Direct plain radiographic methods versus EBRA-Digital for measuring implant migration after total hip arthroplasty.
We aimed to determine whether the precision and sensitivity of migration measurements after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using direct plain radiographic techniques could be made comparable to those of digital methods (EBRA-Digital; University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria) by careful control of radiographic technique and use of modern measuring tools. Precision was examined by analysis of consecutive radiographs taken after repositioning in 20 patients after hybrid THA. The precision (95% confidence interval) of measurements for cup migration using direct methods was +/-1.11 to 3.07 mm (x-axis) and +/-1.28 to 1.92 mm (y-axis). The precision of EBRA for cup measurements was +/-1.00 mm (x-axis) and +/-0.82 mm (y-axis). The precision of stem y-axis migration measurements was +/-1.12 to 6.91 mm using direct methods and +/-0.80 mm using EBRA. Migration of the stem (1.53 mm subsidence; P<.01) and the cup (0.53 mm cranial migration, P<.05) was detected using EBRA in 10 patients followed for 6 months after hybrid THA, but significant migration was not detectable using the most precise of the direct methods. Careful measures to standardize plain radiographs improve precision of direct radiographic measurements; however, their long-term sensitivity remains inferior to methods that employ quality control and measurement algorithms to measure migration from digitized radiographs.
Phillips
Nicholas J
NJ
Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Stockley
Ian
I
Wilkinson
J Mark
JM
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; D005260:Female; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D006622:Hip Prosthesis / Q000009:adverse effects*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D011859:Radiography; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012984:Software