title: The past and future of the past tense.
abstract: What is the interaction between storage and computation in language processing? What is the psychological status of grammatical rules? What are the relative strengths of connectionist and symbolic models of cognition? How are the components of language implemented in the brain? The English past tense has served as an arena for debates on these issues. We defend the theory that irregular past-tense forms are stored in the lexicon, a division of declarative memory, whereas regular forms can be computed by a concatenation rule, which requires the procedural system. Irregulars have the psychological, linguistic and neuropsychological signatures of lexical memory, whereas regulars often have the signatures of grammatical processing. Furthermore, because regular inflection is rule-driven, speakers can apply it whenever memory fails.
authors.affiliation: Dept of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, NE20-413, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 02139, Cambridge, MA, USA
authors.forename: Steven
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Pinker
authors.forename: Michael T.
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Ullman