title: Retrospective audit of different antenatal screening policies for Down's syndrome in eight district general hospitals in one health region.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the effectiveness of different screening policies for the antenatal detection of Down's syndrome.
  
  
  METHODS
  Retrospective six year survey.
  
  
  METHODS
  Maternity units of eight districts.
  
  
  METHODS
  Women who completed their pregnancies between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1999 (155 501 deliveries).
  
  
  METHODS
  Cases of Down's syndrome identified before 24 weeks' gestation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  335 cases of Down's syndrome were identified, 323 in continuing pregnancies or liveborn children. Of these, 171 were identified antenatally. Seven different screening policies were used, in three principal groups: serum screening offered to all mothers, maternal age with serum screening or nuchal translucency available to limited groups, and maternal age combined with anomaly scans. The districts that used serum screening detected 57%, those using maternal age plus serum or nuchal translucency screening 52%, and those using a maternal age of > or =35 and anomaly scans detected 54%. The least successful district, which offered amniocentesis only to women aged over 37 years, detected only 31%. If amniocentesis had been offered from 35 years, as in all other districts, the detection rate would have risen to 54%. Across the region 15% (range 12-20%) of pregnant women were 35 years or more at delivery, and 58% (33-69%) of infants with Down's syndrome were born to women in this age range.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Current additional serum or nuchal translucency screening techniques for antenatal detection of Down's syndrome are less advantageous than previously supposed. More pregnant women were aged over 35 than has been presumed in statistical models used in demonstration projects of serum screening and, as a result, the proportion of affected fetuses in this age group is much greater than predicted.
authors.affiliation: Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton SO16 5YA. dgw@soton.ac.uk
authors.forename: Diana
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Wellesley
authors.forename: Tracy
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Boyle
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Barber
authors.forename: David T
authors.initials: DT
authors.lastname: Howe
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D004314:Down Syndrome / Q000175:diagnosis*; D004739:England; D005260:Female; D005315:Fetal Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis*; D006767:Hospitals, District / Q000458:organization & administration; D006769:Hospitals, General / Q000458:organization & administration; D006801:Humans; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D008485:Medical Audit; D011247:Pregnancy; D011296:Prenatal Diagnosis / Q000379:methods*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016216:Ultrasonography, Prenatal