The bias against India in western literature on history of medicine: with special emphasis on public health.
The article describes a systematic bias against India in Western literature on history of medicine. While many authors have ignored the contributions of India in development of medicine altogether, the others have relegated India's role much behind other civilizations. Unnecessary and deliberate controversies on dating and origin of Ayurveda, primacy of Greek vs. Hindu Medicine and the origin of the practice of variolation have been elaborated by Western authors. Some medical historians, like Siegrist, have tried to give India its due place in the history of medicine. Suitable references of Indian authors have also been quoted to give a comparative and balanced picture. The need for settling this controversy has been emphasized.
Singh
A
A
Community Medicine PGIMER, Chandigarh.
D006663:Historiography; D049672:History, 19th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D049711:History, Modern 1601-; D007194:India; D011634:Public Health / Q000266:history*; D017594:Publication Bias / Q000266:history*; D019366:Western World / Q000266:history*