title: A basis for bias in geographical judgments.
abstract: To determine why North Americans tend to locate European cities south of North American cities at similar latitudes (Tversky, 1981), we had observers provide bearing estimates between cities in the U.S. and Europe. Earlier research using latitude estimates of these cities has indicated that each continent has several subjective regions (Friedman & Brown, 2000a). Participants judged cities from two subjectively northern regions (Milwaukee-Munich), two subjectively southern regions (Memphis-Lisbon), and the two "crossed" regions (Albuquerque-Geneva; Minneapolis-Rome). Estimates were biased only when cities from the subjectively northern regions of North America were paired with cities from the subjectively southern region of Europe. In contrast to the view that biases are derived from distorted or aligned map-like representations, the data provide evidence that the subjective representation of global geography is principally categorical. Biases in numerical location estimates of individual cities and in bearing estimates between city pairs are derived from plausible reasoning processes operating on the same categorical representations.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. alinda@psych.ualberta.ca
authors.forename: Alinda
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Friedman
authors.forename: Norman R
authors.initials: NR
authors.lastname: Brown
authors.forename: Aaron P
authors.initials: AP
authors.lastname: McGaffey
mesh_terms: D001290:Attitude; D003071:Cognition; D005843:Geography; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment