title: Speech perception in nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds.
abstract: Adjusting the speech processor of a cochlear implant, per electrode, to the individual's response is a laborious task that may interfere with a user-friendly start of implant-mediated hearing, particularly in children. This research concerns the possibility of processor adjustment based on a profile derived from measurements of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds across the electrode array, followed by adjustment of the overall level of the profile to the hearing threshold and maximum comfortable loudness level using live voice. The results for CVC word lists show that speech perception is quite insensitive to the threshold setting of the speech processor. On average, the speech score does not decrease by more than 10% when, with the new method, the threshold setting comes out so much lower that the dynamic range has doubled. In contrast, the speech score appears to be sensitive to an increase of the maximum high-frequency stimulation settings for the basal electrodes, resulting in lower scores at these higher settings. The correlation between the overall ECAP thresholds and conventionally measured subjective thresholds is weak (r = 0.64). However, the correlation between the slopes of these threshold curves is satisfactory (r = 0.82). The correlation between the ECAP thresholds and the maximum stimulation levels is poor, both with respect to overall level and slope (r = 0.39 and 0.36, respectively). Applicability of the ECAP threshold in processor adjustment could not be demonstrated in this study. Prediction of the most critical factor in speech perception, the slope of the maximum stimulation curve, from the ECAP thresholds is poor. However, considering habituation to the initial processor setting of at least 6 months, the small decrease in the CVC scores with the new setting suggests that a more user-friendly adjustment procedure can be developed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands. g.smoorenburg@kmb.azu.nl
authors.forename: Guido F
authors.initials: GF
authors.lastname: Smoorenburg
authors.forename: Christina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Willeboer
authors.forename: Johannes E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: van Dijk
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000295:instrumentation; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001309:Auditory Threshold / Q000502:physiology*; D019929:Cochlear Implantation; D003638:Deafness / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*; D004867:Equipment Design; D005072:Evoked Potentials, Auditory / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010700:Phonetics; D017755:Prosthesis Fitting; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D013067:Speech Perception / Q000502:physiology*