title: Assessment in dental VT... can we do better?
abstract: During the VT year the VDP and the trainer could choose to progressively check and complete each of the competencies listed and using the skills evaluation document make the appropriate record. Any areas of further training needs would be identified and a learning plan implemented. The whole process would be supervised by the VT advisor group who could be the resource for further training or support in conjunction with the VDP and trainer. This would be a self evaluation with external validation by the trainer and advisor group similar to the AEGD model in the USA. This would be an assessment that was valid, reliable and feasible as identified by Freeman. The use of a skills evaluation procedure would be similar to a LEP which would support the validity of the process. A record of completion of each key skill (competency) could be made using the supplied paper work and presented periodically as a log of achievement to the VT Advisor group. Of course the whole process also relies on the fact that the trainers need to be competent themselves in using practice based assessment, and an appropriately resourced pilot programme will be needed to make this an effective tool in assessing the overall competency of new graduates in vocational training.
authors.affiliation: Mersey Deanery.
authors.forename: Brian
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Grieveson
mesh_terms: D003162:Competency-Based Education; D004499:Education, Dental, Graduate / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008611:Mentors; D011231:Preceptorship; D015397:Program Evaluation; D012655:Self-Evaluation Programs; D006113:United Kingdom