Prehospital resuscitation practices: a survey of prehospital providers.
Numerous factors affect decision making in the prehospital provision of resuscitative care. This study was undertaken to determine current practices involved in the initiation, continuation and termination of resuscitative efforts, and the impact of advance directives, in the prehospital resuscitation setting. This cross-sectional mailed questionnaire surveyed 3807 members of the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians. The study instrument included questions regarding the termination and withholding of resuscitative efforts in the prehospital setting, as well as survival rates, local protocols and compliance with advance directives. Of 1546 respondents (41% response rate), with a mean 9.0 years of experience, most (89%) indicated that they would withhold resuscitative efforts in the presence of an official state-approved advance directive. However, very few providers would withhold resuscitative efforts if only an unofficial document (4%) or verbal report of an advance directive (10%) were available. Providers with more than 10 years experience were more likely to withhold resuscitation attempts in the presence of only a verbal report of an advance directive (p = 0.02, Chi-square), and were more likely to withhold resuscitation attempts in situations they considered futile (p = 0.001, Chi-square). Most (77%) respondents have local EMS guidelines for termination of resuscitation in the prehospital setting, but 23% of those consider existing guidelines to be inadequate. The majority of prehospital providers stated that they honor official state-approved advance directives, but do not follow directives from unofficial documents or verbal reports of advance directives. More experienced providers stated that they withhold resuscitative efforts more often in futile situations, or in the presence of unofficial advance directives. Advance directives should be utilized more uniformly among patients who wish to forgo resuscitative efforts in the event of cardiac arrest. Because many local protocols are judged to be inadequate, we support the institution of improved clinical guidelines regarding the prehospital termination of resuscitative efforts.
Marco
Catherine A
CA
Acute Care Services, St Vincent Mercy Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio 43608-2691, USA.
Schears
Raquel M
RM
D016223:Advance Directives; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D016887:Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D004632:Emergency Medical Services / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D005260:Female; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006323:Heart Arrest / Q000401:mortality / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011361:Professional Competence; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D018570:Risk Assessment; D014481:United States; D028761:Withholding Treatment / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*