title: Health care rationing affecting older persons: rejected in principle but implemented in fact.
abstract: Health care resources are finite and, therefore, need to be rationed among potential users. Over the past decade and a half in the United States, a variety of explicit, official rationing schemes have been proposed, including some in which chronological age would play a significant role. For ethical and political reasons, it is very unlikely that any age-based rationing schemes will be adopted explicitly and officially. However, various de facto forms of health care rationing are occurring at present. This article outlines the implications of payer behavior, physician practice patterns, the development of evidence-based clinical practice parameters or guidelines, and reliance on consumer choice of health plans as unofficial and generally unacknowledged mechanisms of health care rationing that may exert an important impact on the accessibility of health services for older persons.
authors.affiliation: Office of Geriatric Medicine & Gerontology, Wright State University School of Medicine, Box 927, Dayton, OH 45401-0927, USA. marshall.kapp@wright.edu
authors.forename: Marshall B
authors.initials: MB
authors.lastname: Kapp
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000941:ethics / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006299:Health Services for the Aged / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D006278:Medicare / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D011640:Public Policy; D014481:United States