title: Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasty for failed osteosynthesis of intracapsular proximal femoral fractures.
abstract: We studied the outcome of 100 uncemented Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasties used as a revision procedure for failed osteosynthesis of intracapsular femoral fractures. This group was compared with 730 patients in whom an uncemented Austin-Moore prosthesis had been used as the primary treatment for an intracapsular femoral fracture. The results indicate that the study group had more pain at 1-year post-fracture. There were also significantly more revision procedures in those who had the arthroplasty performed as a salvage procedure. In general, the results of uncemented Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasty used as a revision procedure for failed osteosynthesis are inferior to that for primary hemiarthroplasty. We would advocate that for any case in which there are signs of acetabular damage a total hip replacement might be a better procedure. For the remainder, an alternative arthroplasty should be considered with an uncemented Austin-Moore prosthesis reserved for only the very frail.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedics, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Peterborough, Cambs CB2 2QQ, UK.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Roberts
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Parker
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005264:Femoral Fractures / Q000601:surgery*; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal; D006617:Hip Dislocation / Q000209:etiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology; D012086:Reoperation