Perceptions of Canadian dental faculty and students about appropriate penalties for academic dishonesty.
The purpose of this investigation was to a) compare the opinions of Canadian faculty and students as regards to what they felt was an appropriate penalty for particular academic offenses and b) to analyze the results and create a jurisprudence grid to serve as a guideline for appropriate disciplinary action. Two hundred questionnaires were distributed to the ten dental colleges in Canada. Each college was asked to have ten faculty and ten students complete the survey. A response rate of 100 percent was achieved for students and 92 percent for faculty. The questionnaire required respondents to select what they felt were appropriate penalties for a list of fifteen academic offenses and to render judgment on three specific cases. Statistical analysis of survey responses led to the following conclusions: 1) students gave equal or more lenient penalties than faculty for the same offense; 2) extenuating circumstances introduced via case presentations altered penalty choice only slightly; and 3) offenses could be grouped to correspond with appropriate penalties, thereby establishing a jurisprudence grid that may serve as a guideline for adjudication committees.
Teplitsky
Paul E
PE
Department of Community and Clinical Dentistry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. teplitsky@sask.usask.ca
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002170:Canada; D008192:Deception; D005179:Faculty, Dental; D005607:Fraud; D006801:Humans; D015714:Plagiarism; D028743:Professional Misconduct; D011678:Punishment / Q000523:psychology*; D017406:Sexual Harassment; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D013335:Students, Dental / Q000523:psychology* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013800:Theft