors migrated to the carbonic anhydrase compartment of a two-compartment vessel. Although higher concentrations of the better inhibitors were observed in the carbonic anhydrase compartment, the concentration differences were small (1.83:1.71:1.54:1.46:1 for 4a:4b:4c:4d:5, where 5 is a noninhibiting dipeptide EtOC-Phe-Phe). Addition of a protease rapidly cleaved the weaker inhibitors (4d and 5). Intermediate inhibitor 4c was cleaved at a slower rate, and at the end of the reaction, only 4a and 4b remained. In a separate experiment, the ratio of 4a to 4b was found to increase over time to a final ratio of nearly 4:1. This is greater than the ratio of their inhibition constants (approximately 2:1). The theoretical model predicts that these ratios would increase even further as the destruction proceeds. This removal of poorer inhibitors simplifies identification of the best inhibitor in a complex mixture.
Cheeseman
Jeremy D
JD
Department of Chemistry, McGill University, 801 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6, Canada.
Corbett
Andrew D
AD
Shu
Ronghua
R
Croteau
Jonathan
J
Gleason
James L
JL
Kazlauskas
Romas J
RJ
D001667:Binding, Competitive; D002257:Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism / Q000494:pharmacology*; D002256:Carbonic Anhydrases / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D020650:Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques; D004151:Dipeptides / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism / Q000494:pharmacology*; D004353:Drug Evaluation, Preclinical / Q000379:methods*; D010450:Endopeptidases / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D007700:Kinetics; D010649:Phenylalanine / Q000031:analogs & derivatives; D013449:Sulfonamides / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism / Q000494:pharmacology*
D002257:Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors; D004151:Dipeptides; D013449:Sulfonamides; D010649:Phenylalanine; D010450:Endopeptidases; D002256:Carbonic Anhydrases