title: Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials on ruminal fermentation, blood variables, and the microbial populations of feedlot cattle.
abstract: A study was conducted to determine whether bacterial direct-fed microbials (DFM) could be used to minimize the risk of acidosis in feedlot cattle receiving high concentrate diets. Six ruminally cannulated steers, previously adapted to a high concentrate diet, were used in a double 3 x 3 Latin square to study the effects of DFM on feed intake, ruminal pH, and ruminal and blood characteristics. Steers were provided ad libitum access to a diet containing steam-rolled barley, barley silage, and a protein-mineral supplement at 87, 9, and 4% (DM basis), respectively. Treatments were as follows: control, Propionibacterium P15 (P15), and Propionibacterium P15 and Enterococcus faecium EF212 (PE). The bacterial treatments (10(9) cfu/g) plus whey powder carrier, or whey powder alone for control, were top-dressed once daily at the time of feeding (10 g/[steer/d]). Periods consisted of 2 wk of adaptation and 1 wk of measurements. Ruminal pH was continuously measured for 6 d using indwelling electrodes. Dry matter intake and ruminal pH (mean, minimum, hours, and area pH < 5.8 or < 5.5) were not affected by treatment (P > 0.05). However, supplementation with P15 increased protozoal numbers (P < 0.05) with a concomitant increase in ruminal NH3 concentration (P < 0.01) and a decrease in the number of amylolytic bacteria (P < 0.05) compared with the control. Streptococcus bovis, enumerated using a selective medium, was numerically reduced with supplementation of PE. Although blood pH and blood glucose were not affected by DFM supplementation, steers fed PE had numerically lower concentrations of blood CO2 than control steers, which is consistent with a reduced risk of metabolic acidosis. Although the bacterial DFM used in this study did not induce changes in DMI or ruminal and blood pH, some rumen and blood variables indicated that the bacterial DFM used in this study may decrease the risk of acidosis in feedlot cattle.
authors.affiliation: Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB.
authors.forename: G R
authors.initials: GR
authors.lastname: Ghorbani
authors.forename: D P
authors.initials: DP
authors.lastname: Morgavi
authors.forename: K A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Beauchemin
authors.forename: J A Z
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Leedle
mesh_terms: D000138:Acidosis / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000662:veterinary*; D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000821:Animal Feed / Q000382:microbiology; D000818:Animals; D001784:Blood Gas Analysis / Q000662:veterinary; D002417:Cattle; D002418:Cattle Diseases / Q000517:prevention & control*; D002149:Energy Intake; D016984:Enterococcus faecium / Q000378:metabolism*; D005285:Fermentation; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D008297:Male; D019936:Probiotics / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D011424:Propionibacterium / Q000378:metabolism*; D012417:Rumen / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000382:microbiology*; D016985:Streptococcus bovis