title: Informed consent in medical research.
abstract: That people should only be enrolled in medical research if they have given free and informed consent is now an unquestioned principle of research ethics. It is however a recent innovation. Prior to the prominence given to consent to participation in research in the condemnation of German doctors arraigned at Nuremberg in 1945, informed consent had appeared in American litigation, but only as an issue in clinical malpractice suits. Informed consent as an ethical requirement in medical research had arisen in some earlier European contexts. Despite the Nuremberg judgement, informed consent by participants in research was not widely recognised as ethically mandatory until the early 1970s. This delay seems to have been due in part to scepticism about the practicability of truly informed consent, but medical paternalism and the circumstances surrounding military research during the Cold War period may have contributed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Clinical Geratology, Radcliffe Infirmary, University of Oxford. john.grimleyevans@geratology.oxford.ac.uk
authors.forename: John Grimley
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Evans
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Beck
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics / Q000266:history*; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics / Q000266:history*