A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI.
BACKGROUND
Single embryo transfer (SET) is the sole strategy with which to reduce the incidence of twins following assisted reproductive technology (ART), but SET may increase the number of ART cycles needed per live-born child. Its cost-effectiveness compared with double embryo transfer (DET) is therefore unknown.


METHODS
A decision-analytic model comparing SET with DET was developed. Estimates were obtained from literature, national pregnancy registers and local hospital records. A sensitivity analysis was performed, using pregnancy rates from four published studies. The outcome measure was the cost per child born, calculated from IVF procedure-related, pregnancy-related and neonatal care costs. Neonatal mortality and long-term morbidity costs were not taken into account.


RESULTS
Independently of the pregnancy rates used, the SET cost per child born was in all instances the same as with DET, varying from EURO= 9520 (SET) versus EURO= 9511 (DET) to EURO= 12254 (SET) versus EURO= 12934 (DET).


CONCLUSIONS
More ART cycles are required to obtain the same numbers of children born following SET compared with DET. Because SET allows the avoidance of twins and thus diminishes pregnancy-related and neonatal care costs, there is no difference in the cost per child born between SET and DET. The real advantage of SET is the avoidance of the very high long-term costs resulting from the increased morbidity of twins after birth.
De Sutter
Paul
P
Infertility Centre, University Hospital Gent, Middelheim Hospital, Antwerpen, Belgium. paul.desutter@rug.ac.be
Gerris
Jan
J
Dhont
Marc
M
D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D004624:Embryo Transfer; D005260:Female; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D011247:Pregnancy; D018873:Pregnancy Rate; D020554:Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic