A cost-minimization analysis of orthopaedic consultations using videoconferencing in comparison with conventional consulting.
We compared the costs of conventional outpatient visits to the surgical department of the University Hospital of Oulu with those of videoconferencing between the primary care centre in Pyhäjärvi and the University Hospital (separated by 160 km). The cost data were obtained from a randomized controlled trial that included 145 first-admission and follow-up orthopaedic patients. In the telemedicine group the annual fixed costs were 6074 in the hospital and 3910 in the primary care centre. The additional variable costs were 2 in the hospital and 19 in primary care. At a workload of 100 patients, the total cost, including travel and indirect costs, was 87.8 per patient in the telemedicine group and 114.0 per patient in the conventional group (i.e. a total cost saving from the use of teleconsultation of 2620). A cost-minimization analysis showed that telemedicine was less costly for society than conventional care at a workload of more than 80 patients per year. If the distance to specialist care were reduced from 160 km to 80 km, the break-even point increased to about 200 patients per year. Wider utilization of the videoconferencing equipment for other purposes, or the use of less expensive videoconferencing equipment, would make services cost saving even at relatively short distances. The study showed that orthopaedic outpatient telecare can be cost minimizing.
Ohinmaa
Arto
A
Department of Economics, University of Oulu, Finland. Arto.Ohinmaa@ualberta.ca
Vuolio
Saija
S
Haukipuro
Kari
K
Winblad
Ilkka
I
D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D005387:Finland; D006785:Hospitals, University; D006801:Humans; D009985:Orthopedics / Q000191:economics*; D010044:Outpatient Clinics, Hospital / Q000191:economics*; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000191:economics*; D019114:Remote Consultation / Q000191:economics*; D014741:Video Recording / Q000191:economics