Implications of the 1992 ethics code for diverse groups.
Previous renditions of the American Psychological Association's (APA's) code of ethics have clearly espoused psychologists' commitment to the ideal of having respect for the dignity and worth of the individual human being. The endorsement of the goal to protect fundamental human rights has always been highlighted in the Preambles of each revision of the code. The current code (APA, 1992) appears to have retreated from prioritizing this humanitarian stance. Ethnic minorities, women, gay men, and lesbians have reason to be apprehensive about the apparent downgrading in importance of psychologists' declaration of respect for the dignity and worth of the individual. All previous codes seemed to have been formulated from a perspective of protecting consumers. The new code appears to be driven by a need to protect psychologists. This article examines the possible impact of the shift in traditional priorities on diverse populations.
Payton
C R
CR
Howard University Counseling Service, Washington, DC 20059, USA.
D032781:Codes of Ethics; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D005260:Female; D006716:Homosexuality; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008913:Minority Groups; D011584:Psychology / Q000592:standards*; D014930:Women
American Psychological Association; Bioethics and Professional Ethics