title: Sexual abuse in irritable bowel syndrome: to ask or not to ask -- that is the question.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common and costly disorder in Canada. The paucity of medical treatment underscores the importance of examining every element of the management approach. Data exist supporting an increased prevalence of abuse among individuals with IBS. Importantly, the pathophysiology underlying the link between abuse and IBS is increasingly understood. Treatment recommendations by opinion leaders support an abuse inquiry. However, many clinicians view abuse inquiry as an ethical dilemma.
  
  
  METHODS
  Canadian gastroenterologists were surveyed to determine current practice patterns and to identify barriers to inquiry. Barriers cited by clinicians were explored within an ethical context.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Abuse inquiry is not universally practised in Canada. Fifty-four per cent of the membership of Canadian Association of Gastroenterologists responded to the survey. They reported inquiring into abuse histories in approximately 50% of patients with IBS. The frequency of inquiry declined when male patients were considered. The primal barriers cited were time constraints (25%), personal comfort with abuse issues (25%) and lack of resources for addressing the abuse (33%). Importantly, only a minority (10%), cited abuse history as irrelevant to the management of the patient.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Physicians identify significant barriers to pursuing an inquiry into abuse. However, a minority cited 'clinical irrelevance' as a primal barrier, the implicit statement being that the abuse history has clinical relevance. This view is consistent with opinion leaders and published treatment recommendations. Therefore, by not inquiring into the abuse history, physicians are not fulfilling their ethical responsibility to the patient. Physicians need to resolve their barriers to inquiry. Furthermore, they need to familiarize themselves with treatment recommendations and include this review in their consultation.
authors.affiliation: Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba. ailnycky@sbgh.mb.ca
authors.forename: Alexandra
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ilnyckyj
authors.forename: Charles N
authors.initials: CN
authors.lastname: Bernstein
mesh_terms: D002170:Canada; D003109:Colonic Diseases, Functional / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology* / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D005762:Gastroenterology / Q000941:ethics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D019538:Health Care Surveys / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010819:Physician's Role / Q000523:psychology*; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations / Q000941:ethics; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000941:ethics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012307:Risk Factors; D012742:Sex Offenses / Q000941:ethics* / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data