Recrimination in the analytic situation. A hypothesis about its influence on psychoanalytical groups.
This paper deals with certain distortions in communication generated by mutual recrimination that is the result of disturbances in the ideal agencies of both parties. Although the ideal ego, superego and ego ideal participate equally in reproach, it is the latter which is the most decisive. In clinical experience, recrimination may easily colour the analytic dialogue. In such cases, interpretation loses its sense of clarification and another type of dialogue replaces it. There, words are used to take possession of the other, for its autonomy is a threat to the static character of the pathology of mourning. The problem of recrimination has also tainted the development of psychoanalysis, to the point of disrupting the process of discovery itself. This paper deals with repercussions in the psychoanalytic movement and also in the elements that constitute its structure. Finally, different variations and disturbances in the psychoanalytic ideal are considered, as well as the involvement of the psychoanalytic institution in preserving or transforming the ideal. Here the importance of institutions and institutional ideals is emphasised. Finally, we suggest that ideals either encourage or hinder the working through of individual and collective mourning.
Gálvez
Manuel José
MJ
Av. Coronel Diaz 2760, 1C, (1425) Buenos Aires, Argentina. manueljg@interserver.com.ar
Maldonado
Jorge Luis
JL
D000328:Adult; D003142:Communication; D004532:Ego; D006117:Grief; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000523:psychology* / Q000628:therapy*; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations; D011573:Psychoanalytic Interpretation; D011575:Psychoanalytic Therapy; D013475:Superego; D013561:Symbolism; D014167:Transference, Psychology