title: Comment on "Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes" (Di Lollo, Enns, & Rensink, 2000).
abstract: V. Di Lolo, J. T. Enns, and R. A. Rensink (2000) reported properties of masking that they claimed were inconsistent with all current models. The current authors show, through computer simulation, that many current models can account for V. Di Lollo et al.'s (2000) data. Although V. Di Lollo et al. (2000) argued that their data could be accounted for only with models that incorporate reentrant processing, the current authors show that reentrant processing is not necessary.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, 1364 Psychological Sciences Building, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1364, USA. gfrancis@psych.purdue.edu
authors.forename: Gregory
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Francis
authors.forename: Frouke
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Hermens
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D003198:Computer Simulation; D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D011601:Psychophysics