title: Separating sensitivity from response bias: implications of comparisons of yes-no and forced-choice tests for models and measures of recognition memory.
abstract: A fundamental challenge to psychological research is the measurement of cognitive processes uncontaminated by response strategies resulting from different testing procedures. Test-free estimates of ability are vital when comparing the performance of different groups or different conditions. The current study applied several sets of measurement models to both forced-choice and yes-no recognition memory tests and concluded that the traditional signal-detection model resulted in distorted estimates of accuracy. Two-factor models were necessary to separate memory sensitivity from response bias. These models indicated that (a) memory accuracy did not differ across the tests and (b) the tests relied on the same underlying memory processes. The results illustrate the pitfalls of using a single-component model to measure accuracy in tasks that reflect 2 or more underlying processes.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis 95616, USA. neakroll@ucdavis.edu
authors.forename: Neal E A
authors.initials: NE
authors.lastname: Kroll
authors.forename: Andrew P
authors.initials: AP
authors.lastname: Yonelinas
authors.forename: Ian G
authors.initials: IG
authors.lastname: Dobbins
authors.forename: Christina M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Frederick
mesh_terms: D002755:Choice Behavior; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory; D012372:ROC Curve; D011897:Random Allocation; D011930:Reaction Time; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014705:Verbal Behavior