Scientist and policy-maker response types and times in suburban watersheds.
Differences between scientist and policy-maker response types and times, or the "how" and "when" of action, constrain effective water resource management in suburbanizing watersheds. Policy-makers are often rushed to find a single policy that can be applied across an entire, homogeneous, geopolitical region, whereas scientists undertake multiyear research projects to appreciate the complex interactions occurring within heterogeneous catchments. As a result, watershed management is often practiced with science and policy out of synch. Meanwhile, development pressures in suburban watersheds create changes in the social and physical fabric and pose a moving target for science and policy. Recent and anticipated advances in the scientific understanding of urbanized catchment hydrology and pollutant transport suggest that management should become increasingly sensitive to spatial heterogeneities in watershed features, such as soil types, terrain slopes, and seasonal watertable profiles. Toward this end, policy-makers should encourage funding scientific research that characterizes the impacts of these watershed heterogeneities within a geopolitical zoning and development framework.
Wolosoff
Steven E
SE
Program in Hydrologic Science, SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry, 211 Marshall Hall, 1 Forestry Dr., Syracuse, New York 13210-2778, USA. swolosof@syr.edu
Endreny
Theodore A
TA
D002947:Cities; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D005843:Geography; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D011050:Policy Making; D011057:Politics; D011640:Public Policy; D012586:Science; D014872:Water Movements; D014881:Water Supply