Randomised controlled trial of glove perforation in single and double-gloving methods in gynaecologic surgery.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the value of double-gloving in gynaecological surgery.


METHODS
A prospective randomised controlled trial of glove perforation in single- and double-gloving methods.


METHODS
Rajavithi Hospital between 1 September 1999 to 31 August 2000.


METHODS
Eighty-eight (88) and 82 primary surgeons were selected at random to make up single- and double-gloving groups, respectively, while performing total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO).


METHODS
The gloves were tested by immersion in water.


RESULTS
The glove perforation rate was 6.09% and 22.73% in double-inner and single gloves, respectively, with this difference being statistically different (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the glove perforation rates in single gloves (22.73%) and in double-outer gloves (19.51%). There was matched perforation of the same finger of both outer and inner gloves in 1.22% of total double-inner gloves.


CONCLUSIONS
The double-gloving methods significantly reduced the risk of surgeons' hands contacting blood, when compared with the single-gloving method, in TAH with/or without BSO.
Kovavisarach
Ekachai
E
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rajavithi Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Seedadee
Charoon
C
D004868:Equipment Failure / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005932:Gloves, Surgical / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D016273:Occupational Exposure / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011446:Prospective Studies