A comparative evaluation of three IUDs.
Private practice clinical experience with the insertion of 3 types of IUDs (Lippes loop, Dalkon shield, Cu 7) is evaluated.  Life table analyses indicated similar pregnancy rates for the 3 IUDs.  Lower expulsion rates were experienced with the Dalkon shield.  Higher removal rates were experienced for pelvic inflammatory disease and pain and/or bleeding with the Cu 7.  In part, the higher Cu 7 removal rates reflect a change to more liberal indications for IUD removal.
Ditchik
P M
PM
Ditchik
J M
JM
D000290:Adnexa Uteri; D019411:Clinical Laboratory Techniques; D003267:Contraception; D003710:Demography; D003933:Diagnosis; D004194:Disease; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005193:Family Planning Services; D005836:Genitalia, Female; D006470:Hemorrhage; D007434:Intrauterine Devices; D007435:Intrauterine Devices, Copper; D015993:Life Tables; D010146:Pain; D000292:Pelvic Inflammatory Disease; D012106:Research; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D012816:Signs and Symptoms; D014566:Urogenital System
Adnexal Effects; Adnexitis; Bleeding; Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraception Termination; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Contraceptive Methods; Demographic Analysis; Diseases; Evaluation; Examinations And Diagnoses; Family Planning; Genital Effects, Female; Iud; Iud, Copper Releasing; Iud, Unmedicated; Laboratory Examinations And Diagnoses; Life Table Method; Pain; Qualitative Evaluation; Research Methodology; Retention; Signs And Symptoms; Studies; Urogenital Effects; Use-effectiveness