An investigation of new toxicity test method performance in validation studies: 2. Comparison of three measures of toxicity test performance.
An area that requires further research is how best to measure test method performance in validation studies and how to set criteria that should be used to judge the adequacy of this performance. The studies reported here were designed to begin an investigation of these questions. Computer simulations were used to generate data sets similar to those that might be obtained from a large validation study. These data were then analysed using three procedures including determination of the 95% prediction interval (PI), calculation of Pearson's correlation coefficient and calculation of the contingent probability statistics (CPS), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The results of this work suggest that of the three approaches examined, quantitative measurements with calculation of the 95% PI provide the most information to allow discrimination between the performance of several different NTMs. The results also suggest that dividing data sets into positive and negative toxicity classifications followed by the calculation of CPS leads to considerable information loss. This loss of information may be so significant that it is not possible in certain circumstances to distinguish between NTMs that are adequate and those that are not.
Gillette Company, Gillette Environment, Health & Safety, Needham, Massachusetts 02914, USA. leon_bruner@gillette.com
L H
LH
Bruner
G J
GJ
Carr
J W
JW
Harbell
R D
RD
Curren
D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D018675:Toxicity Tests / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data