Synthetic slings: pros and cons.
Historically, the choice of sling material for the treatment of urinary incontinence has been based on the surgeon's preference and experience. In general, pelvic surgeons have not differentiated artificial graft materials by their inherent qualities or for biocompatibility in the female pelvis and vaginal wall. The introduction of new artificial graft materials and new methods of implantation for the correction of genuine stress incontinence has generated renewed interest in the "pros and cons" associated with nonabsorbable material use. In this review, we discuss and differentiate sling materials and techniques. We consider some of the physical and biologic qualities of artificial graft materials, present theories and practices associated with the successful use of permanent grafts, and discuss the natural evolution of artificial graft slings to the current use of the tension-free vaginal tape and Suprapubic Arc Sling System (American Medical Systems, Minneapolis, MN).
D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D011126:Polypropylenes; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D019736:Prostheses and Implants; D013526:Surgical Mesh; D014550:Urinary Incontinence, Stress / Q000628:therapy*; D013520:Urologic Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods
D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D011126:Polypropylenes