title: Effects of nutrient supply and dietary bulk on O2 uptake and nutrient net fluxes across rumen, mesenteric- and portal-drained viscera in ewes.
abstract: We assessed the effects of nutrient supply and dietary bulk, both increasing with hay intake, on O2 uptake and nutrient net fluxes across the portal-(PDV) and mesenteric- (MDV) drained viscera, and the rumen in adult ewes. Four ewes, fitted with a ruminal cannula, with catheters in the mesenteric artery, the portal, mesenteric and right ruminal veins, and with a blood flow probe around the right ruminal artery, were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square design. Treatments consisted of 500 g DM/d hay (LL, low bulk and low nutrient supply), 500 g DM/d hay + infused nutrients (LH, low bulk and high nutrient supply), 750 g DM/d hay + infused nutrients (MH, medium bulk and high nutrient supply), and 1,000 g DM/d hay (HH, high bulk and high nutrient supply). Infused nutrients consisted of volatile fatty acids (VFA) and casein dissolved in salts and infused continuously in the rumen to provide the same amount of metabolizable energy (7.6 MJ/d) and digestible protein (63 g/d) for LH, MH, and HH. Both increases in bulk and nutrient supply increased O2 uptake in the MDV and PDV. Dietary bulk stimulated mainly blood flow, whereas nutrient supply stimulated mainly O2 extraction rate. The O2 uptake by the rumen was not significantly affected by hay intake, although blood flow increased due to nutrient supply. Increase in hay intake had no effects on portal net release of lactate and net uptake of glucose but increased VFA, 3-D-hydroxybutyrate, ammonia, and amino acids (AA) net release and urea net uptake across PDV. The increase in portal nutrient net fluxes with hay intake was entirely related to the increase of nutrient supply for VFA, 3-D-hydroxybutyrate, ammonia, and urea, irrespective of the amount of casein infused for AA. Dietary bulk had no effect on total energy net release in the portal vein. We conclude that despite the increase in portal O2 uptake, increasing dietary bulk had no significant impact on portal recovery of energy. In ruminal tissues, which were the main site of energy absorption, O2 uptake appeared low and was not sensitive to dietary manipulation. In contrast, in mesenteric tissues, which contribute poorly to energy absorption with forage diets, O2 uptake appeared high and very sensitive to dietary manipulation.
authors.affiliation: Unité de Recherches sur les Herbivores, INRA de Theix, St Genès Champanelle, France.
authors.forename: X T
authors.initials: XT
authors.lastname: Han
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Nozière
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Rémond
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Chabrot
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Doreau
mesh_terms: D000042:Absorption; D000821:Animal Feed; D000824:Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; D000818:Animals; D005260:Female; D008102:Liver Circulation / Q000502:physiology; D010101:Oxygen Consumption / Q000502:physiology*; D011168:Portal System / Q000502:physiology; D011897:Random Allocation; D012039:Regional Blood Flow; D012417:Rumen / Q000378:metabolism*; D012756:Sheep / Q000378:metabolism*; D013152:Splanchnic Circulation / Q000502:physiology; D014781:Viscera / Q000098:blood supply / Q000378:metabolism*