Four observations about "Six Domains of Research Ethics".
Stimulated by Kenneth Pimple's "Six Domains of Research Ethic", this paper examines four aspects of the responsible conduct of research and scientists' social responsibilities. I argue that scholars and decision-makers concerned with the responsible conduct of research should take notice of the rapidly growing body of scholarship on the social organization of science and the behavior of scientists, integrating that work with ethical principles. Of particular concern are the increasing heterogeneity and interdisciplinary of research, the ambivalences in the practice of peer review, the social tensions of research life, and the heightened concern for social and economic returns from federal research investments. In all, the paper echoes and develops Pimple's call for integrative thinking about the responsible conduct of research.
Hackett
Edward J
EJ
Department of Sociology, Arizona State University, Box 872101, Tempe, AZ 85287-2101, USA. ehackett@asu.edu
D004995:Ethics, Professional; D006801:Humans; D010380:Peer Review / Q000379:methods; D012106:Research / Q000592:standards*; D012107:Research Design; D012941:Social Responsibility