title: Tensile bond strength of acrylic resin denture teeth to a microwave- or heat-processed denture base.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Fracture of acrylic resin prosthetic teeth from acrylic resin denture bases can be a problem for some patients. The optimal combination of acrylic resin denture tooth, denture base material, and processing method is not known. Purpose. The objective of this study was to compare the tensile bond strengths of heat- and microwave-polymerized acrylic resins among 4 types of acrylic resin denture teeth.
  
  
  METHODS
  Heat-polymerized (Lucitone 199) and microwave-polymerized (Acron MC) acrylic resins were used. Four types of acrylic resin denture teeth (IPN, SLM, Vitapan, and SR-Orthotyp-PE) were milled to a fixed diameter according to ADA specification no. 15. Ten specimens of each tooth type were processed to each of the denture base materials according to the manufacturers' instructions. Ten additional resin control specimens without teeth also were fabricated. Specimens were thermocycled and tested for strength until fracture with a custom alignment device. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test. A scanning electron microscope was used to identify adhesive and cohesive failures within debonded specimens.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean force required to fracture the specimens ranged from 5.3 +/- 3.01 to 21.6 +/- 5.2 MPa for the microwave-polymerized base and 11.2 +/- 3.0 to 39.1 +/- 5.1 MPa for the heat-polymerized base. The most common failure was cohesive within the denture tooth. With each base material, Orthotyp and IPN teeth exhibited the highest bond strengths; SLM and Orthotyp bond strengths were similar. In general, heat-polymerized groups failed cohesively within the denture base resin or the tooth, and microwave-polymerized groups failed adhesively at either the ridge lap or occlusal surface of the denture tooth.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that the type of denture base material and denture tooth selected for use may influence the tensile bond strength of the tooth to the base. Selection of more compatible combinations of base and resin teeth may reduce the number of prosthesis fractures and resultant repairs.
authors.affiliation: Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1001, USA. robert-schneider@uiowa.edu
authors.forename: Robert L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Schneider
authors.forename: Erik R
authors.initials: ER
authors.lastname: Curtis
authors.forename: James M S
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Clancy
mesh_terms: D000180:Acrylic Resins; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001840:Dental Bonding; D017268:Dental Prosthesis Retention; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D003819:Denture Bases; D006358:Hot Temperature; D008422:Materials Testing; D008872:Microwaves; D011108:Polymers / Q000737:chemistry; D011897:Random Allocation; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D013674:Technology, Dental / Q000379:methods; D013718:Tensile Strength; D014093:Tooth, Artificial
chemical_list: D000180:Acrylic Resins; D011108:Polymers; C075051:Acron MC; C040291:Lucitone