title: [Predictive value of teller Acuity Card Test (TACT) and comparison of recognition and grating acuities in premature children with and without residua of Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The aim of the study was to evaluate the predictive value of grating acuity as measured by the TAC Test (TACT) at the age of 6 months corrected age and to compare grating and recognition acuities in eyes with and without ROP residua at an age of three to seven years.
  
  
  METHODS
  The development of visual acuity between 6 months and 3 - 7 years (4.5 years median) was evaluated in 87 eyes of 44 premature children born between the 24 th and 36 th week of gestation, with a birthweight ranging from 550 to 2580 g. Thirteen eyes reached threshold: ROP disease and underwent cryocoagulation. Grating acuity was measured with the TACT at 6 months corrected age and every half year up to three to seven years (median 4.5 years). Recognition acuity was measured with the Sheridan-Gardiner Test (SGT) at 4.5 years (median). TACT-results at 6 months corrected age and 3 - 7 years were compared for the group of patients with normal posterior pole and patients with ROP residua. Furthermore, SGT scores and TACT scores were compared at the 4.5 years follow-up. A visual acuity of >/= 0.1 (3 cy/ degrees ) and >/= 0.4 (13 cy/ degrees ) was considered favourable at the age of 6 months corrected age and 3 - 7 years, respectively.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The TACT scores ranged from < 0.03 to 0.2 (< 1.0 to 6.5 cy/ degrees ) at 6 months and from < 0.05 to 2.0 (< 1.6 to 57 cy/ degrees ) at 3 - 7 years. In 77 % of cases the TACT scores at 6 months had predictive value for the further TACT scores and in 78 % for the optotype acuity. There was no difference between eyes with normal posterior pole and eyes with ROP residua concerning the predictive value of non favourable optotype acuity.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Testing grating acuity at 6 months corrected age allows to roughly predict both grating and recognition acuities at the age of 3 - 7 years. No difference between patients with normal posterior pole and patients with ROP residua was found.
authors.affiliation: Universitäts-Augenklinik Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Zubcov@em.uni-frankfurt.de
authors.forename: Alina A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Zubcov
authors.forename: Beatrice M
authors.initials: BM
authors.lastname: Rossillion
authors.forename: Borislav
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Kacer
authors.forename: Norbert
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Stärk
authors.forename: Rolf
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Schlösser
authors.forename: Karoline
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Vanselow
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003452:Cryosurgery; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012178:Retinopathy of Prematurity / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000601:surgery; D014787:Vision Tests / Q000295:instrumentation*; D014792:Visual Acuity