Comparison of tests of accommodation for computer users.
BACKGROUND
With the increased use of computers in the workplace and at home, optometrists are finding more patients presenting with symptoms of Computer Vision Syndrome. Among these symptomatic individuals, research supports that accommodative disorders are the most common vision finding.


METHODS
A prepresbyopic group (N= 30) and a presbyopic group (N = 30) were selected from a private practice. Assignment to a group was determined by age, accommodative amplitude, and near visual acuity with their distance prescription. Each subject was given a thorough vision and ocular health examination, then administered several nearpoint tests of accommodation at a computer working distance.


RESULTS
All the tests produced similar results in the presbyopic group. For the prepresbyopic group, the tests yielded very different results.


CONCLUSIONS
To effectively treat symptomatic VDT users, optometrists must assess the accommodative system along with the binocular and refractive status. For presbyopic patients, all nearpoint tests studied will yield virtually the same result. However, the method of testing accommodation, as well as the test stimulus presented, will yield significantly different responses for prepresbyopic patients. Previous research indicates that a majority of patients prefer the higher plus prescription yielded by the Gaussian image test.
D000065:Accommodation, Ocular; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003201:Computers; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D014787:Vision Tests