The house economist and the eating paradox.
An important observation of the experiments of George Collier is that animals normally prefer to maintain their body weight by eating a large number of small meals each day. However, as the effort to obtain access to food increases, the animals adapt by changing to a schedule of eating a small number of large meals each day. A strong implication of this is that there is a hidden cost to eating large meals, and this is the basis of the eating paradox that states that although food is a necessary commodity, the act of ingesting it poses certain metabolic problems for animals. Experiments on cephalic insulin secretion, conditioned insulin secretion and meal feeding are discussed to make the point that the economy demonstrated by rats in Collier's paradigm is dictated in part by predictions of the eating paradox.
Woods
Stephen C
SC
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA. steve.woods@psychiatry.uc.edu
D000818:Animals; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology; D004435:Eating; D004734:Energy Metabolism; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005502:Food; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006943:Hyperglycemia / Q000266:history; D007328:Insulin / Q000266:history / Q000378:metabolism; D000078790:Insulin Secretion; D051381:Rats
D007328:Insulin