Accounts for the N170 face-effect: a reply to Rossion, Curran, & Gauthier.
In their commentary, Rossion, Curran, and Gauthier (Rossion, B., Curran, T., Gauthier, I. (2002). A defense of the subordinate-level expertise account for the N170 component. Cognition, 85, 197-202) (RC&G) raise a series of arguments against the domain-specificity account for the N170 face-effect (Carmel, D., & Bentin, S. (2002). Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition, 83, 1-29). This effect consists of a large difference (always significant) observed in the amplitude of a negative component peaking at the lower posterior-temporal sites in response to human faces relative to many other stimulus categories. As an alternative to domain specificity, RC&G advocate a "subordinate-level expertise" account, by which the N170 effect can be obtained for any type of stimulus for the individual identification of which the perceiver is an expert. While considering some of their arguments well taken and interesting, we believe that, overall, RC&G's interpretation of our current data (as well as some of theirs) and of our position ignores several important aspects and, therefore, their critique is not persuasive.
Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91905, Israel. bentin@isc.cnrs.fr
Shlomo
S
Bentin
David
D
Carmel
D001931:Brain Mapping; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D004594:Electrophysiology; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D005145:Face; D006801:Humans; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*