title: Confidence judgments in children's and adults' event recall and suggestibility.
abstract: The present work investigated the role of children's and adults' metacognitive monitoring and control processes for unbiased event recall tasks and for suggestibility. Three studies were conducted in which children and adults indicated their degree of confidence that their answers were correct after (Study 1) and before (Study 2) answering either unbiased or misleading questions or (Study 3) forced-choice recognition questions. There was a strong tendency for overestimation of confidence regardless of age and question format. However, children did not lack the principal metacognitive competencies when these questions were asked in a neutral interview. Under misleading questioning, in contrast, children's monitoring skills were seriously impaired. Within each age group, better metacognitive differentiation was positively associated with recall accuracy in the suggestive interview.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology IV, University of Würzburg, Germany. roebers@psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de
authors.forename: Claudia M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Roebers
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D003210:Concept Formation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011939:Mental Recall; D010565:Persuasive Communication; D013404:Suggestion; D014796:Visual Perception