Ultrasonographic prediction of term birth weight: how accurate is it?
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of 25 ultrasonic algorithms for the estimation of term fetal weight and to compare these results to an equation that is based on maternal and pregnancy-specific characteristics alone.


METHODS
Ultrasonography was performed in 82 nondiabetic gravid women at 35 to 41 weeks of gestation. Fetal biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, head circumference, and femur length were measured. Twenty-five ultrasonic fetal biometric algorithms and an equation that is based only on maternal characteristics were used to predict birth weight.


RESULTS
The correlation between predicted and actual birth weight ranged from 0.44 to 0.79 for the ultrasonic algorithms and was 0.60 for the maternal characteristics equation. Ultrasonic algorithms had mean absolute prediction errors that ranged from +/-263 to 646 g (+/-7.5%-18.8%). Accuracy for the maternal characteristics equation was not statistically different from the best performing ultrasonic algorithms (+/-353 g, +/-10.4%).


CONCLUSIONS
Term birth weight estimates that use ultrasonography are generally no more accurate than predictions that are based solely on quantitative assessment of maternal and pregnancy-specific characteristics.
Nahum
Gerard G
GG
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Nahum001@mc.Duke.edu
Stanislaw
Harold
H
D000465:Algorithms; D001699:Biometry / Q000379:methods; D001724:Birth Weight; D005260:Female; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008953:Models, Anatomic; D011247:Pregnancy; D016216:Ultrasonography, Prenatal / Q000592:standards*