title: Reflections on the meritocracy debate in Britain: a response to Richard Breen and John Goldthorpe.
abstract: A paper by Breen and Goldthorpe recently claimed to have exposed 'fatal flaws' in my work on meritocracy in Britain. This paper responds to their criticisms. The results of their re-analysis of the NCDS data set are shown to be consistent with my earlier findings and arguments. Furthermore, re-running some of my earlier models using measures that they favour and a method designed to privilege their position, the results once again demonstrate that, while class origins have some effect on class destinations (in particular, for those born into the middle class), ability and effort exert a much greater effect. Based on these results, the paper identifies three core propositions about meritocracy in Britain on which all parties to this debate should now be able to agree.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Independent Studies (Sydney), University of Sussex.
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Saunders
mesh_terms: D000124:Achievement; D000328:Adult; D001290:Attitude; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D004651:Employment / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016901:Intergenerational Relations; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009042:Motivation; D012106:Research; D012923:Social Class; D012937:Social Mobility; D012961:Sociology; D006113:United Kingdom