Apical pressures developed by needles for canal irrigation.
Drying instrumented canals with pressurized air may result in patient morbidity or even fatality. Low pressure and side vent needles have been suggested to lessen the danger. This study observed apical pressures from different needles inserted deeply into small round and ovoid canals as instrumentation progressed. Low-pressure (5 psi) air was injected through the needles, and apical pressures were recorded after each instrument. Pressures varied greatly within each test group. Generalities that can be drawn are that binding the needle within the canal gives higher pressures than with the needle slightly short of binding and that pressures were higher with apexes instrumented to size 30 and higher. With the needle tightly bound, neither needle size, needle design, nor canal shape resulted in statistically significant mean pressure differences. With the needle slightly withdrawn, larger bore needles gave higher pressures than small diameter needles. Caution is advised with the clinical use of pressurized air in the drying of root canals.
Bradford
C E
CE
University of Louisville School of Dentistry, Kentucky, USA.
Eleazer
P D
PD
Downs
K E
KE
Scheetz
J P
JP
D000399:Air Pressure; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001641:Bicuspid; D003481:Cuspid; D003786:Dental Pulp Cavity / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans; D008963:Molar; D009339:Needles; D012212:Rheology; D012388:Root Canal Irrigants / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D018915:Root Canal Preparation / Q000295:instrumentation*; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D013499:Surface Properties; D019227:Tooth Apex / Q000502:physiology*
D012388:Root Canal Irrigants