title: Birth and death of protein domains: a simple model of evolution explains power law behavior.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Power distributions appear in numerous biological, physical and other contexts, which appear to be fundamentally different. In biology, power laws have been claimed to describe the distributions of the connections of enzymes and metabolites in metabolic networks, the number of interactions partners of a given protein, the number of members in paralogous families, and other quantities. In network analysis, power laws imply evolution of the network with preferential attachment, i.e. a greater likelihood of nodes being added to pre-existing hubs. Exploration of different types of evolutionary models in an attempt to determine which of them lead to power law distributions has the potential of revealing non-trivial aspects of genome evolution.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A simple model of evolution of the domain composition of proteomes was developed, with the following elementary processes: i) domain birth (duplication with divergence), ii) death (inactivation and/or deletion), and iii) innovation (emergence from non-coding or non-globular sequences or acquisition via horizontal gene transfer). This formalism can be described as a birth, death and innovation model (BDIM). The formulas for equilibrium frequencies of domain families of different size and the total number of families at equilibrium are derived for a general BDIM. All asymptotics of equilibrium frequencies of domain families possible for the given type of models are found and their appearance depending on model parameters is investigated. It is proved that the power law asymptotics appears if, and only if, the model is balanced, i.e. domain duplication and deletion rates are asymptotically equal up to the second order. It is further proved that any power asymptotic with the degree not equal to -1 can appear only if the hypothesis of independence of the duplication/deletion rates on the size of a domain family is rejected. Specific cases of BDIMs, namely simple, linear, polynomial and rational models, are considered in details and the distributions of the equilibrium frequencies of domain families of different size are determined for each case. We apply the BDIM formalism to the analysis of the domain family size distributions in prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteomes and show an excellent fit between these empirical data and a particular form of the model, the second-order balanced linear BDIM. Calculation of the parameters of these models suggests surprisingly high innovation rates, comparable to the total domain birth (duplication) and elimination rates, particularly for prokaryotic genomes.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We show that a straightforward model of genome evolution, which does not explicitly include selection, is sufficient to explain the observed distributions of domain family sizes, in which power laws appear as asymptotic. However, for the model to be compatible with the data, there has to be a precise balance between domain birth, death and innovation rates, and this is likely to be maintained by selection. The developed approach is oriented at a mathematical description of evolution of domain composition of proteomes, but a simple reformulation could be applied to models of other evolving networks with preferential attachment.
authors.affiliation: National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA. karev@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
authors.forename: Georgy P
authors.initials: GP
authors.lastname: Karev
authors.forename: Yuri I
authors.initials: YI
authors.lastname: Wolf
authors.forename: Andrey Y
authors.initials: AY
authors.lastname: Rzhetsky
authors.forename: Faina S
authors.initials: FS
authors.lastname: Berezovskaya
authors.forename: Eugene V
authors.initials: EV
authors.lastname: Koonin
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D017360:Arabidopsis / Q000235:genetics; D001412:Bacillus subtilis / Q000235:genetics; D005075:Biological Evolution; D017173:Caenorhabditis elegans / Q000235:genetics; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003643:Death; D004331:Drosophila melanogaster / Q000235:genetics; D004926:Escherichia coli / Q000235:genetics; D014644:Genetic Variation / Q000235:genetics; D006801:Humans; D008432:Mathematical Computing; D017013:Methanobacteriaceae / Q000235:genetics; D008954:Models, Biological; D036801:Parturition; D017434:Protein Structure, Tertiary / Q000235:genetics*; D012441:Saccharomyces cerevisiae / Q000235:genetics; D048229:Sulfolobus solfataricus / Q000235:genetics; D020124:Thermotoga maritima / Q000235:genetics