Flavor preferences conditioned by sucrose depend upon training and testing methods: two-bottle tests revisited.
In confirmation of prior work, rats given one-bottle training with flavored 5% and 30% sucrose solutions (CS5 and CS30) strongly preferred the CS5 when both flavors were presented in intermediate 17.5% sucrose solutions. The CS5 preference has been attributed to a conditioned satiety response to the CS30 flavor, but equal intakes of CS5 and CS30 in one-bottle tests did not support this view. To determine if sweetness differences between training and test solutions contributed to the CS5 preference, new rats were trained and tested with flavored 10% sucrose solutions. One flavor (CS5) was paired with matched intragastric (ig) water infusions (=net 5% solution) and another flavor (CS30) was paired with matched infusions of 50% sucrose (=net 30% solution) during one-bottle training. In two-bottle tests with both flavors paired with an intermediate infusion (25%=net 17.5%), the rats initially showed no overall preference for the CS5 or CS30. Following additional training, the rats significantly preferred the CS30 to the CS5. The intragastric data suggested that a change in sweet taste context between training and testing might have accounted for the strong CS5 preference obtained in the first experiment. This was confirmed in a third experiment in which rats were trained with flavored 5% and 30% sucrose solutions and then given two-bottle tests with both flavors presented either in 5% sucrose or 30% sucrose. Rats tested with 30% sucrose strongly preferred the CS5 flavor, whereas rats tested with 5% sucrose significantly preferred the CS30 flavor. Thus, the outcome of two-bottle flavor preference tests and presumably other tests of conditioned flavor reward may be greatly influenced by the solutions used in the tests. The impact of this variable may be greatest when the training solutions do not substantially differ in their net postingestive reinforcing actions. This appears to be the case with 5% and 30% sucrose solutions because the satiating effect of the concentrated solution tends to counteract its nutrient reinforcing action.
Sclafani
Anthony
A
Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY 11210, USA. asclafani@gc.cuny.edu
D000818:Animals; D003216:Conditioning, Operant / Q000187:drug effects*; D005260:Female; D005518:Food Preferences / Q000187:drug effects*; D007441:Intubation, Gastrointestinal; D051381:Rats; D017207:Rats, Sprague-Dawley; D012528:Satiety Response / Q000187:drug effects; D013395:Sucrose / Q000494:pharmacology*; D013649:Taste / Q000187:drug effects*
D013395:Sucrose