Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, USA.
S R
SR
Harner
D000368:Aged; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003657:Decision Making; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D033241:Lawyers; D007872:Legal Guardians; D008020:Life Support Care; D016743:Mental Competency / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D026706:Paternalism; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D012297:Right to Die / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012945:Social Values; D013219:State Government; D020458:Third-Party Consent; D016312:Treatment Refusal / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D014481:United States; D028761:Withholding Treatment
Death and Euthanasia; Legal Approach; Mental Health Therapies