Dutch version of the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire: validity and reliability in a pain-free population.
The current study examined validity and reliability of the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (PVAQ) in two samples of healthy college students. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis showed that a two-factor model of the PVAQ was most suitable in the present study. The first factor could be referred to as attention to pain whereas the second factor could be specified as attention to changes in pain. With regard to the convergent and divergent validity, the PVAQ was found to correlate highly with related constructs like catastrophising (PCS) and general body vigilance (BVQ). The correlation between PVAQ and pain-related fear (FPQ) was moderate, whereas correlations with unrelated constructs like trait anxiety (STAI-T) and fear of spiders (FSQ) were low. Furthermore, the PVAQ showed good internal consistency and fair test-retest reliability. Altogether, these findings suggest that the PVAQ is a valid and reliable measure of pain vigilance in healthy individuals. The results of this study can be regarded as a starting point for further validation of the PVAQ in clinical pain populations. Implications for future research and treatment interventions are discussed.
Roelofs
J
J
Department of Medical, Clinical and Experimental Psychology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands. j.roelofs@dep.unimaas.nl
Peters
M L
ML
Muris
P
P
Vlaeyen
J W S
JW
D000328:Adult; D001143:Arousal / Q000502:physiology*; D001364:Awareness / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008297:Male; D010146:Pain / Q000175:diagnosis*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014175:Translating