Morality in group and family therapies: multiperson therapies and the 1992 ethics code.
Although virtually every psychotherapeutic approach or orientation has adapted group and family therapy to its conceptions of psychological dysfunctions and how to treat them, levels of training of practitioners in all of these approaches are often insufficient to meet the requirements of ethically as well as technically responsible conduct of treatment for persons in groups and families. The new ethics code (American Psychological Association [APA], 1992) does include a few issues specific to multiperson therapies, but other issues critical to the competent practice of group and family therapy remain unaddressed. The result can be confusing to those applying standards for individual therapy to multiperson therapies. It is argued that the classical ethical concerns of psychotherapists, informed consent, confidentiality, countertransference reactions, aand intrusions of therapist values, require special sensitivity to how they are expressed in mulitperson therapies. Practitioners of group and family therapies must be better sensitized to the technical distinctions and the associated ethical vulnerabilities of the modalities they use. Future planning for revision of the APA ethics code should take these factors into account.
Lakin
M
M
Department of Psychology: Social and Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706, USA.
D032781:Codes of Ethics; D003219:Confidentiality; D016265:Conflict of Interest; D003379:Countertransference; D004644:Emotions; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D005196:Family Therapy; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D011361:Professional Competence; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations; D011584:Psychology / Q000592:standards*; D011615:Psychotherapy, Group
American Psychological Association; Bioethics and Professional Ethics