title: Economics of selecting for sex: the most important genetic trait.
abstract: Over 20,000 calves have resulted from artificial insemination (AI) of cattle with sexed, frozen/thawed sperm in the course of experimentation in several countries, and from commercial sales in the United Kingdom. This technology likely will become commercially available in many countries within a few years. Accuracy of the process is about 90% for either sex, and resulting calves appear to be no different from non-sexed controls in birthweight, mortality, rate of gain, and incidence of abnormalities. The main determinants of the extent of use of sexed sperm will be pregnancy rate and cost. Fertility of low doses (1.5 x 10(6)-2 x 10(6)) of sexed, frozen sperm for AI of heifers usually has been in the range of 70-80% of unsexed sperm at normal doses (10 x 10(6)-20 x 10(6) sperm) in well managed herds; it has been lower in poorly managed herds, and likely will be lower with lactating dairy cows. It is expected that fertility of sexed sperm will increase significantly due to very recent improvements in the hydrodynamics of the sexing process and potential improvements in cryopreservation procedures. It is unclear how sexed sperm will be priced; the cost of sexed sperm for cattle will likely be more than double the cost of unsexed sperm in most markets. The economic benefit of using sexed sperm also will depend on the baseline fertility of the herd since at lower fertility, it takes more doses of semen per calf produced. It is noted that for a small percentage of elite cattle, the economics of using sexed sperm do not depend primarily on increased production or efficiency of producing meat or milk, but rather on factors such as scarcity, tradition, cattle show winnings, and biosecurity during herd expansion. Until sorting efficiencies improve and costs decline, sales likely will be limited primarily to these niche markets. With near normal fertility and a premium for sexing in the range of US$ 10 per insemination dose, sexed sperm likely would become economically and environmentally beneficial for many, if not most populations of cattle being bred by AI.
authors.affiliation: Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Laboratory, Foothills Campus, Colorado State University, ARBL Building, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. gseidel@colostate.edu
authors.forename: G E
authors.initials: GE
authors.lastname: Seidel
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle / Q000235:genetics*; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D015925:Cryopreservation; D003612:Dairying; D005260:Female; D007315:Insemination, Artificial / Q000662:veterinary; D008297:Male; D011247:Pregnancy; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Q000662:veterinary; D012662:Semen Preservation; D012732:Sex Determination Analysis / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods; D012743:Sex Preselection / Q000662:veterinary*; D013094:Spermatozoa