title: [Evaluation of the management of blunt renal trauma and indication for surgery].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Appropriate management of renal trauma is still controversial. Many of the patients have minor injuries and conservative treatment can achieve excellent outcomes without any complications. For major injuries of deep lacerations or ruptures, we have been performing early surgical treatment to salvage the kidney in the selected cases after the precise evaluation of the injury. To obtain the optimal management options, we evaluated the clinical results of our procedures.
  
  
  METHODS
  We conducted a retrospective study, which included 106 cases of blunt renal trauma with evident etiology over the past 22 years and 9 months. The severity of the injury was evaluated mainly by CT scanning. The indication of renal exploration included persistent renal bleeding, large hematoma around the kidney, dislocated fragments, nonviable tissue, massive urinary extravasation and vascular injury. With the patients who required an operation, we first controlled the bleeding by clamping the hilar vessels. Then, the final decision whether to repair or remove the kidney was made based on the direct inspection of the injured kidney after the complete removal of the hematoma. The severity of renal trauma was classified by the classifications found in The Organ Injury Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Sixty-three patients were managed conservatively without any interventions, while 22 surgical repairs and 21 nephrectomies were performed. Of the 63 patients, 35 patients (81.4%) were operated on within 2 days after the injury. Judging from systolic blood pressure, red cell count, blood loss during surgery and transfusion requirements, surgically treated patients were more severely injured than conservatively treated patients. And nephrectomized patients than surgically repaired patients. All the surgically repaired cases were confirmed to have preserved renal functions postoperatively. In all of the 50 patients with Grade I injuries, conservative treatment was successful. Eight out of the 19 Grade II and III cases, who were indicated for kidney exploration because of multiple lacerations or considerable bleeding, were also successfully repaired. Localized hematoma with no urine leakage, even when it was large, settled spontaneously without complication. For the 37 Grade IV and V injuries, including 4 cases with hilar injuries, we implemented conservative procedures on 2 patients, surgical repair on 14 patients and nephrectomy on 21 patients. In the conservatively treated cases, one deep laceration with relatively large, but localized, hematoma, and minimal urine extravasation healed spontaneously. Atrophy of the segment and hypertension developed in the other ruptured kidney with dislocated fragments, large hematoma and urine leakage. This kidney, which also required later surgical exploration, did have good parenchymal blood flow. Hilar injury cases were all resulted in nephrectomy.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In most of our cases the indication for surgical exploration or nephrectomy based on our criteria seemed to be properly decided. Several cases, though, might have received overtreatment. Recent advances in evaluations and strategies of renal trauma have decreased the need for surgical exploration. This may have overreached the indication for conservative management. Severely injured kidneys may be managed conservatively because in most cases bleeding settles after the full formation of large hematoma within the Gerota's fascia. In such cases, though, no one can predict whether the injury will heal spontaneously or not, and, moreover, whether a complication will develop or not. We think that the optimal management of the patient requires an accurate evaluation of the injured kidney. Therefore the indication for surgical exploration should be made based on the degree of the injury.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Kinki University School of Medicine.
authors.forename: Takeshi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Matsuura
authors.forename: Kazuhiro
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Nose
authors.forename: Hideo
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Tahara
authors.forename: Yasushi
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Hara
authors.forename: Naoya
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Amasaki
authors.forename: Tsukasa
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Nishioka
authors.forename: Atsunobu
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Esa
authors.forename: Seiji
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kunikata
authors.forename: Takahiro
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Akiyama
authors.forename: Takashi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Kurita
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D019468:Disease Management; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007668:Kidney / Q000293:injuries* / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D015599:Trauma Severity Indices; D014949:Wounds, Nonpenetrating / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*