Substituent effects on the bond dissociation enthalpies of aromatic amines.
Bond dissociation enthalpy differences, Z-X DeltaBDE = BDE(4-YC(6)H(4)Z-X) - BDE(C(6)H(5)Z-X), for Z = CH(2) and O are largely independent of X and are determined mainly by the stabilization/destabilization effect of Y on the 4-YC(6)H(4)Z(*) radicals. The effects of Y are small (< or =2 kcal/mol for all Y) for Z = CH(2), but they are large for Z = O, where good correlations with sigma(p)(+)(Y) yield rho(+) = 6.5 kcal/mol. For Z = NH, two sets of electrochemically measured N-H DeltaBDEs correlate with sigma(p)(+)(Y), yielding rho(+) = 3.9 and 3.0 kcal/mol. However, in contrast to the situation with phenols, these data indicate that the strengthening effect on N-H BDEs of electron-withdrawing (EW) Y's is greater than the weakening effect of electron-donating (ED) Y's. Attempts to measure N-H DeltaBDEs in anilines using two nonelectrochemical techniques were unsuccessful; therefore, we turned to density functional theory. Calculations on 15 4-YC(6)H(4)NH(2) gave N-H DeltaBDEs correlating with sigma(p)(+) (rho(+) = 4.6 kcal/mol) and indicated that EW and ED Y's had comparable strengthening and weakening effects, respectively, on the N-H bonds. To validate theory by connecting it to experiment, the N-H DeltaBDEs of four 4,4'-disubstituted diphenylamines and five 3,7-disubstituted phenothiazines were both calculated and measured by the radical equilibration EPR technique. For all compounds, theory and experiment agreed to better than 1 kcal/mol. Dissection of N-H DeltaBDEs in 4-substituted anilines and O-H DeltaBDEs in 4-substituted phenols into interaction enthalpies between Y and NH(2)/OH (molecule stabilization/destabilization enthalpy, MSE) and NH*/O* (radical stabilization/destabilization enthalpy, RSE) reveals that for both groups of compounds, ED Y's destabilize the molecule and stabilize the radical, while the opposite holds true for EW Y's. However, in the phenols the effects of substituents on the radical are roughly 3 times as great as those in the molecule, whereas in the anilines the two effects are of comparable magnitudes. These differences arise from the stronger ED character of NH(2) vs OH and the weaker EW character of NH* vs O*. The relatively large contributions to N-H BDEs in anilines arising from interactions in the molecules suggested that N-X DeltaBDEs in 4-YC(6)H(4)NH-X would depend on X, in contrast to the lack of effect of X on O-X and CH(2)-X DeltaBDEs in 4-YC(6)H(4)O-X and 4-YC(6)H(4)CH(2)-X. This suggestion was confirmed for X = CH(3), H, OH, and F, for which the calculated NH-X DeltaBDEs yielded rho(+) = 5.0, 4.6, 4.0, and 3.0 kcal/mol, respectively.
Pratt
Derek A
DA
Contribution from the Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0R6. derek.a.pratt@vanderbilt.edu
DiLabio
Gino A
GA
Valgimigli
Luca
L
Pedulli
Gian Franco
GF
Ingold
K U
KU