A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and neurophysiological studies in the assessment of cervical radiculopathy.
Neurophysiological studies (NPS) are often used by both neurosurgeons and neurologists to supplement neuroimaging findings in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy and in operative decision-making. The aim of this study was to assess whether nerve conduction and electromyographic studies added significant information to that obtained from high resolution MRI to warrant routine use. Over the 10-year period (1991-2001), we identified 48 patients who underwent both preoperative NPS and MRI for cervical radiculopathy. Sensitivity of MRI and NPS for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy was 93 and 42%, respectively. Whilst the positive predictive values for MRI and NPS were similar (91% versus 86%), the former had a higher negative predictive value (25% versus 7%). In only one case was the decision to operate based on NPS despite a negative MRI. We therefore suggest that in patients with clinical and MRI evidence of cervical radiculopathy, NPS has limited additional diagnostic value.
Ashkan
K
K
Department of Neurosurgery, Atkinson Morley's Hospital, London, UK. kashkan@btinternet.com
Johnston
P
P
Moore
A J
AJ
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D004576:Electromyography; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009333:Neck; D009431:Neural Conduction; D011379:Prognosis; D011843:Radiculopathy / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000601:surgery; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013126:Spinal Nerve Roots / Q000503:physiopathology