From apes to humans: locomotion as a key feature for phylogeny.
If bipedalism has often been considered to be of a crucial interest for understanding hominid evolution, the acceptance of locomotor features to build phylogenies is still far from being a reality in the field. Especially for hominid evolution, it still seems to be difficult to accept that traits, other than craniodental ones, can be useful for defining the major dichotomies. The recent discovery of Australopithecus anamensis suggests a challenging view of the major dichotomy between apes and humans. Whilst it is widely accepted that Ardipithecus ramidus is ancestral to Australopithecus anamensis, which in its turn is ancestral to Australopithecus afarensis and then to later hominids, the postcranial adaptations, which should be taken into account, suggest another branching pattern. Based on the fact that by 4.0 million years two different locomotor patterns can be identified in hominids, two lineages would appear to be present: the "Australopithecine" lineage (with Australopithecus afarensis or Ardipithecus ramidus if the latter is really a hominid sensu stricto) and the "Hominine" lineage (with Australopithecus anamensis = Praeanthropus africanus).
Senut
Brigitte
B
Laboratoire de Paléontologie du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR 8569 et GDR 983 CNRS, 8, rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France.
D000818:Animals; D005580:Fossils; D015186:Hominidae / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000145:classification / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008124:Locomotion / Q000502:physiology*; D010802:Phylogeny; D012886:Skull / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D014070:Tooth / Q000033:anatomy & histology