Motion - Screening and surveillance of Barrett's epithelium is practical and cost effective: arguments against the motion.
The issue of whether to screen individuals for Barrett's esophagus (BE) to prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is highly controversial. Important considerations are that BE is not highly prevalent in the general population and that not many patients with BE develop or die from EAC. Studies that suggest an improved prognosis from surveillance programs are susceptible to lead-time bias. Most of the principles for effective screening, as outlined by the World Health Organization, are not met by endoscopic screening and surveillance protocols. The diagnosis of BE (and dysplasia) is often unclear. Most patients with BE are not identified by screening, and few deaths would be prevented by surveillance. A decision analysis found that the most cost effective screening protocol would be every five years, but the costs associated with prolongation of life are very high, even if a group at high risk for EAC could be identified.
Chiba
Naoki
N
Surrey GI Clinic, Guelph, Canada. chiban@on.aibn.com
D001471:Barrett Esophagus / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000191:economics; D004938:Esophageal Neoplasms / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006287:Health Planning Guidelines; D006801:Humans; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000191:economics; D009864:Ontario; D011159:Population Surveillance; D011379:Prognosis