title: Examining the role of the fixation cue in inhibition of return.
abstract: To clarify the role of the fixation cue in inhibition of return (IOR), the present study compared four conditions: fixation cue immediately after the peripheral cue, in the middle of the stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA), immediately before the onset of the target, or no fixation cue. With a 200-ms SOA, less IOR was found when the fixation cue was either absent or occurred immediately after the peripheral cue. No differences between the four conditions were found with 400-ms and 800-ms SOAs. These findings suggest that there is a brief period of time in which attention cannot be withdrawn from the peripherally cued location. Once attention has been withdrawn from the peripherally cued location, IOR can be found at short SOAs.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, 100 St. George Street, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3. pratt@psych.utoronto.ca
authors.forename: Jay
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Pratt
authors.forename: Martin H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Fischer
mesh_terms: D003463:Cues; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D011897:Random Allocation