Characterization of the analgesic actions of adenosine: comparison of adenosine and remifentanil infusions in patients undergoing major surgical procedures.
Perioperative pain is still a major problem, and new pharmacological means should be explored to mitigate such pain. Adenosine is an ubiquitous endogenous substance; when exogenously administered, it provides a number of salutary effects including neuromodulation, antinociception, and cytoprotective actions. The aim of this study was to characterize the perioperative antinociceptive-analgesic effects of intraoperative adenosine infusion and determine the duration of actions in the postoperative period, and compare them to those of remifentanil in patients undergoing major surgical procedures in a double-blind study.Sixty-two patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatments. After standard induction of anesthesia, the lungs were mechanically ventilated. Anesthesia was maintained with a constant alveolar concentration of inhaled anesthetics (3% desflurane and 65% nitrous oxide in oxygen). A variable-rate of intravenous infusion of adenosine (50-500 microg kg(-1) x min(-1)) or remifentanil (0.05-0.5 microg kg(-1) x min(-1)) was initiated 5 min before the skin incision and was titrated to maintain systolic blood pressure and heart rate within 20% of baseline values during surgery. Postoperative evaluations included the level of sedation, degree of pain severity, opioid analgesic (fentanyl, morphine) consumption, and cardiorespiratory variables for 48 h. Intraoperative inhibition of the cardiovascular responses to surgical stimulation could be equally achieved by adenosine or remifentanil, and both could maintain excellent hemodynamic stability. Postoperatively, however, there were striking differences: (1). initial pain score was reduced by 60% (P<0.001) in the adenosine group compared to the remifentanil group and it remained lower throughout the 48 h recovery period; (2). postoperative morphine requirements during the first 0.25, 2 and 48 h were consistently lower in the adenosine group as compared to the remifentanil group (78, 71 and 42%, P<0.001, respectively); (3). adenosine patients remained significantly less sedated at all evaluations; (4) the end-tidal and arterial carbon dioxide values in the remifentanil group were significantly higher when patients were admitted to the postanesthesia care unit. No adverse effect of adenosine was observed at any time. Intraoperative adenosine infusion provided a salutary recovery from anesthesia associated with a pronounced and sustained postoperative pain relief. Compared to remifentanil, adenosine significantly reduced the opioid requirements and minimized the side effects including protracted sedation, cardiorespiratory instability, nausea, and vomiting in the postoperative recovery period.
Fukunaga
Atsuo F
AF
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, 1000 West Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90509, USA. ab.fukunaga@verizon.net
Alexander
George E
GE
Stark
Charles W
CW
D000241:Adenosine / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D000328:Adult; D000700:Analgesics / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D000701:Analgesics, Opioid / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D000769:Anesthesia, Inhalation; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000188:drug therapy*; D010880:Piperidines / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D000077208:Remifentanil; D016896:Treatment Outcome
D000700:Analgesics; D000701:Analgesics, Opioid; D010880:Piperidines; D000241:Adenosine; D000077208:Remifentanil