title: Evaluation of a peer-reviewed career development and compensation program for physicians at an academic health science center.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The Department of Pediatrics at the Hospital for Sick Children, which is funded by an alternative payment plan, has implemented a novel career development and compensation program (CDCP). Job activity profiles were used to more clearly define job expectations, benchmarks guided career development, and peer review was used to assess performance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the departmental pediatricians' satisfaction with the CDCP.
  
  
  METHODS
  Pediatricians, all of whom had undergone CDCP annual reviews, could participate if they had undergone the in-depth triennial CDCP review. Each received a 5-point Likert scale-based questionnaire that asked how well the CDCP had conformed to the principles identified by the department during the development of the CDCP. Anonymous, confidential responses were collated and used to guide focus groups that discussed areas of greatest concern and attempted to identify solutions. Focus groups were led by external facilitators who were experienced in qualitative research. They audiotaped the sessions, transcribed the comments, and analyzed the data with the assistance of a qualitative analysis application.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Sixty of the eligible 88 pediatricians participated, and 74% of their responses were that the CDCP had addressed the original principles "somewhat," "to a great extent," or "extremely well." The remainder indicated that some of the principles were either "not addressed" or "only to a small extent" by the CDCP. Results from the 11 focus groups (46 participants) indicated that the CDCP was an improvement over the previous method of career development and determination of the rate of remuneration. Most were also still in agreement with the purpose and design principles. Although they did not want the CDCP to undergo a major redesign, they identified areas that need improvement. Short-, medium-, and long-term action plans to address these areas are under way.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Pediatricians at the health science center of the Hospital for Sick Children remain supportive of the CDCP.
authors.affiliation: Paediatric Consultants Partnership, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. hugh.obrodovich@sickkids.ca
authors.forename: Hugh
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: O'Brodovich
authors.forename: Ramune
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Pleinys
authors.forename: Ronald
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Laxer
authors.forename: Susan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Tallett
authors.forename: Norman
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Rosenblum
authors.forename: Christina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Sass-Kortsak
mesh_terms: D000046:Academic Medical Centers / Q000458:organization & administration; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D019985:Benchmarking; D002322:Career Mobility; D004650:Employee Performance Appraisal; D017144:Focus Groups; D006776:Hospitals, Pediatric / Q000458:organization & administration; D006801:Humans; D007587:Job Description; D007588:Job Satisfaction; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital / Q000523:psychology; D009864:Ontario; D010372:Pediatrics / Q000592:standards*; D010380:Peer Review; D015397:Program Evaluation; D013192:Staff Development; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D000078329:Workforce