title: Stem cell research: a target article collection: Part III--determining moral status.
abstract: In this chapter, I review some of the background thinking concerning matters of moral status that I had developed in previous years and that I would now bring to the work of the Human Embryo Research Panel. Two ideas were at the forefront of my thinking. First, that biology usually offers not decisive "events" but only continuous processes of development. Second, in making status determinations we do not so much "identify" a point on a developmental continuum where moral respect should be accorded as "choose" that point. These choices are "balancing decisions" in which the community of moral agents weighs its interests in protecting an entity against the burdens of doing so. After illustrating these two contentions, I consider some of the reasons why thinkers on the "right" and "left" of our bioethics debates have resisted or missed this basic insight.
authors.affiliation: Dartmouth College, USA.
authors.forename: Ronald M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Green
mesh_terms: D000028:Abortion, Induced; D026683:Advisory Committees; D033421:Beginning of Human Life; D002410:Catholicism; D033041:Embryo Research; D004622:Embryo, Mammalian; D005314:Embryonic and Fetal Development; D026689:Ethical Analysis; D005306:Fertilization; D006801:Humans; D028681:Moral Obligations; D028723:Personhood; D011640:Public Policy; D038522:Twinning, Monozygotic; D014481:United States