Efficiency of visual selective attention is related to the type of target.
Lavie and Cox (1997, Psychological Science, 8, 395) suggested that stimuli outside the focus of attention can have more distracting effects when the task requires less attention than when it requires more. This idea provides an explanation for the proposed dissociation found between two forms of attentional control (Folk & Remington, 1998, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847). This proposal was based on a red (green) distractor that captured attention when a red (green) target was used, but not when a green (red) target was used, and the further result that, if there were no distractor, reaction times were faster than with either type of distractor. We tested whether a target that requires serial search would eliminate the dissociation. With the same targets used by Folk and Remington (ones that can be found with parallel search), we also obtained a dissociation. However, with the serial-search targets, dissociation was not found. Our interpretation is that the dissociation represents two forms of the same attentional process.
Arizona State University, 12 E. Loma Vista Drive, Tempe, AZ 85282-3574, USA. cheal@asu.edu
MaryLou
M
Cheal
Garvin
G
Chastain
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011930:Reaction Time; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis