title: Bargaining health benefits in the workplace: an inside view.
abstract: Before contract negotiations in 1999, the author served on an "issue-based" health benefits committee of faculty union representatives and university administrators. Although the committee solicited estimates from health insurers regarding the impact of higher copayments on monthly premiums, in subsequent negotiations, the projected cost savings did not lead to changes in coverage or copayments. The explanations offered are (1) national or regional employers may be reluctant to raise employees' health benefit copayments when labor markets are tight; (2) collective bargaining, particularly when other, nonmonetary issues are being bargained, may lead to results different from those from a strictly competitive model; and (3) employers with market power in the product market may shift these highest costs to consumers through higher prices.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Montagne
mesh_terms: D000288:Administrative Personnel; D003098:Collective Bargaining; D017049:Employer Health Costs; D006264:Health Benefit Plans, Employee / Q000191:economics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D019458:Insurance Coverage / Q000191:economics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D007349:Insurance, Health, Reimbursement; D017059:Models, Econometric; D017008:Negotiating; D012456:Salaries and Fringe Benefits; D014481:United States; D017132:Workplace / Q000191:economics