title: Effect of a fluoride-releasing self-etch acidic primer on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
abstract: Conventional adhesive systems use three different agents--an enamel conditioner, a primer solution, and an adhesive resin--during the bonding of orthodontic brackets to enamel. A unique characteristic of some new bonding systems in operative dentistry is that they combine the conditioning and priming agents into a single application. Combining conditioning and priming saves time and should be more cost-effective to the clinician and indirectly to the patient. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the effects of self-etching primers, including a fluoride-releasing primer, on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. The brackets were bonded to extracted human teeth according to one of four protocols. In group 1 (control), teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric acid; after the sealant was applied, the brackets were bonded with Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) and light cured for 20 seconds. In group 2, a self-etch acidic primer (3M ESPE, St Paul, Minn) was applied as suggested by the manufacturer, and the brackets were then bonded with Transbond XT as in the first group. In group 3, an experimental self-etch primer EXL #547 (3M ESPE) was applied to the teeth as suggested by the manufacturer, and the brackets were then bonded as in groups 1 and 2. In group 4, a fluoride-releasing self-etch primer, One-Up Bond F (J. Mortia, USA Inc. Irvine, Calif) that also has a novel dye-sensitized photo polymerization initiator system was applied as suggested by the manufacturer, and the brackets were then bonded as in the other groups. The present in vitro findings indicated that the shear bond strengths of the four groups were significantly different (P = .001). Duncan multiple range tests indicated that One-Up Bond F (mean +/- SD strength, 5.1+/-2.5 MPa) and Prompt L-Pop (strength, 7.1+/-4.4 MPa) had significantly lower shear bond strengths than both the EXL #547 self-etch primer (strength, 9.7+/-3.7 MPa) or the phosphoric acid etch and the conventional adhesive system (strength, 10.4+/-2.8 MPa).
authors.affiliation: Orthodontic Department, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA. karla-stsarkovich@uiowa.edu
authors.forename: Samir E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Bishara
authors.forename: Raed
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ajlouni
authors.forename: John F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Laffoon
authors.forename: John J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Warren
mesh_terms: D000134:Acid Etching, Dental / Q000379:methods; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003738:Dental Cements; D005460:Fluorides, Topical / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D006801:Humans; D008689:Methacrylates; D009943:Organophosphorus Compounds; D016910:Orthodontic Brackets; D019279:Resin Cements; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric
chemical_list: D003738:Dental Cements; C466203:EXL 547 Self-Etch Primer; D005460:Fluorides, Topical; D008689:Methacrylates; C446260:One-Up-Bond F; D009943:Organophosphorus Compounds; C408584:Prompt L-Pop; D019279:Resin Cements; C065742:Transbond; D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate