title: Assessment of root curvature and distance using computed tomography.
abstract: The safety and efficacy of subgingival root surface instrumentation may be enhanced by optimized adaptation between instrument and treated surface. Thus, detailed knowledge of root geometry may allow advances in instrument design. The aim of this study was therefore to measure root radii of various tooth types as well as distances between tooth roots using computed tomography. Two hundred sixteen teeth in eight patients were studied, with cross sections of teeth at the level of the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) being regarded as ellipses. The maximum radii of ellipses were calculated and averaged for each tooth surface within various tooth groups. In addition, the spacing between roots at CEJ level and 5 mm below the CEJ was measured. Mean radii varied from 1.09+/-0.50 mm (lower incisor, lingual) to 13.7+/-0.96 mm (upper molar, mesial). Radii of 1 mm to 6 mm were most frequently found at buccal, palatal, and lingual surfaces, whereas the majority of radii were between 2 mm and 11 mm at mesial and distal sites. Root distance varied between 1.04+/-0.49 mm (lower incisors, CEJ level) and 2.81+/-1.70 mm (lower molars, 5 mm below CEJ). The curvature of an instrument for root surface instrumentation should correspond to a radius of at least 11 mm to achieve maximum adaptation to the treated surface, and the width of the working end should be less than 1 mm to allow sufficient interdental instrumentation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Periodontology, University of Münster, Waldeyerstrasse 30, 48149 Münster, Germany. peterslk@uni-muenster.de
authors.forename: G J
authors.initials: GJ
authors.lastname: Petersilka
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Draenert
authors.forename: P-M
authors.initials: PM
authors.lastname: Jervøe-Storm
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Heinecke
authors.forename: T F
authors.initials: TF
authors.lastname: Flemmig
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D019412:Anatomy, Cross-Sectional; D001641:Bicuspid / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D003481:Cuspid / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D007180:Incisor / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D008297:Male; D008334:Mandible; D008437:Maxilla; D008963:Molar / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D008964:Molar, Third / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D009811:Odontometry / Q000379:methods; D010518:Periodontitis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D036542:Tomography, Spiral Computed; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*; D019237:Tooth Cervix / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D014092:Tooth Root / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*