WorkCover's physiotherapy forms: purpose beyond paperwork?
We retrospectively analysed 219 consecutive treatment plans submitted to a large New South Wales workers' compensation insurer for workers coded by the insurer as suffering from back pain. The purpose was to (i) describe the quality of goals of treatment provided to insurers by physiotherapists for workers with back pain using guidelines provided by the WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (WorkCover); (ii) compare the physiotherapists' prognoses against prognoses indicated in clinical practice guidelines; and (iii) make recommendations about the communication system between physiotherapists and insurers. The back pain of most treated workers was classified as acute and the majority of physiotherapists estimated that treatment would be of short duration, which is concordant with current treatment guidelines. However, most physiotherapists did not provide precise, measurable or time-specific treatment goals, despite this being emphasised by WorkCover. We propose ways of improving communication practices between physiotherapists and insurers.
Schonstein
Eva
E
School of Physiotherapy, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, New South Wales. e.schonstein@fhs.usyd.edu.au
Kenny
Dianna T
DT
Maher
Christopher G
CG
D003142:Communication; D005568:Forms and Records Control; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D006801:Humans; D007344:Insurance Claim Reporting; D017116:Low Back Pain / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D009517:New South Wales; D010347:Patient Care Planning; D026741:Physical Therapy Modalities / Q000145:classification* / Q000191:economics*; D011379:Prognosis; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014942:Workers' Compensation / Q000458:organization & administration*