Does ASA classification impact success rates of endovascular aneurysm repairs?
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical success, clinical success, postoperative complication rate, need for a secondary procedure, and mortality rate with endovascular aneurysm repair (EAR), based on the physical status classification scheme advocated by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). At a single institution 167 patients underwent attempted EAR. Query of a prospectively maintained database supplemented with a retrospective review of medical records was used to gather statistics pertaining to patient demographics and outcome. In patients selected for EAR on the basis of acceptable anatomy, technical and clinical success rates were not significantly different among the different ASA classifications. Importantly, postoperative complication and 30-day mortality rates do not appear to significantly differ among the different ASA classifications in this patient population.
Section of Vascular Surgery, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA 70121, USA.
Michael S
MS
Conners
Britt H
BH
Tonnessen
W Charles
WC
Sternbergh
Glen
G
Carter
Moises
M
Yoselevitz
Samuel R
SR
Money
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000776:Anesthesiology / Q000145:classification* / Q000592:standards; D017544:Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / Q000150:complications / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D017543:Iliac Aneurysm / Q000150:complications / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology / Q000401:mortality / Q000628:therapy; D012955:Societies, Medical; D016019:Survival Analysis; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014481:United States; D014656:Vascular Surgical Procedures