What does the implicit association test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice-related IATs.
Drawing on recent criticism of the Implicit Association Test (IAT), the present study tested the convergent and discriminant validity of two prejudice-related IATs to corresponding explicit prejudice measures in a German student sample (N = 61). Confirming convergent validity, (a) an IAT designed to assess negative associations related to Turkish people was significantly related to the explicit endorsement of prejudiced beliefs about Turkish people, and (b) an IAT designed to assess negative associations related to East Asians was significantly related to explicit prejudice against East Asians. Moreover, confirming discriminant validity, (c) the Asian IAT was unrelated to the explicit endorsement of prejudiced beliefs about Turkish people, and (d) the Turkish IAT was unrelated to explicit prejudice against Asian people. These results further corroborate the assumption that the IAT is a valid method to assess the strength of evaluative associations in the domain of prejudice and stereotypes.
Gawronski
Bertram
B
University of Würzburg Lehrstuhl für Psychologie II Röntgenring 10, D-97070 Würzburg Germany. gawronski@psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de
D000328:Adult; D001245:Association Learning; D005006:Ethnicity / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010556:Personality Tests / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011287:Prejudice; D011594:Psychometrics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013240:Stereotyping; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology