[Knowledge of "Hardship Exemptions" in statutory sickness insurance].
OBJECTIVE
The German Statutory Sickness Fund comprises about 90 % of the total population. There are special relief or 'hardship' regulations in the Statutory Sickness Fund (the 'Härtefallregelungen') exempting those insured persons from co-payment for whom the co-payments would be an undue financial burden. The most important research questions are: How many of the insured persons do actually know about the possibility of being exempted? How did this group learn about the possibility? How many insured are not exempted from co-payment although they are entitled to be exempted? Why didn't they apply? According to our knowledge there is no comparable national or international study in this field of research.


METHODS
The data for the empirical study are collected in a Statutory Sickness Fund in the city of Augsburg (Southern Germany). 18 238 insured (pre-selected as not being exempted from co-payments, but probably entitled to be exempted) were addressed with a very short questionnaire in September 2000. They were asked about their household income, the number of the household members and the money spent for co-payments for medicaments, dental prostheses and other health-related services, in order to identify those entitled to be exempted, and a control group. Among those who responded 1.002 persons were interviewed by CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interview).


RESULTS
Within the study group interviewed by CATI there was only limited knowledge about the "Härtefallregelungen". About two-thirds of the respondents (61.58 %) were unfamiliar with the possibility of getting an annual reimbursement of the co-payments. Less than one-third (27.78 %) knew nothing about the regulation of being totally exempted from co-payments. Most persons learnt about the regulations from friends and relatives, but few from physicians and other health professionals. One of the reasons most frequently mentioned for not applying for the "Härtefallregelungen" was a presumably too high income. Reasons which lie within the formalities of the application or refer to the potentially embarrassing situation were reported less often.


CONCLUSIONS
Knowledge about the possibilities of being exempted from co-payments for medicaments and other health-related services and goods should be increased. With most of the respondents having learnt about the "Härtefallregelungen" from friends and relatives, patients could get relevant information from physicians and other health professionals more frequently. As financial aspects are the reasons reported most for not applying for the "Härtefallregelungen", the information policy could be enhanced e. g. by simplified examples for calculating the relevant income for being entitled. This way there is a chance that all insured persons who are entitled will actually benefit from the "Härtefallregelungen".
Eller
M
M
Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Management im Gesundheitswesen, GSF München-Neuherberg, Germany. eller@gsf.de
Baumann
F
F
Mielck
A
A
D004608:Eligibility Determination / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005382:Financing, Personal / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005858:Germany; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D007182:Income; D008489:Medical Indigency / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D012051:Reimbursement Mechanisms / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors