title: To peritonealise or not to peritonealise? A randomised trial at abdominal hysterectomy in Iran.
abstract: We conducted a trial to determine whether non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum alters the intraoperative or post-operative course at abdominal hysterectomy. This was a parallel-group double-blind randomised controlled trial was performed on 66 women who underwent abdominal hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy. Twenty-seven were allocated to the control 'closed' group and 39 women to the study 'open' group. The main outcome measures were operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative pain assessed by visual analogue scale and amount of postoperative analgesia. The study was conducted in the Department of Gynecological Oncology in a university teaching hospital. The operative time was shorter (P < 0.05) and the time to ambulation without assistance was significantly shorter in study group. There were no difference in postoperative pain, blood loss, amount of postoperative analgesia and antibiotics in the two groups. Peritoneal closure at abdominal hysterectomy provides no immediate postoperative benefits while unnecessarily lengthening surgical time and anaesthesia exposure. We suggest that the traditional practice of visceral and parietal closure be abolished at abdominal hysterectomy.
authors.affiliation: Department of Gynaecology, Tehran University of Medical Science, Vali-e-Asr Hospital, Iran. valrec2@yahoo.com
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Behtash
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Ghaemaghami
authors.forename: M M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Gilani
authors.forename: M T
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Rajabi
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Moghimi
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Hanjani