Loop diathermy excision compared with cervical laser vaporisation for the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone and laser vaporisation are equally effective in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.


METHODS
Randomised controlled trial.


METHODS
Women referred for evaluation of cytological abnormality who were considered suitable for outpatient local destructive treatment.


METHODS
Seven colposcopy units in the North West Region.


METHODS
Loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone and laser vaporisation.


METHODS
Smear reported as moderate dyskariosis or worse following treatment.


RESULTS
Of 289 women randomised, 285 had one or more smears following treatment. Women were more likely to have a smear reported as moderate dyskariosis or worse following laser vaporisation [hazard ratio 3.01 (95% CI 1.27 to 7.12)]. The cumulative risk of a smear reported as moderate dyskariosis or worse was 6.0% at six months and 12.1% at three years in those allocated laser vaporisation, and 2.0% at six months, and 3.3% at three years in those allocated loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone.


CONCLUSIONS
Loop diathermy excision is a more effective treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia than laser vaporisation.
Dey
P
P
Centre for Cancer Epidemiology, Withington, Manchester, UK.
Gibbs
A
A
Arnold
D F
DF
Saleh
N
N
Hirsch
P J
PJ
Woodman
C B J
CB
D000328:Adult; D004564:Electrocoagulation / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D053685:Laser Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D012307:Risk Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D002583:Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D014626:Vaginal Smears / Q000379:methods; D002578:Uterine Cervical Dysplasia / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*