title: Elbow extension.
abstract: Reconstruction of elbow extension is an established treatment with a high degree of patient satisfaction. The D-T transfer is the most common method and has the advantage of inducing no serious complications; however, it necessitates a long period of healing and recovery. The Bi-T transfer is used much less frequently and, in the author's opinion, has few advantages compared with the D-T transfer. It is somewhat less time consuming to perform, and the rehabilitation period is a few weeks shorter. This method, however, has several drawbacks, including difficulties in learning to use the muscle as an extensor and a reduction of elbow flexion strength, which might result in a subjective functional loss. What is the best treatment for patients with a posterior deltoid that has a strength grade of 2 or 3: a D-T or Bi-T transfer or functional electrical stimulation? Today, this question is impossible to answer. The author is convinced that the optimal postoperative regimen for a reconstructed elbow extension has not been found yet.
authors.affiliation: Department of Hand Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. arvid.ejeskar@orthop.gu.se
authors.forename: Arvid
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ejeskär
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D004551:Elbow Joint / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000601:surgery; D011182:Postoperative Care; D011782:Quadriplegia / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D013709:Tendon Transfer / Q000379:methods*