Mixing location-irrelevant and location-relevant trials: influence of stimulus mode on spatial compatibility effects.
The performance advantage for spatially compatible mappings of physical locations to keypress responses, relative to incompatible mappings, is eliminated when stimulus color, rather than location, is relevant on half of the trials. In Experiment 1, we compared the effects of mixing for different stimulus modes (physical locations, arrow directions, and location words) to determine whether this elimination of the stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) effect would generalize to other stimulus modes. The SRC effect was unaffected when the location information was conveyed by arrows and was amplified when the location information was conveyed by words. In Experiment 2, we used vocal left-right responses instead of keypresses, and the SRC effects for all three stimulus modes were enhanced by mixing. In both experiments, for all stimulus modes, mixing reduced or reversed correspondence effects for trials on which the location information was irrelevant when the mapping for those trials on which it was relevant was incompatible. These findings suggest that when trial types are mixed, direct activation of the corresponding response, regardless of mapping, does not occur for physical locations mapped to keypresses. However, such activation does occur when stimuli or responses are verbal, apparently because performance is mediated in part by activation of a verbal name code for the stimulus.
Proctor
Robert W
RW
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1364, USA. proctor@psych.purdue.edu
Vu
Kim-Phuong L
KP
D006801:Humans; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011930:Reaction Time; D013028:Space Perception; D014825:Vocabulary