Comparing cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of residential mobility and migration.
"A reevaluation of cross-sectional versus longitudinal models of residential mobility...casts doubt on the study by Davies and Pickles in 1985 in which it was argued that cross-sectional analysis is inadequate.... With the use of data from the [U.S.] Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), the conclusion of this reevaluation is that longitudinal analysis increases our understanding of the processes and provides a richer understanding of migration and mobility but does not undermine the work that has been produced from cross-sectional analysis."
Clark
W A
WA
D000569:Americas; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003710:Demography; D019049:Developed Countries; D004641:Emigration and Immigration; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005843:Geography; D008722:Methods; D009656:North America; D011153:Population; D011157:Population Dynamics; D012106:Research; D012111:Residence Characteristics; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D014481:United States
Americas; Comparative Studies; Critique; Cross Sectional Analysis; Data Analysis; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Geographic Factors; Methodological Studies; Migration; Migration, Internal; North America; Northern America; Population; Population Dynamics; Research Methodology; Residence Characteristics; Residential Mobility; Spatial Distribution; Studies; United States