title: Copper toxicity thresholds for important restoration grass species of the Western United States.
abstract: Copper toxicity thresholds for plant species that are used in restoration activities in western North America have not been established. As a result, ecological risk assessments must rely on toxicity thresholds established for agronomic species, which usually differ from those of species used in restoration. Thus, risk assessors have the potential for classifying sites as phytotoxic to perennial, nonagronomic species and calling for intensive remediation activities that may not be necessary. The objective of this study was to provide a better estimate of Cu toxicity thresholds for five grass species that are commonly used in restoration efforts in the western United States. We used a greenhouse screening study where seedlings of introduced redtop (Agrostis gigantea Roth.), the native species slender wheatgrass (Elymus trachycaulus [Link] Gould ex Shinners var. Pryor), tufted hairgrass (Deschampsia caespitosa [L.] Beauvois), big bluegrass (Poa secunda J. Presl var. Sherman), and basin wildrye (Leymus cinereus [Scribner & Merrill] A. Love var. Magnar) and the agricultural species common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were grown in sand culture and exposed to supplemental concentrations of soluble Cu of 0 (control), 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 mg/L. We determined six measures of toxicity: the 60-d mean lethal concentration (LC50), 60-d mean effective concentration (EC50)-plant, 60-d EC50-shoot, 60-d EC50-root, phytotoxicity threshold (PT50)-shoot, and the PT50-root. Results suggest that these restoration grass species generally have higher Cu tolerance than agronomic species reported in the past. Of the species tested, redtop appeared to be especially tolerant of high levels of substrate and tissue Cu. Values of EC50-plant for restoration grasses were between 283 and 710 mg Cu/L compared to 120 mg Cu/L for common wheat. Measured PT50-shoot values were between 737 and 10,792 mg Cu/L. These reported thresholds should be more useful for risk assessors than those currently used, which are based largely on agronomic crops.
authors.affiliation: Colorado State University, Department of Rangeland Ecosystem Science, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1478, USA. mark.paschke@colostate.edu
authors.forename: Mark W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Paschke
authors.forename: Edward F
authors.initials: EF
authors.lastname: Redente
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000383:Agriculture; D001673:Biodegradation, Environmental; D003300:Copper / Q000633:toxicity*; D007928:Lethal Dose 50; D006109:Poaceae / Q000502:physiology*; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012989:Soil Pollutants / Q000633:toxicity*; D014481:United States
chemical_list: D012989:Soil Pollutants; D003300:Copper