Long-term results of small fenestra stapedectomy compared with large fenestra technique.
OBJECTIVE
A comparison is made of the postoperative long-term hearing results of small fenestra stapedectomy versus large fenestra techniques. Several reports in the literature favor improved hearing results in small fenestra stapedectomy compared with large fenestration and/or total stapedectomy.


METHODS
A retrospective review of 34 patients who had stapedectomy performed by the same surgeon between 1982 and 1992. All patients have been followed for up to 10 years postoperatively.


RESULTS
In 18 ears of 17 patients, surgery was performed with small fenestra technique, and 17 ears of 17 patients had total stapedectomy or posterior-half fenestration. After small fenestra stapedectomy, initial average air-bone gap at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz was 9 dB hearing loss. Hearing thresholds at 4000 Hz deteriorated to 4% over the study period. Speech reception thresholds declined 15%. After total or posterior-half stapedectomy the average air-bone gap at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz was 5 dB hearing loss. Hearing thresholds at 4000 Hz deteriorated 8% and 18% for the small fenestra and large fenestra groups, respectively, over time. Statistically, there was no difference in hearing deterioration rate between these two groups.


CONCLUSIONS
An experienced surgeon can obtain excellent results using either large or small fenestra technique for otosclerosis. After initial successful closure of the air-bone gaps at all measured frequencies, hearing thresholds over the study period were stable for both groups.
Esquivel
Carlos R
CR
Department of Otology and Neurotology, Evanston Northwestern Health Care System, Northwestern University Medical School, Evanston Hospital, Evanston, Illinois 60201, USA.
Mamikoglu
Bulent
B
Wiet
Richard J
RJ
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006320:Hearing Tests; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013201:Stapes Surgery / Q000379:methods*; D013997:Time Factors