title: Effect of adjunctive range-of-motion therapy after primary total knee arthroplasty on the use of health services after hospital discharge.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There is controversy as to whether continuous passive motion (CPM) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which is the standard treatment, confers significant benefit with respect to outcome. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if CPM or slider-board (SB) therapy, used as adjuncts to standardized exercises (SEs) during the acute-care hospital stay, resulted in a reduced total length of hospitalization and post-discharge rehabilitation in patients who underwent primary TKA.
  
  
  METHODS
  We carried out a randomized, clinical trial on 120 patients who received a TKA at the University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, a tertiary care institution. The study horizon began at the point of discharge from the hospital and continued up to 6 months after operation. Postoperatively, patients (40 in each group) received CPM and SEs, SB therapy and SEs or SEs alone while in the tertiary Health service use was compared using transfer institution length of stay(LOS), post-discharge rehabilitation, readmission and complication rates and their associated costs.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were no differences in health service use or costs among the 3 groups over the 6-month study. The rates of postoperative complications and readmissions also were similar among the groups. Increased health service use associated with knee flexion that was less than 60 degrees at discharge, but similar proportions of patients with poor knee range of movement (ROM) at discharge were found in each group.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This finding suggests that adjunctive ROM therapy, as used in this study, does not reduce health service use. Further research is required to determine if adjunctive ROM therapy after discharge from the surgical hospital decreases health service utilization in those patients who have poor knee ROM at the time of discharge.
authors.affiliation: Department of Rehabilitation, University Health Economics Research Centre, Edmonton, Alta.
authors.forename: Donna M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Davies
authors.forename: D William C
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Johnston
authors.forename: Lauren A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Beaupre
authors.forename: Doug A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Lier
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000416:Alberta; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000191:economics / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D005260:Female; D006296:Health Services / Q000191:economics; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000503:physiopathology; D007720:Knee Prosthesis / Q000009:adverse effects; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015915:Motion Therapy, Continuous Passive; D026741:Physical Therapy Modalities; D011184:Postoperative Period; D016459:Prosthesis-Related Infections; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D016896:Treatment Outcome