title: Automaticity and eyewitness accuracy: a 10- to 12-second rule for distinguishing accurate from inaccurate positive identifications.
abstract: Eyewitness researchers have shown that witnesses accurately choosing the culprit out of a lineup reach their decisions more quickly than those erroneously choosing an innocent individual. However, this research is silent regarding how quickly or slowly witnesses must be, in absolute terms, to indicate that they are accurate or inaccurate. Across 4 studies, the authors discovered that a time boundary of roughly 10 to 12 s best differentiated accurate from inaccurate positive identifications. Witnesses making their identification faster than 10 to 12 s were nearly 90% accurate; those taking longer were roughly 50% accurate. This finding is consistent with previous research showing that accurate witnesses are more likely than inaccurate witnesses to reach their decisions automatically, that is, quickly, without conscious thought or effort.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-7601, USA. dad6@cornell.edu
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Dunning
authors.forename: Scott
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Perretta
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001332:Automatism; D002648:Child; D003415:Crime; D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall; D011897:Random Allocation; D011930:Reaction Time; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014743:Videotape Recording; D014796:Visual Perception