title: High dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Overall survival rates are disappointing for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer. There is a hypothesis that high dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplant (autograft) may improve survival rates by permitting higher doses of adjuvant chemotherapy to be given.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To compare the effectiveness of high dose chemotherapy and autograft versus conventional chemotherapy for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group specialised register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to Aug. 2002), EMBASE (1980 to Aug. 2002), PsycINFO (1984 to Aug. 2002), Cinahl (1982 to July 2002), the websites of co-operative research groups and ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncologists) and reference lists of articles found.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomised controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of high dose chemotherapy and autograft versus conventional chemotherapy for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  We identified nine trials that met the inclusion criteria. Three independent reviewers extracted data.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In total 1758 women were randomised to receive high dose chemotherapy with autograft and 1767 women were randomised to receive conventional chemotherapy. There were 48 non cancer-related deaths on the high dose arm and four on the conventional dose arm (RR 7.74, 95% CI (3.43, 17.50). Since many studies have not completed follow-up, overall survival rates were in most cases based on results to date. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between women who received high dose chemotherapy with autograft and women who received conventional chemotherapy, either at three years (RR 1.02, 95% CI (0.98, 1.06)), or at five years (RR 0.98, 95% CI (0.93, 1.05)). There was a statistically significant benefit in event-free survival at three years for the group who received high dose chemotherapy (RR 1.11, 95% CI (1.05, 1.18)). However at five years there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (RR 1.00, 95% CI (0.92, 1.08)). Side-effects were more common and more severe in the high dose group though most were reversible. Women in the high dose group reported significantly worse quality of life scores immediately after treatment but at one year there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in quality of life scores.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of high dose chemotherapy with autograft for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer.
authors.affiliation: Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility, National Womens Hospital, Claude Rd, Epsom, Auckland, New Zealand. c.farquhar@auckland.ac.nz
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Farquhar
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Basser
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Marjoribanks
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Lethaby
mesh_terms: D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D016026:Bone Marrow Transplantation; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000401:mortality; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D033581:Stem Cell Transplantation; D015996:Survival Rate; D014182:Transplantation, Autologous