title: Approaches to spondylotic cervical myelopathy: conservative versus surgical results in a 3-year follow-up study.
abstract: METHODS
  A 3-year prospective randomized study was conducted.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To compare conservative and operative treatments of mild and moderate, nonprogressive, and slowly progressive forms of spondylotic cervical myelopathy.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  DATA It is not known whether the results of decompressive surgery for the mild and moderate forms of spondylotic cervical myelopathy are any better than those of the conservative approach.
  
  
  METHODS
  For this study, 68 patients were randomized into two groups. Group A, treated conservatively, consisted of 35 subjects, whereas Group B, treated surgically, was composed of 33 patients. The clinical outcome was evaluated by modified JOA score, timed 10-m walk, the score for daily activities recorded by video and evaluated by two observers blinded to the type of therapy, and subjective assessment by the patients themselves at months 6, 12, 24, and 36 of the follow-up period.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There was, on the average, no significant deterioration in mJOA score in the two groups over the 3-year follow-up period, but there was a slightly expressed decrease in the self-evaluation score in Group B, and a slight deterioration of the score for daily activities in Group A. Comparison of the two groups showed a significant difference in the timed 10-m walk test favoring group A, but no difference in mJOA score or self-evaluation by the patients themselves, with the exception of a better score at month 6 in favor of Group B.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The 3-year follow-up study did not show, on the average, that the surgery is superior to conservative treatment for mild and moderate forms of spondylotic cervical myelopathy.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, Faculty Hospital of Brno, Czech Republic. zkadan@fnbrno.cz
authors.forename: Zdenek
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Kadanka
authors.forename: Miroslav
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mares
authors.forename: Josef
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Bednaník
authors.forename: Vladimír
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Smrcka
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Krbec
authors.forename: Lubor
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Stejskal
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Chaloupka
authors.forename: Dagmar
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Surelová
authors.forename: Oldrich
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Novotný
authors.forename: Igor
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Urbánek
authors.forename: Ladislav
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Dusek
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000893:Anti-Inflammatory Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D001510:Bed Rest; D002574:Cervical Vertebrae / Q000601:surgery; D019299:Decompression, Surgical; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D007103:Immobilization; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009333:Neck; D011446:Prospective Studies; D040242:Risk Reduction Behavior; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D013117:Spinal Cord Compression / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000628:therapy; D013118:Spinal Cord Diseases / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000628:therapy*; D013128:Spinal Osteophytosis / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000628:therapy*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D016138:Walking
chemical_list: D000893:Anti-Inflammatory Agents