Comparison of MRI pulse sequences in defining prostate volume after permanent implantation.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the relative value of three MRI pulse sequences in defining the prostate volume after permanent implantation.


METHODS
A total of 45 patients who received a permanent 125I implant were studied. Two weeks after implantation, an axial CT scan (2 mm thickness) and T1-weighted, T1-weighted fat saturation, and T2-weighted axial MRI (3-mm) studies were obtained. The prostate volumes were compared with the initial ultrasound planning volumes, and subsequently the CT, T1-weighted, and T1-weighted fat saturation MRI volumes were compared with the T2-weighted volumes. Discrepancies in volume were evaluated by visual inspection of the registered axial images and the registration of axial volumes on the sagittal T2-weighted volumes. In a limited set of patients, pre- and postimplant CT and T2-weighted MRI studies were available for comparison to determine whether prostate volume changes after implant were dependent on the imaging modality.


RESULTS
T1-weighted and T1-weighted fat saturation MRI and CT prostate volumes were consistently larger than the T2-weighted MRI prostate volumes, with a volume on average 1.33 (SD 0.24) times the T2-weighted volume. This discrepancy was due to the superiority of T2-weighted MRI for prostate definition at the following critical interfaces: membranous urethra, apex, and anterior base-bladder and posterior base-seminal vesicle interfaces. The differences in prostate definition in the anterior base region suggest that the commonly reported underdose may be due to overestimation of the prostate in this region by CT. The consistent difference in volumes suggests that the degree of swelling observed after implantation is in part a function of the imaging modality. In patients with pre- and postimplant CT and T2-weighted MRI images, swelling on the T2-weighted images was 1.1 times baseline and on CT was 1.3 times baseline, confirming the imaging modality dependence of prostate swelling.


CONCLUSIONS
Postimplant T2-weighted MRI images provided superior prostate definition in all critical regions of the prostate compared with CT and the other MRI sequences tested. In addition to defining an optimal technique, these findings call two prior observations into question. Under dosing at the anterior base region may be overestimated because of poor definition of the prostate-bladder muscle interface. The swelling observed after implantation was lower on T2-weighted images as well, suggesting that a fraction of postimplant swelling is a function of the imaging modality. These findings have implications for preimplant planning and postimplant evaluation. As implant planning techniques become more conformal, and registration methods become more efficient, T2-weighted MRI after implantation will improve the accuracy of postimplant dosimetry.
McLaughlin
P W
PW
Department of Radiation Oncology, Providence Hospital, Southfield, MI, USA. mclaughb@umich.edu
Narayana
V
V
Drake
D G
DG
Miller
B M
BM
Marsh
L
L
Chan
J
J
Gonda
R
R
Winfield
R J
RJ
Roberson
P L
PL
D001918:Brachytherapy; D006801:Humans; D007457:Iodine Radioisotopes / Q000627:therapeutic use; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D011467:Prostate / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology*; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology* / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed
D007457:Iodine Radioisotopes