The impacts of health, education, family planning and electrification programs on fertility, mortality and child schooling in East Java, Indonesia.
This paper examines the effects of public health, family planning, education, electrification, and water supply programs on fertility, child mortality, and school enrollment decisions of rural households in East Java, Indonesia.  The theoretical model assumes that parents maximize a utility function, subject to 1) a budget constraint that equates income with expenditures on children (including schooling and health inputs), and 2) a production function that relates health inputs to child survival possibilities.  Public programs affect prices of contraceptives, schooling and health inputs, and environmental conditions that in turn affect child survival.  Data are taken from the 1980 East Java Population Survey, the Socio-economic Survey, and the Detailed Village Census.  The final sample consists of 3170 rural households with married women of childbearing age.  Ordinary least squares and logit regressions of recent fertility, child mortality, and school enrollment on program and household variables yielded the following findings.  1) The presence of maternal and child health clinics reduced fertility but not mortality.  2) The presence of public health centers strongly reduced mortality but not fertility.  3) The presence of contraceptive distribution centers had no effect on fertility.  4) School attendance rates were influenced positively by the availability of primary and secondary schools.  5) Health and family planning programs had no effects on schooling.  6) The availability of public latrines reduced fertility and mortality.  7) The water supply variable did not affect the dependent variables when ordinary least squares techniques were applied but had statistically significant impact when logit methods were used.  8) Electricity supply had little effect on the dependent variables.  9) The mother's schooling had a strong positive correlation with children's schooling but no effect on fertility or mortality.  10) Household expenditures were related positively to school attendance and negatively to mortality.  11) There was little or no interaction between household variables and presence of government programs.  12) Subprovincial area measures of service availability appeared more appropriate for public health and family planning services, while village-level measures appeared more appropriate for schooling.
Wirakartakusumah
M D
MD
D001208:Asia; D001210:Asia, Southeastern; D001519:Behavior; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D003657:Decision Making; D003710:Demography; D003906:Developing Countries; D004467:Economics; D004522:Educational Status; D004777:Environment; D005193:Family Planning Services; D005298:Fertility; D006262:Health; D007214:Indonesia; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009026:Mortality; D011153:Population; D011154:Population Characteristics; D011157:Population Dynamics; D011634:Public Health; D012424:Rural Population; D012923:Social Class; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D013334:Students; D014881:Water Supply
Asia; Behavior; Carrying Capacity; Decision Making; Demographic Factors; Developing Countries; Economic Factors; Educational Status; Environment; Family Planning; Fertility; Health; Indonesia; Models, Theoretical; Mortality; Natural Resources; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; Public Health; Rural Population; School Enrollment; Socioeconomic Factors; Socioeconomic Status; Southeastern Asia; Utility Theory; Water Supply