Comparative evaluation of the DPX and DPX-IQ lunar densitometer systems following software upgrade.
Bone densitometry research departments perform system and software upgrades infrequently in order to maintain high precision. This study compares the results obtained on a Lunar densitometer with DPX, and DPX-IQ installed to achieve year 2000 compliance. The DPX-IQ provides an improved femur edge detection algorithm with an expanded reference database. Two hundred data files for each measurement site acquired on DPX were reanalyzed on DPX-IQ. There was no change to the bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), T-scores or Z-scores for the L2-L4 spine, radius (ultradistal and 33%), and total body. There was a significant high correlation for the femoral neck BMD (r = 0.98; p < 0.05). The mean differences in BMD, BMC, T-scores, and Z-scores at the femoral neck and Ward's and trochanteric regions were not significant (p > 0.05). The limits of agreement within the 95% confidence interval for the femoral neck BMD using the Bland and Altman method was between -0.057 and 0.063 g/cm(2). This order of magnitude magnifies the long-term precision error and alters the usual confidence limits for interpretation of true change in densitometry practice. Therefore, it is important for reanalysis of DPX data files with the DPX-IQ to be performed so that longitudinal changes in BMD can be accurately assessed.
Wong
Joseph C H
JC
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Bone Densitometry, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston Road, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia. joseph.wong@mailbox.uq.edu.au
Griffiths
Matthew R
MR
D015502:Absorptiometry, Photon / Q000295:instrumentation*; D015519:Bone Density; D005269:Femur / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D006801:Humans; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000295:instrumentation*; D011884:Radius / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D012984:Software