[Will publication of quality indicators in the health service improve the quality? International experiences and Danish perspectives].
It is well known that publication of hospital quality indicators may lead to improving of treatments. But the publication can also have some negative side effects: Focus may shift to the evaluated areas at the expense of non-evaluated areas. The most ill patients may be sorted out and high risk patients may be transferred to other hospitals or discharged in order to avoid their dying during hospitalisation and improve statistics. Overestimation of patient risk in order to improve relative treatment outcome. Increasing flow of patients to hospitals with high scores on quality indicators may cause imbalance between activities and budgets and hence longer waiting times and reduced quality of treatment. Negative publicity due to low scores on quality indicators may lead to under-utilisation of hospital capacity, patient and staff insecurity and staff wastage. Thus, publication of quality indicators may improve quality within the health sector, but it is very important to recognise potential pitfalls and negative side effects.
D019985:Benchmarking; D003718:Denmark; D030881:Disclosure; D017052:Hospital Mortality; D006761:Hospitals / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D007255:Information Services / Q000600:supply & distribution*; D009518:New York; D010351:Patient Discharge; D018579:Patient Selection; D010414:Pennsylvania; D011643:Publishing; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D019984:Quality Indicators, Health Care; D012308:Risk Management; D016896:Treatment Outcome
Fører offentliggørelse af kvalitetsmålinger i sundhedsvaesenet til bedre kvalitet? Internationale erfaringer og danske perspektiver.