Public health law in an age of terrorism: rethinking individual rights and common goods.
The balance between individual interests and common goods needs to be recalibrated in an age of terrorism. Public health agencies should have a robust infrastructure to conduct essential public health services at a level of performance that matches evolving threats to the health of the public. This includes a well-trained workforce, electronic information, surveillance, and laboratory capacity. This paper explains modern efforts at public health law reform: a Model Public Health Statute and the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA), which has been enacted wholly or in part by nineteen states and the District of Columbia. Next, the paper shows why existing public health laws provide a weak foundation for public health practice. Finally, the paper offers a systematic defense of MSEHPA, which has galvanized the public debate around the appropriate balance between public goods and individual rights.
Gostin
Lawrence O
LO
D023482:Bioterrorism / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000517:prevention & control*; D002961:Civil Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003254:Consumer Advocacy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D004189:Disaster Planning / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D004630:Emergencies; D005610:Freedom; D006801:Humans; D037141:Mandatory Programs / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D011057:Politics; D011634:Public Health / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011635:Public Health Administration / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011049:Social Control Policies / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D014481:United States