Colonoscopy curriculum development and performance-based assessment criteria on a computer-based endoscopy simulator.
OBJECTIVE
Computer-based colonoscopy simulators (CBCS) have been developed and are being introduced into the training environment. The ability of these simulators to replicate the dimensions of patient-based diagnostic colonoscopy is good. However, the benefit of simulators to either learners or their patients has not yet been established. We describe a process by which a CBCS curriculum and CBCS-based performance criteria were established for first-year gastroenterology fellows at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.


METHODS
We used a commercially available CBCS (AccuTouch Endoscopy Simulator, Immersion Medical, Gaithersburg, MD), which consists of a specialized colonoscope that is inserted into a computer-based module with a screen showing the colonic lumen of a virtual patient. A tutorial and six cases of varying complexity are available on the CBCS. Performance variables that are measured by the simulator include the time to complete the procedure, the distance that the scope was advanced, the degree to which the mucosa was adequately visualized, the possible complications such as colonic perforation, and the level of pain experienced by the simulated patient. To begin, we established ideal performance standards by measuring the above variables for ten "expert" faculty colonscopists who completed two cases on the CBCS. Next, we measured CBCS performance standards for five partially trained colonoscopists. Finally, two non-physician gastrointestinal assistants, without prior endoscopic training, were asked to practice on the simulator to determine the time and procedure frequency required to improve their CBCS proficiency. By calculating average performance standards within each of these three groups, we were able to estimate the number of CBCS cases and minimal performance standards for new trainees. Based on the learning curves for novice colonoscopists as well as the performances of partially trained and expert colonoscopists, we speculated that if CBCS training were to be beneficial, the benefit would most likely occur at the early stages of training. The curriculum we developed consists of viewing a one-hour, multimedia tutorial, which describes the procedure and various colonoscopy techniques. This is followed by nine hours of hands-on CBCS experience, during which time the trainee will complete approximately 25 CBCS colonoscopies. Before advancing to live-patient colonoscopies, the trainee must meet certain performance standards on specific CBCS cases. These standards include the ability to view the entire colon in less than 15 minutes with minimal pain and no complications.


CONCLUSIONS
If effective, this new colonoscopy training curriculum should result in improved competency at patient-based colonoscopy, particularly in the early stages of training. To address this question, first-year gastroenterology fellows at Mayo Clinic have been randomized into two groups: (1) a group that experiences a tutorial with hands-on CBCS curriculum and (2) a group that experiences a tutorial only. Their performances at patient-based colonoscopy as well as surveys of patient satisfaction will be measured and analyzed to determine what, if any, benefit is provided by CBCS.
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Robert E
RE
Sedlack
Joseph C
JC
Kolars
D002983:Clinical Competence; D003113:Colonoscopy; D003479:Curriculum; D016099:Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; D005257:Fellowships and Scholarships; D005762:Gastroenterology / Q000193:education; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008910:Minnesota; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis