Controlling the vocabulary for anatomy.
When confronted with the representation of human anatomy, natural language processing (NLP) system designers are facing an unsolved and frequent problem: the lack of a suitable global reference. The available sources in electronic format are numerous, but none fits adequately all the constraints and needs of language analysis. These sources are usually incomplete, difficult to use or tailored to specific needs. The anatomist's or ontologist's view does not necessarily match that of the linguist. The purpose of this paper is to review most recognized sources of knowledge in anatomy usable for linguistic analysis. Their potential and limits are emphasized according to this point of view. Focus is given on the role of the consensus work of the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists (IFAA) giving the Terminologia Anatomica.
Baud
R H
RH
Division d'Informatique Medicale, University Hospital of Geneva, CH - 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Lovis
C
C
Rassinoux
A M
AM
Ruch
P
P
Geissbuhler
A
A
D000715:Anatomy / Q000145:classification*; D008037:Linguistics; D012014:Reference Books, Medical; D017432:Unified Medical Language System; D018875:Vocabulary, Controlled