title: Experience with the vacuum assisted closure negative pressure technique in the treatment of non-healing diabetic and dysvascular wounds.
abstract: The purpose of this study is to report our experience with the Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) negative pressure technique in patients with non-healing wounds of the foot, ankle, and lower limb. We retrospectively reviewed 17 patients with non-healing wounds of the lower extremity who underwent treatment using the Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) device. Thirteen of 17 (76%) had diabetes mellitus, nine of whom were insulin-dependent, and 10 of whom had associated peripheral neuropathy. Eight of 17 (47%) had severe peripheral vascular disease. All had failed previous management with serial wound debridements and dressing changes; 15 of 17 (88%) had previously completed at least one course of oral antibiotics. Thirteen of 17 (76%) had previously undergone operative irrigation and debridement of the wounds; six of 17 (35%) had previously undergone revascularization procedures of the involved extremity. Five of 17 (29%) had wounds necessitating an amputation procedure prior to the present treatment; seven of 17 (41%) had failed treatment with local growth factors prior to the present treatment. Average length of treatment with the VAC device was 8.2 weeks. Fourteen of 17 (82%) wounds successfully healed; four underwent split-thickness skin grafting for wound closure; four were briefly treated with local growth factors; six were treated with only dressing changes following VAC treatment. Three of 17 (18%) wounds failed VAC treatment; all three patients had diabetes and had wounds located in the midfoot or forefoot; two of three had severe peripheral vascular disease. Our results indicate that the Vacuum Assisted Closure negative pressure technique is emerging as an acceptable option for wound care of the lower extremity. Not all patients are candidates for such treatment; those patients with severe peripheral vascular disease or smaller forefoot wounds may be best treated by other modalities. Larger wounds seem to be better suited for skin grafting or two-stage primary closure.
authors.forename: Michael P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Clare
authors.forename: Timothy C
authors.initials: TC
authors.lastname: Fitzgibbons
authors.forename: Scott T
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: McMullen
authors.forename: R Colleen
authors.initials: RC
authors.lastname: Stice
authors.forename: Dennis F
authors.initials: DF
authors.lastname: Hayes
authors.forename: Loree
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Henkel
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D017719:Diabetic Foot / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D016523:Foot Ulcer / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans; D007871:Leg Ulcer / Q000150:complications / Q000628:therapy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016491:Peripheral Vascular Diseases / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology; D011312:Pressure; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013396:Suction / Q000379:methods; D014618:Vacuum; D014945:Wound Healing