Evaluating quality of nursing care: the gap between theory and practice.
The purpose of this article is to determine whether nursing practice, as judged by nurse peer reviewers, varies by type or location of hospital and to assess which aspects of practice tend to be most at variance with nursing theory. This article provides a framework of continued quality assessment and improvement that is based on prior research. Trained nurse peer reviewers carried out structured implicit review, which utilized their professional judgment to evaluate the process of nursing care for patients admitted to acute hospitals with heart failure or cerebrovascular accident. Findings show significant variations in the quality of nursing care and support the continued development of nursing quality assessment and improvement initiatives directed at reducing the gap between nursing theory and practice.
University of California at Los Angeles, School of Nursing, Calif 90095-6918, USA. bchang@sonnet.ucla.edu
Betty L
BL
Chang
Jan L
JL
Lee
Marjorie L
ML
Pearson
Katherine L
KL
Kahn
Marc N
MN
Elliott
Lisa L
LL
Rubenstein
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D005260:Female; D006333:Heart Failure / Q000451:nursing; D006742:Hospital Bed Capacity; D006761:Hospitals; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D015403:Nursing Evaluation Research; D009738:Nursing Service, Hospital; D009742:Nursing Theory; D018024:Peer Review, Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D017064:Process Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D020521:Stroke / Q000451:nursing; D014481:United States