[Validation of an experimental protocol of an optoelectronic analysis of continuous active knee kinematics in vitro].
OBJECTIVE
In vitro experiments are particularly useful for studying kinematic changes in the normal knee exposed to experimental conditions simulating different disease states. We developed an experimental protocol allowing a kinematic analysis of the femorotibial and femoropatellar joints in healthy knees and after implantation of a knee prosthesis, using a central pivot to simulate active loaded movement from the standing to sitting position.


METHODS
An experimental device was designed to apply force to the femur of a cadaveric specimen including the femur, the patella and the tibia. The tibia was angled in the sagittal plane and the femur was free to move in space in response to the geometric movement of the knee joint, the capsuloligamentary structures, the quadriceps tendon and gravity. Variation in the length of the quadriceps tendon controlled the flexion-extension movement. The experimental setup included computer-controlled activation allowing continuous coordinated movement of the femur relative to the tibia and of the tibia relative to the ground. Standard activations simulated movement from the standing to the sitting position.


METHODS
Five pairs of fresh-frozen cadaver specimens including the entire femur, patella, tibia and fibula, the capsuloligamentary and intra-articular structures of the knee, the superior and inferior tibiofibular ligaments and the quadriceps tendon were studied. The quadriceps tendon was connected to the computer-guided activation device. Reflectors were fixed onto the anterior aspect of the femur, the superior tibial epiphysis and the center of the patella. Anatomic landmarks on the femur, the tibia, and the patella were identified to determine the plane of movement of each bone in the three rotation axes and the three translation directions. Three infrared cameras recorded movements of the reflectors fixed on the bony segments and, by mathematical transformation, the movement of the corresponding bony segment, displayed in time-course curves.


RESULTS
The precision of the measurements, evaluated in a previous study, was +/- 1.5 degrees for rotation and +/- 0.5 mm for translation movements. Three acquisitions were made for each experiment and produced results differing less than one degree. A qualitative analysis of femorotibial and femoropatellar kinematics was achieved for the normal knee. The automatic internal rotation of the femur during flexion was observed and the patellar kinematics were defined with six degrees of freedom.


CONCLUSIONS
This experimental setup enables a comparison of the kinetics of a normal knee with the kinetics observed after implantation of a prosthesis on the same knee. The kinetic analysis does not involve a succession of static states but rather a continuous movement generated by the action of the quadriceps that can be loaded, simulating partial weight bearing. Using the markers fixed directly on the bones, this in vitro study allowed remarkably precise and reproducible measurements. The movements simulated regularly encountered clinical situations. The quality of the movement recorded for a given prosthesis thus provides an accurate approach to the quality of the prosthesis. The goal is not to define the exact kinematics of the normal knee but rather to compare the kinematics of the normal knee with that of the same knee after prosthesis implantation allowing an accurate method for assessing prosthesis design and studying the influence of different parameters, particularly the ligaments. Concomitant study of femorotibial and femoropatellar kinematics provides further information rarely found in the literature.
Jenny
J-Y
JY
Centre de Traumatologie et d'Orthopédie, 10, avenue Baumann, 67400 Illkirch-Graffenstaden. jyjenny@aol.com
Lefèbvre
Y
Y
Vernizeau
M
M
Lavaste
F
F
Skalli
W
W
D000368:Aged; D000886:Anthropometry; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002102:Cadaver; D002985:Clinical Protocols / Q000592:standards; D005269:Femur / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000503:physiopathology; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010329:Patella / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000503:physiopathology; D011187:Posture; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards*; D012399:Rotation; D013977:Tibia / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000503:physiopathology; D016474:Weight-Bearing