Peritoneal dialysis in anuric patients: concerns and cautions.
Most recent studies have found an equivalent survival for patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD); evidence even suggests that PD might be the preferred modality during the first 3-4 years of renal replacement therapy. This is probably related to the continuous and minimally invasive character of PD as compared to HD, resulting in better preservation of residual renal function (RRF) and less cardiovascular strain. On the other hand, blood pressure control, fluid balance, and adequacy targets may be difficult to obtain in long-term PD patients. The question arises whether PD is a feasible option in anuric patients. It is clear that the answer depends on the body size and the peritoneal membrane transport characteristics of the patient, so that PD will be feasible in some anuric patients, whereas in others it will not be. Evaluation of the peritoneal transport characteristics and adaptation of the PD prescription is warranted. A constant evaluation of the fluid balance, nutritional, and cardiovascular status is needed. This article reviews the physiologic insights and clinical evidence necessary for a good PD prescription in anuric patients.
D001002:Anuria / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000401:mortality / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008991:Monitoring, Physiologic / Q000379:methods*; D010531:Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods*; D011379:Prognosis; D006435:Renal Dialysis / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D015996:Survival Rate