title: Recycled poultry bedding as cattle feed.
abstract: Since the 1950s, recycled poultry bedding has been used as an economical feedstuff for beef cattle. It has been extensively studied at several experiment stations around the world with regard to its safety and nutritional aspects. It will continue to be closely scrutinized as the public increases its awareness of agricultural issues. As this study was being prepared, the news media was "spotlighting" bovine spongiform encephalopathy. Currently, in the United States there is a ban on incorporation of mammalian-derived protein feeds into ruminant diets. This has led to a requirement of beef cattle producers signing affidavits indicating that they had met this obligation. Some poultry companies use ruminant meat and bone meal in broiler diets when least-cost formulation indicates that it is economically desirable. This then poses the question of whether feeding RPB to beef cattle should be permitted if the birds had been fed ruminant meat and bone meal. It also raises the question of whether cattle grazing pastures fertilized with RPB are exposed to ruminant meat and bone meal. Because of the importance of pasture fertilization as a waste disposal solution for the poultry industry, it seems that the issue will be quickly resolved by omitting the ruminant meat and bone meal from poultry diets should concerns increase. Use of RPB, like many byproduct feeds, requires a higher level of management expertise than traditional feeds. Despite the potential problems discussed in this study, an informed beef cattle producer can gain a financially competitive edge by using RPB. A simple processing method, deep-stacking under polyethylene sheeting, can produce a safe product that will provide a complete diet when blended with an energy source and supplemented with some long-stem fiber. The diets can be used for both brood cows and stocker calves for extended periods of time, and the practice of feeding RPB is safe for both cattle and consumers [45]. Economic parameters will influence the future use of RPB; however, the general public's perception and acceptance will ultimately determine its long-term use.
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, 122 Upchurch Hall, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA. drankins@aces.edu
authors.forename: Darrell L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Rankins
authors.forename: Matthew H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Poore
authors.forename: Dawn J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Capucille
authors.forename: Glenn M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Rogers
mesh_terms: D000821:Animal Feed / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards; D000822:Animal Husbandry / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods; D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle / Q000378:metabolism*; D003902:Detergents; D004043:Dietary Fiber / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000032:analysis; D004044:Dietary Proteins / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000032:analysis; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D008372:Manure; D011200:Poultry; D012449:Safety
chemical_list: D003902:Detergents; D004043:Dietary Fiber; D004044:Dietary Proteins; D008372:Manure