Perineal outcomes in NSW public and private hospitals: analysing recent trends.
Women using private health insurance for pregnancy care may be unaware of the impact that this choice has in increasing their risk of experiencing a range of interventions during childbirth. This paper identifies recent trends in episiotomy rates and perineal outcomes for New South Wales (NSW) public and private hospitals between 1997 and 1999. Clear and consistent differences exist in birth outcomes in NSW private hospitals in respect to greater episiotomy use and poorer overall perineal outcomes, higher caesarean section rates and higher instrumental birth rates. Given the potential health impact for women who experience intervention during childbirth, identification of clinically unjustified practices is an important step towards ensuring that women's choices provide them with optimal childbirth outcomes regardless of their health insurance status.
Shorten
Allison
A
Department of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 2522.
Shorten
Brett
B
D003657:Decision Making; D004841:Episiotomy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D016304:Hospitals, Private / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006779:Hospitals, Public / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D007350:Insurance, Hospitalization; D007743:Labor, Obstetric; D008427:Maternal Health Services / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D009517:New South Wales / Q000453:epidemiology; D011247:Pregnancy; D011256:Pregnancy Outcome; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012307:Risk Factors