Two-stage IMZ implants and ITI implants inserted in a single-stage procedure. A prospective comparative study.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a two-stage implant system in a single-stage procedure and to study the impact of the microgap at crestal level and to monitor the microflora in the peri-implant area. Forty edentulous patients (Cawood & Howell class V-VI) participated in this study. After randomisation, 20 patients received two IMZ implants inserted in a single-stage procedure and 20 patients received two ITI implants. After 3 months, overdentures were fabricated, supported by a bar and clip attachment. A standardised clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed immediately after denture insertion and 6 and 12 months later. Twelve months after loading, peri-implant samples were collected with sterile paper points and analysed for the presence of putative periodontal pathogens using culture techniques. One IMZ implant was lost due to insufficient osseointegration. With regard to the clinical parameters at the 12 months evaluation, significant differences for plaque score and probing pocket depth (IMZ: mean 3.3 mm, ITI: mean 2.9 mm) were found between the two groups. The mean bone loss in the first year of functioning was 0.6 mm for both groups. Prevotella intermedia was detected more often in the ITI group (12 implants) than in the IMZ group (three implants). Porphyromonas gingivalis was found in three patients. In one of these patients an implant showed bone loss of 1.6 mm between T0 and T12. Some associations were found between clinical parameters and the target microorganisms in the ITI group. These associations were not present in the IMZ group. The short-term results indicate that two-stage implants inserted in a single-stage procedure may be as predictable as one-stage implants. The microgap at crestal level in nonsubmerged IMZ implants seems to have no adverse influence on the peri-implant microbiological colonisation and of crestal bone loss in the first year of functioning. The peri-implant sulcus can and does harbour potential periodontal pathogens without signs of peri-implantitis during the evaluation period of 1 year.
Heydenrijk
Kees
K
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands. k.heydenrijk@kchir.azg.nl
Raghoebar
Gerry M
GM
Meijer
Henny J A
HJ
van der Reijden
Willy A
WA
van Winkelhoff
Arie Jan
AJ
Stegenga
Boudewijn
B
D016301:Alveolar Bone Loss / Q000145:classification / Q000382:microbiology; D001439:Bacteroides / Q000302:isolation & purification; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D003758:Dental Implantation, Endosseous / Q000379:methods*; D015921:Dental Implants / Q000145:classification / Q000382:microbiology; D003774:Dental Plaque Index; D017267:Dental Prosthesis Design; D019094:Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D003781:Denture Retention; D003828:Denture, Overlay; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007575:Jaw, Edentulous / Q000534:rehabilitation / Q000601:surgery; D008297:Male; D016555:Matched-Pair Analysis; D008875:Middle Aged; D016348:Osseointegration; D010514:Periodontal Pocket / Q000145:classification; D016966:Porphyromonas gingivalis / Q000302:isolation & purification; D018713:Prevotella intermedia / Q000302:isolation & purification; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012044:Regression Analysis; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D013499:Surface Properties; D016896:Treatment Outcome
D015921:Dental Implants