title: Moral hypocrisy: addressing some alternatives.
abstract: Two studies addressed alternative explanations for 3 pieces of evidence supporting the existence of moral hypocrisy. In Study 1, no support was found for the idea that low salience of social standards accounts for falsifying the result of a coin flip to assign oneself a more desirable task. In Study 2, no support was found for the idea that responses of those who honestly win the flip account for the higher ratings of morality of their action by participants who assign themselves the more desirable task after flipping the coin. Also, no support was found for the idea that responses of those who honestly win the flip account for the inability of personal moral responsibility measures to predict moral action. Instead, results of both studies provided additional evidence of moral hypocrisy.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045, USA. dbatson@ku.edu
authors.forename: C Daniel
authors.initials: CD
authors.lastname: Batson
authors.forename: Elizabeth R
authors.initials: ER
authors.lastname: Thompson
authors.forename: Hubert
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Chen
mesh_terms: D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007615:Kansas; D008297:Male; D009014:Morals; D009042:Motivation; D012647:Self-Assessment