title: A comparison of guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia.
abstract: Although the clinical and administrative rationales for the use of guidelines in the treatment of schizophrenia are convincing, meaningful implementation has been slow. Guideline characteristics themselves influence whether implementation occurs. The authors examine three widely distributed guidelines and one set of algorithms to compare characteristics that are likely to influence implementation, including their degree of scientific rigor, comprehensiveness, and clinical applicability (ease of use, timeliness, specificity, and ease of operationalizing). The three guidelines are the Expert Consensus Guideline Series' "Treatment of Schizophrenia"; the American Psychiatric Association's "Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia"; and the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) treatment recommendations. The algorithms are those of the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP). The authors outline the strengths of each and suggest how a future guideline might build on these strengths.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry of the University of Michigan Health System BID102, UH, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0020, USA. kmilner@umich.edu
authors.forename: Karen K
authors.initials: KK
authors.lastname: Milner
authors.forename: Marcia
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Valenstein
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D012559:Schizophrenia / Q000628:therapy*