title: [Long-term prognosis of women with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. a case-control study].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Women with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction have a worse prognosis than men. However, information about the prognosis of women with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) is scarce. The aim of this study was to determine if the long-term prognosis of men and women with NSTEACS differs.
  
  
  METHODS
  Case-control study. In a consecutive series of 300 patients admitted for a NSTEACS and ischemic ECG changes, we compared the clinical characteristics, in-hospital and long-term follow-up of 95 women and 95 men matched for age, presence of diabetes, and past history of hypertension.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The median age of patients was 69 years, 36% had diabetes, and 65% had a history of hypertension. There were no gender differences in the history of angina or hypercholesterolemia, clinical presentation, number of patients with ST-segment depression, and CK-MB elevation. However, smoking, coronary artery disease, and peripheral vascular disease were less frequent in women. Treatment at admission and at discharge was similar in men and women, as was the use of in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic procedures (echocardiography: 80 vs 88%; coronary angiography: 57 vs 59%; percutaneous coronary intervention: 17 vs 14%; coronary surgery 13 vs. 11%). Women had a better mean ejection fraction (55 13 vs 49 14%; p < 0.01) and fewer stenosed coronary vessels (1.4 1.1 vs 2.2 0.9; p < 0.01). There were no differences in the frequency of recurrent angina (28 vs 25%), death, or infarction (both 3.2%) during hospitalization. However, during a 30-month follow-up the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or a new episode of NSTEACS was significantly lower in women with a relative risk (RR) of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.33-0.86; p < 0.01). This apparently better prognosis persisted after adjusting for clinical data and ejection fraction (RR: 0.57 (0.33-0.98); p < 0.05), but disappeared after adjusting for the number of diseased coronary vessels (RR: 0.71 (0.35-1.47); p = 0.36).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Women with NSTEACS had a better long-term prognosis than men. This better prognosis was independent of the patients' clinical characteristics and treatment, and could be explained by a less severe and less extensive coronary artery disease.
authors.affiliation: Institut de Malalties Cardiovasculars. Hospital Clínic. Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS). Departament de Medicina. Universitat de Barcelona. España. xbosch@medicina.ub.es
authors.forename: Xavier
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Bosch
authors.forename: Nuria
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Casanovas
authors.forename: Faustino
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Miranda-Guardiola
authors.forename: Salvador
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Díez-Aja
authors.forename: Marta
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sitges
authors.forename: Ignaci
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Anguera
authors.forename: Ginés
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Sanz
authors.forename: Amadeo
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Betriu
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000789:Angina, Unstable / Q000401:mortality / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000628:therapy; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D004562:Electrocardiography; D005260:Female; D006329:Heart Conduction System / Q000503:physiopathology*; D017052:Hospital Mortality; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000401:mortality / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000628:therapy; D011379:Prognosis; D012737:Sex Factors; D016019:Survival Analysis; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome