title: Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery in patients with chronic pancreatitis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In recent years, technological advances and technical refinements to laparoscopic instruments have encouraged some surgeons to explore the application of laparoscopic methods to benign disorders of the pancreas. The aim of this report was to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery in patients with chronic pancreatitis.
  
  
  METHODS
  One group of five patients with disease of nonalcoholic origin localized in the body-tail of the pancreas underwent distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the splenic vessels; a second group of six patients with symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts (alcoholic origin in four cases and idiopathic in two cases) underwent laparoscopic transgastric drainage. For distal pancreatectomy and spleen salvage, the patient's positioning was half-lateral decubitus with the left side up. Four ports were used. A comparison was made with 41 patients with chronic, pancreatitis who underwent conventional open distal pancreatectomy. For the patients with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, the mean operative time was 4 h (range 3-5).
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were no pancreatic-related complications, but one patient was reoperated for perforation of duodenal ulcer. The mean hospital stay was 6 days and the mean time to resume normal daily activities was 3 weeks. Laparoscopic pseudocyst drainage was performed in four patients via laparoscopic anterior gastrostomy and two patients via laparoscopic intraluminal cystogastrostomy. The mean operative time was 100 min (range 60-160). There was no morbidity. The mean hospital stay was 5 days, and the mean time to resume normal daily activities was 2 weeks.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study provides information about the possibilities of performing laparoscopic surgery in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the splenic vessels and laparoscopic transgastric drainage are feasible and safe techniques. They offer obvious advantages, such as reduction of the parietal damage to the abdomen, a shorter hospital stay, and an earlier postoperative recovery than can be obtained with conventional open pancreatic resection.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Institute of Digestive Diseases IMD, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, Escalera 6, Barcelona E-08034, Spain. L.Fdz-Cruz@medicina.ub.es
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Fernández-Cruz
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Sáenz
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Astudillo
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Pantoja
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Uzcátegui
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Navarro
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002760:Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; D002908:Chronic Disease; D004322:Drainage / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010180:Pancreatectomy / Q000379:methods; D010192:Pancreatic Pseudocyst / Q000150:complications; D010195:Pancreatitis / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*