[Quality of manuscript evaluation in Gaceta Sanitaria].
OBJECTIVE
To describe strengths and weaknesses of peer reviews of manuscripts received in Gaceta Sanitaria in order to guide reviewers selection, to improve quality of peer reviews and to establish an internal system to be incorporated to the editorial process of handling manuscripts.


METHODS
100 peer reviews of 55 manuscripts received during 2000 and 2001 were included. A questionnaire containing closed questions assessing specific and general components of reviews' quality was applied (answers Yes/No or on a 5-points scale). Descriptive and correlation analyses were performed for the different items in the questionnaire. An Index of Quality was obtained by adding the ratings on the items in the questionnaire measuring specific quality components.


RESULTS
Peer reviews were rated high regarding completeness of the forms for reviewers (84%), constructiveness of the comments (reviews over 3: 63%), identification of the strengths and weaknesses of the method (reviews over 3: 59%) and substantiation of the reviewer comments (reviews over 3: 58%). Assessment of the manuscript's relevance (reviews over 3: 40%) or originality (reviews over 3: 35%) were less frequent.


CONCLUSIONS
Quality of peer reviews in Gaceta Sanitaria is good. Some weaknesses in the reviews have been pointed out. It is possible to establish a systematic process for assessing peer reviewers using simple indicators such as general utility of the review for the editorial decision and general quality of the review.
García
A M
AM
Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Bromatología, Toxicología y Medicina Legal, Universitat de Valencia, Spain. anagar@uv.es
Plasència
A
A
Fernández
E
E
D015706:Bibliometrics; D008374:Manuscripts, Medical as Topic; D010380:Peer Review; D011643:Publishing / Q000592:standards*; D011786:Quality Control; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
La calidad de las evaluaciones de manuscritos en Gaceta Sanitaria.