Disambiguating conscious and unconscious influences: do exclusion paradigms demonstrate unconscious perception?
Does exclusion failure--responding with previously presented words despite instructions to avoid doing so--demonstrate unconscious influences? This article examines exclusion-based evidence for unconscious perception. I propose an alternative signal detection theory (SDT) framework that can account for exclusion failure and ostensibly convergent qualitative differences without positing additional unconscious perceptual mechanisms. In the proposed SDT model, exclusion failure is a criterion artifact, similar to classic SDT-based critiques of subjective threshold approaches. However, it is suggested that exclusion approaches do demonstrate that response strategies are applied only to above-criterion stimuli and thereby illustrate important qualitative differences between two conscious processes: phenomenal awareness itself and higher-order (i.e., metacognitive) decision processes.
Snodgrass
Michael
M
University of Michigan Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Riverview Building, 900 Wall Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA. jmsnodgr@umich.edu
D001364:Awareness / Q000502:physiology; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology; D003243:Consciousness; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology; D010465:Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D014473:Unconscious, Psychology