title: Whatever happened to ecology?
abstract: The holistic ecology of the early days had much in common with the world-view of primal people and of the romantic poets. In the 1950s a revival of reductionist and mechanistic ideas took place. The living world, constantly changing in a total "chance direction", appeared by its very nature "totally indestructible". The view of ecological succession toward a "climax" (Odum) became unacceptable for its assumed metaphysical and teleological connotations. Ecological succession is indeed only one special instance of sequential development, that is a feature of all life processes at all levels of organisation. Even the principle of "balance" was rejected by reductionists, because it recalled divine-order. Finally, the principle that "the whole is more than the sum of its parts" was abandoned, thus denying the most basic feature of the living world: organisation. Mainstream scientific ecology no longer reflects the ecological movement of today and may serve to justify the destruction that the irresponsible activities of the multinationals are giving rise to.
authors.affiliation: egoldsmith@ecologist.fsnet.co.uk
authors.forename: Edward
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Goldsmith
mesh_terms: D004463:Ecology