Pubovaginal sling and pelvic prolapse repair in women with occult stress urinary incontinence: effect on postoperative emptying and voiding symptoms.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the perioperative morbidity of performing a concurrent pubovaginal sling with prolapse repair in women with occult (or potential) stress incontinence, particularly on voiding dysfunction and emptying.


METHODS
We reviewed the charts of 38 women with grade 3-4 pelvic prolapse and occult stress incontinence. All patients underwent video urodynamic testing with the prolapse unreduced and again with the prolapse reduced with a pessary or packing. The abdominal leak point pressure was determined. Appropriate surgical repair of all components of the prolapse was performed concurrently with pubovaginal sling placement. The outcomes were measured with respect to the time to spontaneous voiding, permanent urinary retention, development of stress incontinence or de novo urge incontinence, resolution of urge incontinence, and perioperative complications.


RESULTS
The mean age was 72 years, and the mean follow-up was 15 months (range 6 to 39). The mean time required before spontaneous voiding resumed without the need for catheterization was 11.8 days (range 2 to 46). No patient developed permanent urinary retention. Two (9.5%) of 21 women without preoperative urge incontinence developed de novo urge incontinence. However, existing urge incontinence resolved in 45%. One woman developed a suprapubic wound infection, which resolved with conservative management. Stress incontinence occurred in 2 women (7%) at 4 and 19 months postoperatively. Clinically significant prolapse (uterine) developed in 1 patient 2 years after surgery.


CONCLUSIONS
Simultaneous pubovaginal sling placement for women with occult stress incontinence undergoing repair of a large pelvic prolapse is effective in preventing postoperative stress incontinence and has little negative effect on postoperative bladder emptying. It should be considered in all women with occult stress incontinence undergoing prolapse repair.
Barnes
Nathalie M
NM
Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.
Dmochowski
Roger R
RR
Park
Royal
R
Nitti
Victor W
VW
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology; D011630:Pubic Bone; D014550:Urinary Incontinence, Stress / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery*; D014596:Uterine Prolapse / Q000601:surgery*; D014621:Vagina / Q000601:surgery*