Primate limb bones and locomotor types in arboreal or terrestrial environments.
Postcranial limb bones were compared among primates of different locomotor types. Seventy-one primate species, in which all families of primates were included, were grouped into nine locomotor types. Osteometrical data on long bones and data on the cross-sectional geometry of the humerus and the femur were studied by means of allometric analysis and principal component analysis. Relatively robust forelimb bones were observed in the primate group which adopted the relatively terrestrial locomotor type compared with the group that adopted the arboreal locomotor type. The difference resembled the previously reported comparison between terrestrial and arboreal groups among all quadrupedal mammals. The degree of arboreality in daily life is connected with the degree of hindlimb dominance, or the ratio of force applied to the fore- and hindlimb in positional behaviour and also with the shape, size and robusticity of limb bones.
Kimura
Tasuku
T
Division of Anthropology, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo. kimura@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
D000818:Animals; D001824:Body Constitution / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology; D005360:Fibula / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology; D006811:Humerus / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology; D016014:Linear Models; D008124:Locomotion / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D011323:Primates / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000145:classification / Q000502:physiology*; D025341:Principal Component Analysis; D011884:Radius / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology; D013977:Tibia / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology; D014457:Ulna / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology