Relationship of milk yield and quality to preweaning gain of calves from Angus, Brahman and reciprocal-cross cows on different forage systems.
Interactions of the regression of preweaning ADG on dam milk yield and quality with breed group and forage environment were evaluated in a two-phase study. Phase I consisted of milk yield and quality and calf gain records from 1989 to 1991 for purebred Angus (n = 64) and Brahman (n = 62) cows mated to sires of both breeds. Phase II consisted of milk yield and quality and calf gain records from 1991 to 1997 for Angus (n = 94), Brahman (n = 85), Angus x Brahman (n = 86) and Brahman x Angus (n = 93) mated to Polled Hereford sires. In Phase I, forage environments included common bermudagrass and endophyte-infected tall fescue. In Phase II, forage environments included common bermudagrass and endophyte-infected tall fescue (1991 to 1995) and a rotational system of both forages (1995 to 1997) in which each forage was grazed during its appropriate growing season, usually June through October for bermudagrass and November through May for tall fescue. Milk yield was estimated monthly six times during lactation from spring through fall and converted to a 24-h basis. Milk fat, milk protein, and somatic cell count were analyzed by a commercial laboratory. In Phase I, the relation of preweaning ADG to milk yield, milk fat yield, and protein yield was greater (P < 0.05) in Brahman cows on bermudagrass than Angus on bermudagrass. The regression of preweaning ADG on milk yield in Phase I was greater (P < 0.05) for cows on tall fescue than cows which grazed bermudagrass. In Phase II, the relation of preweaning ADG to milk yield, milk fat yield, and milk protein yield was greater or tended to be greater (P < 0.01, P < 0.11, P < 0.01, respectively) in purebred cows compared to reciprocal-cross cows. The regression of preweaning ADG on milk yield and milk protein yield was greater (P < 0.05) on tall fescue than bermudagrass in Phase II. These results suggest that the influence of milk yield and quality on calf growth may differ among breed types and production system, and the efficacy of genetic improvements in milk traits may depend on the breed type and forage environment.
Brown
M A
MA
USDA, ARS, Grazinglands Research Laboratory, El Reno, OK 73036, USA. mbrown@grl.ars.usda.gov
Brown
A H
AH
D000821:Animal Feed; D000818:Animals; D000833:Animals, Suckling / Q000254:growth & development*; D001947:Breeding; D002417:Cattle / Q000502:physiology*; D003433:Crosses, Genetic; D004777:Environment; D005223:Fats / Q000032:analysis; D005260:Female; D005516:Food Microbiology; D005658:Fungi / Q000254:growth & development; D005838:Genotype; D007774:Lactation; D008892:Milk / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000592:standards*; D008894:Milk Proteins / Q000032:analysis; D006109:Poaceae / Q000382:microbiology; D012621:Seasons; D014886:Weaning
D005223:Fats; D008894:Milk Proteins