Perceptions of genetics research as harmful to society: differences among samples of African-Americans and European-Americans.
Genetics has the potential not only to find cures for diseases, but to possess the mechanisms to change the bio-social make-up of populations. A specific question that has arisen on this issue is how developments in genetic technology may intersect with existing race and ethnic relations. Evidence of the racialization of some genetic disorders has been demonstrated elsewhere. The purpose of this study is to compare and contrast African-American and European-American attitudes on the benefits of genetics research for society. Findings show that African-Americans were more likely to say genetics research is harmful for society. This relationship remained statistically significant after controls were introduced in a regression model. Demographic characteristics and self-rated knowledge of genetics had no effect on attitudes among African-Americans. A willingness to use genetic services correlated with favorable attitudes. Differences in social position may lead some groups to opposing interpretations and symbolic meanings of genetics. This may be true in the context of this study because the social meanings of genetics may be tainted by racialization, historical attempts at eugenics, and the potential abuse of genetics targeting groups partially defined by superficial genetic characteristics.
Department of Sociology and Clinical Research, Epidemiology and Statistics Training Program, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA. allenfurr@louisville.edu
L Allen
LA
Furr
D001741:Black or African American; D001290:Attitude; D003625:Data Collection; D003710:Demography; D005260:Female; D036281:Genetic Research; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D011639:Public Opinion; D044465:White People