title: Required steps for the validation of a Laboratory Information Management System.
abstract: The task of managing laboratory data is not a new one. Over the past two decades, the use of Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS) has revolutionized how laboratories manage their data. A LIMS is more than software; it has become the workhorse of the laboratory, encompassing laboratory work-flow combined with user input, data collection, instrument integration, data analysis, user notification, and delivery of information and reporting. Types of organizations that utilize LIMS vary greatly from research laboratories to manufacturing laboratories to environmental testing laboratories. Commercially-available LIMS have been around since the 1980s. In addition, many laboratories have designed, implemented, and maintained in-house LIMS. The heart of any LIMS is the software. Like other laboratory systems, the LIMS software is subject to quality control and quality assurance checks. In regulatory environments this associated QA/QC is referred to as "system validation." The primary purpose of system validation is to ensure that the software is performing in a manner for which it was designed. For example, the system acceptance criteria should be established and tested against quantifiable tasks to determine if the desired outcome has been achieved. LIMS features, such as autoreporting, reproducibility, throughput, and accuracy must be quantifiable and verifiable. System validation ensures that the entire system has been properly tested, incorporates required controls, and maintains and will continue to maintain data integrity. Laboratories must establish protocols and standards for the validation process and associated documentation. Although vendors of commercial LIMS perform initial internal system validations, the system must be revalidated whenever the end user, vendor or third party adds modifications or customizations to the LIMS. Currently, detailed guidance regarding system validation of LIMS is not available to the user. The issue is addressed in Good Automated Laboratory Practices (GALP) and National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) documents which indicate specific requirements or recommendations for operational checks and periodic testing; however, it is up to the laboratory to determine suitable methods to accomplish these tasks. Proper validation of a LIMS will allow a laboratory to comply with regulations and also provide comprehensive documentation on the system that is necessary to troubleshoot future problems.
authors.affiliation: USACE Washington Aqueduct, 5900 MacArthur Blvd. NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA. Elizabeth.A.Turner@wad01.usace.army.mil
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Turner
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Bolton
mesh_terms: D002984:Clinical Laboratory Information Systems / Q000592:standards*; D003625:Data Collection / Q000592:standards; D004784:Environmental Monitoring; D006801:Humans; D011786:Quality Control; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards*; D014481:United States; D014484:United States Environmental Protection Agency; D014486:United States Food and Drug Administration