title: Racial bias in decisions made by mock jurors evaluating a case of sexual harassment.
abstract: White (N = 161) and Black (N = 152) college students served as mock jurors in a simulated civil case in which a female plaintiff accused a male defendant of sexual harassment. The authors experimentally manipulated the race (Black or White) of the litigants and asked the mock jurors to decide whether the defendant was guilty; to rate the certainty of their belief in the defendant's guilt; and, when they judged the defendant guilty, to recommend an award to the plaintiff. Mock jurors of both races tended to favor litigants of their own race and their own gender. Racial bias was highest among White male jurors and lowest among White female jurors.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858-4353, USA. WuenschK@mail.ecu.edu
authors.forename: Karl L
authors.initials: KL
authors.lastname: Wuensch
authors.forename: Matthew W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Campbell
authors.forename: Frederick C
authors.initials: FC
authors.lastname: Kesler
authors.forename: Charles H
authors.initials: CH
authors.lastname: Moore
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001741:Black or African American; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007603:Jurisprudence; D008297:Male; D011287:Prejudice; D017406:Sexual Harassment / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D044465:White People