title: Randomised, placebo controlled, double blind study of alfuzosin SR in patients undergoing trial without catheter following acute urinary retention.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Acute urinary retention caused by bladder outlet obstruction resulting from prostatic enlargement is one of the commonest causes for acute admission to urology wards. More recently, there has been a trend to commence treatment with alpha-blockers after catheterisation followed by a trial without catheter (TWOC), in the hope that surgery may be avoided in a significant proportion of patients. There is no conclusive evidence of the efficacy of this treatment. We conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy of using the alpha-blocker alfuzosin SR in patients with acute urinary retention.
  
  
  METHODS
  All patients presenting with acute urinary retention to our unit were included in the trial. Exclusion criteria included patients with known bladder or prostate malignancy, bladder calculi, urinary tract infections, urethral stricture or patients on alpha-blockers. A total of 81 patients consented and were randomised. Sixty-two patients completed the study. The retention volume was recorded. Trial medicine was recorded on a twice-daily dose and the first TWOC was carried out after a minimum of three doses or 36 hours after admission. TWOC was considered successful on voiding with a residual volume of <200 ml. Unsuccessful patients were recatheterised and discharged home on trial medication, and called for a second TWOC after 2 weeks. Successful patients were continued on alpha-blockers and failures were put on the operating list for TURP. Patients on active treatments were reviewed at 2 year.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of the 34 patients treated with alfuzosin SR, 17 (50%) resumed voiding and of the 28 patients from placebo group, 16 (57%) voided successfully. All 33 patients were continued open labelled on alfuzosin SR 5mg BD. Out of 33 patients, 13 (43%) had TURP within first year after TWOC and three died due to various medical causes. Out of remaining 17 patients, 15 attended for follow-up. The mean peak flow rate was 8.4 ml/s and the mean residual volume was 112 ml. Six patients (40%) required TURP for severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). So out of 28 patients followed at 2 year, 19 (68%) had TURP.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These data do not support the routine use of alpha-blockers in patients with acute urinary retention. Also continuing use of alpha-blockers does not seem to prevent further requirements of TURP, although larger studies are needed to support this.
mesh_terms: D000208:Acute Disease; D000317:Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002404:Catheterization; D003692:Delayed-Action Preparations / Q000627:therapeutic use; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011799:Quinazolines / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D016055:Urinary Retention / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000601:surgery
chemical_list: D000317:Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; D003692:Delayed-Action Preparations; D011799:Quinazolines; C047638:alfuzosin