title: Comparison of pulpal sensitivity between a conventional and two resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements.
abstract: This clinical study compared handling and any short-term tooth sensitivity associated with using one conventional and two resin-modified glass ionomer cements marketed for luting gold and ceramometal crowns. The patient's response to a 10-second blast of air applied to the vital tooth was scored pre-operatively and again within a one-to-four week post-cementation recall period. A score was also recorded for any sensitivity present at the time of cementation of the crown on the unanesthetized tooth. All three cements were easy to mix and place. Most of the teeth had no response to pulpal stimulation pre-operatively, associated with the cementation procedure or post-cementation, and there were no instances of severe sensitivity recorded. For all cements, the level of post-cementation tooth sensitivity was similar, and less than that found pre-operatively.
authors.affiliation: Dental School, Adelaide University, South Australia.
authors.forename: R J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Smales
authors.forename: M S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Gale
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002484:Cementation / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000737:chemistry; D003442:Crowns; D003722:Dental Alloys; D003807:Dentin Sensitivity / Q000139:chemically induced*; D005260:Female; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000737:chemistry; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D016037:Single-Blind Method
chemical_list: D003188:Composite Resins; D003722:Dental Alloys; C113301:FujiPlus; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; C467911:New Fuji I; C084550:Vitremer