Mitral inflow and mitral annular motion velocities in patients with mitral annular calcification: evaluation by pulsed Doppler echocardiography and pulsed Doppler tissue imaging.
OBJECTIVE
We evaluated the relationship between the mitral inflow velocities by pulsed Doppler echocardiography and mitral annular motion velocities by pulsed Doppler tissue imaging in patients with mitral annular calcification.


RESULTS
Fifty-three patients with mitral annular calcification were divided into two groups: severe mitral annular calcification (n=15, mitral annular calcification bigger than or equal 5mm in width) and mild mitral annular calcification (n=38, mitral annular calcification <5mm in width). In addition, 20 patients with hypertensive heart disease (HHD group) and mild left ventricular hypertrophy but no mitral annular calcification and 30 normal individuals (normal group) were studied. The early diastolic mitral inflow velocity (E) was higher in the severe mitral annular calcification group (0.75+/-0.26 m/s) than in the HHD and normal groups (mild mitral annular calcification, 0.65+/-0.21; HHD, 0.57+/-0.24; normal, 0.55+/-0.15m/s), and the late diastolic mitral inflow velocity (A) was higher in the severe mitral annular calcification group (1.24+/-0.23 m/s) than in the other three groups (mild mitral annular calcification, 0.96+/-0.20; HHD, 0.84+/-0.23; normal, 0.75+/-0.13 m/s). In contrast, the early and late diastolic annular velocities (Ea, Aa) were lower in the severe mitral annular calcification group (Ea: 5.7+/-2.2; Aa: 11.9+/-4.4 cm/s) than in the other three groups (Ea: mild mitral annular calcification, 8.3+/-2.5; HHD, 7.7+/-2.2; normal, 9.0+/-1.8 cm/s; Aa: mild mitral annular calcification, 14.2+/-4.1; HHD, 14.3+/-2.8; normal, 14.2+/-2.1cm/s). Mitral valve area was smaller in the severe mitral annular calcification group (2.6+/-1.0 cm(2)) than in the other three groups (mild mitral annular calcification, 3.1+/-0.7; HHD, 4.1+/-0.7; normal, 4.2+/-0.9 cm(2)). In the mitral annular calcification and normal groups, the A correlated inversely with mitral valve area (r=-0.67, P<0.01) and directly with severity of mitral annular calcification (r=0.65, P<0.01), and the Ea correlated inversely with left ventricular wall thickness (r=-0.37, P<0.01) and severity of mitral annular calcification (r=-0.45, P<0.01).


CONCLUSIONS
Patients with severe mitral annular calcification have higher mitral inflow velocities due to mitral annular restriction and lower mitral annular velocities caused by decreased mitral annular motion and abnormal left ventricular relaxation.
Soeki
T
T
Department of Cardiology and Clinical Research, National Zentsuji Hospital, Kagawa, Japan. tsoeki@jun.ncvc.go.jp
Fukuda
N
N
Shinohara
H
H
Sakabe
K
K
Onose
Y
Y
Sawada
Y
Y
Tamura
Y
Y
D000368:Aged; D001783:Blood Flow Velocity; D002114:Calcinosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000503:physiopathology*; D003326:Coronary Circulation; D018619:Echocardiography, Doppler, Pulsed; D005260:Female; D006349:Heart Valve Diseases / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000503:physiopathology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008943:Mitral Valve / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000503:physiopathology*; D009200:Myocardial Contraction; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D018617:Ultrasonography, Doppler, Pulsed