title: Prehospital ACLS--does it work?
abstract: Cardiac disease is the most common cause of death in the United States, and sudden cardiac arrest frequently claims the lives of men and women during their most productive years. It is believed that much better survival rates can be achieved for victims of cardiac arrest through optimizing the "chain of survival" as described by the American Heart Association. The relative and incremental benefit of full prehospital ACLS over basic life support and defibrillation is unproven, however. This is an important issue in this era of cost containment. Some of the ongoing studies including the OPALS study may clarify the cost effectiveness and relative efficacy of rapid defibrillation and full ACLS programs for victims of prehospital cardiac arrest [6].
authors.affiliation: Thoracic and Cardiovascular Institute, Sparrow Health System, Michigan State University, 1200 E, Michigan Avenue, Suite 525, East Lansing, MI 48912, USA.
authors.forename: Alok
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Maheshwari
authors.forename: Avanti
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Mehrotra
authors.forename: Anoop K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Gupta
authors.forename: Ranjan K
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Thakur
mesh_terms: D022561:Advanced Cardiac Life Support / Q000191:economics; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D004632:Emergency Medical Services; D006323:Heart Arrest / Q000401:mortality; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D015996:Survival Rate; D013997:Time Factors; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology