Substance or style? An investigation of the NEO-PI-R validity scales.
The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992b) has been criticized for the absence of validity scales designed to detect response distortion. Recently, validity scales were developed from the items of the NEO-PI-R (Schinka, Kinder, & Kremer, 1997) and several studies have used a variety of methods to test their use. However, it is controversial whether these scales are measuring something that is substantive (such as psychopathology or its absence) or stylistic (which might be effortful distortion or less conscious processes such as lack of insight). In this study, we used a multimethod-multitrait approach to examine the validity of these scales in a clinical sample of 668 participants diagnosed with personality disorders or major depression. Using various indicators of both stylistic and substantive variance, confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) suggested that these validity scales measure something that may be conceptually distinct from, yet highly related to, substantive variance in responding.
Morey
Leslie C
LC
Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-4235, USA. lcm@psyc.tamu.edu
Quigley
Brian D
BD
Sanislow
Charles A
CA
Skodol
Andrew E
AE
McGlashan
Thomas H
TH
Shea
M Tracie
MT
Stout
Robert L
RL
Zanarini
Mary C
MC
Gunderson
John G
JG
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D003866:Depressive Disorder / Q000175:diagnosis; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010554:Personality Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D010555:Personality Inventory; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000379:methods; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013694:Temperament