Encoding of sound motion by binaural brainstem units in a Horseshoe bat.
In order to study how and if single brainstem units respond to moving compared with stationary sounds, radially moving sound sources were presented to the bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. This time-variant binaural stimulation was simulated dichotically through earphones (closed-acoustic-field for the virtual azimuth range of +/-40 degrees from the midline). Neurophysiologically recorded responses primarily showed a function of interaural intensity difference (IID) which is considered a direct correlate of the sound source's azimuth angle. However, this is only true for the stationary case. Unit's response did not remain unaffected by the dynamic stimulus cues of sound source movement (velocity and direction). Maximal discharge rate became a function of motion velocity as well as the slopes of the response profiles. Hence, coding of IID became ambiguous as, depending on the unit, the response profiles and therefore a unit's receptive field, became spatially shifted with respect to one another when the direction of the sound source movement was reversed. Shifts within the movement direction (hysteresis) as well as against it (termed here 'advance') were observed: hysteresis is typical for units with non-monotonic, stationary rate/intensity functions, whereas those units with monotonic functions predominantly show advances. Further dynamic response features in form of transient peaks and troughs, superimposed on the response profiles, were registered. It appears that the ongoing firing rate no longer represents azimuth position alone, but vigorously reproduces the dynamic cues (velocity and movement direction), too. With respect to the neural mechanisms leading to dynamic response features, it is proposed that, as long excitation and inhibition act with similar short time constants, neural activity can rapidly and faithfully follow changing IIDs. Different time constants for excitation, inhibition, facilitation, and depression may be responsible for the dynamic 'features' such as transient responses and hysteresis/advance. They may provide biologically relevant information for nocturnally hunting bats to efficiently guide their flight maneuvers.
Schlegel
Peter A
PA
Zoologisches Institut, Ludwigs- Maximilians- Universität, Luisenstr. 14, D 80333 München, Germany. schlegel@zi.biologie.uni-muenchen.de
D000818:Animals; D001306:Auditory Pathways / Q000502:physiology*; D001933:Brain Stem / Q000502:physiology*; D002685:Chiroptera / Q000502:physiology*; D004594:Electrophysiology; D009038:Motion; D009475:Neurons, Afferent / Q000502:physiology; D013016:Sound; D013017:Sound Localization / Q000502:physiology*