title: Macroinvertebrate and fish populations in a restored impounded salt marsh 21 years after the reestablishment of tidal flooding.
abstract: During the last two decades, the State of Connecticut has restored tidal flow to many impounded salt marshes. One of the first of these and the one most extensively studied is Impoundment One in the Barn Island Wildlife Management Area in Stonington, Connecticut. In 1990, twelve years after the re-establishment of tidal flooding, the density of the marsh snail Melampus bidentatus, the numerically dominant macroinvertebrate of the high marsh, in Impoundment One was about half that in reference marshes below the breached impoundment dike. By 1999 the densities of Melampus above and below the dike were not significantly different, but the shell-free biomass was greater above the dike as a result of the somewhat larger number and size of the snails there. Twenty-one years after the renewal of tidal flooding, three marsh macroinvertebrates (the amphipods Orchestia grillus and Uhlorchestia spartinophila and the mussel Geukensia demissa) were significantly less abundant in the previously impounded marsh than in the reference marshes, whereas another amphipod (Gammarus palustris) was more abundant above the breached dike where conditions appeared to be somewhat wetter. In 1991 the fish assemblage in a mosquito-control ditch in Impoundment One was similar to that in a ditch below the breached dike; however, the common mummichog Fundulus heteroclitus appeared to be less abundant in the restoring marsh. By 1999 the number of mummichogs caught in ditches was significantly greater in Impoundment One than in the reference marsh, but the numbers of mummichogs trapped along the tidal creek were comparable above and below the dike. The results obtained in this study and those of other restoring marshes at Barn Island indicate the full recovery of certain animal populations following the reintroduction of tidal flow to impounded marshes may require up to two or more decades. Furthermore, not only do different species recover at different rates on a single marsh, but the time required for the recovery of a particular species may vary widely from marsh to marsh, often independently of other species.
authors.affiliation: Department of Zoology, Goodwin-Niering Center for Conservation Biology and Environmental Studies, Connecticut College, New London 06320, USA.
authors.forename: Varun
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Swamy
authors.forename: Paul E
authors.initials: PE
authors.lastname: Fell
authors.forename: Misha
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Body
authors.forename: Michael B
authors.initials: MB
authors.lastname: Keaney
authors.forename: Mawuli K
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Nyaku
authors.forename: Elizabeth C
authors.initials: EC
authors.lastname: McIlvain
authors.forename: Alice L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Keen
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D003445:Crustacea; D017753:Ecosystem; D004738:Engineering; D004784:Environmental Monitoring; D020387:Food Chain; D023781:Fundulidae; D011157:Population Dynamics; D012908:Snails; D013997:Time Factors; D014872:Water Movements