Correspondence between supervisors and trainees in their perception of supervision events.
The focus of this study is on how the participants in 16 supervisory dyads perceive the content and process in a supervisory session, and on the meaning they attach to supervisory events. A central issue is to what degree the participants in each dyad correspond in their perceptions and evaluation of supervisory events. Another question is how lack of correspondence affects the trainees' experience of satisfaction with the supervision. A majority of the dyads were rated low or moderate in correspondence, and it is discussed whether the influence of low correspondence on trainee satisfaction may be related to supervisory intentions and style characteristics. A main point in the discussion is whether role ambiguity may be related to obscure communication and reduced correspondence, and it is suggested that more attention should be paid to negotiating and renegotiating rules for the supervisory relationship.
Reichelt
Sissel
S
University of Oslo, Institute of Psychology, Oslo, Norway. sissel.reichelt@psykologi.uio.no
Skjerve
Jan
J
D000328:Adult; D003142:Communication; D004493:Education; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D010465:Perception; D010549:Personal Satisfaction; D011586:Psychology, Clinical / Q000193:education* / Q000458:organization & administration*; D013334:Students