title: Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.
abstract: Four conditioned lick suppression experiments with rats examined the effect of trial spacing on cue interaction. Experiments 1 and 2 found overshadowing to be eliminated with massed compound stimulus-outcome pairings and the usual trial spacing effect to be reversed with compound acquisition trials. Experiment 3 found that whether acquisition compound-outcome pairings were massed or spaced determined the effect of posttraining extinction treatment. Extinction of the overshadowing cue reduced responding following massed training and increased responding following spaced training. Extinction of the context decreased responding following massed training. Experiment 4 found the conditioning and devaluation results to be associative and stimulus specific. These results are in accord with the extended comparator hypothesis (J. C. Denniston, H. I. Savastano, & R. R. Miller, 2001).
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, New York 13902-6000, USA.
authors.forename: Steven C
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Stout
authors.forename: Raymond
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Chang
authors.forename: Ralph R
authors.initials: RR
authors.lastname: Miller
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001245:Association Learning; D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D003463:Cues; D005108:Extinction, Psychological; D005260:Female; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D051381:Rats; D017207:Rats, Sprague-Dawley; D012055:Reinforcement Schedule; D013997:Time Factors