Is complete seizure control imperative?
Is complete control imperative? The answer depends on whether complete control is indeed possible, on the possibility of achieving modifications of lifestyle, and on the type of epilepsy, with particular reference to the presence of progressive dysfunction. This may be seen in patients with temporal lobe or other forms of focal epilepsy, in the epileptic encephalopathies such as West and Lennox Gastaut Syndromes and even in some patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Progressive memory changes and global cognitive problems are examples. Progressive language deterioration, secondary epileptogenesis and phenomena analogous to kindling are also important issues. How long treatment should be continued depends on many factors, not least the preference of the patient and of the family. Weighing the benefits of complete control versus the side effects and risks of medication or surgery is crucial. There are obvious benefits to complete control; it is imperative if these benefits are greater than the cost.
Andermann
Frederick
F
McGill University, Montreal Neurological Hospital and Institute, 3801 University Street, Montreal, PQ, H3A 2B4, Canada. mida@musica.mcgill.ca
D018450:Disease Progression; D004827:Epilepsy / Q000145:classification / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000523:psychology; D006801:Humans; D008019:Life Style; D008569:Memory Disorders / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D012640:Seizures / Q000517:prevention & control*