Pre-operative diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions: in vivo dermoscopy performs better than dermoscopy on photographic images.
BACKGROUND
Epiluminescence microscopy (ELM) (dermoscopy, dermatoscopy) is a technique for non-invasive diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions that improves the diagnostic performance of dermatologists. Little is known about the possible influence of associated clinical features on the reliability of dermoscopic diagnosis during in vivo examination.


OBJECTIVE
To compare diagnostic performance of in vivo dermoscopy (combined clinical and dermoscopic examination) with that of dermoscopy performed on photographic slides (pure dermoscopy).


METHODS
This case series comprised 256 pigmented skin lesions consecutively identified as suspicious or equivocal during examination in a general dermatological clinic. Clinical examination and in vivo dermoscopy were performed before excision by two trained dermatologists. The same observers carried out dermoscopy on photographic slides at a later time, and these three diagnostic classifications were reviewed together with the histological findings for the individual lesions. This was carried out in a university hospital.


RESULTS
In vivo dermoscopy performed better than dermoscopy on photographic slides for classification of pigmented skin lesions compared with histological diagnosis, and both performed better than general clinical diagnosis. In vivo dermoscopic diagnosis of melanoma showed 98.1% sensitivity, 95.5% specificity and 96.1% diagnostic accuracy while dermoscopic diagnosis of melanoma on photographic slides was less reliable with 81.5% sensitivity, 86.7% specificity and 85.2% diagnostic accuracy. In particular, diagnosis of melanoma based on photographic slides led to nine false negative cases (three in situ, six invasive; thickness ranges 0.2-1.5 mm).


CONCLUSIONS
In vivo dermoscopy, i.e. combined clinical and dermoscopic examination, is more reliable than dermoscopy on photographic slides. In clinical practice, therefore, in vivo dermoscopy cannot be considered independent from associated clinical characteristics of the lesions, which help the trained observer to reach a more precise classification. This may have implications on the reliability of ELM diagnosis made by an observer not fully trained in the clinical diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions or by a remote observer during digital ELM teleconsultation.
Carli
P
P
Department of Dermatology, University of Florence, Italy. CARLI@cesit1.unifi.it
De Giorgi
V
V
Argenziano
G
G
Palli
D
D
Giannotti
B
B
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001707:Biopsy, Needle; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003880:Dermatology / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007150:Immunohistochemistry; D008163:Luminescent Measurements; D008297:Male; D008545:Melanoma / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D008853:Microscopy; D008875:Middle Aged; D009508:Nevus, Pigmented / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D010781:Photography; D011300:Preoperative Care / Q000379:methods; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012878:Skin Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*