Antimicrobial susceptibility of udder pathogens isolated from dairy herds in the west littoral region of Uruguay.
A total of 522 strains belonging to streptococci, enterococci and staphylococci isolated from sub-clinical and clinical cases of bovine mastitis from the west littoral region of Uruguay were analysed for their susceptibility to several antimicrobial agents. The susceptibility patterns were studied by agar disk diffusion methods (ADDM) and broth micro-dilution to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The concentration that inhibits 90% (MIC90) of the analysed strains reported in micrograms per millilitre, for Staphylococcus aureus were > 8, 8, < or = 0.5, < or = 4, < or = 1, < or = 0.5, > 64, < or = 0.25, 0.5, < or = 1 and < or = 1 to penicillin, ampicillin, oxacillin, cephalotin, gentamicin, erythromycin, oxitetracycline, enrofloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, neomycin, and clindamycin, respectively. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) had different values for penicillin (4) and ampicillin (2), while the other antimicrobial agents had the same MIC90 values as reported for S. aureus. The MIC90 values for streptococci were 0.12, 0.25, < or = 4, 16, < or = 0.25, 0.5, 0.25 for penicillin, ampicillin, cephalotin, gentamicin, erythromycin, oxytetracycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, whereas MIC90 for enterococci were 4, 4, 4, < or = 0.5, 2, > 8 for penicillin, ampicillin, gentamicin, erythromycin, oxytetracycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, respectively. Of 336 strains of S. aureus, 160 (47.6%) were resistant to penicillin. For 41 CNS strains, 10 (27%) presented penicillin-resistance. All the streptococcal strains were susceptible to penicillin, while 3 (7%) of the 43 enteroccocal strains were resistant. Non significant statistical differences were found between the results obtained by ADDM and broth micro-dilution for classifying bacterial isolates as susceptible or resistant according to the National Committee of Clinical Laboratory Standards.
Gianneechini
R E
RE
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Concha
C
C
Franklin
A
A
D000818:Animals; D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000494:pharmacology* / Q000627:therapeutic use; D002417:Cattle; D004352:Drug Resistance, Microbial; D016983:Enterococcus / Q000187:drug effects; D004917:Erythromycin / Q000494:pharmacology; D005260:Female; D006094:Gram-Positive Bacteria / Q000187:drug effects*; D008414:Mastitis, Bovine / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000382:microbiology*; D008826:Microbial Sensitivity Tests / Q000662:veterinary; D010406:Penicillins / Q000494:pharmacology; D013210:Staphylococcus / Q000187:drug effects; D013291:Streptococcus / Q000187:drug effects; D014583:Uruguay / Q000453:epidemiology
D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D010406:Penicillins; D004917:Erythromycin