Diaphragm versus diaphragm with spermicides for contraception.
BACKGROUND
The diaphragm is usually used with a spermicide. However, some practitioners have suggested that spermicides offer no additional contraceptive protection and have advocated alternative guidelines for the use of diaphragms.


OBJECTIVE
The objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness, safety and acceptability of the diaphragm with and without spermicide.


METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, POPLINE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and reference lists of relevant articles. In addition, we contacted experts in the field to identify unpublished studies.


METHODS
Randomized controlled trials comparing women of reproductive age using the diaphragm with and without spermicide as the sole contraceptive method that reported clinical outcomes.


METHODS
Two reviewers independently extracted data on outcomes and trial characteristics and any discrepancies were resolved by consensus or by consultation with the third reviewer. The results of the one identified study are presented descriptively.


RESULTS
We identified only one study. No significant difference was found in the pregnancy rates (with typical use or consistent use) or discontinuation rates between the diaphragm-with-spermicide and diaphragm-without-spermicide groups. However, this study failed to recruit the planned number of participants and was consequently underpowered.


CONCLUSIONS
We cannot distinguish between the contraceptive effectiveness of the diaphragm with and without spermicide.
Cook
L
L
Public Health and General Practice, Christchurch School of Medicine, Christchurch, New Zealand. lynley.cook@ xtra.co.nz
Nanda
K
K
Grimes
D
D
D003267:Contraception / Q000379:methods*; D003274:Contraceptive Devices, Female; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D013089:Spermatocidal Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage*
D013089:Spermatocidal Agents