title: Protein dynamics: imidazole and 2-mercaptoethanol binding to the Rhodobacter capsulatus cytochrome c(2) mutant, glycine 95 proline.
abstract: The Class I c-type cytochromes can bind exogenous ligands in the oxidized state, with the kinetics of ligand binding providing information on naturally occurring intramolecular dynamics. Typically, nitrogenous bases are used as ligands; however, it is less well known that 2-mercaptoethanol (BME), a commonly used cytochrome reducing agent, can form a complex with the heme. To better understand the cytochrome-mercaptan interaction, we have investigated the kinetics of binding of BME to wild type and mutants of Rhodobacter capsulatus cytochrome c(2) and to horse cytochrome c. Complex formation with the G95P mutant is apparent from the formation of a green color and a shift in the Soret peak to 418 nm from 410 nm upon addition of BME. Unlike horse cytochrome c and wild-type R. capsulatus cytochrome c(2), G95P permits the kinetics of formation of the BME-G95P complex to be measured since complex formation and reduction kinetics can be resolved. The affinity constant for the binding of BME to mutant G95P was strong ( approximately 1.5 x 10(5)M(-1)) and the kinetics of formation of the BME-G95P complex were found to undergo a change in rate-limiting step consistent with a concentration-independent protein rearrangement (68s(-1)) followed by second-order binding of BME ( approximately approximately 1.3 x 10(5)M(-1)s(-1)). The most remarkable characteristic of mutant G95P is the relatively large amount of high-spin species in equilibrium with the low- spin form, which can be estimated to be approximately 3% at pH 7. The BME binding kinetics, coupled with the kinetics of imidazole binding to G95P, allow us, for the first time, to specify all four rate constants describing the ligand binding reaction. Moreover, we can use the kinetic results to estimate the rate constants for ligand binding with the wild-type cytochrome c(2). This has also allowed us to quantify and more fully interpret cytochrome dynamics.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
authors.forename: Chantal
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Dumortier
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Fitch
authors.forename: Terrance E
authors.initials: TE
authors.lastname: Meyer
authors.forename: Michael A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Cusanovich
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003574:Cytochrome c Group / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism*; D045362:Cytochromes c2; D005998:Glycine / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism; D006736:Horses; D007093:Imidazoles / Q000378:metabolism*; D007700:Kinetics; D008623:Mercaptoethanol / Q000378:metabolism*; D010084:Oxidation-Reduction; D017354:Point Mutation; D011392:Proline / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism; D016354:Rhodobacter capsulatus / Q000201:enzymology*; D013057:Spectrum Analysis
chemical_list: D003574:Cytochrome c Group; D007093:Imidazoles; D008623:Mercaptoethanol; C029899:imidazole; D045362:Cytochromes c2; D011392:Proline; D005998:Glycine