Validity of the mockwitness paradigm: testing the assumptions.
Mockwitness identifications are used to provide a quantitative measure of lineup fairness. Some theoretical and practical assumptions of this paradigm have not been studied in terms of mockwitnesses' decision processes and procedural variation (e.g., instructions, lineup presentation method), and the current experiment was conducted to empirically evaluate these assumptions. Four hundred and eighty mockwitnesses were given physical information about a culprit, received 1 of 4 variations of lineup instructions, and were asked to identify the culprit from either a fair or unfair sequential lineup containing 1 of 2 targets. Lineup bias estimates varied as a result of lineup fairness and the target presented. Mockwitnesses generally reported that the target's physical description was their main source of identifying information. Our findings support the use of mockwitness identifications as a useful technique for sequential lineup evaluation, but only for mockwitnesses who selected only 1 lineup member. Recommendations for the use of this evaluation procedure are discussed.
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at El Paso, 79968, USA.
Dawn E
DE
McQuiston
Roy S
RS
Malpass
D002755:Choice Behavior; D003416:Criminal Law; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008568:Memory; D015588:Observer Variation; D012935:Social Justice; D013240:Stereotyping; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D013781:Texas; D014796:Visual Perception