Accountability in action?: the case of a database purchasing decision.
The increasing prevalence of audit in university settings has raised concerns about the potentially adverse effects of invasive measures of performance upon the conduct of research and generation of knowledge. What sustains the current commitment to audit? It is argued that in order to address this question we need to understand how and to what extent notions of accountability are played out in practice. This is illustrated through the analysis of materials from an ethnographic study of 'good management practice' in the deployment of technologies in university settings. The paper examines the ways in which ideas of accountability - involving considerations such as 'value for money' - inform the practical processes of deciding about the purchase of a new database technology.
Neyland
Daniel
D
Said Business School, University of Oxford.
Woolgar
Steve
S
D003132:Commerce; D019992:Databases as Topic; D003657:Decision Making; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D006801:Humans; D008330:Management Audit; D012106:Research / Q000592:standards*; D012941:Social Responsibility; D014495:Universities