Motor distal component and pragmatic representation of objects.
In this study, we tested whether in certain experimental conditions the distal and proximal motor components may dissociate in action imitation, and how the distal component and the object representation may interact. Experiments 1-3 were carried out using a dual task procedure in which an action span and a motor suppression were coupled. In Experiment 1, it was shown that action spans were affected more by a distal movement (e.g. distal motor suppression) than by a proximal movement (proximal motor suppression). In Experiment 2, it was demonstrated that the reduction of the action spans was not due to the distal motor suppression being more difficult than the proximal motor suppression. In Experiment 3, pantomimes were replaced with the corresponding objects and the participants were asked to mime the objects, reproducing the appropriate actions. During the presentation of the objects, the participants were engaged in a motor suppression that was performed either by the hand or by the arm. The distal motor suppression reduced the pantomime span more significantly than the proximal motor suppression. Experiment 4 showed that the spans of pantomimes of objects shown in Experiment 3 are longer when participants do not perform motor suppressions. Our results suggest that in normal subjects a difference between the distal and the proximal motor component can be observed under dual task conditions and that distal motor suppression seems to interfere both with the encoding of action and with pragmatic representation of objects.
Tessari
Alessia
A
Programme in Neuroscience, Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, Via Beirut 2-4, Trieste, Italy.
Rumiati
Raffaella Ida
RI
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000502:physiology*; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*