Oncology service correspondence: do we communicate?
The aim of this study is to assess the content of letters sent from a hospital oncology service regarding the initial assessment of new referrals and the requirements of hospital specialists and General Practitioners (GPs) regarding oncology service correspondence. The content of letters regarding the initial consultation of 204 consecutive new oncology patients was analysed. General Practitioners and referring specialists were sent a 13-point survey to gauge their preferences for the information contained in oncology correspondence pertaining to the initial assessment of an oncology patient. Seventy-two percent of the patients had a letter written following their initial oncology assessment. The GP received a copy of 81% of the letters (58% of the study sample). The diagnosis was recorded in all our letters, and the proposed treatment plan was addressed in 84% of our letters. Both GPs and specialists required information on examination and investigation findings, diagnosis, treatment options, proposed management plan, and what the patient was told. The GPs required further information on current medication, likely side-effects of the proposed management, and clarification of when to contact the oncologist. The majority of the respondents were in favour of a structured letter.
Babington
S
S
Department of Radiation Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. scottb@radonc.wsahs.nsw.gov.au
Wynne
C
C
Atkinson
C H
CH
Hickey
B E
BE
Abdelaal
A S
AS
D015709:Correspondence as Topic; D005194:Family Practice; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D008511:Medicine; D009520:New Zealand; D016522:Oncology Service, Hospital; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D013038:Specialization