[Comparison of central pulse pressure estimated from pulse wave propagation velocity and carotid pulse pressure measured by applantation tonometry].
BACKGROUND
Pulse pressure (PP) corresponds to the difference between arterial systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Central PP seems to be a stronger coronary risk marker than brachial PP. Central PP can be estimated by aortic PP measured non invasively by aplanation tonometry of the carotid artery. The aim of this study was to compare 2 methods of estimation of aortic PP: estimation from Pulse Wave Velocities (PWV) and by aplanation tonometry of the carotid artery. Estimation from PWV is based on the non uniform transmission of the PP i.e. the amplification of PP from the aorta to brachial artery, through arteries of increasing impedance.


METHODS
One hundred and fifty one subjects were included, 111 hemodialysis patients and 40 subjects free of cardiovascular treatment or cardiovascular organ damage, recruited in a preventive medicine setting. Central PP was measured by aplanation tonometry of the carotid artery. The following formula was used for the relationship between PP and PWV in the two arterial segments considered for pulse wave travel (waterhammer formula): [formula: see text] Where measurement of brachial PP (PPBr) and PWV at aortic (PWVAo) and brachial (PWVBr) gives an estimation of aortic PP (PPAo estimated). Carotid-femoral PWV was used for PWVAo and carotid-radial PWV was used for PWVBr. The two methods were compared by t-test and according to Bland and Altman's method.


RESULTS
In the hemodialysis group (73 males, 44 +/- 12 years old), brachial PP was 56 +/- 15 mm Hg and central PP as measured at the carotid level was 47 +/- 15 mmHg. In the healthy group (29 males, 46 +/- 11 years old), these values were 46 +/- 10 mmHg and 35 +/- 10 mmHg respectively. Compared to carotid artery aplanation tonometry, PPAo estimated was larger than central PP by 2.9 +/- 6.3 mmHg in hemodialysis patients and by 5.4 +/- 6.6 mmHg in the healthy group. The difference was significantly larger in healthy subjects than in hemodialysis patients (p = 0.031).


CONCLUSIONS
The PWV estimated PP is larger than the central PP measured at the carotid level by aplanation tonometry. The difference is larger in cardiovascular event free subjects than in patients on hemodialysis.
D000328:Adult; D001794:Blood Pressure / Q000502:physiology*; D002339:Carotid Arteries / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008365:Manometry / Q000379:methods*; D008875:Middle Aged; D006435:Renal Dialysis; D012307:Risk Factors
Comparaison de la pression pulsée centrale estimée à partir des vitesses de propagation de l'onde du pouls et de la pression pulsée carotidienne mesurée par tonométrie d'aplanation.