title: Recognition of small stimulus screen masks using the multifocal ERG.
abstract: To evaluate the ability of the multifocal ERG (mfERG) to detect small defects in the stimulus array was the objective of this paper. Seven normal subjects had mfERGs recorded with a VERIS system. Stimulus arrays composed of 61, 103 or 241 hexagons were covered in part by small masks of different light transmittance properties. Only masks that covered at least one-half of a single 103 hexagon stimulus cell caused a significant reduction in signal. Different-shaped masks of about 5 degrees diameter were detectable using a 61-hexagon array only when they fully covered a stimulus cell. Detection was better, but marginal for some of the masks, with the 103 hexagon array. The 241 hexagon array showed sharp defects for all masks. Masking the stimulus screen is not equivalent to having a pathologic scotoma, but it demonstrates the greatest possible spatial sensitivity of the mfERG system. Thus, the mfERG appears to be able to detect small retinal lesions if they reduce local retinal function by at least 50% and correspond to at least half the area of one stimulus hexagon. Scotomas 5 degrees or smaller would be best detected using a fine (241 hexagon) stimulus array. With coarser stimulus arrays (e.g. 103 or 61 hexagons), the effect of a small scotoma depends on its location relative to the stimulus cells. These issues should be considered when selecting mfERG recording conditions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University Medical Center, CA 94305-5308, USA. marmor@stanford.edu
authors.forename: Michael F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Marmor
authors.forename: Aimee V
authors.initials: AV
authors.lastname: Chappelow
authors.forename: Guangwei
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Luo
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004596:Electroretinography / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D012160:Retina / Q000502:physiology; D012607:Scotoma / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity