Failure of direction identification for briefly presented second-order motion stimuli: evidence for weak direction selectivity of the mechanisms encoding motion.
We sought to investigate why the direction of second-order motion, unlike first-order motion, cannot be identified when the stimulus exposure duration is brief (<200 ms). In a series of experiments observers identified both the orientation (vertical or horizontal) and the direction (left, right, down or up) of a drifting sinusoidal modulation (0.93 c/ degrees ) in either the luminance (first order) or the contrast (second order) of a two-dimensional noise carrier. All motion stimuli were equated for visibility, and the duration was varied using the method of constant stimuli. Performance was measured for second-order motion over a range of drift temporal frequencies (0.63-5.04 Hz) and for first-order motion stimuli composed of two, opposite drifting modulations in luminance of unequal modulation depth. Orientation-identification performance was nearly 100% correct for both first-order and second-order motion stimuli, even at the briefest stimulus duration tested (26.49 ms). Direction identification for first-order motion was also typically good with brief presentations, but was poor for second-order motion when the exposure duration was < approximately 200 ms. Importantly increasing either the drift temporal frequency of second-order motion or the bidirectional nature of the first-order motion patterns produced comparable levels of performance for the two varieties of motion (i.e. the minimum duration required for reliable direction identification could be equated). As orientation-identification performance for the first-order and second-order motion stimuli was comparably good and minimally affected by duration, the marked differences on the direction-identification task must be specific to mechanisms that encode drift direction, rather than spatial structure. We propose that second-order motion detectors are much less selective for stimulus direction than first-order motion sensors, and thus are more susceptible to the deleterious effects of limiting stimulus duration (which introduces spurious motion in the opposite direction, particularly at low drift rates). Alternative explanations based on the delayed propagation of second-order motion signals or the temporal characteristics of the underlying motion mechanisms are not supported by our findings.
McGill Vision Research Unit, 687 Pine Avenue West, Rm. H4-14, Montreal, Que., Canada, H3A 1A1. timothy.ledgeway@nottingham.ac.uk
Timothy
T
Ledgeway
Robert F
RF
Hess
D006801:Humans; D008029:Lighting; D008297:Male; D008959:Models, Neurological; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009039:Motion Perception; D009949:Orientation; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011601:Psychophysics; D012684:Sensory Thresholds; D013997:Time Factors