Improving access to the international coverage of reports of controlled trials in electronic databases: a search of the Australasian Medical Index.
BACKGROUND
Locating reports of trials from journals not indexed in the major databases presents difficulties to systematic reviewers, and may be a factor in improving the reliability of the reviews.


OBJECTIVE
To identify and make available reports of controlled trials from the Australasian Medical Index (AMI). To measure the quality of indexing of trials in AMI.


METHODS
Using a highly sensitive search strategy consisting of methodology indexing and free-text terms, records from AMI were read for reports of controlled trials. Trials meeting the criteria were submitted for inclusion in The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR) and assessed for the quality of their indexing.


RESULTS
3621 records were downloaded, of which 512 were identified as reports of controlled trials (317 RCTs; 195 CCTs) and submitted to CCTR. The precision of methodology indexing terms was 60%, but sensitivity just 18%. The quality of indexing of trials was generally poor with only 50 tagged with the RCT/CCT publication type term. 453 reports (88%) were not previously available in CCTR.


CONCLUSIONS
The large proportion of trials found to be unique to the AMI database increases the pool of studies available to systematic reviewers, and helps ensure CCTR remains the most comprehensive source of trials.
McDonald
Steve
S
Australasian Cochrane Centre, Monash Institute of Health Services, Research, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia. steve.mcdonald@med.monash.edu.au
D000043:Abstracting and Indexing / Q000592:standards; D001315:Australia; D018849:Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; D016206:Databases, Bibliographic; D006801:Humans; D016247:Information Storage and Retrieval; D009520:New Zealand; D017594:Publication Bias; D011786:Quality Control; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012042:Registries