Ethical dimensions of therapeutic human cloning.
Therapeutic human cloning has the potential significantly to reduce human suffering and enhance human happiness. This is the main ethical argument in its favour. The main ethical arguments against it centre on questions to do with the moral status of the human embryo. A subsidiary set of arguments arises from the connections between therapeutic human cloning and reproductive cloning. Most of the ethical questions concerning the status of the human embryo have long been examined in the context of abortion, though they are being re-examined in the context of genetic screening and embryo research. A consensus on such matters seems extremely unlikely to result in the near future. The current role of ethicists may not, therefore, be so much to attempt to produce a definitive answer to the question of the status of the human embryo at the very early developmental stages at which therapeutic human cloning would take place, but more to help clarify arguments and indicate the implications of particular approaches. That is what this paper seeks to do.
Institute of Education, University of London, 20 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL, UK. m.reiss@ioe.ac.uk
Michael J
MJ
Reiss
D019976:Cloning, Organism; D026689:Ethical Analysis / Q000379:methods; D028663:Ethical Theory; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005060:Europe; D016332:Fetal Tissue Transplantation; D015316:Genetic Therapy; D018380:Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D019172:Transplantation Conditioning