title: Randomization in surgical trials.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There are concerns that use of the term "randomized" conveys a form of legitimacy to surgical trials that may sometimes be inappropriate. The objective of this study was to review the nature and use of randomization techniques in surgical trials.
  
  
  METHODS
  We evaluated aspects of the randomization process in 619 surgical trials published within 10 prestigious journals between January 1990 and December 1999.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Only 33% of the published trials (202/619) adequately described a valid randomization process. Furthermore, 78% (484/619) did not declare the use or extent of a blinding technique and almost two-thirds of the published trials failed to state how they concealed the randomization process.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our study indicates that many published surgical trials ignore basic aspects of the randomization process. It is difficult for surgeons to have faith in trials that fail to demonstrate an unbiased allocation of patients and ignore the need to maintain some confidentiality about the allocation of patients into groups.
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D013514:Surgical Procedures, Operative