title: 2.2 Continuous quality improvement.
abstract: Continuous quality improvement (CQI) can be envisaged as a circular process of goal-setting, followed by external and internal evaluations resulting in improvements that can serve as goals for a next cycle. The need for CQI is apparent, because of public accountability, maintaining European standards and the improvement of dental education. Many examples are known where recommendations from both external and internal evaluation are used for the improvement of dental education. Unfortunately, the implementation of the recommendations is inconsistent, rarely systematic and usually not transparent. This section agreed that it is essential to apply CQI in a structured, systematic and transparent way if we are to improve and maintain the quality of dental education. A model is proposed which includes three aspects: a) the process of CQI; b) the subjects to which CQI should be applied; and c) the management tools to govern CQI. It is stressed, that CQI is a process that can be applied in any dental school irrespective of curriculum or educational approach within the relevant context of the country or the region. The approach needs to recognize the complexity and the need to balance a quality improvement with accountability. A CQI system is also constrained in any organization by the attitudes and values of the staff. Inevitably there has to be a wide range in the application of CQI. Nevertheless, an agreed model on CQI might enhance convergence towards higher standards of dental education. The process of CQI can be supported by developments in information and communication technology (ICT): collection of data, identifying the steps in CQI, formats of reports, etc. The section was set, as one of its tasks, to advise on the development of a network based on a number of case studies on the application of CQI in dental education.
authors.affiliation: Malmö University, Sweden.
authors.forename: Madeleine
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Rohlin
authors.forename: Rob M H
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Schaub
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Holbrook
authors.forename: Edvitar
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Leibur
authors.forename: Gérard
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Lévy
authors.forename: Lenka
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Roubalikova
authors.forename: Maria
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Nilner
authors.forename: Valerie
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Roger-Leroi
authors.forename: Gunter
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Danner
authors.forename: Haluk
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Iseri
authors.forename: Cecile
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Feldman
mesh_terms: D018864:Cultural Diversity; D003625:Data Collection; D003906:Developing Countries; D004497:Education, Dental / Q000592:standards*; D004521:Educational Measurement / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D038622:Internationality; D017145:Models, Educational; D009937:Organizational Objectives; D015397:Program Evaluation / Q000379:methods; D012575:Schools, Dental / Q000592:standards; D017749:Total Quality Management